@misc{62984,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{feministische studien}},
  issn         = {{2365-9920}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{323--327}},
  publisher    = {{Walter de Gruyter GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Vincent Streichhahn (Hrsg.): Feministische Internationale. Texte zu Geschlecht, Klasse und Emanzipation 1832–1936}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/fs-2025-0042}},
  volume       = {{43}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inbook{56381,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{Theorien des Digitalen Kapitalismus}},
  editor       = {{Carstensen, Tanja and Sevignani, Sebastian  and Schaupp, Simon }},
  publisher    = {{Suhrkamp}},
  title        = {{{Zwischen Antikapitalismus und Unternehmertum. Genossenschaften im Digitalen Kapitalismus. }}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{65103,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>This paper reports on a survey of co-operatives in the cultural and technology sectors in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Creative industries are a growth area for new cooperativism, with more than a quarter of surveyed co-operatives in operation for less than five years. While the findings show that co-operation is a promising strategy for countering individualised experiences of work, for democratising workplaces, and for facilitating satisfying work in creative industries, they also reveal significant challenges which individual co-operatives and the wider co-operative movement must confront for cooperativism to have a sustainable and inclusive future in the cultural and technology sectors.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{de Peuter, Greig and Dreyer, Bianca and Sandoval, Marisol and Szaflarska, Aleksandra}},
  issn         = {{0961-5784}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Co-operative Studies}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{57--64}},
  publisher    = {{UK Society for Co-operative Studies}},
  title        = {{{Cooperativism in cultural and tech sectors: Promises and challenges}}},
  doi          = {{10.61869/jtvr5224}},
  volume       = {{55}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@misc{56398,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol and de Peuter, Greig}},
  booktitle    = {{Stir to Action}},
  title        = {{{Cultures of Co-operation: Insights from a Study of Co-ops in the Creative Industries}}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@techreport{56384,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol and de Peuter, Greig and Dryer, Bianca and Szaflarska, Aleksandra}},
  title        = {{{Sharing Like We Mean It: Working Co-operatively in the Cultural and Tech Sectors}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{56378,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol and Littler, Jo}},
  booktitle    = {{Dynamics of Virtual Work}},
  isbn         = {{9783030106522}},
  issn         = {{2947-9290}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Creative Hubs: A Co-operative Space?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-10653-9_8}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{56367,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Platform cooperativism proposes to create an alternative to the corporate sharing economy based on a model of democratically owned and governed co-operatives. The idea sounds simple and convincing: cut out the corporate middleman and replace Uber with a service owned and managed by taxi drivers themselves, create a version of Airbnb run by cities, or turn Facebook into a platform democratically controlled by all users. This article discusses the ambivalences of platform cooperativism, exploring both the movement’s potentials to subvert digital capitalism from the inside and the risk of being co-opted by it. Platform cooperativism aims to foster social change by creating a People’s Internet and replacing corporate-owned platforms with user-owned co-operatives. It yokes social activism with business enterprise. As a result, the movement is shaped by tensions and contradiction between politics and enterprise, democracy and the market, commons and commercialisation, activism and entrepreneurship. This article explores these tensions based on a Marxist perspective on the corrosive powers of capitalist competition on the one hand and a Foucaultian critique of entrepreneurialism on the other. It concludes with a reflection on the politics of platform cooperativism, drawing out problematic implications of an uncritical embrace of entrepreneurialism and highlighting the need to defend a politics of social solidarity, equality and public goods. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{0896-9205}},
  journal      = {{Critical Sociology}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{801--817}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Entrepreneurial Activism? Platform Cooperativism Between Subversion and Co-optation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/0896920519870577}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{56375,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Apple is one of the most dominant and most admired computer companies in the world. But hidden behind the clean surface of Apple’s advanced gadgets lies a dirty world of work. This paper focuses on the dark side of the information age by looking at working conditions in the workshops of Apple’s contract manufacturers in China. For this purpose I suggest a systematic model of working conditions that can be used for assessing and comparing work in different industries. Departing from Karl Marx’s circuit of capital it identifies elements that shape working conditions throughout the capital accumulation process including productive forces, relations of production, the production process, products, and labour legislation. Subsequently I apply this model to the realm of electronics manufacturing. Based on research conducted by corporate watchdogs this paper provides detailed insights into the work and life reality of workers in Apple’s first tier supplier factories. An analysis of Apple’s response to labour rights allegations furthermore reveals three ideological patterns that rather obscure existing problems than offering viable solutions.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1726-670X}},
