@inbook{41365, author = {{Schaper, Niclas and Seifert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{Kompetenzorientierung in Schule und Lehrerbildung.}}, editor = {{Eilerts, Katja and Hilligus, Annegret Helen and Kaiser, Gabriele and Bender, Peter}}, publisher = {{LIT}}, title = {{{Überprüfung eines Kompetenzmodells und Messinstruments zur Strukturierung allgemeiner pädagogischer Kompetenz in der universitären Lehrerbildung.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{41457, author = {{Schreiber, Melanie and Darge, Kerstin and König, Johannes and Seifert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{AEPF-Tagung „Baustelle Lehrerbildung”}}, location = {{Klagenfurt}}, title = {{{Lernvoraussetzungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Merkmale der Lehrerausbildung aus der Sicht von Studierenden.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{41462, author = {{Watson, Christina and Seifert, Andreas and Schaper, Niclas and Siemen, Tobias}}, booktitle = {{AEPF-Tagung „Baustelle Lehrerbildung”}}, location = {{Klagenfurt}}, title = {{{Erfassung der Qualität des Unterrichtshandelns angehender Lehrkräfte – Entwicklung eines videogestützten Beobachtungsinstruments.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{41460, author = {{Seifert, Andreas and Watson, Christina and König, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{AEPF-Tagung „Baustelle Lehrerbildung”}}, location = {{Klagenfurt}}, title = {{{LEK – Längsschnittliche Erhebung pädagogischer Kompetenz von Lehramtsstudie-renden: Anlage der Studie und institutioneller Kontext.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{41459, author = {{Seifert, Andreas and Schaper, Niclas and Hilligus, Annegret Helen and Riese, Josef}}, booktitle = {{AEPF/KBBB-Tagung „Nationale und regionale empirische Bildungsforschung”}}, location = {{Bamberg}}, title = {{{SPEE: Eine (Zwischen-)Bilanz aus Sicht der Forschung.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{41458, author = {{Seifert, Andreas and Schaper, Niclas}}, booktitle = {{AEPF-Tagung “Baustelle Lehrerbildung”}}, location = {{Klagenfurt}}, title = {{{LEK – Längsschnittliche Erhebung pädagogischer Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden: Zur Entwicklung von bildungswissenschaftlichem Wissen.}}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inbook{58877, author = {{Milkov, Nikolay}}, booktitle = {{Sex, Love, and Friendship}}, editor = {{ Leigh McEvoy, Adrianne}}, isbn = {{978-90-420-3368-9}}, pages = {{155–165}}, publisher = {{Brill}}, title = {{{Sexual Experience}}}, doi = {{10.1163/9789401200684_019}}, volume = {{232}}, year = {{2011}}, } @inproceedings{17903, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{International Grassmann Conference. Hermann Grassmann Bicentennial: Potsdam and Szczecin, 16–19 September 2009. Video Recording of the Conference}}, editor = {{Petsche, Hans-Joachim and Lenke, Peter}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag}}, title = {{{Robert und Hermann Grassmann’s Influence on the History of Formal Logic (Videomitschnitt des Vortrags)}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{32168, abstract = {{Based on a cultural-historical and dialogical conceptualization of thinking and speech as formulated in Soviet psychology and linguistics of the 1920s and 1930s, this article seeks to reflect upon a congruent way of investigating writing as a cognitive and communicative activity. What has to be taken into account when developing a methodology for writing research from a cultural-historical and dialogical perspective? Firstly, writing is not separated from other forms of speech activity like interpersonal and intrapersonal speech. Thus, inner dialogue and the addressed character of writing become crucial notions to be methodologically considered. Secondly, contrary to current writing research traditions such as literacy studies and studies of the writing process in cognitive psychology, both individual writing processes and socio-cultural writing practices as well as their relationship must be considered. These reflections lead towards the conclusion that writing is not fully accessible to external observation or to introspection. In consequence, a suggestion of a methodological approach is given, inspired by the activity theoretically informed method of auto-confrontation. The proposed method consists of two phases: a) videotaping of a writing episode and b) co-analysis of the videotaped writing episode in dialogue between writer and researcher. The second phase transfers the writing activity into a new context where understanding it becomes possible. The co-analysis makes involved positions audible: positions of the writer and of the researcher, of real and imagined readers as well as intersubjective and community-related positions. Finally, implications of the proposed research setting are discussed and evaluated with regard to the theoretical grounding. An instance of the methodology to be sketched in this article was developed in the context of the author’s dissertation project in preparation at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, Germany with the working title «Writing processes and writing practices. A conceptualization from a dialogical perspective». The project is funded by scholarships of Universität Bayern e.V. and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.