@inbook{34707, abstract = {{Of the many outstanding female philosophers of the European Enlightenment, Emilie Du Châtelet excelled as a physicist, a philosopher, and a mathematician, as well as a Bible critic. She was famous in her lifetime and was not completely forgotten thereafter. Among her admirers, correspondents and friends were the most acknowledged scholars of her time, including Voltaire, Clairault, Maupertuis, Diderot, Helvetius, La Mettrie, Buffon, Christian Wolff, Leonard Euler, and Johann II Bernoulli. Her philosophical work enjoyed high reputation and her opus magnum, the Institutions physiques, was translated into Italian and German and proved her to be an intellectual of European stature. Its defense of living forces and its implied forecast into dynamics as well as her methodological grounding of scientific knowledge as hypothetical, impacted philosophy and science. Reality must by nature escape us. What we perceive are phenomena. Du Châtelet explains the function of space and time to trace us back to the origin of phenomena. Her influence on Kant is evident. Next to her writings in physics, mathematics, philosophy, language, and logic, she contributed to morality and ethics. Du Châtelet left an opus of quite systematic breadth. This impressive publishing activity excels in the amount of its scientific and philosophical production to which a vast collection of manuscripts must be added.She argued against prejudice and idolatry in philosophy and science. Science is a cooperative undertaking over history and beyond nations. Her moral writings align with ideas of the French materialists. Du Châtelet translated and commented on Newton’s Principia, preparing thus the fertile soil of the generation of physicists to come in France.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, keywords = {{aura Bassi Luise Gottsched Immanuel Kant Dourtous de Mairan Johann II Bernoulli Algarotti Buffon d’Alembert La Mettrie Principle of contradiction Hypotheses Enlightenment Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence Living forces Dead forces, happiness Space Imaginary beings Monads Epicurus Ethics Women philosophers Newton’s laws Principia Motion inertia Active force Vis viva Vis mortua Hypothetic reasoning Hypotheses, a priori principles, Experience, Dead forces, Living forces, Energy Dynamics}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Du Châtelet, Émilie (1706–1749)}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_410-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{34706, abstract = {{Essential ideas significantly connected to humanism, Renaissance, and early modern philosophy stem from women’s pens. The supportive role of women in the early modern period has hardly been recognized up to today. The relevant issues women have contributed to range from commentaries on and critiques of the Bible, and their demands for equality and the critique of political institutions, topics that became eminent enhancers of political and societal change in the relevant period of early modern philosophy, to enlightenment philosophy.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, editor = {{Jalobenau, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T.}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Women in Early Modern Philosophy and Science: An Introduction}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_529-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @misc{21294, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{H-France Net}}, issn = {{ISSN 1553-9172}}, title = {{{Review Hagengruber Le Ru Émilie Du Châtelet Philosophe }}}, volume = {{158}}, year = {{2020}}, } @inbook{31437, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{20690, abstract = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, isbn = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}}, journal = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}}, keywords = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}}, location = {{Bologna }}, pages = {{331--353}}, title = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @inbook{20569, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Männlich, weiblich, divers? Philosophische Anthropologie der Geschlechter}}, editor = {{Hoye, William J.}}, isbn = {{978-3-00-065669-9}}, pages = {{27--59}}, publisher = {{Josef Pieper Stiftung}}, title = {{{Der männliche Gott. Bibel- und Gesellschaftskritik in der Tradition der Philosophinnen der frühen Neuzeit}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @book{31436, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1}}, year = {{2020}}, } @book{34106, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Brown, Andrew and Kölving, Ulla and Ertz, Stefanie}}, title = {{{The Saint Petersburg Manuscripts. A historical and critical online edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/stp/ (2020-2021)}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{20686, abstract = {{Die Philosophiegeschichte, die heute gelehrt wird präsentiert sich als ein Kanon, der von "großen Männern" dominiert wird. Doch das ist nicht richtig und vor allem, es war nicht immer so. Es gab großartige und einflussreiche Denkerinnen, von Hildegard von Bingen bis Hannah Arendt und Edith Stein, "in allen Ländern und zu allen Zeiten", wie der aufgeklärte Historiograph Jakob Brucker 1745 in seiner Philosophiegeschichte schrieb. }}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{philosophie Magazin}}, keywords = {{women philosophers, stolen history, Ruth Hagengruber}}, number = {{13}}, pages = {{8--14}}, title = {{{Die gestohlene Geschichte}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{15493, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, issn = {{0930-6633}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, keywords = {{Interview, Europe, Women, Diversity}}, pages = {{43--44}}, publisher = {{Deutscher Akademikerinnenbund}}, title = {{{Frauen aus der Mitte Deutschlands}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{13549, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, issn = {{0026-9662}}, journal = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 27}}, number = {{4}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Women Philosophers in Early Modern Philosophy}}}, doi = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inbook{12726, abstract = {{In seiner Auseinandersetzung mit Immanuel Kant bestreitet Johann August Eberhard Kants Anspruch, in seiner Transzendentalphilosophie die Reichweite und Grenzen des Verstandes auf neue, zuvor nicht dagewesene Weise definiert zu haben. Eberhard dagegen meint die Prinzipien und Grundbegriffe transzendentalphilosophischer Erkenntniskritik schon aus der Leibniz-Wolffschen Schule ableiten zu k{\"o}nnen. An einschl{\"a}giger Stelle -- im dritten Teil seiner Ausf{\"u}hrungen {\"U}ber den wesentlichen Unterschied der Erkenntnis durch die Sinne und durch den Verstand -- belegt er diese Behauptung mit einem Verweis auf die {\glqq}Definition{\grqq} der Erscheinung in den Institutions physiques der Philosophin und Mathematikerin Du Ch{\^a}telet.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}}, isbn = {{978-3-658-14021-2}}, pages = {{173--195}}, publisher = {{Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; Imprint: Springer VS}}, title = {{{Émilie Du Châtelet zwischen Leibniz und Kant. Du Châtelet in der Eberhard-Kant-Kontroverse}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-658-14022-9{\textunderscore }6}}, volume = {{24}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{12778, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hutton, Sarah}}, issn = {{0960-8788}}, journal = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{673--683}}, title = {{{Introduction}}}, doi = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}}, volume = {{27}}, year = {{2019}}, } @book{12775, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hecht, Hartmut}}, isbn = {{9783658140229}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. Vol. 3. Philosophie History of Science Frauen in Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Women Philosophers and Scientists}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-658-14022-9}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inbook{12777, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hecht, Hartmut}}, booktitle = {{Emilie du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}}, isbn = {{978-3-658-14021-2}}, pages = {{5--12}}, publisher = {{Springe}}, title = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und ihre Wirkung in Deutschland}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @book{12085, abstract = {{In diesem Band werden neueste Forschungen zur Physikerin, Mathematikerin und Philosophin Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749) vorgestellt. Emilie Du Châtelet genoss in der deutschen Aufklärung eine hohe Reputation. Sie verband Leibniz Metaphysik mit der Physik von Newton und gelangte zu erstaunlichen Ergebnissen, die die Physik auf den Weg zu Einsteins Energieformel führte. Ihre Werke wurden sofort ins Deutsche übersetzt, Kant nimmt in seiner ersten Dissertation von 1747 auf sie Bezug. Die Sammlung stellt Texte vor, die den Einfluss der deutschen Aufklärung auf Du Châtelets und Du Châtelets Einfluss auf die deutsche Philosophie diskutieren. Die großen Namen der Epoche stehen hier zur Debatte, Leibniz, Wolff, Boskovic, Euler, Friedrich II, Voltaire, La Mettrie und viele weitere Größen der Aufklärung werden in ihrem Zusammenhang mit Du Châtelet vorgestellt. }}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}}, isbn = {{ISBN 978-3-658-14022-9}}, keywords = {{Emilie Du Châtelet, Immanuel Kant, Leibniz, Aufklärung, Christian Wolff, Luise Gottsched}}, pages = {{420}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}}}, volume = {{3 }}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{12933, abstract = {{Abstract · Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) were three philosophers and scientists of outstanding im-portance in their epoch. However, the attribution of importance and reputation to women’s intellectual achievements in this period is a case of its own. This paper investigates the methodical attempt of 18th century historiography, presenting the example of Jakob Brucker and his Pinacoteca to relocate intellectual women in his history of philosophy and science. The relative integration of women into the 18th century intellectual sphere is the starting point of this methodical investigation to retrace its ‘why and how’. Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philoso-phy, Science.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Bruniana & Campanelliana}}, keywords = {{Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philosophy, Science.}}, number = {{Studi 18}}, publisher = {{Fabrizio Serra Roma Pisa }}, title = {{{Relocating Women in the History of Philosophy and Science. Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) in Brucker’s Pinacotheca}}}, volume = {{Suppl XLIII}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{15494, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, issn = {{09306633}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, keywords = {{Maria von Welser, Women, Media, War, Women in War, Refugees}}, number = {{2019}}, pages = {{20--22}}, publisher = {{Deutscher Akademikerinnen Bund}}, title = {{{Zur Ehrenpromotion von Maria von Welser an der Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Universität Paderborn}}}, volume = {{2019}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{12082, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hutton, Sarah}}, issn = {{0960-8788}}, journal = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{673--683}}, title = {{{Introduction}}}, doi = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}}, volume = {{27}}, year = {{2019}}, } @inproceedings{34110, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29}}, pages = {{57--62}}, title = {{{Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern}}}, year = {{2018}}, }