@misc{9731,
  author       = {{Flotmann-Scholz, Christina}},
  booktitle    = {{Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch}},
  pages        = {{259--262}},
  title        = {{{Oedipal Murders and Nostalgic Ressurections: The Victorians in Historical Middlebrow Fiction, 1914-1959. by Caterina Maria Grasl}}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{158,
  abstract     = {{While requirements focus on how the user interacts with the system, user stories concentrate on the purpose of software features. But in practice, functional requirements are also described in user stories. For this reason, requirements clarification is needed, especially when they are written in natural language and do not stick to any templates (e.g., "as an X, I want Y so that Z ..."). However, there is a lot of implicit knowledge that is not expressed in words. As a result, natural language requirements descriptions may suffer from incompleteness. Existing approaches try to formalize natural language or focus only on entirely missing and not on deficient requirements. In this paper, we therefore present an approach to detect knowledge gaps in user-generated software requirements for interactive requirement clarification: We provide tailored suggestions to the users in order to get more precise descriptions. For this purpose, we identify not fully instantiated predicate argument structures in requirements written in natural language and use context information to realize what was meant by the user.}},
  author       = {{Bäumer, Frederik Simon and Geierhos, Michaela}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information and Software Technologies (ICIST)}},
  editor       = {{Dregvaite, Giedre  and Damasevicius, Robertas }},
  isbn         = {{978-3-319-46253-0}},
  keywords     = {{Natural language requirements clarification, Syntactically incomplete requirements, Compensatory user stories}},
  location     = {{Druskininkai, Lithuania}},
  pages        = {{549--558}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Running out of Words: How Similar User Stories Can Help to Elaborate Individual Natural Language Requirement Descriptions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_44}},
  volume       = {{639}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{9227,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  booktitle    = {{Pragmatic Perspectives on Postcolonial Discourse: Linguistics and Literature}},
  editor       = {{Schubert, Christoph and Volkmann, Laurenz}},
  pages        = {{99--113}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge Scholars}},
  title        = {{{Pragmatic Implications of ‘You’-Narration for Postcolonial Fiction: Mohsin Hamid’s "How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia"}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{9207,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}},
  journal      = {{CounterText}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{307--321}},
  title        = {{{Multisensory Imaginings: An Audionarratological Analysis of Philip Roth’s Novel Indignation and its German Radio Play Adaptation Empörung}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{9230,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  booktitle    = {{Narrative Theory, Literature, and New Media: Narrative Minds and Virtual Worlds}},
  editor       = {{Hatavara, Mari and Hyvärinen, Matti and Mäkälä, Maria and Mäyrä, Frans}},
  pages        = {{256--277}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Performing Selves and Audience Design: Interview Narratives on the Internet}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{9229,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}},
  booktitle    = {{Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative}},
  editor       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}},
  pages        = {{1--26}},
  publisher    = {{de Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Audionarratology: Prolegomena to a Research Paradigm Exploring Sound and Narrative.” }}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{9228,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  booktitle    = {{Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative}},
  editor       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila and Kinzel, Till}},
  pages        = {{239--256}},
  publisher    = {{de Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Pictures into Sound: Aural World-Making in Art Gallery Audio Guides}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@book{9194,
  editor       = {{Kinzel, Till and Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  isbn         = {{9783110464320}},
  pages        = {{268}},
  publisher    = {{de Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative}}},
  volume       = {{52}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{9209,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Literary Linguistics}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{1--25}},
  title        = {{{Constructing Dialogues, (Re)constructing the Past: ‘Remembered’ Conversations in Frank McCourt’s "Angela’s Ashes"}}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{9208,
  author       = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}},
  journal      = {{Language and Literature}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{145--158}},
  title        = {{{Reconsidering Second-Person Narration and Involvement}}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@book{35501,
  editor       = {{Ehland, Christoph and Wächter, Cornelia}},
  isbn         = {{9789004313361}},
  pages        = {{273}},
  publisher    = {{Brill}},
