[{"language":[{"iso":"ger"}],"_id":"50928","user_id":"20571","editor":[{"full_name":"Hagengruber, Ruth","last_name":"Hagengruber","first_name":"Ruth"},{"full_name":"Hecht, Hartmut","last_name":"Hecht","first_name":"Hartmut"}],"status":"public","publication":"Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. ","type":"book_chapter","title":"“Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.” ","publisher":"Springer","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:02:23Z","date_created":"2024-01-26T00:02:16Z","author":[{"last_name":"Blank","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","first_name":"Andreas"}],"place":"Wiesbaden","year":"2019","page":"79-98","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. “Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.” . In: Hagengruber R, Hecht H, eds. <i>Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. </i>. Springer; 2019:79-98.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.’ ,” in <i>Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. </i>, R. Hagengruber and H. Hecht, Eds. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2019, pp. 79–98.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.’ .” In <i>Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. </i>, edited by Ruth Hagengruber and Hartmut Hecht, 79–98. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2019.","apa":"Blank, A. (2019). “Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.” . In R. Hagengruber &#38; H. Hecht (Eds.), <i>Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. </i> (pp. 79–98). Springer.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2019, place={Wiesbaden}, title={“Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.” }, booktitle={Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. }, publisher={Springer}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}, year={2019}, pages={79–98} }","short":"A. Blank, in: R. Hagengruber, H. Hecht (Eds.), Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. , Springer, Wiesbaden, 2019, pp. 79–98.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Metaphilosophie und das Prinzip des Widerspruchs: Leibniz, Wolff und Du Châtelet.’ .” <i>Émilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. </i>, edited by Ruth Hagengruber and Hartmut Hecht, Springer, 2019, pp. 79–98."},"quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published"},{"language":[{"iso":"ger"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50925","status":"public","editor":[{"first_name":"Luca","full_name":"Basso, Luca","last_name":"Basso"}],"publication":"Leibniz und das Naturrecht. ","type":"book_chapter","title":"“Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.” ","date_created":"2024-01-25T23:56:37Z","author":[{"id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"publisher":"Steiner","date_updated":"2024-01-25T23:56:44Z","page":"103-118","citation":{"mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.’ .” <i>Leibniz und das Naturrecht. </i>, edited by Luca Basso, Steiner, 2019, pp. 103–18.","short":"A. Blank, in: L. Basso (Ed.), Leibniz und das Naturrecht. , Steiner, Stuttgart, 2019, pp. 103–118.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2019, place={Stuttgart}, title={“Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.” }, booktitle={Leibniz und das Naturrecht. }, publisher={Steiner}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Basso, Luca}, year={2019}, pages={103–118} }","ama":"Blank A. “Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.” . In: Basso L, ed. <i>Leibniz und das Naturrecht. </i>. Steiner; 2019:103-118.","apa":"Blank, A. (2019). “Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.” . In L. Basso (Ed.), <i>Leibniz und das Naturrecht. </i> (pp. 103–118). Steiner.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.’ .” In <i>Leibniz und das Naturrecht. </i>, edited by Luca Basso, 103–18. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2019.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Leibniz und Besold über Bündnisrecht und Naturrecht.’ ,” in <i>Leibniz und das Naturrecht. </i>, L. Basso, Ed. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2019, pp. 103–118."},"year":"2019","place":"Stuttgart","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published"},{"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"50952","user_id":"20571","status":"public","type":"review","publication":"Studia Leibnitiana","title":"Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode ","date_updated":"2024-01-26T01:01:12Z","author":[{"full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T01:01:04Z","volume":51,"year":"2019","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (2019). Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode . In <i>Studia Leibnitiana</i> (Vol. 51, pp. 141–143).","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (Eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen Der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode .” <i>Studia Leibnitiana</i>, vol. 51, 2019, pp. 141–43.","short":"A. Blank, Studia Leibnitiana 51 (2019) 141–143.