@inbook{9672, author = {{Strauß, Sara}}, booktitle = {{Dementia and Subjectivity. Aesthetic, Literary and Philosophical Perspectives}}, editor = {{Ringkamp, Daniela and Strauß, Sara and Süwolto, Leonie}}, publisher = {{Lang}}, title = {{{Introduction}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9673, author = {{Strauß, Sara}}, booktitle = {{Presence of the Body: Awareness In and Beyond Experience}}, editor = {{Hofmann, Gert and Zorić , Snježana}}, pages = {{139--153}}, publisher = {{Rodopi}}, title = {{{Neuroethical Reflections on Body and Awareness in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go and Ian McEwan’s Saturday}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9692, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, journal = {{Journal of Contemporary Drama in English}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{156--172}}, title = {{{The Immobility of Power in British Political Theatre after 2000: Absurdist Dystopias}}}, volume = {{5}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9693, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, booktitle = {{Finance, Terror, and Science on Stage. Current Public Concerns in 21st-Century British Drama}}, editor = {{Frank, Kerstin and Lusin, Caroline}}, pages = {{19--39}}, publisher = {{Narr Francke Attempto}}, title = {{{Still/Again 'Political'? New Approaches to Questioning Power in Mike Bartlett's 13 (2011)}}}, volume = {{82}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{9696, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, booktitle = {{Anglistik. International Journal of English Studies}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{175--177}}, title = {{{Pope, G.: Reading London's Suburbs}}}, volume = {{28}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inproceedings{97, abstract = {{Bridging the gap between informal, imprecise, and vague user requirements descriptions and precise formalized specifications is the main task of requirements engineering. Techniques such as interviews or story telling are used when requirements engineers try to identify a user's needs. The requirements specification process is typically done in a dialogue between users, domain experts, and requirements engineers. In our research, we aim at automating the specification of requirements. The idea is to distinguish between untrained users and trained users, and to exploit domain knowledge learned from previous runs of our system. We let untrained users provide unstructured natural language descriptions, while we allow trained users to provide examples of behavioral descriptions. In both cases, our goal is to synthesize formal requirements models similar to statecharts. From requirements specification processes with trained users, behavioral ontologies are learned which are later used to support the requirements specification process for untrained users. Our research method is original in combining natural language processing and search-based techniques for the synthesis of requirements specifications. Our work is embedded in a larger project that aims at automating the whole software development and deployment process in envisioned future software service markets.}}, author = {{van Rooijen, Lorijn and Bäumer, Frederik Simon and Platenius, Marie Christin and Geierhos, Michaela and Hamann, Heiko and Engels, Gregor}}, booktitle = {{2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)}}, isbn = {{978-1-5386-3489-9}}, keywords = {{Software, Unified modeling language, Requirements engineering, Ontologies, Search problems, Natural languages}}, location = {{Lisbon, Portugal}}, pages = {{379--385}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{From User Demand to Software Service: Using Machine Learning to Automate the Requirements Specification Process}}}, doi = {{10.1109/REW.2017.26}}, year = {{2017}}, } @book{9712, editor = {{Strauß, Sara and Ringkamp, Daniela and Süwolto, Leonie}}, publisher = {{Lang}}, title = {{{Dementia and Subjectivity. Aesthetic, Literary and Philosophical Perspectives}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inproceedings{9717, author = {{Strauß, Sara}}, booktitle = {{Narrative and Mental Health}}, location = {{Paderborn}}, title = {{{Fragments of a Life Remembered: Fragmentation and Silences in Dementia Narratives}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{1098, abstract = {{An end user generally writes down software requirements in ambiguous expressions using natural language; hence, a software developer attuned to programming language finds it difficult to understand th meaning of the requirements. To solve this problem we define semantic categories for disambiguation and classify/annotate the requirement into the categories by using machine-learning models. We extensively use a language frame closely related to such categories for designing features to overcome the problem of insufficient training data compare to the large number of classes. Our proposed model obtained a micro-average F1-score of 0.75, outperforming the previous model, REaCT.