@inproceedings{51091,
  author       = {{Drossel, Kerstin and Friesen, S. and Phillips, M. and Forkosh, A. and Christensen, R. and Trevisan, O. and Shaffer, D.W. and Horikoshi, I.}},
  booktitle    = {{Moving forward to new educational realities in the digital era. Report of EDUsummIT 2023 }},
  editor       = {{Phillips, M. and Fisser, P.}},
  location     = {{Kyoto, Japan}},
  pages        = {{59--70}},
  title        = {{{Thematic Working Group 8 - Pedagogical Reasoning and Reflective Practice: Teacher's Professional Learning and Development (TLPD) in New Digital Realities}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{66479,
  abstract     = {{Sense of belonging at school (SoBaS) is a basic requirement for every student and
a major inclusivity goal for educational institutions. In the present study, we re-
port on a self-evaluation of the Laborschule Bielefeld (LS; Germany) covering
­ SoBaS. LS is an inclusive experimental comprehensive school with more than for-
ty years of experience concerning a non-segregative and diversity-friendly school
culture. Based on propensity score matching, the study investigated whether the
SoBaS scores of the students at this inclusive experimental school (N= 115) differ
from the students visiting inclusive classes in regular state-run comprehensive
schools (N= 2376). Furthermore, we examined the factors in the students’ educa-
tional environment at LS that may potentially influence their SoBaS. The results
indicate that the students attending the LS experienced a higher SoBaS. In additi-
on, certain aspects of LS's teaching and interaction culture were identified as aus-
picious factors for accomplishing high levels of students’ SoBaS.}},
  author       = {{Marker, Rabea and Kullmann, Harry and Zentarra, Dominik and Geist, Sabine and Lütje-Klose, Birgit}},
  issn         = {{1866-6671}},
  journal      = {{Journal for Educational Research Online}},
  keywords     = {{sense of belonging, inclusive education, secondary school, social-emotional needs}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{250--273}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Sense of Belonging at School as a quality measure of inclusion – Comparing the inclusive experimental school Laborschule Bielefeld with regular inclusive comprehensive schools and investigating the determining factors}}},
  doi          = {{10.31244/jero.2023.02.06}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{31023,
  abstract     = {{Research in inclusive education reveals multiple studies that explore the efforts of individual stakeholders to create an equitable educational experience for students with disabilities. However, these individual efforts are often examined discretely, compartmentalising the contributions of various stakeholders. As a consequence, the complex interplay between these contributions has not been fully
explored, with the capacity for a rich network of support being assumed rather than explicitly constructed. This report draws on the personal reflections of nine academics in the field of inclusive
education from Australia, Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland. Serving as both contributors and participants, this study draws together their personal interpretations and their exper-
tise regarding the value of collective and collaborative inclusive education. Inductive thematic analysis of participant reflections yielded the view that stakeholders working together within an educational setting, offers more effective and appropriate opportunities to support learners with additional needs.}},
  author       = {{Subban, Pearl  and Bradford, Brent and Sharma, Umesh and Loreman, Tim and Avramidis, Elias and Kullmann, Harry and Sahli Lozano, Caroline and Romano, Alessandra and Woodcock, Stuart}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Special Needs Education}},
  keywords     = {{Inclusive education, inclusive schools, school leadership, school community, village mindset}},
  pages        = {{291–302}},
  title        = {{{Does it really take a village to raise a child? Reflections on the need for collective responsibility in inclusive education}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/08856257.2022.2059632}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{26657,
  author       = {{Albers, Timm and Filipiak, Agnes and Franzen, Katja and Hellmich, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{ Grenzen.Gänge.Zwischen.Welten. Kontroversen – Entwicklungen  – Perspektiven der Inklusionsforschung}},
  editor       = {{Schimek, B and Kremsner, G and Proyer, M and Grubich, R and Paudel, F and Grubich-Müller, R}},
  pages        = {{207--214}},
  publisher    = {{Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{Kompetenzentwicklung im inklusiven Unterricht (KinU) – eine internationale Perspektive}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{34467,
  author       = {{Lütje-Klose , Birgit and Grüter, Sandra and Neumann, Phillip and Weber, Antonia and Goldan, Janka and Gorges, Julia and Wild, Elke}},
  booktitle    = {{Qualifizierung für Inklusion. Sekundarstufe }},
  editor       = {{Lutz, Deborah and Becker, Jonas and Buchhaupt, Felix and Katzenbach, Dieter and Strecker, Alicia and Urban, Michael}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-8309-4514-7}},
