@inbook{34466,
  author       = {{Papenkordt, Jörg and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  booktitle    = {{Human-Technology Interaction}},
  isbn         = {{9783030992347}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Determinants of Trust in Smart Technologies}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-030-99235-4_13}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34154,
  abstract     = {{Regulations to prevent ethnic discrimination in accessing the labor
market are implemented most thoroughly in the public sector. However, it remains
to be assessed if these regulations are internalized. We conducted a field
experiment to examine ethnic discrimination when applying for internships in
German municipalities by unsolicited inquiries. We compared responses in
German cities to Turkish, Italian, and German applicants in two periods, and find
consistent disadvantages for the Turkish and Italian applicants as well as
differences related to gender. Thus, the likelihood for ethnic discrimination rises
when applying for positions in public institutions that are not subject to
regulations.}},
  author       = {{Auer, Thorsten Fabian and Ekemen, Helin and Hagedorn, Carolin and Heise, Chantal and Rese, Christine}},
  issn         = {{1681 8997}},
  journal      = {{Empirical Economics Letters}},
  keywords     = {{Ethnic Discrimination, Public Sector, Field Experiment, Application Procedure}},
  number       = {{7}},
  pages        = {{47--55}},
  title        = {{{Same Different but not Same Same: Ethnic Discrimination in Application Procedures in the German Public Sector}}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{32397,
  abstract     = {{Unternehmen investieren zunehmend in Angebote Betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung (BGF). Dabei stellt sich die Frage nach dem Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnis jenseits des individuellen Nutzens durch die Förderung der Mitarbeitergesundheit. Deshalb wurden im Rahmen einer Sekundäranalyse Effekte der BGF auf den Unternehmenserfolg berechnet. Die Ergebnisse lassen vermuten, dass sich eine verhaltensorientierte BGF kaum positiv auf die Arbeitsproduktivität und Kommunikationsstruktur in Unternehmen auswirkt.}},
  author       = {{Auer, Thorsten Fabian and Sennefelder, Lisa and Meier, Heiko}},
  issn         = {{1876-4851}},
  journal      = {{Public Health Forum}},
  keywords     = {{Kommunikation, Arbeitsproduktivität, Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung, Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnis}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{214--216}},
  publisher    = {{Walter De Gruyter GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung: Ein leeres Versprechen?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/pubhef-2022-0069}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@techreport{45668,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Im Rahmen dieser Studie wird der Status Quo des KI-Einsatzes in der industriellen Arbeitswelt in der Region OstWestfalenLippe erfasst und beschrieben. Dadurch wird eine Grundlage geschaffen, um eine zielführende Unterstützung der Gestaltung von durch Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) gestützter Arbeitsprozesse in Unternehmen zu ermöglichen, indem beispielsweise bedarfsbezogene Maßnahmen entwickelt und durchgeführt sowie weiterer Forschungsbedarf aufgezeigt wird.  Die Befragung wurde im Jahr 2021 von dem Kompetenzzentrum Arbeitswelt.Plus sowie dem Spitzencluster it’s OWL initiiert. Dabei sind drei Zielgruppen – Unternehmensleitung, Personalabteilung (HR) sowie Arbeitnehmer*innen – adressiert worden. Insgesamt nahmen 317 Personen aus 89 verschiedenen Unternehmen bzw. Organisationen an der Befragung teil – zu 38 % Unternehmer*innen, zu 13 % Personaler*innen und zu 49 % Arbeitnehmer*innen. Die meisten der Teilnehmenden stammten aus der Elektroindustrie, dem Maschinenbau sowie dem Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie (IKT)-Sektor.  Die Befragungsergebnisse zeigen, dass sich die meisten Unternehmen in der Anfangsphase der KI-Nutzung befinden. Zwischen einzelnen Unternehmensbereichen und verschiedenen Branchen zeigen sich gewisse Unterschiede in der Nutzungsphase. Die Befragten stehen aktuell vor der Nutzung von vor allem teilautonomen KI-Systemen, die ausführende und analytische menschliche Tätigkeitenbeispielsweise durch Informationsbereitstellungen unterstützen. Wesentliche Ziele der KI-Nutzung sind die Effizienzsteigerung, Qualitätsverbesserung, Entscheidungsoptimierung sowie Unterstützung der Arbeitnehmer*innen. Allerdings werden in allen Unternehmen die fehlende Expertise sowie insgesamt die Komplexität des Themenfelds als Hinderungsgründe identifiziert.  In allen Unternehmen und allen Unternehmensbereichen werden hohe Auswirkungen durch KI erwartet. Auf die Arbeitsgestaltung werden insgesamt eher positive Auswirkungen erwartet. Die Befragten schätzen die Bedeutung von KI, ihre Aufgeschlossenheit sowie ihr Vertrauen gegenüber KI als insgesamt hoch ein, ihr Verständnis von KI dagegen eher als gering. Tendenziell zeigt sich eine große Diskrepanz zwischen Selbst- und Fremdbild mit einer teils deutlich negativeren Wahrnehmung anderer. Die Befragten erwarten außerdem steigende Kompetenzanforderungen sowie einen hohen Weiterbildungsbedarf, insbesondere bezüglich des grundlegenden Verständnisses über KI. In den wenigsten Unternehmen existiert jedoch ein gezieltes Weiterbildungsangebot.  Die Erkenntnisse aus der Befragung fließen im Rahmen des Kompetenzzentrums Arbeitswelt.Plus in die gezielte Gestaltung und Einführung KI-gestützter Arbeitsformen sowie bedarfsgerechter Unterstützungsangebote ein. Die hohe Komplexität der KI-Einführung sowie die sowohl technischen als auch mitarbeiterbezogenen Herausforderungen verdeutlichen den Bedarf für eine soziotechnische Perspektive und ein systematisches Vorgehen bei der Gestaltung dieses vielschichtigen Themenfelds.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Papenkordt, Jörg and Gabriel, Stefan and Thommes, Kirsten and Dumitrescu, Roman}},
