How does practice modulate fake-production costs in a basketball task? Analyses of frequency distributions and mixture effects
N.T. Böer, C. Schütz, M. Weigelt, I. Güldenpenning, Psychological Research 89 (2025).

Action inhibition in a sport-specific paradigm: examining the limits of action control in basketball
C. Wickemeyer, I. Güldenpenning, M. Weigelt, Psychological Research (2024).

Imagine to automatize: automatization of stimulus–response coupling after action imagery practice in implicit sequence learning
S.F. Dahm, H. Hyna, D. Krause, Psychological Research 87 (2023) 2259–2274.

Practice reduces the costs of producing head fakes in basketball
N.T. Böer, M. Weigelt, C. Schütz, I. Güldenpenning, Psychological Research (2023).

The time course of salience: not entirely caused by salience
A. Krüger, I. Scharlau, Psychological Research (2021).

Is the head-fake effect in basketball robust against practice? Analyses of trial-by-trial adaptations, frequency distributions, and mixture effects to evaluate effects of practice
I. Güldenpenning, C. Schütz, M. Weigelt, W. Kunde, Psychological Research 84 (2020) 823–833.

Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab effect and the 'Weather Station Model' of visual backward masking.
O. Neumann, I. Scharlau, Psychological Research 71 (2007) 667–677.

Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast.
O. Neumann, I. Scharlau, Psychological Research 71 (2007) 626–633.

Perceptual latency priming: A measure of attentional facilitation.
I. Scharlau, Psychological Research 71 (2007) 678–686.

Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors.
U. Ansorge, I. Scharlau, K. Labudda, Psychological Research 70 (2006) 103–116.

Evidence against response bias in temporal order tasks with attention manipulation by masked primes.
I. Scharlau, Psychological Research 68 (2004) 224–236.

Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional interpretation.
I. Scharlau, O. Neumann, Psychological Research 67 (2003) 184–196.