  pages        = {{163--178}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Weil wir tatsächlich nicht voneinander wussten, was jeder Einzelne so an verborgenen Schätzen bringt}}},
  doi          = {{10.31244/9783830995142}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{35874,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Inklusion ist als Thema aus dem deutschen Bildungssystem nicht mehr wegzudenken und trotzdem stellt sie weiterhin eine Herausforderung auf unterschiedlichen Ebenen dar. Die Qualifizierung der pädagogischen Fachkräfte ist dabei neben der Bereitstellung adäquater Rahmenbedingungen als ein besonders wichtiges Handlungsfeld zu betrachten. Die Bände der Reihe „Qualifizierung für Inklusion“ greifen den bestehenden Forschungs- und Entwicklungsbedarf auf und geben einen Überblick über die Ergebnisse der vom BMBF im Rahmen des Programms „Qualifzierung der pädagogischen Fachkräfte für inklusive Bildung“ geförderten Forschungsprojekte. Adressiert werden damit sowohl Wissenschaftler:innen als auch mit dem Themenfeld Inklusion befasste Personen und Institutionen der Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung, der Bildungsadministration und der Bildungspolitik. Der zweite Band der Reihe versammelt die Vorstellung von Projekten, Ergebnissen und Materialien, die sich dem Bildungsbereich der Grundschule zuordnen lassen. Die Reihe besteht aus drei weiteren Bänden, in denen die Ergebnisse zur Qualifizierung für Inklusion im Elementarbereich (Band 1), in der Sekundarstufe (Band 3) sowie in der Berufsschule, Hochschule und Erwachsenenbildung (Band 4) vorgestellt werden.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Franzen, Katja and Albers, Timm and Hellmich, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{Qualifizierung für Inklusion. Grundschule}},
  editor       = {{Buchhaupt, Felix and Becker, Jonas and Katzenbach, Dieter and Lutz, Deborah and Strecker, Alica and Urban, Michael}},
  isbn         = {{9783830945130}},
  pages        = {{163--176}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Qualifizierung von Studierenden des Grund- und Förderschullehramts für Inklusion in Schule und Unterricht}}},
  doi          = {{10.31244/9783830995135}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{35867,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Following the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities, questions concerning the joint education of students with and without special educational needs remain to be answered. Currently, there is a need for knowledge about the necessary conditions for a successful implementation of inclusive education. Thus, the aim of the present study is to identify conditions for the implementation of inclusion that are seen as necessary by primary school principals. Therefore, 32 primary school principals were interviewed. The results of the interview study reveal that factors like personnel, financial and material resources as well as building infrastructure in primary schools are seen as important requirements for the successful realisation of inclusive education. Apart from that, the importance of attitudes towards inclusion and sociopolitical conditions for the realisation of inclusion became apparent. Further conditions, which are mentioned from the interviewed principals’ point of view, are related to teacher training, appropriate class sizes and, for example, opportunities for exchanging information. The results of the study indicate that there are essential obstacles as perceived by primary school principals that can impede the implementation of inclusion in primary schools.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Görel, Gamze and Hellmich, Frank}},
  issn         = {{2515-0731}},
  journal      = {{Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education}},
  keywords     = {{General Engineering}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{127--137}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge University Press (CUP)}},
  title        = {{{Primary School Principals’ Views on the Required Conditions for a Successful Implementation of Inclusive Education}}},
  doi          = {{10.1017/jsi.2022.9}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{35787,
  author       = {{Franzen, Katja and Moschner, Barbara and Hellmich, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{Sonderpädagogik – zwischen Dekategorisierung und Rekategorisierung }},
  editor       = {{Müller, Thomas and Ratz, Christoph and Stein, Roland and Lüke, Carina}},
  pages        = {{334–340}},
  publisher    = {{Bad Heilbrunn}},
  title        = {{{Qualität der Erfahrungen aus dem inklusiven Unterricht und Selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen von Grundschullehrkräften}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{35832,
  author       = {{Löper, Marwin Felix and Hellmich, Frank}},
  booktitle    = {{Sonderpädagogik – zwischen Dekategorisierung und Rekategorisierung}},
  editor       = {{Müller, Thomas and Ratz, Christoph and Stein, Roland and Lüke, Carina}},
  pages        = {{372–378}},
