Erofeeva, M. A., &; Klowait, N. (2020). Dei ex machina: The Interaction Order of Gamified Distance Learning. Sociology of Power, 32(3), 189–220.https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-3-189-220 

Weigelt, M., Güldenpenning, I., &; Steggemann-Weinrich, Y. (2020). The Head-Fake Effect in Basketball Is Based on the Processing of Head Orientation, but Not on Gaze Direction. Psychology, 11(10), 1493–1510.https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.1110095 

Friehs, M. A., Güldenpenning, I., Frings, C., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Electrify your Game! Anodal tDCS Increases the Resistance to Head Fakes in Basketball. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4(1), 62–70.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-019-00133-8 

Böhm, E., Eggert, A., Terho, H., Ulaga, W., &; Haas, A. (2020). Drivers and outcomes of salespersons’ value opportunity recognition competence in solution selling. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 40(3), 180–197.https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2020.1778484 

Güldenpenning, I., Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., &; Kunde, W. (2020). Is the head-fake effect in basketball robust against practice? Analyses of trial-by-trial adaptations, frequency distributions, and mixture effects to evaluate effects of practice. Psychological Research, 84, 823–833.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1078-4 

Schütz, C., Güldenpenning, I., Koester, D., &; Schack, T. (2020). Social cues can impact complex behavior unconsciously. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 21017.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77646-2 

Güldenpenning, I., Kunde, W., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Head-fake perception in basketball: the relative contributions of expertise, visual or motor training, and test repetition. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(1), 202–222.https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2020.1854819 

Güldenpenning, I., Weigelt, M., Memmert, D., &; Klatt, S. (2020). Processing deceptive information in sports: Individual differences for responding to head fakes depends on the attentional capability of the observer. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, 101764.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101764 

Güldenpenning, I., Kunde, W., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Cognitive load reduces interference by head fakes in basketball. Acta Psychologica, 203, 103013.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103013 

Kesternich, M., Löschel, A., &; Ziegler, A. (2020). Negotiating weights for burden sharing rules in international climate negotiations: an empirical analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23(2), 309–331.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00289-0 

Friehs, M. A., Güldenpenning, I., Frings, C., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Electrify your game! Anodal tDCS increases the resistance to head fakes in basketball. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 4, 62–70.

Margraf, L., Krause, D., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Valence-dependent changes of neural processing of augmented feedback after extensive practice of a new motor task (C. Dobel, C. Giesen, L. A. Grigutsch, J. M. Kaufmann, G. Kovács, F. Meissner, K. Rothermund, &; S. R. Schweinberger , Eds.). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

Köster, C., &; Kehne, M. (2020). Zwischen Trend und Tradition: die Vielfalt des klassischen Gerätturnens und der innovativen Formen des Sichbewegens im Sportunterricht ausgeglichen nutzen. Sportpädagogik, 44(1), 2–6.

Köster, C. (2020). Fitnessstudio Turnhallef: Schülerinnen und Schüler lernen verschiedene Methoden des (hoch-)intensiven Intervalltrainings an klassischen Turngeräten kennen. Sportpädagogik, 44(1), 42–49.

Güldenpenning, I. (2020). Bericht zur 52. Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für  Sportpsychologie: Neues Format, unbekannte Talente und Belohnungsaufschub. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 27(2), 80–81.https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000300 

Weigelt, M., Güldenpenning, I., &; Steggemann-Weinrich, Y. (2020). No effect of social cues in antisocial behavior: The head-fake effect in basketball is not based on the processing of eye gaze direction. In G. Amesberger, S. Würth, &; T. Finkenzeller (Eds.), Zukunft der Sportpsychologie zwischen Verstehen und Evidenz. Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp) (p. 155). Universität Salzburg.

Polzien, A., Güldenpenning, I., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Worauf basiert der Blicktäuschungseffekt im Basketball? Stimulus-Stimulus (S-S) vs. Stimulus-Response (S-R) Interferenz. In G. Amesberger, S. Würth, &; T. Finkenzeller (Eds.), Zukunft der Sportpsychologie zwischen Verstehen und Evidenz. Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp) (p. 154). Universität Salzburg.

Weigelt, M., Güldenpenning, I., &; Ste, Y. (2020).  The head-fake effect in  basketball is based on the automating processing of head orientation, but not on gaze  information. In C. Dobel, C. Giesen, L. A. Grigutsch, J. M. Kaufmann, G. Kovács, F. Meissner, K. Rothermund, &; S. R. Schweinberger (Eds.), Abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP) (p. 279). Pabst Science Publishers.

Friehs, M., Güldenpenning, I., Frings, C., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Electrify your Game! Anodal tDCS Increases the Resistance to Head Fakes in Basketball in basketball. In C. Dobel, C. Giesen, L. A. Grigutsch, J. M. Kaufmann, G. Kovács, F. Meissner, K. Rothermund, &; S. R. Schweinberger (Eds.), Abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP) (p. 69). Pabst Science Publishers.

Polzien, A., Güldenpenning, I., &; Weigelt, M. (2020). Temporal distance between head turn and pass modulates the head fake effect in basketball. In C. Dobel, C. Giesen, L. A. Grigutsch, J. M. Kaufmann, G. Kovács, F. Meissner, K. Rothermund, &; S. R. Schweinberger (Eds.), Abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP) (p. 200). Pabst Science Publishers.