}}, author = {{Kim, Yeong-Su and Lee, Seung-Woo and Dollmann, Markus and Geierhos, Michaela}}, issn = {{2205-8494}}, journal = {{International Journal of Software Engineering for Smart Device}}, keywords = {{Natural Language Processing, Semantic Annotation, Machine Learning}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{1--6}}, publisher = {{Global Vision School Publication}}, title = {{{Semantic Annotation of Software Requirements with Language Frame}}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{13875, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, journal = {{Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies}}, number = {{1-2}}, pages = {{95--120}}, title = {{{The Renewal of British Political Theater in the Twenty-First Century: Indirect Narrative Approaches to Ideology and Power}}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{9631, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Erzählen}}, editor = {{Martínez, Matías}}, pages = {{63--65}}, publisher = {{Metzler}}, title = {{{Hörfunk}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{9633, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Erzählen}}, editor = {{Martínez, Matías}}, pages = {{87--91}}, publisher = {{Metzler}}, title = {{{Musik}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9201, author = {{Hatavara, Mari and Hyvärinen, Matti and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, journal = {{Style}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{293--299}}, title = {{{Narrating Selves in Everyday Contexts: Art, the Literary and Life Experience}}}, volume = {{51}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9204, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, journal = {{Partial Answers}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{167--188}}, title = {{{Sounding Postmodernity: Radio Adaptation of Alasdair Gray’s "Lanark"}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9203, author = {{Hatavara, Mari and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, journal = {{Style}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{391--408}}, title = {{{Fictionality, Narrative Modes and Vicarious Storytelling}}}, volume = {{51}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9205, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}}, journal = {{Partial Answers}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{61--67}}, title = {{{Narrating Sounds: Introduction to the Forum}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9222, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Das Dialoggedicht: Studien zur englischen, deutschen und romanischen Lyrik / Dialogue Poems: Studies in English, German and Romance Language Poetry}}, editor = {{Bischoff, Christina Johanna and Kinzel, Till and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, pages = {{407--421}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag Winter}}, title = {{{Surprising Twists in Conversation: Christina Rossetti’s Dialogue Poems}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9221, author = {{Kinzel, Till and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Das Dialoggedicht: Studien zur englischen, deutschen und romanischen Lyrik / Dialogue Poems: Studies in English, German and Romance Language Poetry}}, editor = {{Bischoff, Christina Johanna and Kinzel, Till and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, pages = {{13--34}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag Winter}}, title = {{{Das Dialoggedicht – Prolegomena zur poetischen Dialogizität}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9220, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Jahrbuch Literatur und Medizin}}, editor = {{Steger, Florian}}, pages = {{67--88}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag Winter}}, title = {{{Lyrik in der medizinischen Ausbildung}}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9226, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Life and Narrative: The Risks and Responsibilities of Storying Experience}}, editor = {{Schiff, Brian and McKim, Elizabeth and Patron, Sylvie}}, pages = {{161--178}}, publisher = {{Oxford University Press}}, title = {{{Narrative Refashioning and Illness: Doctor-Patient Encounters in Siri Hustvedt’s "The Shaking Woman"}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9223, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Dementia and Subjectivity: Aesthetic, Literary and