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2019, title={Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode }, volume={51}, journal={Studia Leibnitiana}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2019}, pages={141–143} }","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (Eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen Der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode .” <i>Studia Leibnitiana</i>, 2019.","ieee":"A. Blank, “Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode ,” <i>Studia Leibnitiana</i>, vol. 51. pp. 141–143, 2019.","ama":"Blank A. Review of Irene Dingel, Michael Kempe and Wenchao Li (eds.), Leibniz in Mainz. Europäische Dimensionen der Mainzer Wirkungsperiode . <i>Studia Leibnitiana</i>. 2019;51:141-143."},"page":"141-143","intvolume":"        51","publication_status":"published"},{"page":"513-534","intvolume":"        27","citation":{"chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.’ .” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy </i> 27, no. 3 (2019): 513–34.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.’ ,” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy </i>, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 513–534, 2019.","ama":"Blank A. “Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.” . <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy </i>. 2019;27(3):513-534.","short":"A. Blank, British Journal for the History of Philosophy  27 (2019) 513–534.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.’ .” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy </i>, vol. 27, no. 3, 2019, pp. 513–34.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2019, title={“Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.” }, volume={27}, number={3}, journal={British Journal for the History of Philosophy }, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2019}, pages={513–534} }","apa":"Blank, A. (2019). “Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.” . <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy </i>, <i>27</i>(3), 513–534."},"year":"2019","issue":"3","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1524366"}],"title":"“Self-Knowledge and Varieties of Human Excellence in the French Moralists.” ","volume":27,"author":[{"full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:17:25Z","date_updated":"2024-02-02T19:16:37Z","oa":"1","status":"public","publication":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy ","type":"journal_article","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50868"},{"status":"public","publication":"Perspectives on Science","type":"journal_article","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"50874","user_id":"20571","year":"2018","intvolume":"        26","page":"157-184","citation":{"ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.’ ,” <i>Perspectives on Science</i>, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 157–184, 2018.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.’ .” <i>Perspectives on Science</i> 26, no. 2 (2018): 157–84.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.’ .” <i>Perspectives on Science</i>, vol. 26, no. 2, 2018, pp. 157–84.","short":"A. Blank, Perspectives on Science 26 (2018) 157–184.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2018, title={“Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.” }, volume={26}, number={2}, journal={Perspectives on Science}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2018}, pages={157–184} }","apa":"Blank, A. (2018). “Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.” . <i>Perspectives on Science</i>, <i>26</i>(2), 157–184.","ama":"Blank A. “Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.” . <i>Perspectives on Science</i>. 2018;26(2):157-184."},"quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","issue":"2","title":"“Sixteenth-Century Pharmacology and the Controversy between Reductionism and Emergentism.” ","date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:35:57Z","volume":26,"author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","last_name":"Blank","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:35:49Z"},{"quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","issue":"3","year":"2018","page":"289-304","intvolume":"        33","citation":{"ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.’ ,” <i>Hypatia</i>, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 289–304, 2018.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.’ .” <i>Hypatia</i> 33, no. 3 (2018): 289–304.","apa":"Blank, A. (2018). “Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.” . <i>Hypatia</i>, <i>33</i>(3), 289–304.","ama":"Blank A. “Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.” . <i>Hypatia</i>. 2018;33(3):289-304.","short":"A. Blank, Hypatia 33 (2018) 289–304.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.’ .” <i>Hypatia</i>, vol. 33, no. 3, 2018, pp. 289–304.