  journal      = {{tripleC: Communication, Capitalism &amp; Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{318--347}},
  publisher    = {{Information Society Research}},
  title        = {{{Foxconned Labour as the Dark Side of the Information Age: Working Conditions at Apple’s Contract Manufacturers in China.}}},
  doi          = {{10.31269/triplec.v11i2.481}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{56373,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>The overall task of this paper is to elaborate a typology of the forms of labour that are needed for the production, circulation and use of digital media. First, we introduce a cultural-materialist perspective on theorising digital labour. Second, we discuss the relevance of Marx’s concept of the mode of production for the analysis of digital labour. Third, we introduce a typology of the dimensions of working conditions. Fourth, based on the preceding sections we present a digital labour analysis toolbox. Finally, we draw some conclusions. We engage with the question what labour is, how it differs from work, which basic dimensions it has and how these dimensions can be used for defining digital labour. We introduce the theoretical notion of the mode of production as analytical tool for conceptualizing digital labour. Modes of production are dialectical units of relations of production and productive forces. Relations of production are the basic social relations that shape the economy. Productive forces are a combination of labour power, objects and instruments of work in a work process, in which new products are created. We have a deeper look at dimensions of the work process and the conditions under which it takes place. We present a typology that identifies dimensions of working conditions. It is a general typology that can be used for the analysis of any production process.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian and Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1726-670X}},
  journal      = {{tripleC: Communication, Capitalism &amp; Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society}},
  number       = {{2}},
  publisher    = {{Information Society Research}},
  title        = {{{Digital Workers of the World Unite! A Framework for Critically Theorising and Analysing Digital Labour}}},
  doi          = {{10.31269/triplec.v12i2.549}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{56369,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>This article discusses the experience of being an academic in the UK in the contemporary climate of neoliberal capitalism and ‘metric power’ (Beers 2016). Drawing on existing literature and our own practice, the first portion of the paper explores the relationship between neoliberalism, metrics and knowledge. We then examine how neoliberal mantras and instruments impact the university’s structures and processes, and reflect on consequences for the academic self. We take as a starting point the context of increasing workloads and the pressure on academics to excel in multiple roles, from ‘world-leading’ researchers to ‘excellent’ teachers and ‘service providers’ to professional administrators performing recruitment and (self)marketing tasks. Neoliberal academia, we suggest, promotes a meritocratic ideology of individual achievement that frames success and failure as purely personal ‘achievements’, which encourages a competitive ethos and chronic self-criticism. This article insists that these problems need to be understood in the context of neoliberal policy-making and the corporatisation of knowledge, including funding cuts and grant imperatives, the low status of teaching, the cynical instrumentation of university league tables, and increased institutional reliance on precarious academic labour. The article goes on to focus on responses that resist, challenge or, in some cases, compound, the problems identified in part one. Responses by dissatisfied academics range in style and approach – some decide against an academic career; others adopt a strategy of individual withdrawal within the system by trying to create and protect spaces of independence – for example, by refusing to engage beyond officially required minimums. This article argues that opportunities for positive systemic change can be found in collective efforts to oppose the status quo and to create alternatives for how academic labour is organised. Therein, solidarity can act as an instrument of opposition to the individualisation of the neoliberal academic self.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Feldman, Zeena and Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1726-670X}},
  journal      = {{tripleC: Communication, Capitalism &amp; Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{214--233}},
  publisher    = {{Information Society Research}},
  title        = {{{Metric Power and the Academic Self: Neoliberalism, Knowledge and Resistance in the British University}}},
