@inproceedings{38121,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Richert, Benjamin and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Differences in event-related potentials indicate differential use of mental rotation processes in parity judgements of humanoid and alphanumeric stimuli}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{38115,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Richert, Benjamin and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Neuronale Korrelate der mentalen Rotation von menschlichen Figuren und alphanumerischen Stimuli}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37828,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Nursing staff is burdened by high workload and stress. Furthermore, heavy lifting, as well as transferring nursing home residents, cause lumbar tissue damage and back pain. Exercise intervention studies to reduce work-related problems are rare and the evidence for efficacy of studies among nurses is limited. Studies including targeted analysis of requirements are necessary to generate effective recommendations and tailored interventions for health promotion programmes. The purpose of this multicentred intervention study is to identify work-related problems, to implement health promotion programmes and to evaluate their effectiveness.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A randomised controlled trial will be conducted, including a total of 48 nursing home facilities in eight regions of Germany with an estimated sample size of 700 nurses. Standardised ergonomics and posture training (10 weeks, once a week for 20–30 min) and subsequently, back-fitness training (12 weeks, once a week for 45–60 min) will be administered. Following the implementation of standardised health promotion programmes, further demand-oriented interventions can be implemented. The perceived exposure to work-related demands, work-related pain in different parts of the body, health-related quality of life, perceived stress, work-related patterns of behaviour and experience, presentism behaviour, work environment as well as general needs and barriers to health promotion, will be assessed at baseline (pre-test), at 10 weeks (post-test, after ergonomics training), at 22 weeks (post-test, after back-fitness training) and at 34 weeks of the programme (follow-up).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Hamburg (AZ: 2018_168). The results of the study will be published in open-access and international journals. Furthermore, the results will be presented in the participating nursing homes and at national and international conferences.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS.de (DRKS00015241).</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Otto, Ann-Kathrin and Pietschmann, Juliane and Appelles, Luisa-Marie and Bebenek, Michael and Bischoff, Laura L and Hildebrand, Claudia and Johnen, Bettina and Jöllenbeck, Thomas and Kemmler, Wolfgang and Klotzbier, Thomas and Korbus, Heide and Rudisch, Julian and Schott, Nadja and Schoene, Daniel and Voelcker-Rehage, Claudia and Vogel, Oliver and Vogt, Lutz and Weigelt, Matthias and Wilke, Jan and Zwingmann, Katharina and Wollesen, Bettina}},
  issn         = {{2044-6055}},
  journal      = {{BMJ Open}},
  keywords     = {{General Medicine}},
  number       = {{10}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ}},
  title        = {{{Physical activity and health promotion for nursing staff in elderly care: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial}}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038202}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37787,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>In sports games, tactical instructions are mostly presented on tactic boards under temporal constraints determined by the length of time outs (e.g., 20–60 s time outs in basketball) and coaches’ instructional behavior. Thus, instructions should be presented in a way that enables fast and errorless information processing. High affordances in visual–spatial transformation (e.g., mental rotation processes) might both impede information processing and decrease execution performance. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the effect of different orientations of visual tactical displays on observation time under self-paced conditions as well as to compare the effects on execution performance to those of externally paced conditions. According to the self-determination theory, self-control over observation time is assumed to increase performance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In a mixed-factors design with two factors, 48 participants were instructed to execute a basketball playing pattern, which was presented on a virtual tactic board in one of five different spatial disparities to the players’ on-court perspective. The Self-Paced Group determined the observation time in a self-controlled manner, whereas in the Yoked Group observation times were externally controlled, i.e., the observation time was constrained to match that of the Self-Paced Group..</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The self-controlled time for watching the pattern before execution was significantly shorter and spatial accuracy in pattern execution was significantly higher for low disparity between instruction perspective and on-court perspective. Self-control over observation time did not affect execution accuracy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The orientation effects might be explained by interfering mental rotation processes that are necessary to transform the instructional perspective into the players’ egocentric perspective. According to these results, coaches should align their tactic boards to their players’ on-court viewing perspective.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3142}},
  journal      = {{German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{354--365}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Mental rotation and performance in basketball: effects of self-controlled and externally controlled time constraints on the processing and execution of tactic board instructions with varied orientations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12662-020-00659-6}},