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2018, title={“Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.” }, volume={33}, number={3}, journal={Hypatia}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2018}, pages={289–304} }"},"date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:34:13Z","volume":33,"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:34:03Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"title":"“Anne-Thérèse de Lambert on Aging and Self-Esteem.” ","publication":"Hypatia","type":"journal_article","status":"public","_id":"50873","user_id":"20571","language":[{"iso":"eng"}]},{"user_id":"20571","_id":"50930","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"type":"book_chapter","publication":"Women Philosophers on Autonomy. ","status":"public","editor":[{"first_name":"Sandrine","last_name":"Bergès","full_name":"Bergès, Sandrine"},{"first_name":"Alberto","full_name":"Siani, Alberto","last_name":"Siani"}],"author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","last_name":"Blank","id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas"}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T00:06:02Z","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:06:08Z","publisher":"Routledge","title":"“Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.” ","publication_status":"published","quality_controlled":"1","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. “Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.” . In: Bergès S, Siani A, eds. <i>Women Philosophers on Autonomy. </i>. Routledge; 2018:43-60.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.’ ,” in <i>Women Philosophers on Autonomy. </i>, S. Bergès and A. Siani, Eds. London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 43–60.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.’ .” In <i>Women Philosophers on Autonomy. </i>, edited by Sandrine Bergès and Alberto Siani, 43–60. London: Routledge, 2018.","apa":"Blank, A. (2018). “Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.” . In S. Bergès &#38; A. Siani (Eds.), <i>Women Philosophers on Autonomy. </i> (pp. 43–60). Routledge.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2018, place={London}, title={“Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.” }, booktitle={Women Philosophers on Autonomy. }, publisher={Routledge}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Bergès, Sandrine and Siani, Alberto}, year={2018}, pages={43–60} }","short":"A. Blank, in: S. Bergès, A. Siani (Eds.), Women Philosophers on Autonomy. , Routledge, London, 2018, pp. 43–60.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Complaisance and the Question of Autonomy in the French Women Moralists, 1650–1710.’ .” <i>Women Philosophers on Autonomy. </i>, edited by Sandrine Bergès and Alberto Siani, Routledge, 2018, pp. 43–60."},"page":"43-60","year":"2018","place":"London"},{"_id":"50929","user_id":"20571","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. ","type":"book_chapter","editor":[{"last_name":"Hamou","full_name":"Hamou, Philippe","first_name":"Philippe"},{"last_name":"Pécharman","full_name":"Pécharman, Martine","first_name":"Martine"}],"status":"public","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:04:22Z","publisher":"Oxford University Press","date_created":"2024-01-26T00:04:15Z","author":[{"full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"title":"“Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.” ","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","place":"Oxford","year":"2018","page":"186-204","citation":{"chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.’ .” In <i>Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. </i>, edited by Philippe Hamou and Martine Pécharman, 186–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.’ ,” in <i>Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. </i>, P. Hamou and M. Pécharman, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 186–204.","ama":"Blank A. “Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.” . In: Hamou P, Pécharman M, eds. <i>Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. </i>. Oxford University Press; 2018:186-204.","apa":"Blank, A. (2018). “Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.” . In P. Hamou &#38; M. Pécharman (Eds.), <i>Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. </i> (pp. 186–204). Oxford University Press.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2018, place={Oxford}, title={“Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.” }, booktitle={Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. }, publisher={Oxford University Press}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Hamou, Philippe and Pécharman, Martine}, year={2018}, pages={186–204} }","short":"A. Blank, in: P. Hamou, M. Pécharman (Eds.), Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. , Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018, pp. 186–204.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Cartesian Logic and Locke’s Critique of Maxims.’ .” <i>Locke and Cartesian Philosophy. </i>, edited by Philippe Hamou and Martine Pécharman, Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 186–204."}},{"publication":"Renaissance Quarterly","type":"review","status":"public","_id":"50953","user_id":"20571","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication_status":"published","year":"2018","intvolume":"        71","page":"774-776","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die philosophischen Totengespräche der Frühaufklärung . <i>Renaissance Quarterly</i>. 