@inbook{53445,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{The Realities of Autonomous Weapons}},
  editor       = {{Bächle, Thomas Christian and Bareis, Jascha}},
  pages        = {{187--204}},
  publisher    = {{Bristol University Press}},
  title        = {{{Governing Autonomies: Imagining Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the “Future Combat Air System” European Armament Project}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{58938,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{AUSDRUCK - Das IMI-Magazin}},
  number       = {{120}},
  pages        = {{25--27}},
  title        = {{{KI außer Kontrolle}}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61785,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{Marxistische Blätter}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{87--91}},
  title        = {{{Künstliche Intelligenz in der Kriegsführung. Überblick, Hoffnungen und Risiken}}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{61786,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{Marxistische Blätter}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{92--96}},
  title        = {{{Autonome Waffensysteme und Meaningful Human Control}}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@misc{61787,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{NETZPOLITIK.ORG}},
  title        = {{{KI im Krieg. „Wir brauchen mehr kritische Debatten und zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement“}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{62016,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of International Security}},
  title        = {{{The more-than-human biopolitics of swarming – complexity, emergence, and control in military robotics}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/eis.2025.10023}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@article{53125,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{AI & Society}},
  title        = {{{Imagining and Governing Artificial Intelligence – the Ordoliberal Way: An Analysis of the National Strategy ‘AI Made in Germany’}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00146-024-01940-0   }},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{54794,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens and Weber, Jutta}},
  journal      = {{Ethics and Armed Forces}},
  number       = {{1}},
  title        = {{{“Meaningful Human Control” and Complex Human-Machine Assemblages – On the Limits of Ethical AI Principles in the Context of Autonomous Weapons Systems}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{53446,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{CILIP Bürgerrechte & Polizei}},
  number       = {{134}},
  title        = {{{Biometrische Gesichtserkennung – Technologischer Solutionismus für mehr „Sicherheit“}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@misc{54991,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{Diskursmonitor. Glossar zur strategischen Kommunikation in öffentlichen Diskursen}},
  title        = {{{Versicherheitlichung}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{58396,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens and Weber, Jutta}},
  journal      = {{FIfF Kommunikation - Zeitschrift für Informatik und Gesellschaft}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{35--38}},
  title        = {{{Ethische KI im Krieg? Zu den Grenzen einer Responsible AI in the Military Domain}}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@misc{58401,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{TELEPOLIS}},
  title        = {{{KI im Krieg: Wenn Algorithmen über Leben und Tod entscheiden}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{50605,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
               <jats:p>This chapter discusses the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) by law enforcement with a special focus on machine learning applications. First, FRT is situated in the larger context of the rise of video surveillance and a shift in Western security culture. The chapter shows how the promise of FRT addresses the problems of video surveillance. Then, it explains how FRT works and how machine learning techniques such as eigenface and convolutional neural networks come into play. Afterward, it explains how the accuracy and effectiveness of FRT are evaluated and why it is important to take the interplay of human operators and FRT systems into account. Finally, several controversies around the police use of FRT are presented and the limits of technological solutions to the problem of bias are demonstrated.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Machine Learning}},
  isbn         = {{9780197653609}},
  publisher    = {{Oxford University Press}},
  title        = {{{Facial Recognition in Law Enforcement}}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197653609.013.25}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{50606,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence}},
  isbn         = {{9781803928562}},
  pages        = {{763 -- 772}},
  publisher    = {{Edward Elgar Publishing}},
  title        = {{{The use of AI in domestic security practices}}},
  doi          = {{10.4337/9781803928562.00077}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@misc{51075,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  issn         = {{0938-3476}},
  title        = {{{ELSA zieht in den Krieg - Zur Rolle der Kritik an autonomen Waffensystemen für deren Legitimationsstrategien}}},
  volume       = {{4/2023}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{50603,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Mathematical models and computer simulations play a crucial role in the context of the COVID-19 crisis for knowledge about the possible course of the pandemic and for appropriate policy decisions. The paper presents results from an ethnographic study of a government-funded R &amp; D project dealing with agent-based modeling and simulation (ABMS) in the context of pandemic management. Based on the assumption that the use of computer simulations in pandemic management is not only a means to an end for political or epidemiological goals but also plays a significant role in determining which goals and strategies appear politically legitimate, the paper reconstructs how insights into the pandemic are generated in ABMS and specifically in the researched project and made accessible for decision-making.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  issn         = {{2567-8833}},
  journal      = {{TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis}},
  keywords     = {{General Medicine}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{30--35}},
  publisher    = {{Oekom Publishers GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Agentenbasierte Modellierung und Simulation im Pandemiemanagement}}},
  doi          = {{10.14512/tatup.32.1.30}},
  volume       = {{32}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{54795,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{Digital Culture & Society}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{161--179}},
  title        = {{{Conflicting Values in Epidemiological Modelling, Simulation and Dashboard-Design. A Contribution to the Analysis of the Epistemisation of Pandemic Politics}}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{50600,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>
In a case study approach, the paper traces how technological expectations have been influential in the creation of European institutions, R&amp;D programmes and regulatory instruments and how they have contributed to processes of European integration. The first case study shows how the promises of a coming ‘Atomic Age’ have been mobilized to support the foundation of the European Atomic Energy Community and, thus, contributed to European integration in the post-WW2 era. The second case study analyses how the security stream within the EU’s framework programmes for R&amp;D is shaped by the promise of ‘technosecurity’ and enacts the normative claim of the EU’s security integration in the post-Cold War era. The third case study analyses how the EU’s AI strategy and AI act articulates the vision of a ‘human-centric AI’ and how this vision is related to the EU’s current attempt to restore citizens’ trust in times of crisis.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  issn         = {{2243-4690}},
  journal      = {{Science & Technology Studies}},
  keywords     = {{History and Philosophy of Science}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{26--46}},
  publisher    = {{Science and Technology Studies}},
  title        = {{{Technological Expectations and the Making of Europe}}},
  doi          = {{10.23987/sts.110036}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{43350,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens and Kaufmann, Stefan }},
  booktitle    = {{Resilienz als Prozess}},
  editor       = {{Endreß,  M and Rampp, B}},
  pages        = {{289--310}},
  publisher    = {{Springer VS}},
  title        = {{{Resilienz durch Integration freiwilliger Helfer*innen in den Katastrophenschutz: organisationale und (forschungs-)politische Perspektiven}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{43278,
  author       = {{Hälterlein, Jens}},
  journal      = {{Big Data & Society}},
  number       = {{1}},
  title        = {{{Epistemologies of predictive policing: Mathematical social science, social physics and machine learning}}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}