  volume       = {{50}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37796,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>BACKGROUND: A detail of previous studies on mental rotation, which has not received any attention so far, relates to the testing situation of the participants. In nearly every study, participants were tested in a sitting posture (and not standing). However, when considering embodied cognition approaches on mental processes, participants may not be able to fully exploit these processes when performing mental rotation tasks in a sitting posture.&#x0D;
AIM: Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the potential influence of two different postures (sitting vs. standing), when solving mental body rotation tasks.&#x0D;
METHOD: Sixteen participants (6 females) were tested in two mental body-rotation tasks (MBRT), requiring either an object-based spatial transformation (based on a same-different judgment) or an egocentric transformation (based on a left-right judgment) in a sitting and in a standing posture. Reaction times and response errors were analysed in two three-way ANOVAs, with the factors orientation, task, and posture.&#x0D;
RESULTS: Results revealed an effect of orientation and task, indicating that participants performed better for egocentric than for object-based transformations. However, there was no effect of posture.&#x0D;
CONCLUSION: The different dynamics of postural control during sitting and standing do not induce different embodiment effects on mental rotation.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Barela, José Angelo and Figueiredo, Gabriella Andreeta and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2446-4902}},
  journal      = {{Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior}},
  keywords     = {{General Engineering}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{73--84}},
  publisher    = {{Brazilian Journal for Motor Behavior}},
  title        = {{{Mental body rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations in different postures: sitting vs. standing}}},
  doi          = {{10.20338/bjmb.v14i2.165}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37824,
  author       = {{Memmert, Daniel and Noël, Benjamin and Machlitt, Daniel and van der Kamp, John and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{The role of different directions of attention on the extent of implicit perception in soccer penalty kicking}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2020.102586}},
  volume       = {{70}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37775,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Memmert, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{0270-1367}},
  journal      = {{Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}},
  keywords     = {{Nephrology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{137--145}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{The Mental Rotation Ability of Expert Basketball Players: Identifying On-Court Plays}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/02701367.2020.1713289}},
  volume       = {{92}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37789,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris and Steggemann-Weinrich, Yvonne}},
  issn         = {{2152-7180}},
  journal      = {{Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{General Earth and Planetary Sciences, General Environmental Science}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{1493--1510}},
  publisher    = {{Scientific Research Publishing, Inc.}},
  title        = {{{The Head-Fake Effect in Basketball Is Based on the Processing of Head Orientation, but Not on Gaze Direction}}},
  doi          = {{10.4236/psych.2020.1110095}},
  volume       = {{11}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37827,
  author       = {{Friehs, Maximilian A. and Güldenpenning, Iris and Frings, Christian and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3290}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Cognitive Enhancement}},
  keywords     = {{General Medicine}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{62--70}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Electrify your Game! Anodal tDCS Increases the Resistance to Head Fakes in Basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s41465-019-00133-8}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37829,
  abstract     = {{Reactions to the pass of a basketball player performing a head fake are typically slower than reactions to a basketball player who passes without a head fake (i.e., head-fake effect). The present study shows that extensive practice reduces the head-fake effect in basketball. Additional analyses were conducted to explore the mechanism behind the reduced head-fake effect. First, we analyzed whether or not participants developed some control over the processing of irrelevant gaze direction, as indicated by specific trial-to-trial adaptations (i.e., congruency sequence effect). Second, we fitted the individual frequency distributions of RTs to ex-Gaussian distributions, to evaluate if practice specifically affects the Gaussian part of the distribution or the exponential part of the distribution. Third, we modeled individual RT distributions as the so-called mixture effects to examine whether the way irrelevant gaze direction impacts performance (either occasionally but massively or continuously but moderately) changes with practice. The analyses revealed that the effect of practice could not be explained with an increasing congruency-sequence effect. Also, it could not be found in the ex-Gaussian distributional analyses. The assumption that residual failure to inhibit the processing of the gaze direction in contrast to continuous failures to do so might favor mixed effects over uniform effects at later courses of practice could not be validated. The reduced head-fake effect thus is argued to source in participants’ general increasing ability to inhibit the processing of the task-irrelevant gaze direction information and/or in a priority shift of gaze processing to a processing of the pass direction.}},
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Schütz, Christoph and Weigelt, Matthias and Kunde, Wilfried}},