2018;71:774-776.","ieee":"A. Blank, “Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die philosophischen Totengespräche der Frühaufklärung ,” <i>Renaissance Quarterly</i>, vol. 71. pp. 774–776, 2018.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die Philosophischen Totengespräche Der Frühaufklärung .” <i>Renaissance Quarterly</i>, 2018.","apa":"Blank, A. (2018). Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die philosophischen Totengespräche der Frühaufklärung . In <i>Renaissance Quarterly</i> (Vol. 71, pp. 774–776).","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die Philosophischen Totengespräche Der Frühaufklärung .” <i>Renaissance Quarterly</i>, vol. 71, 2018, pp. 774–76.","short":"A. Blank, Renaissance Quarterly 71 (2018) 774–776.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2018, title={Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die philosophischen Totengespräche der Frühaufklärung }, volume={71}, journal={Renaissance Quarterly}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2018}, pages={774–776} }"},"date_updated":"2024-01-26T01:02:30Z","volume":71,"date_created":"2024-01-26T01:02:19Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"title":"Review of Riccarda Suitner, Die philosophischen Totengespräche der Frühaufklärung "},{"intvolume":"        43","page":"401-415","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (2017). “Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.” . <i>History of European Ideas</i>, <i>43</i>(3), 401–415.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2017, title={“Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.” }, volume={43}, number={3}, journal={History of European Ideas}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2017}, pages={401–415} }","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.’ .” <i>History of European Ideas</i>, vol. 43, no. 3, 2017, pp. 401–15.","short":"A. Blank, History of European Ideas 43 (2017) 401–415.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.’ ,” <i>History of European Ideas</i>, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 401–415, 2017.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.’ .” <i>History of European Ideas</i> 43, no. 3 (2017): 401–15.","ama":"Blank A. “Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.” . <i>History of European Ideas</i>. 2017;43(3):401-415."},"year":"2017","issue":"3","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","title":"“Common Usage, Presumption and Verisimilitude in Sixteenth-Century Theories of Juridical Interpretation.” ","volume":43,"author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","last_name":"Blank","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:39:05Z","date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:39:13Z","status":"public","publication":"History of European Ideas","type":"journal_article","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50876"},{"publication_status":"published","quality_controlled":"1","issue":"6","year":"2017","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (2017). “D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.” . <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy</i>, <i>25</i>(6), 1116–1137.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.’ .” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy</i>, vol. 25, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1116–37.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2017, title={“D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.” }, volume={25}, number={6}, journal={British Journal for the History of Philosophy}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2017}, pages={1116–1137} }","short":"A. Blank, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2017) 1116–1137.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.’ .” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy</i> 25, no. 6 (2017): 1116–37.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.’ ,” <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy</i>, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1116–1137, 2017.","ama":"Blank A. “D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.” . <i>British Journal for the History of Philosophy</i>. 2017;25(6):1116-1137."},"page":"1116-1137","intvolume":"        25","date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:37:44Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:37:34Z","volume":25,"title":"“D’Holbach on Self-Esteem and the Moral Economy of Oppression.” ","type":"journal_article","publication":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","status":"public","_id":"50875","user_id":"20571","language":[{"iso":"eng"}]},{"year":"2017","place":"Stuttgart","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (2017). “Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” . In T. Leinkauf &#38; S. Meier-Oeser (Eds.), <i>Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. </i> (pp. 161–177). Steiner.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. ““Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” .” <i>Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. </i>, edited by Thomas Leinkauf and Stefan Meier-Oeser, Steiner, 2017, pp. 161–77.