  publisher    = {{Kompetenzzentrum Arbeitswelt.Plus}},
  title        = {{{Künstliche Intelligenz in der industriellen Arbeitswelt}}},
  doi          = {{10.55594/tmao3234}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{44637,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34191,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Since the seminal work of Albert and Whetten, the organizational identity concept has become ubiquitous and highly relevant in various fields. This study systematically reviews how Albert and Whetten’s concept of organizational identity has been disseminated in different research areas. It employs quantitative (topic modeling) and qualitative text analysis, as well as a network analysis to examine a sample of 1,041 papers published between 1985 and mid-2022 that cite Albert and Whetten’s seminal work. Using this method of systematic literature analysis, the current study investigates the criteria of the basic definition and hypotheses mentioned in their work that contribute to its increasing significance, and those with the potential to become substantial aspects of future organizational identity research. Accordingly, Albert and Whetten’s conceptualization of organizational identity is often partially adopted in the literature. Thus, this study contributes to organizational identity research by unveiling further research questions on the evolving character of organizational identity, research methodology, and quantitative operationalization, on the basis of Albert and Whetten’s organizational identity conceptualization.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Knorr, Karin and Hein-Pensel, Franziska}},
  issn         = {{2198-1620}},
  journal      = {{Management Review Quarterly}},
  keywords     = {{Strategy and Management, Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Since Albert and Whetten: the dissemination of Albert and Whetten’s conceptualization of organizational identity}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11301-022-00311-7}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34295,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{32273,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Melkas, Helinä and Pekkarinen, Satu and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Gustafsson, Christine and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1044-7318}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/10447318.2022.2081283}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{51210,
  author       = {{Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Thommes, Kirsten and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä}},
  issn         = {{0144-929X}},
  journal      = {{Behaviour &amp; Information Technology}},
  keywords     = {{Human-Computer Interaction, General Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{758--774}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Assistant nurses and orientation to care robot use in three European countries}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042736}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{63778,
  author       = {{Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Thommes, Kirsten and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä}},
  issn         = {{0144-929X}},
  journal      = {{Behaviour &amp; Information Technology}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{758--774}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Assistant nurses and orientation to care robot use in three European countries}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/0144929x.2022.2042736}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{44638,
  author       = {{Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Gustafsson, Christine and Melkas, Helinä and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{2451-9588}},
  journal      = {{Computers in Human Behavior Reports}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Psychology, Neuroscience (miscellaneous)}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{When do individuals choose care robots over a human caregiver? Insights from a laboratory experiment on choices under uncertainty}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100258}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{34283,
  author       = {{Gutt, Jana Kim and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  booktitle    = {{Academy of Management Proceedings}},
  title        = {{{Speaking of Performance: Evaluating Team Members’ Performance with Open-Ended Audio Comments}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.16394abstract}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{24335,
  author       = {{Hoffmann, Christin and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Ziemann, Niklas}},
  journal      = {{PloS one}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{e0256490}},