  publisher    = {{Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{Adaptiver Unterricht in der (inklusiven) Grundschule aus der Perspektive von Lehrkräften}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@book{35883,
  author       = {{Aroni, Katerina and Toulia, Anastasia and Alves, Sílvia Regina Gonçalves  and Hassani, Sepideh and Heidrich, Franziska Anna and Franzen, Katja and Görel, Gamze and Löper, Marwin Felix and Aguiar, Teresa and Silveira-Maia, Mónica and Sanches-Ferreira, Maria Manuela Pires Sanches and Hellmich, Frank and Schwab, Susanne and Avramidis, Ilias}},
  publisher    = {{Porto Polytechnic}},
  title        = {{{FRIEND-SHIP Intervention Program – The Handbook}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34468,
  abstract     = {{Multiprofessionelle Kooperation zwischen allgemeinen und sonderpädagogischen Lehrkräften und mit weiteren Fachkräften, u.a. der Schulsozialarbeit, der Schulpsychologie und mit Schulbegleitungen, gilt bei der Entwicklung inklusiver Schulen als zentrale Stellschraube. Dementsprechend wird Kooperation im Kontext Schule auch in der universitären Ausbildung von zukünftig miteinander kooperierenden Professionen sowie in Fortbildungen für Lehrkräfte und multiprofessionelle Teams verstärkt ins Blickfeld gerückt. Zugleich lässt sich beobachten, dass in inklusiven Schulen bislang vermeintlich klare Zuständigkeiten, insbesondere zwischen Sonder- und Sozialpädagog*innen, aufweichen und neu austariert werden müssen. Bei der Entwicklung multiprofessioneller Teams gilt die Klärung von Rollen und Aufgaben als eine besondere Herausforderung, wenn unterschiedliche Professionen mit unterschiedlichen institutionellen Anbindungen und pädagogischen Zielperspektiven oder Grundhaltungen mitei-nander kooperieren. Das vorgestellte Instrument – der Rollenhut – dient dazu, in multiprofessionellen Gruppen eine individuelle Reflexion über die eigenen Aufgaben anzustoßen und auf dieser Grundlage gemeinsam über die gegenseitigen Erwartungen und Rollen zu diskutieren. Das Instrument wurde im Kontext von Fortbildungen multiprofessioneller Teams an Schulen konzipiert und auch im Rahmen der universitären Lehrer*innenbildung erprobt.}},
  author       = {{Neumann, Phillip and Hopmann, Benedikt and Lütje-Klose, Birgit}},
  issn         = {{2625-0675}},
  journal      = {{Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung - Zeitschrift zur Konzeption, Gestaltung und Diskussion}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{13--25}},
  title        = {{{Der Rollenhut als Vermittlungsmedium - Rollenklärungsprozesse im Kontext multiprofessioneller Kooperationen als Thema universitärer Aus- und Fortbildungen von Lehrkräften und Sozialpädagog*innen}}},
  doi          = {{10.11576/HLZ-4949}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{34461,
  abstract     = {{Teaching is a highly demanding profession that requires handling multiple and potentially contradictory goals. Therefore, it is likely that teachers experience conflict between work-related goals on a daily basis. Intraindividual goal conflict may occur when individuals pursue multiple goals drawing on the same limited resources (resource-based goal conflict), or when two or more goals are incompatible in terms of goal attainment strategy or desired end states (inherent goal conflict). Because goal conflict is typically associated with negative effects such as attenuated motivation and wellbeing, teacher goal conflict may jeopardize teaching motivation. This cross-sectional study investigated the effects of in-service teachers’ (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 302) goal conflicts on their autonomous (intrinsic and identified regulation) and controlled (introjected and extrinsic regulation) teaching motivation and tested the satisfaction of teachers’ basic need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness as mediators. In line with our hypotheses, results from structural equation modeling showed that frequently experiencing resource-based goal conflict leads to a lower satisfaction of the basic need for autonomy, which, however, was unrelated to teaching motivation. In contrast, frequently experiencing inherent goal conflict attenuates the satisfaction of the basic need for competence, which, in turn, positively predicted autonomous teaching motivation and negatively predicted extrinsic regulation. As expected, relatedness was not associated with the experience of goal conflict. The discussion focuses on differential effects of the two types of goal conflict on teaching motivation and on the relevance to expand research on teachers’ intraindividual goal conflicts.}},
  author       = {{Gorges, Julia and Neumann, Phillip and Störtländer, Jan Christoph}},
  issn         = {{1664-1078}},
  journal      = {{Frontiers in Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{General Psychology}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media SA}},
  title        = {{{Teachers Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Goal Conflicts Affect Teaching Motivation Mediated by Basic Need Satisfaction}}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876521}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{36133,