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2017, place={Stuttgart}, title={“Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” }, booktitle={Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. }, publisher={Steiner}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Leinkauf, Thomas and Meier-Oeser, Stefan}, year={2017}, pages={161–177} }","short":"A. Blank, in: T. Leinkauf, S. Meier-Oeser (Eds.), Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. , Steiner, Stuttgart, 2017, pp. 161–177.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. ““Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” .” In <i>Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. </i>, edited by Thomas Leinkauf and Stefan Meier-Oeser, 161–77. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2017.","ieee":"A. Blank, ““Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” ,” in <i>Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. </i>, T. Leinkauf and S. Meier-Oeser, Eds. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2017, pp. 161–177.","ama":"Blank A. “Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” . In: Leinkauf T, Meier-Oeser S, eds. <i>Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. </i>. Steiner; 2017:161-177."},"page":"161-177","publication_status":"published","quality_controlled":"1","title":"“Ontologie und Metaphilosophie in Leibniz’ Mühlenargument.” ","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:31:34Z","publisher":"Steiner","author":[{"id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T00:31:28Z","editor":[{"first_name":"Thomas","last_name":"Leinkauf","full_name":"Leinkauf, Thomas"},{"first_name":"Stefan","last_name":"Meier-Oeser","full_name":"Meier-Oeser, Stefan"}],"status":"public","type":"book_chapter","publication":"Harmonie und Realität. Beiträge zu Leibniz’ später Philosophie. ","language":[{"iso":"ger"}],"_id":"50941","user_id":"20571"},{"status":"public","type":"review","publication":"Journal of the History of Philosophy ","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"50954","user_id":"20571","year":"2017","citation":{"chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism .” <i>Journal of the History of Philosophy </i>, 2017.","ieee":"A. Blank, “Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism ,” <i>Journal of the History of Philosophy </i>, vol. 55. pp. 543–544, 2017.","apa":"Blank, A. (2017). Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism . In <i>Journal of the History of Philosophy </i> (Vol. 55, pp. 543–544).","ama":"Blank A. Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism . <i>Journal of the History of Philosophy </i>. 2017;55:543-544.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism .” <i>Journal of the History of Philosophy </i>, vol. 55, 2017, pp. 543–44.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2017, title={Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism }, volume={55}, journal={Journal of the History of Philosophy }, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2017}, pages={543–544} }","short":"A. Blank, Journal of the History of Philosophy  55 (2017) 543–544."},"page":"543-544","intvolume":"        55","publication_status":"published","title":"Review of Kuni Sakamoto, Julius Caesar Scaliger, Renaissance Reformer of Aristotelianism ","date_updated":"2024-01-26T01:03:55Z","date_created":"2024-01-26T01:03:49Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"volume":55},{"user_id":"20571","_id":"50877","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication":"Hungarian Philosophical Review","type":"journal_article","status":"public","volume":61,"author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:40:25Z","date_updated":"2024-02-02T19:22:17Z","oa":"1","main_file_link":[{"open_access":"1","url":"http://real.mtak.hu/152223/"}],"title":"“Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.” ","issue":"1","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","intvolume":"        61","page":"7-22","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. “Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.” . <i>Hungarian Philosophical Review</i>. 2017;61(1):7-22.","apa":"Blank, A. (2017). “Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.” . <i>Hungarian Philosophical Review</i>, <i>61</i>(1), 7–22.","short":"A. Blank, Hungarian Philosophical Review 61 (2017) 7–22.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.’ .” <i>Hungarian Philosophical Review</i>, vol. 61, no. 1, 2017, pp. 7–22.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2017, title={“Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.” }, volume={61}, number={1}, journal={Hungarian Philosophical Review}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2017}, pages={7–22} }","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.’ ,” <i>Hungarian Philosophical Review</i>, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2017.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Protestant Natural Philosophy and the Question of Emergence, 1540–1610.’ .” <i>Hungarian Philosophical Review</i> 61, no. 1 (2017): 7–22."