  title        = {{{Middlebrow and Gender: 1890-1945}}},
  volume       = {{Volume 62}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@misc{9730,
  author       = {{Flotmann-Scholz, Christina}},
  booktitle    = {{Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{189--190}},
  title        = {{{Die literarische Kommunikationsspirale: Strukturelle Wechselwirkungen zwischen literarischem Text und Rezeption in der angelsächsischen Kinder- und Jugendliteratur des späten 20./ frühen 21. Jahrhunderts. by Uta Woiwod}}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{58784,
  author       = {{Wirth, Robert}},
  booktitle    = {{Le Crime, le Chatiment et les Ecossais/ Crime, Punishent and the Scots}},
  title        = {{{His Bloody Deceptive Project: the Unjustified Confessions of Roderick Macrae}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{58785,
  author       = {{Wirth, Robert}},
  booktitle    = {{Waiting as Cultural Practice: International and Interdisciplinary Conference}},
  title        = {{{The Long Wait for the Nation-State: Past and Future Scotlands}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{58778,
  author       = {{Wirth, Robert}},
  booktitle    = {{L'engagement en Ecosse autour de l'enjeu de l'indépendance}},
  editor       = {{Camp-Pietrain, Edwige and Leydier, Gilles }},
  pages        = {{103--127}},
  title        = {{{Committed Tuppence-worth: When Celebrities Dabble in Scottish Politics}}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@misc{58779,
  booktitle    = {{Journal of Scottish Thought: If Scotland ...Conjecturing 2014}},
  editor       = {{Hames, Scott and Hunter, Adrian}},
  issn         = {{1755 9928}},
  pages        = {{88--101}},
  publisher    = {{Research Institute of Irish and Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen}},
  title        = {{{Present and Absent Nostalgia in the 2014 Referendum}}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inbook{293,
  abstract     = {{Opinion mining from physician rating websites depends on the quality of the extracted information. Sometimes reviews are user-error prone and the assigned stars or grades contradict the associated content. We therefore aim at detecting random individual error within reviews. Such errors comprise the disagreement in polarity of review texts and the respective ratings. The challenges that thereby arise are (1) the content and sentiment analysis of the review texts and (2) the removal of the random individual errors contained therein. To solve these tasks, we assign polarities to automatically recognized opinion phrases in reviews and then check for divergence in rating and text polarity. The novelty of our approach is that we improve user-generated data quality by excluding error-prone reviews on German physician websites from average ratings.}},
  author       = {{Geierhos, Michaela and Bäumer, Frederik Simon and Schulze, Sabine and Stuß, Valentina}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE 2015)}},
  editor       = {{Ali, Moonis  and Kwon, Young Sig and Lee, Chang-Hwan and Kim, Juntae  and Kim, Yongdai }},
  isbn         = {{978-3-319-19065-5}},
  location     = {{Seoul, South Korea}},
  pages        = {{305--315}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Filtering Reviews by Random Individual Error}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-19066-2_30}},
  volume       = {{9101}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@inproceedings{1141,
  author       = {{Stuß, Valentina and Geierhos, Michaela}},
  booktitle    = {{DHd 2015: Book of Abstracts}},
  location     = {{Graz, Austria}},
  pages        = {{239--243}},
  publisher    = {{ZIM-ACDH}},
  title        = {{{Identifikation kognitiver Effekte in Online-Bewertungen}}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@inproceedings{1142,
  author       = {{Geierhos, Michaela and Bäumer, Frederik Simon}},
  booktitle    = {{DHd 2015: Book of Abstracts}},
  location     = {{Graz, Austria}},
  pages        = {{69--72}},
  publisher    = {{ZIM-ACDH}},
  title        = {{{Erfahrungsberichte aus zweiter Hand: Erkenntnisse über die Autorschaft von Arztbewertungen in Online-Portalen}}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

@article{1143,
  abstract     = {{Der Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Patienten findet heutzutage zunehmend im Internet statt. Bewertungsportale wie jameda, DocInsider oder imedo.de bieten Patienten und deren Angehörigen die Möglichkeit, anonym Beschwerden zu äußern oder Weiterempfehlungen auszusprechen. Gleichzeitig ermöglichen diese hunderttausend Individualerfahrungen die Erhebung der Patientenzufriedenheit sowie die Überprüfung bestehender Gerüchte, wie z. B. dass Privatpatienten schneller einen Arzttermin bekommen und weniger Zeit im Wartezimmer verbringen. Die Analyse anonymer Online-Arztbewertungen kann nur dann erfolgreich sein, wenn bei der Interpretation der Patientenerfahrungsberichte berücksichtigt wird, dass behandlungsqualitätsunabhängige Faktoren Auswirkungen auf die subjektive Bewertung und das Beschwerdeverhalten haben. Ein neuer Ansatz ist daher, bedeutende Indikatoren für die Patientenzufriedenheit im Web 2.0 zur Generierung eines detaillierten Erfahrungs- und Patientenstimmungsbildes unter Berücksichtigung demographischer und regionaler Einflüsse zu ermitteln.}},
  author       = {{Geierhos, Michaela and Schulze, Sabine}},
  journal      = {{ForschungsForum Paderborn}},
  pages        = {{14--19}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderbon}},
  title        = {{{Der zufriedene Patient 2.0: Analyse anonymer Arztbewertungen zur Generierung eines Patientenstimmungsbildes}}},
  volume       = {{18}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}