Philosophical Perspectives}}, editor = {{Ringkamp, Daniela and Süwolto, Leonie and Strauss, Sara}}, pages = {{159--176}}, publisher = {{Peter Lang}}, title = {{{Negotiating Vulnerable Subjects: Margaret Thatcher’s Dementia in Media and Film}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9225, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, booktitle = {{Dialogue across Media}}, editor = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Thomas, Bronwen}}, pages = {{117--136}}, publisher = {{John Benjamins}}, title = {{{Dialogic Interactions on Radio: Studs Terkel’s Literary Interviews}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{9224, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Thomas, Bronwen}}, booktitle = {{Dialogue across Media}}, editor = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Thomas, Bronwen}}, pages = {{1--15}}, publisher = {{John Benjamins}}, title = {{{Dialogue across Media: An Introduction}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @book{9189, editor = {{Bischoff, Christina Johanna and Kinzel, Till and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, isbn = {{978-3825368081}}, pages = {{523}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag Winter}}, title = {{{Das Dialoggedicht: Studien zur englischen, deutschen und romanischen Lyrik / Dialogue Poems: Studies in English, German and Romance Language Poetry}}}, volume = {{84}}, year = {{2017}}, } @book{9193, editor = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Thomas, Bronwen}}, isbn = {{9789027210456}}, pages = {{296}}, publisher = {{John Benjamins}}, title = {{{Dialogue Across Media}}}, volume = {{28}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{9190, booktitle = {{Style}}, editor = {{Hatavara, Mari and Hyvärinen, Matti and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, issn = {{0039-4238}}, number = {{3}}, publisher = {{Style 51(3)}}, title = {{{Narrating Selves in Everyday Contexts: Art, the Literary and Life Experience}}}, volume = {{51}}, year = {{2017}}, } @misc{9192, booktitle = {{Partial Answers}}, editor = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{61--188}}, publisher = {{Partial Answers 15(1)}}, title = {{{Narrating Sounds}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{9206, author = {{Hatavara, Mari and Mildorf, Jarmila}}, journal = {{Narrative}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{65--82}}, title = {{{Hybrid Fictionality and Vicarious Narrative Experience}}}, volume = {{25}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{35515, author = {{Ehland, Christoph}}, booktitle = {{Literature and Cultural Memory}}, editor = {{Irimia, Mihaela}}, pages = {{232--249}}, publisher = {{Brill}}, title = {{{The Scott Monument and Scottish Cultural Memory}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{46141, abstract = {{Abstract In this paper, the contractions shoulda, coulda, woulda are compared with their respective full forms should have, would have, and could have. Although the full forms are used much more frequently and are, therefore, considered canonical, the non-canonical forms have increased in frequency throughout the better part of the twentieth century. They are predominantly used in American English – in conversation as well as in fictional writing to imitate speech. With respect to their syntactic environment, shoulda, coulda, and woulda behave differently than their full counterparts since they are often used without subjects and without lexical verbs. Some of these uses can be explained by the fact that shoulda, coulda, and woulda are not always used as verbal items but also as nouns, adjectives, and interjections. Due to their overall low frequency and their restriction to a particular register, however, it appears they will keep their non-canonical status for the foreseeable future.}}, author = {{Freudinger, Markus}}, issn = {{2196-4726}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik}}, keywords = {{Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{319--337}}, publisher = {{Walter de Gruyter GmbH}}, title = {{{Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda – Non-Canonical Forms on the Move?}}}, doi = {{10.1515/zaa-2017-0031}}, volume = {{65}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inbook{46142, author = {{Freudinger, Markus}}, booktitle = {{Exploring the Periphery}}, editor = {{Quakernack, Stefanie and Meister, Till and Fulger, Diana and Devos, Nathan}}, pages = {{107--130}}, publisher = {{Aisthesis Verlag}}, title = {{{On the Kinda Peripheral Character of Gotta and what we Oughta Do about it}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inproceedings{1151, abstract = {{Welche Informationen über Unternehmenszusammenschlüsse werden in Zeitungsnachrichten vermittelt, und wie können diese Informationen automatisch extrahiert werden? Dies soll am Beispiel des Verhaltens von Aktionären während eines Zusammenschlusses ermittelt werden. Dazu werden die wichtigsten Aussagen über das Votum der Aktionäre im Hinblick auf eine automatische Erkennung sprachlich analysiert. Im Fokus stehen dabei die Berichte über Aktionärsabstimmungen hinsichtlich der Annahme bzw. Ablehnung eines Übernahmeangebots.