},"year":"2017"},{"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50853","status":"public","editor":[{"id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","last_name":"Blank","first_name":"Andreas"}],"type":"book_editor","title":"Animals. New Essays","date_created":"2024-01-25T21:21:31Z","publisher":"Philosophia","date_updated":"2024-01-25T21:26:12Z","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (Ed.). (2016). <i>Animals. New Essays</i>. Philosophia.","short":"A. Blank, ed., Animals. New Essays, Philosophia, Munich, 2016.","mla":"Blank, Andreas, editor. <i>Animals. New Essays</i>. Philosophia, 2016.","bibtex":"@book{Blank_2016, place={Munich}, title={Animals. New Essays}, publisher={Philosophia}, year={2016} }","ieee":"A. Blank, Ed., <i>Animals. New Essays</i>. Munich: Philosophia, 2016.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas, ed. <i>Animals. New Essays</i>. Munich: Philosophia, 2016.","ama":"Blank A, ed. <i>Animals. New Essays</i>. Philosophia; 2016."},"place":"Munich","year":"2016","publication_status":"published"},{"quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published","issue":"1","year":"2016","intvolume":"         5","page":"29-52","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. “Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.” . <i>Journal of Early Modern Studies</i>. 2016;5(1):29-52.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.’ .” <i>Journal of Early Modern Studies</i> 5, no. 1 (2016): 29–52.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.’ ,” <i>Journal of Early Modern Studies</i>, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 29–52, 2016.","apa":"Blank, A. (2016). “Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.” . <i>Journal of Early Modern Studies</i>, <i>5</i>(1), 29–52.","short":"A. Blank, Journal of Early Modern Studies 5 (2016) 29–52.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2016, title={“Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.” }, volume={5}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Early Modern Studies}, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2016}, pages={29–52} }","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.’ .” <i>Journal of Early Modern Studies</i>, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, pp. 29–52."},"date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:42:00Z","volume":5,"author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","last_name":"Blank"}],"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:41:52Z","title":"“Striving Possibles and Leibniz’s Cognitivist Theory of Volition.” ","publication":"Journal of Early Modern Studies","type":"journal_article","status":"public","_id":"50878","user_id":"20571","language":[{"iso":"eng"}]},{"language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50879","status":"public","publication":"Eighteenth-Century Studies ","type":"journal_article","title":"“D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.” ","volume":49,"date_created":"2024-01-25T22:43:24Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","last_name":"Blank","id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas"}],"date_updated":"2024-01-25T22:43:31Z","intvolume":"        49","page":"439-453","citation":{"chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.’ .” <i>Eighteenth-Century Studies </i> 49, no. 4 (2016): 439–53.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.’ ,” <i>Eighteenth-Century Studies </i>, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 439–453, 2016.","ama":"Blank A. “D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.” . <i>Eighteenth-Century Studies </i>. 2016;49(4):439-453.","apa":"Blank, A. (2016). “D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.” . <i>Eighteenth-Century Studies </i>, <i>49</i>(4), 439–453.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.’ .” <i>Eighteenth-Century Studies </i>, vol. 49, no. 4, 2016, pp. 439–53.","bibtex":"@article{Blank_2016, title={“D’Holbach on Self-Esteem, Justice, and Cosmopolitanism.” }, volume={49}, number={4}, journal={Eighteenth-Century Studies }, author={Blank, Andreas}, year={2016}, pages={439–453} }","short":"A. Blank, Eighteenth-Century Studies  49 (2016) 439–453."},"year":"2016","issue":"4","quality_controlled":"1","publication_status":"published"},{"type":"book_chapter","publication":"Leibniz’ Rezeption der Aristotelischen Logik und Metaphysik. ","status":"public","editor":[{"full_name":"Nicolás, Juan","last_name":"Nicolás","first_name":"Juan"}],"user_id":"20571","_id":"50931","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"publication_status":"published","quality_controlled":"1","citation":{"ama":"Blank A. “Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.” . In: Nicolás J, ed. <i>Leibniz’ Rezeption Der Aristotelischen Logik Und Metaphysik. </i>. Olms; 2016:257-272.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.’ ,” in <i>Leibniz’ Rezeption der Aristotelischen Logik und Metaphysik. </i>, J. Nicolás, Ed. Hildesheim: Olms, 2016, pp. 257–272.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.’ .” In <i>Leibniz’ Rezeption Der Aristotelischen Logik Und Metaphysik. </i>, edited by Juan Nicolás, 257–72. Hildesheim: Olms, 2016.","apa":"Blank, A. (2016). “Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.” . In J. Nicolás (Ed.), <i>Leibniz’ Rezeption der Aristotelischen Logik und Metaphysik. </i> (pp. 257–272). Olms.","short":"A. Blank, in: J. Nicolás (Ed.), Leibniz’ Rezeption Der Aristotelischen Logik Und Metaphysik. , Olms, Hildesheim, 2016, pp. 257–272.