  issn         = {{0340-0727}},
  journal      = {{Psychological Research}},
  keywords     = {{Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{823--833}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Is the head-fake effect in basketball robust against practice? Analyses of trial-by-trial adaptations, frequency distributions, and mixture effects to evaluate effects of practice}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00426-018-1078-4}},
  volume       = {{84}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37760,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Kunde, Wilfried and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1612-197X}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Psychology, Social Psychology}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{202--222}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Head-fake perception in basketball: the relative contributions of expertise, visual or motor training, and test repetition}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/1612197x.2020.1854819}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37785,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias and Memmert, Daniel and Klatt, Stefanie}},
  issn         = {{1469-0292}},
  journal      = {{Psychology of Sport and Exercise}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Psychology}},
  pages        = {{101764}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Processing deceptive information in sports: Individual differences for responding to head fakes depends on the attentional capability of the observer}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101764}},
  volume       = {{51}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37823,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Kunde, Wilfried and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0001-6918}},
  journal      = {{Acta Psychologica}},
  keywords     = {{Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{103013}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Cognitive load reduces interference by head fakes in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103013}},
  volume       = {{203}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{38120,
  author       = {{Margraf, Linda and Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  editor       = {{Dobel, Christian and Giesen, Carina and Grigutsch, Laura Anne and Kaufmann, Jürgen M. and Kovács, Gyula and Meissner, Franziska and Rothermund, Klaus and Schweinberger , Stefan R.}},
  location     = {{Jena}},
  publisher    = {{Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.}},
  title        = {{{Valence-dependent changes of neural processing of augmented feedback after extensive practice of a new motor task}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{47019,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris and Steggemann-Weinrich, Y.}},
  booktitle    = {{Zukunft der Sportpsychologie zwischen Verstehen und Evidenz. Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Amesberger, G. and Würth, S. and Finkenzeller, T.}},
  location     = {{Salzburg (online)}},
  pages        = {{155}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Salzburg}},
  title        = {{{No effect of social cues in antisocial behavior: The head-fake effect in basketball is not based on the processing of eye gaze direction}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{47026,
  author       = {{Polzien, A. and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Zukunft der Sportpsychologie zwischen Verstehen und Evidenz. Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Amesberger, G. and Würth, S. and Finkenzeller, T.}},
  location     = {{Salzburg (online)}},
  pages        = {{154}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Salzburg}},
  title        = {{{Worauf basiert der Blicktäuschungseffekt im Basketball? Stimulus-Stimulus (S-S) vs. Stimulus-Response (S-R) Interferenz}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{47016,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris and Ste, Y.}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Dobel, C. and Giesen, C. and Grigutsch, L. A. and Kaufmann, J. M. and Kovács, G. and Meissner, F. and Rothermund, K. and Schweinberger, S. R.}},
  location     = {{Jena}},
  pages        = {{279}},
  publisher    = {{Pabst Science Publishers}},
  title        = {{{ The head-fake effect in  basketball is based on the automating processing of head orientation, but not on gaze  information}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{47017,
  author       = {{Polzien, A. and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 62nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Dobel, C. and Giesen, C. and Grigutsch, L. A. and Kaufmann, J. M. and Kovács, G. and Meissner, F. and Rothermund, K. and Schweinberger, S. R.}},
  location     = {{Jena}},
  pages        = {{200}},
  publisher    = {{Pabst Science Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Temporal distance between head turn and pass modulates the head fake effect in basketball}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{47061,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Krause, Daniel and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  booktitle    = {{Sportpsychologie: Grundlagen und Anwendung}},
  editor       = {{Schüler, J, and Wegner, M. and Plessner, H.}},
  pages        = {{43–68}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Lernen und Gedächtnis im Sport}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56802-6_3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{38116,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Böer, Nils Tobias and Kunde, Wilfried and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Zukunft der Sportpsychologie zwischen Verstehen und Evidenz. Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Amesberger, G. and Würth, S. and Finkenzeller, T.}},
  location     = {{Salzburg (online)}},
  pages        = {{39}},
  title        = {{{Anpassungseffekte an spielerspezifische Häufigkeiten von Blicktäuschungen im Basketball}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