}}, author = {{Stotz, Sophia and Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{DHd 2016: Modellierung - Vernetzung - Visualisierung. Die Digital Humanities als fächerübergreifendes Forschungsparadigma. Konferenzabstracts, Universität Leipzig, 7. bis 12. März 2016}}, isbn = {{978-3-941379-05-3}}, location = {{Leipzig, Germany}}, pages = {{378--381}}, publisher = {{Nisaba-Verlag}}, title = {{{Wie verhalten sich Aktionäre bei Unternehmenszusammenschlüssen? Modellierung sprachlicher Muster zur Analyse treibender Faktoren bei der Berichterstattung}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{1152, author = {{Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik}}, editor = {{Gronau, Norbert and Becker, Jörg and Sinz, Elmar and Suhl, Leena and Leimeister, Jan M.}}, keywords = {{Webmonitoring}}, publisher = {{GITO-Verlag}}, title = {{{Webmonitoring}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{1153, author = {{Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik}}, editor = {{Gronau, Norbert and Becker, Jörg and Sinz, Elmar and Suhl, Leena and Leimeister, Jan M.}}, keywords = {{Sentimentanalyse}}, publisher = {{GITO-Verlag}}, title = {{{Sentimentanalyse}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{1154, author = {{Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik}}, editor = {{Gronau, Norbert and Becker, Jörg and Sinz, Elmar and Suhl, Leena and Leimeister, Jan M.}}, keywords = {{Text Mining}}, publisher = {{GITO-Verlag}}, title = {{{Text Mining}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{1155, author = {{Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Enzyklopädie der Wirtschaftsinformatik}}, editor = {{Gronau, Norbert and Becker, Jörg and Sinz, Elmar and Suhl, Leena and Leimeister, Jan M.}}, keywords = {{Crawler}}, publisher = {{GITO-Verlag}}, title = {{{Crawler (fokussiert / nicht fokussiert)}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{176, abstract = {{Users prefer natural language software requirements because of their usability and accessibility. When they describe their wishes for software development, they often provide off-topic information. We therefore present an automated approach for identifying and semantically annotating the on-topic parts of the given descriptions. It is designed to support requirement engineers in the requirement elicitation process on detecting and analyzing requirements in user-generated content. Since no lexical resources with domain-specific information about requirements are available, we created a corpus of requirements written in controlled language by instructed users and uncontrolled language by uninstructed users. We annotated these requirements regarding predicate-argument structures, conditions, priorities, motivations and semantic roles and used this information to train classifiers for information extraction purposes. The approach achieves an accuracy of 92% for the on- and off-topic classification task and an F1-measure of 72% for the semantic annotation.}}, author = {{Dollmann, Markus and Geierhos, Michaela}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)}}, location = {{Austin, TX, USA}}, pages = {{1807--1816}}, publisher = {{Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)}}, title = {{{On- and Off-Topic Classification and Semantic Annotation of User-Generated Software Requirements}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{17726, author = {{Mindt, Ilka}}, journal = {{ICAME Journal 40}}, pages = {{9 -- 15}}, title = {{{40 issues of ICAME News/ICAME Journal}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{17727, author = {{Kytö, Merja and Stenström, Anna-Brita and Mindt, Ilka}}, journal = {{ICAME Journal 40}}, pages = {{5 -- 8}}, title = {{{An interview with Joybrato Mukherjee, the Chair oft he ICAME Board}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{17764, author = {{Mindt, Ilka}}, journal = {{Silesian Studies in English 2015}}, location = {{Opava}}, pages = {{38 -- 59}}, publisher = {{Silesian University in Opava}}, title = {{{The diachronic development of 'COME TO V'}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{191, abstract = {{One purpose of requirement refinement is that higher-level requirements have to be translated to something usable by developers. Since customer requirements are often written in natural