  abstract     = {{Considering students’ voices and perspectives is indispensable in educational contexts. Therefore, instruments of measurement that are reliable and valid and can be used easily without complications are needed in schools. The Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ) is a short instrument used to assess three central dimensions of inclusion, namely emotional and social inclusion and academic self-concept. Previous evaluations indicate in general high psychometric properties. This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the three scales of the PIQ’s student version using different approaches in two samples from primary (grade 4, N = 721) and secondary (grade 7, N = 393) schools. The results of confirmatory factorial analyses confirmed the PIQ’s three factors in both samples which are also measurement equivalent across grades. Plausible correlations with additional divergent and convergent scales reveal that the PIQ measures the theoretically assumed constructs—emotional and social inclusion as well as academic self-concept—validly. }},
  author       = {{Knickenberg, Margarita and Zurbriggen, Carmen L. A. and Schwab, Susanne}},
  issn         = {{2158-2440}},
  journal      = {{SAGE Open}},
  keywords     = {{General Social Sciences, General Arts and Humanities}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Validation of the student version of the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire in primary and secondary education settings}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/21582440221079896}},
  volume       = {{12}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{43418,
  author       = {{Engemann, Mario}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift PädagogikUNTERRICHT}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{55--56}},
  title        = {{{Ein kommentierter Tagungsbericht zur 4. Werkstatt Unterrichtsfach Pädagogik Ostwestfalen-Lippe (WUPO)}}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{46290,
  author       = {{Caruso, Carina and Drossel, Kerstin and Heldt, M}},
  journal      = {{Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{347--361}},
  title        = {{{Zum Ausmaß und Zusammenhang der unterrichtsbezogenen Nutzung digitaler Medien mit der Medienkompetenz von Lehrkräften unter Berücksichtigung von Hintergrundmerkmalen}}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{34755,
  author       = {{Eremin, Oxana and Krämer, Anike and Mattei, Annalisa}},
  booktitle    = {{ Wissenstransfer als Aufgabe, Herausforderung und Chance kulturwissenschaftlicher Forschung. }},
  editor       = {{Harmening, Anda-Lisa and Leinfellner, Stefanie and Meier, Rebecca}},
  isbn         = {{ 978-3-534-27585-4}},
  pages        = {{323--352}},
  publisher    = {{wbg}},
  title        = {{{(K)Eine Frage des Wissens: Zum Verhältnis von Gender Studies & Wissenstransfer}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{38527,
  author       = {{Büker, Petra and Glawe, Katrin and Herding, Jana and Menke, Insa}},
  booktitle    = {{Reflexion und Reflexivität im Kontext Grundschule. Perspektiven für Forschung, Lehrer:innenbildung und Praxis}},
  editor       = {{Gläser, Eva and Poschmann, Julia and Büker, Petra and Miller, Susanne}},
  pages        = {{52--57}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Julius Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{inklud-e: Sensibilität für Inklusion durch Fallarbeit entwickeln – Professionalisierung angehender Grundschullehrkräfte in digitalen Lehr-/Lernformaten}}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@article{40482,
  author       = {{Büker, Petra and Kamin, Anna-Maria and Glawe, Katrin and Herding, Jana and Menke, Insa and Schaper, Franziska}},
  journal      = {{HLZ- Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{337--355}},
  title        = {{{Inklusions- und digitalisierungsbezogene Kompetenzanforderungen in der Lehrkräftebildung verzahnen: Theoretische und konzeptionelle Grundlagen der Lehr-/Lernumgebung inklud.nrw}}},
  doi          = {{10.11576/hlz-5960}},
  volume       = {{5}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{37745,
  author       = {{Büker, Petra and Glawe, Katrin and Herding, Jana}},
  booktitle    = {{Professionalisierung von Grundschullehrkräften}},
  editor       = {{Mammes, Ingelore and Rotter, Carolin}},
  pages        = {{276--292}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Julius Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{Professionalisierung angehender Grundschullehrkräfte für Inklusion. Aktuelle Herausforde-rungen für die universitäre Lehrer*innenbildung}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{40506,
  abstract     = {{September 2022
Ausgezeichnet mit dem Waxmann-Posterpreis}},
  author       = {{Büker, Petra and Kamin, Anna-Maria and Becker, Veronika and Glawe, Katrin and Herding, Jana and Schaper, Franziska and Stets, Mona}},
  title        = {{{inklud.nrw – fallbasiertes Lehren und Lernen mit OER zum vernetzen Aufbau von Inklusionssensibilität und digitalisierungsbezogenen Kompetenzen in der Lehrer:innenbildung. Posterbeitrag an der 30. Jahrestagung der DGfE-Kommission Grundschulforschung und Pädagogik der Primarstufe an der Universität Regensburg}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