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.’ .” <i>Leibniz’ Rezeption Der Aristotelischen Logik Und Metaphysik. </i>, edited by Juan Nicolás, Olms, 2016, pp. 257–72.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2016, place={Hildesheim}, title={“Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.” }, booktitle={Leibniz’ Rezeption der Aristotelischen Logik und Metaphysik. }, publisher={Olms}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Nicolás, Juan}, year={2016}, pages={257–272} }"},"page":"257-272","year":"2016","place":"Hildesheim","author":[{"last_name":"Blank","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","first_name":"Andreas"}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T00:07:48Z","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:07:55Z","publisher":"Olms","title":"“Renaissance Aristotelianism and the Conciliatory Approach to Individuation in the Early Leibniz.” "},{"year":"2016","place":"Freiburg","page":"177-194","citation":{"apa":"Blank, A. (2016). “D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend” . In S. Bunke &#38; K. Mihaylova (Eds.), <i>Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. </i> (pp. 177–194). Rombach.","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend’ .” <i>Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. </i>, edited by Simon Bunke and Katerina Mihaylova, Rombach, 2016, pp. 177–94.","short":"A. Blank, in: S. Bunke, K. Mihaylova (Eds.), Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. , Rombach, Freiburg, 2016, pp. 177–194.","bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2016, place={Freiburg}, title={“D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend” }, booktitle={Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. }, publisher={Rombach}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Bunke, Simon and Mihaylova, Katerina}, year={2016}, pages={177–194} }","ama":"Blank A. “D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend” . In: Bunke S, Mihaylova K, eds. <i>Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. </i>. Rombach; 2016:177-194.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend’ ,” in <i>Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. </i>, S. Bunke and K. Mihaylova, Eds. Freiburg: Rombach, 2016, pp. 177–194.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend’ .” In <i>Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. </i>, edited by Simon Bunke and Katerina Mihaylova, 177–94. Freiburg: Rombach, 2016."},"publication_status":"published","title":"“D’Holbach über Wahrhaftigkeit als politische Tugend” ","date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:15:47Z","publisher":"Rombach","date_created":"2024-01-26T00:15:41Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","last_name":"Blank","id":"20571","full_name":"Blank, Andreas"}],"editor":[{"full_name":"Bunke, Simon","last_name":"Bunke","first_name":"Simon"},{"first_name":"Katerina","last_name":"Mihaylova","full_name":"Mihaylova, Katerina"}],"status":"public","publication":"Aufrichtigkeitseffekte. Signale, soziale Interaktionen und Medien im Zeitalter der Aufklärung. ","type":"book_chapter","language":[{"iso":"ger"}],"_id":"50933","user_id":"20571"},{"user_id":"20571","_id":"50932","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"type":"book_chapter","publication":"Animals. New Essays. ","status":"public","editor":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","last_name":"Blank"}],"date_created":"2024-01-26T00:09:12Z","author":[{"first_name":"Andreas","full_name":"Blank, Andreas","id":"20571","last_name":"Blank"}],"date_updated":"2024-01-26T00:18:01Z","publisher":"Philosophia","title":"“Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.” ","publication_status":"published","citation":{"bibtex":"@inbook{Blank_2016, place={Munich}, title={“Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.” }, booktitle={Animals. New Essays. }, publisher={Philosophia}, author={Blank, Andreas}, editor={Blank, Andreas}, year={2016}, pages={75–99} }","mla":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.’ .” <i>Animals. New Essays. </i>, edited by Andreas Blank, Philosophia, 2016, pp. 75–99.","short":"A. Blank, in: A. Blank (Ed.), Animals. New Essays. , Philosophia, Munich, 2016, pp. 75–99.","apa":"Blank, A. (2016). “Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.” . In A. Blank (Ed.), <i>Animals. New Essays. </i> (pp. 75–99). Philosophia.","chicago":"Blank, Andreas. “‘Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.’ .” In <i>Animals. New Essays. </i>, edited by Andreas Blank, 75–99. Munich: Philosophia, 2016.","ieee":"A. Blank, “‘Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.’ ,” in <i>Animals. New Essays. </i>, A. Blank, Ed. Munich: Philosophia, 2016, pp. 75–99.","ama":"Blank A. “Daniel Sennert and the Late Aristotelian Controversy over the Natural Origin of Animal Souls.” . In: Blank A, ed. <i>Animals. New Essays. </i>. Philosophia; 2016:75-99."},"page":"75-99","place":"Munich","year":"2016"}]