language by end users, they lack precision, completeness and consistency. Although user stories are often used in the requirement elicitation process in order to describe the possibilities how to interact with the software, there is always something unspoken. Here, we present techniques how to automatically refine vague software descriptions. Thus, we can bridge the gap by first revising natural language utterances from higher-level to more detailed customer requirements, before functionality matters. We therefore focus on the resolution of semantically incomplete user-generated sentences (i.e. non-instantiated arguments of predicates) and provide ontology-based gap-filling suggestions how to complete unverbalized information in the user’s demand.}}, author = {{Geierhos, Michaela and Bäumer, Frederik Simon}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB)}}, editor = {{Métais, Elisabeth and Meziane, Farid and Saraee, Mohamad and Sugumaran, Vijayan and Vadera, Sunil }}, isbn = {{978-3-319-41753-0}}, keywords = {{Requirement refinement, Concept expansion, Ontology-based instantiation of predicate-argument structure}}, location = {{Salford, UK}}, pages = {{37--47}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{How to Complete Customer Requirements: Using Concept Expansion for Requirement Refinement}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_4}}, volume = {{9612}}, year = {{2016}}, } @book{21904, abstract = {{Reviews/Rezensionen: Lasagabaster (2017) in der Zeitschrift Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 5(1) :https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.5.1.06las] Burmeister (2019) in der Zeitschrift Fremdsprachen Lehren und Lernen, 48(1): http://www.periodicals.narr.de/index.php/flul/article/view/4836 Breeze (2018) in der Zeitschrift Estudios sobre Educación, 34(1): https://www.unav.edu/publicaciones/revistas/index.php/estudios-sobre-educacion/article/download/21762/17478}}, author = {{Rumlich, Dominik}}, publisher = {{Lang}}, title = {{{Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @proceedings{9688, editor = {{Tönnies, Merle and Ehland, Christoph and Mindt, Ilka}}, location = {{Paderborn}}, publisher = {{WVT}}, title = {{{Anglistentag 2015 Paderborn: Proceedings}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inbook{9689, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, booktitle = {{Religion und Kultur}}, editor = {{von Stosch, Klaus and Hofmann, Michael and Schmitz, Sabine}}, pages = {{81--96}}, publisher = {{transcript}}, title = {{{Religion im zeitgenössischen britischen Drama}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{9690, author = {{Tönnies, Merle}}, journal = {{Anglistik. International Journal of English Studies}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{113--124}}, title = {{{The Use of Comic Effects in Memoirs of British Asian Adolescence: Twenty-First Century Writers Looking Back at the 1970s and 1980s}}}, volume = {{27}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{9691, author = {{Tönnies, Merle and Brüning, Joana and Sand, Andrea}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{301--320}}, title = {{{The Duality of Page and Stage: Constructing Lyrical Voices in Contemporary British Poetry Written for Performance}}}, volume = {{64}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inbook{9697, author = {{Strauß, Sara}}, booktitle = {{Traces of Aging: Old Age and Memory in Contemporary Narrative}}, editor = {{Moreno, Marta Cerezo and Soler, Nieves Pascual}}, pages = {{133--147}}, publisher = {{transcript}}, title = {{{Memory, Dementia and Narrative Identity in Alice Munro’s ‘The Bear Came Over the Mountain’}}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{9729, author = {{Flotmann-Scholz, Christina}}, booktitle = {{Journal for the Study of British Cultures}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{75--78}}, title = {{{The Making of English Popular Culture. ed. by John Storey}}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{9730, author = {{Flotmann-Scholz, Christina}}, booktitle = {{Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{189--90}}, title = {{{Die literarische Kommunikationsspirale: Strukturelle Wechselwirkungen zwischen literarischem Text und Rezeption in der angelsächsischen Kinder- und Jugendliteratur des späten 20./ frühen 21. Jahrhunderts. by Uta Woiwod}}}, volume = {{27}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{9731, author = {{Flotmann-Scholz, Christina}}, booktitle = {{Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch}}, pages = {{259--262}}, title = {{{Oedipal Murders and Nostalgic Ressurections: The Victorians in Historical Middlebrow Fiction, 1914-1959. by Caterina Maria Grasl}}}, volume = {{57}}, year = {{2016}}, }