@article{31439, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{33--34}}, title = {{{Ökonomie, Technik, Umwelt: Die Zukunft bestimmen, während wir die Vergangenheit überdenken: Defining the Future – Rethinking the Past}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{31442, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{31}}, title = {{{Vizepräsidentin a.D. des DAB, Prof. Dr. Ulrike Detmers verleiht zum 20. Mal den von ihr ins Leben gerufenen Preis‚ Managerin des Jahres}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{31441, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{32--33}}, title = {{{Der Elisabeth-von-Böhmen-Preis zur Erforschung der Geschichte der Philosophinnen wird zum dritten Mal verliehen}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{31446, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{7--8}}, title = {{{Frauen aus aller Frauen Länder gestalten die Zukunft Deutschlands. Jahrestagung des DAB am 30. April 2021}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{21276, abstract = {{This collection of essays presents new work on women’s contribution to philosophy between the Renaissance and the mid-eighteenth century. They bring a new perspective to the history of philosophy, by highlighting women’s contributions to philosophy and testifying to the rich history of women’s thought in this period. By showing that women were active in many branches of philosophy (metaphysics, science, political philosophy cosmology, ontology, epistemology) the book testifies to the rich history of women’s thought across Europe in this period. The scope of the collection is international, both in terms of the philosophers represented and the contributors themselves from Britain and North America, but also from continental Europe and from as far afield as Australia and Brazil. The philosophers discussed here include both figures who have recently come to be better known (Elisabeth of Bohemia, Anne Conway, Mary Astell, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, Emilie du Châtelet), and less familiar figures (Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella Arcangela Tarabotti, Tullia d’Aragona, Madame Deshoulières, Madame de Sablé, Angélique de Saint-Jean Arnauld d’Andilly, Olivia Sabuco, Susanna Newcome). The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy.}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hutton, Sarah}}, isbn = {{ISBN 9780367758646}}, keywords = {{History of Women Philosophers, Methodology, History of Philosophy, Women's Studies, Gender History}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Women Philosophers from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{21277, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, editor = {{Jalobeanu, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T.}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Du Châtelet, Émilie (1706–1749)}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_410-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{34112, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, journal = {{Konsens (2021), 9}}, title = {{{Der Deutsche Akademikerinnenbund ist Mitglied der Europäischen Bewegung Deutschland (EBD)}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{31434, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, publisher = {{Zenodo}}, title = {{{Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists Documentation 2016-2019 (Version 1)}}}, doi = {{http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4982197}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{34105, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Neumann, Hanns-Peter and Muller, Jil and Wells, Aaron}}, title = {{{The Paris Ms Fr. 12265. A Critical and Historical Online Edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/dcpm/ (2021-2022)}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{34707, abstract = {{Of the many outstanding female philosophers of the European Enlightenment, Emilie Du Châtelet excelled as a physicist, a philosopher, and a mathematician, as well as a Bible critic. She was famous in her lifetime and was not completely forgotten thereafter. Among her admirers, correspondents and friends were the most acknowledged scholars of her time, including Voltaire, Clairault, Maupertuis, Diderot, Helvetius, La Mettrie, Buffon, Christian Wolff, Leonard Euler, and Johann II Bernoulli. Her philosophical work enjoyed high reputation and her opus magnum, the Institutions physiques, was translated into Italian and German and proved her to be an intellectual of European stature. Its defense of living forces and its implied forecast into dynamics as well as her methodological grounding of scientific knowledge as hypothetical, impacted philosophy and science. Reality must by nature escape us. What we perceive are phenomena. Du Châtelet explains the function of space and time to trace us back to the origin of phenomena. Her influence on Kant is evident. Next to her writings in physics, mathematics, philosophy, language, and logic, she contributed to morality and ethics. Du Châtelet left an opus of quite systematic breadth. This impressive publishing activity excels in the amount of its scientific and philosophical production to which a vast collection of manuscripts must be added.She argued against prejudice and idolatry in philosophy and science. Science is a cooperative undertaking over history and beyond nations. Her moral writings align with ideas of the French materialists. Du Châtelet translated and commented on Newton’s Principia, preparing thus the fertile soil of the generation of physicists to come in France.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, keywords = {{aura Bassi Luise Gottsched Immanuel Kant Dourtous de Mairan Johann II Bernoulli Algarotti Buffon d’Alembert La Mettrie Principle of contradiction Hypotheses Enlightenment Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence Living forces Dead forces, happiness Space Imaginary beings Monads Epicurus Ethics Women philosophers Newton’s laws Principia Motion inertia Active force Vis viva Vis mortua Hypothetic reasoning Hypotheses, a priori principles, Experience, Dead forces, Living forces, Energy Dynamics}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Du Châtelet, Émilie (1706–1749)}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_410-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{34706, abstract = {{Essential ideas significantly connected to humanism, Renaissance, and early modern philosophy stem from women’s pens. The supportive role of women in the early modern period has hardly been recognized up to today. The relevant issues women have contributed to range from commentaries on and critiques of the Bible, and their demands for equality and the critique of political institutions, topics that became eminent enhancers of political and societal change in the relevant period of early modern philosophy, to enlightenment philosophy.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, editor = {{Jalobenau, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T.}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Women in Early Modern Philosophy and Science: An Introduction}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_529-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @misc{21294, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{H-France Net}}, issn = {{ISSN 1553-9172}}, title = {{{Review Hagengruber Le Ru Émilie Du Châtelet Philosophe }}}, volume = {{158}}, year = {{2020}}, } @inbook{31437, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{20690, abstract = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, isbn = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}}, journal = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}}, keywords = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}}, location = {{Bologna }}, pages = {{331--353}}, title = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @inbook{20569, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Männlich, weiblich, divers? Philosophische Anthropologie der Geschlechter}}, editor = {{Hoye, William J.}}, isbn = {{978-3-00-065669-9}}, pages = {{27--59}}, publisher = {{Josef Pieper Stiftung}}, title = {{{Der männliche Gott. Bibel- und Gesellschaftskritik in der Tradition der Philosophinnen der frühen Neuzeit}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @book{31436, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1}}, year = {{2020}}, } @book{34106, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Brown, Andrew and Kölving, Ulla and Ertz, Stefanie}}, title = {{{The Saint Petersburg Manuscripts. A historical and critical online edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/stp/ (2020-2021)}}}, year = {{2020}}, } @article{20686, abstract = {{Die Philosophiegeschichte, die heute gelehrt wird präsentiert sich als ein Kanon, der von "großen Männern" dominiert wird. Doch das ist nicht richtig und vor allem, es war nicht immer so. Es gab großartige und einflussreiche Denkerinnen, von Hildegard von Bingen bis Hannah Arendt und Edith Stein, "in allen Ländern und zu allen Zeiten", wie der aufgeklärte Historiograph Jakob Brucker 1745 in seiner Philosophiegeschichte schrieb. }}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{philosophie Magazin}}, keywords = {{women philosophers, stolen history, Ruth Hagengruber}}, number = {{13}}, pages = {{8--14}}, title = {{{Die gestohlene Geschichte}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{15493, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, issn = {{0930-6633}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, keywords = {{Interview, Europe, Women, Diversity}}, pages = {{43--44}}, publisher = {{Deutscher Akademikerinnenbund}}, title = {{{Frauen aus der Mitte Deutschlands}}}, year = {{2019}}, } @article{13549, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, issn = {{0026-9662}}, journal = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 27}}, number = {{4}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Women Philosophers in Early Modern Philosophy}}}, doi = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}}, year = {{2019}}, }