  doi          = {{10.31269/triplec.v16i1.899}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{56368,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> This article focuses on the relation between work and pleasure in the cultural sector. I first unpack the concept of passionate work, situating it within four possible ways of relating work and pleasure. I argue that the work ethic of do what you love, contrary to what it promises, limits the prospects of loveable work. As part of a neoliberal work culture, do what you love transfers the battleground from society onto the self. It favours self-management over politics. Drawing on findings from interview research with members of worker co-operatives in the UK cultural industries, I then go on to explore the relation between work and pleasure within cultural co-ops. I discuss how cultural co-ops might inspire and contribute to a movement for transforming the future of work by turning the desire for loveable work from a matter of individual transformation and competition into a practice of co-operation and social change. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1367-5494}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Cultural Studies}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{113--129}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{From passionate labour to compassionate work: Cultural co-ops, do what you love and social change}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/1367549417719011}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

@misc{56399,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{Stir to Action }},
  title        = {{{Do Not Feed the Monster!}}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{56371,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{0950-2378}},
  journal      = {{New Formations}},
  number       = {{88}},
  pages        = {{51--68}},
  publisher    = {{Lawrence and Wishart}},
  title        = {{{Fighting Precarity with Co-Operation? Worker Co-Operatives in the Cultural Sector.}}},
  doi          = {{10.3898/newf.88.04.2016}},
  volume       = {{88}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{56379,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age}},
  isbn         = {{9781349570775}},
  publisher    = {{Palgrave Macmillan UK}},
  title        = {{{The Hands and Brains of Digital Culture: Arguments for an Inclusive Approach to Cultural Labour}}},
  doi          = {{10.1057/9781137478573_3}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{56370,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1362-6620}},
  journal      = {{Soundings}},
  number       = {{63}},
  pages        = {{98--111}},
  publisher    = {{Lawrence and Wishart}},
  title        = {{{What would Rosa do? Co-operatives and radical politics}}},
  doi          = {{10.3898/136266216819377039}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{56388,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age}},
  isbn         = {{9781349570775}},
  publisher    = {{Palgrave Macmillan UK}},
  title        = {{{The Hands and Brains of Digital Culture: Arguments for an Inclusive Approach to Cultural Labour}}},
  doi          = {{10.1057/9781137478573_3}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{56372,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> The task of this paper is to trace the academic discourse on corporate social responsibility (CSR) by discussing how CSR approaches and models relate profit goals and social goals of the corporation. I show that CSR approaches that dominate the academic discourse either instrumentalize the social, idealize the corporate, or separate the corporate from the social. Based on a critical political economy perspective I argue that it is necessary to consider mutual interrelations between profit goals and social goals. This perspective reveals an antagonism between the corporate and the social that points to the impossibility of CSR. Critical CSR research thus far has failed to draw the necessary conclusions from its own analysis: despite acknowledging the structural flaws of the concept of CSR, critics have hardly made any attempts to overcome it. I argue that despite its ideological character CSR contains a rational element. Realizing this rational kernel however requires going beyond CSR. I therefore suggest a new concept that turns CSR off its head and places it upon its feet. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{0486-6134}},
  journal      = {{Review of Radical Political Economics}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{608--624}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{From CSR to RSC}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/0486613415574266}},
  volume       = {{47}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@inbook{56383,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol and Christian, Fuchs}},
  booktitle    = {{The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media}},
  editor       = {{Atton , Chris}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{The Political Economy of Capitalist and Alternative Social Media}}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@article{56374,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  issn         = {{1318-3222}},
  journal      = {{Javnost - The Public}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{39--57}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Corporate Social (IR)Responsibility in Media and Communication Industries}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/13183222.2013.11009120}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}

@inbook{56380,
  author       = {{Sandoval, Marisol}},
  booktitle    = {{The Routledge Companion to Global Popular Culture}},
  isbn         = {{9780203081846}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Participation (Un)Limited: Social Media and the Prospects of a Common Culture}}},
  doi          = {{10.4324/9780203081846-15}},
  year         = {{2014}},
}