  title        = {{{The Hare and the Hedgehog: Empirical evidence on the relationship between the individual Pace of Life and the speed-accuracy continuum}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256490}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{24549,
  author       = {{Hoffmann, Christin and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Ziemann, Niklas}},
  issn         = {{0921-8009}},
  journal      = {{Ecological Economics}},
  title        = {{{Faster, harder, greener? Empirical evidence on the role of the individual Pace of Life for productivity and pro-environmental behavior}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107212}},
  volume       = {{191}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{26146,
  author       = {{Hein-Pensel, Franziska and Knorr, Karin and Oertel, Simon and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{0065-0668}},
  journal      = {{Academy of Management Proceedings}},
  title        = {{{Incongruent Patterns of Organizational Identity Crafting by Different Organizational Actors}}},
  doi          = {{10.5465/ambpp.2021.15048abstract}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{26143,
  author       = {{Knorr, Karin and Hein-Pensel, Franziska and Oertel, Simon and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{0065-0668}},
  journal      = {{Academy of Management Proceedings}},
  title        = {{{Rhetoricians of the past: Rhetorical history and the crafting of organizational identity}}},
  doi          = {{10.5465/ambpp.2021.15116abstract}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{24456,
  abstract     = {{One objective of current research in explainable intelligent systems is to implement social aspects in order to increase the relevance of explanations. In this paper, we argue that a novel conceptual framework is needed to overcome shortcomings of existing AI systems with little attention to processes of interaction and learning. Drawing from research in interaction and development, we first outline the novel conceptual framework that pushes the design of AI systems toward true interactivity with an emphasis on the role of the partner and social relevance. We propose that AI systems will be able to provide a meaningful and relevant explanation only if the process of explaining is extended to active contribution of both partners that brings about dynamics that is modulated by different levels of analysis. Accordingly, our conceptual framework comprises monitoring and scaffolding as key concepts and claims that the process of explaining is not only modulated by the interaction between explainee and explainer but is embedded into a larger social context in which conventionalized and routinized behaviors are established. We discuss our conceptual framework in relation to the established objectives of transparency and autonomy that are raised for the design of explainable AI systems currently.}},
  author       = {{Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Cimiano, Philipp and Scharlau, Ingrid and Matzner, Tobias and Buhl, Heike M. and Buschmeier, Hendrik and Esposito, Elena and Grimminger, Angela and Hammer, Barbara and Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold and Horwath, Ilona and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Kern, Friederike and Kopp, Stefan and Thommes, Kirsten and Ngonga Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille and Schulte, Carsten and Wachsmuth, Henning and Wagner, Petra and Wrede, Britta}},
  issn         = {{2379-8920}},
  journal      = {{IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems}},
  keywords     = {{Explainability, process ofexplaining andunderstanding, explainable artificial systems}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{717--728}},
  title        = {{{Explanation as a Social Practice: Toward a Conceptual Framework for the Social Design of AI Systems}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/tcds.2020.3044366}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{21126,
  author       = {{Pekkarinen, Satu and Hennala, Lea and Tuisku, Outi and Gustafsson, Christine and Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Thommes, Kirsten and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Melkas, Helinä}},
  issn         = {{1569-1101}},
  journal      = {{Gerontechnology}},
  title        = {{{Care robots in society: Knowledge and orientation needs}}},
  doi          = {{10.4017/gt.2020.19.s.69664}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{21127,
  author       = {{Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Thommes, Kirsten and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Pekkarinen, Satu and Melkas, Helinä and Gustafsson, Christine}},
  issn         = {{1569-1101}},
  journal      = {{Gerontechnology}},
  title        = {{{The need for care robot orientation in elder care services}}},
  doi          = {{10.4017/gt.2020.19.s.69574}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{17361,
  author       = {{Johansson-Pajala, Rose-Marie and Thommes, Kirsten and Hoppe, Julia Amelie and Tuisku, Outi and Hennala, Lea and Pekkarinen, Satu and Melkas, Helina and Gustafsson, Christine}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Social Robotics}},
  pages        = {{1--15}},
  title        = {{{Care Robot Orientation: What, Who and How? Potential Users` Perceptions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12369-020-00619-y}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}