}}, author = {{Karsten, Andrea}}, journal = {{Cultural-Historical Psychology}}, keywords = {{writing, writing research, dialogue, dialogical perspective, auto-confrontation}}, pages = {{91 -- 98}}, title = {{{Towards Cultural-Historical and Dialogical Writing Research – Some Methodological Considerations}}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{32169, abstract = {{Ziel dieses Beitrags ist, Vygotskijs Konzeption von Schreiben durch eine genaue Lektüre seiner Texte herauszuarbeiten. Es zeigen sich mit einer entwicklungspsychologischen Herangehensweise zum einen und dem Begriff des schriftlichen Sprechens im Kontext von innerem und äußerem Sprechen zum anderen zwei wesentliche Interessens- und Arbeitsgebiete Vygotskijs im Hinblick auf Schreiben. Dem folgend arbeitet dieser Beitrag zunächst die Überlegungen Vygotskijs zu ontogenetischen Aspekten des Schreibens heraus. Darüber hinaus wird dargestellt, in welcher Beziehung bei Vygotskij „schriftliches Sprechen“ zu den Konzepten des inneren und des äußeren Sprechens steht. Es ergibt sich ein Bild von Schreiben als gleichermaßen kognitivem wie kommunikativem Vorgang. Auf diesen Gedanken Vygotskijs bauen abschließend Überlegungen auf, die Wege für mögliche Weiterentwicklungen von Vygotskijs Konzeption von Schreiben weisen.}}, author = {{Karsten, Andrea}}, journal = {{Tätigkeitstheorie – Journal für tätigkeitstheoretische Forschung in Deutschland (Activity Theory – Journal of Activity-Theoretical Research in Germany) }}, pages = {{21 -- 50}}, title = {{{Konzeption von Schreiben}}}, volume = {{1}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{15531, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, journal = {{HNI Jahresbericht}}, pages = {{89}}, title = {{{Die Berechenbarkeit von Denken und Handeln}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{6067, abstract = {{Implicit change detection demonstrates how the visual system can benefit from stored information that is not immediately available to conscious awareness. We investigated the role of motor action in this context. In the first two experiments, using a one-shot implicit change detection paradigm, participants responded to unperceived changes either with an action (jabbing the screen at the guessed location of a change) or with words (verbal report), and sat either 60 cm or 300 cm (with a laser pointer) away from the display. Our observers guessed the locations of changes at a reachable distance better with an action than with a verbal judgment. At 300 cm, beyond reach, the motor advantage disappeared. In experiment 3, this advantage was also unavailable when participants sat at a reachable distance but responded with hand-held laser pointers near their bodies. We conclude that a motor system specialized for real-time visually guided behavior has access to additional visual information. }}, author = {{Tseng, Philip and Tuennermann, Jan and Roker-Knight, Nancy and Winter, Dorina and Scharlau, Ingrid and Bridgeman, Bruce}}, issn = {{0301-0066}}, journal = {{Perception}}, keywords = {{implicit change detection, action perception, visual system, perceptual judgment, verbal fluency, Analysis of Variance, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Random Allocation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception, Visual Memory, Visual Stimulation, Implicit Memory, Judgment, Perceptual Discrimination}}, number = {{10}}, pages = {{1311 -- 1321}}, title = {{{Enhancing implicit change detection through action.}}}, volume = {{39}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inproceedings{30899, abstract = {{Temporal order judgments (TOJs) have been used for demonstrating the facilitating effect of attention on information processing - prior entry. Prior entry is a robust, often large effect. Besides attention, other factors shorten perceptual latency, for instance stimulus saliency, action affordances of an object, or threatening objects. The expectable size for these effects is far smaller than that usually obtained for prior entry. Some effects might consist of only a few milliseconds. But are TOJs sensitive enough for detecting such small effects? For answering this question, we tested whether objects highly associated with a certain color are perceived earlier. In a four-alternative TOJ, including a "simultaneous" and "uncertain" category, we found a small advantage for high color diagnostic objects. This indicates high sensitivity of the TOJ task. We also found that "simultaneous" judgements were most sensitive. This is important for the debate on the usefulness of order vs. simultaneous judgments.}}, author = {{Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics}}, editor = {{Bastianelli, Alessia and Vidotto, Giulio}}, issn = {{1010-6065}}, location = {{Padua}}, pages = {{461 -- 466}}, title = {{{Temporal order judgments: A sensitive measure for measuring perceptual latency?}}}, volume = {{26}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{6090, abstract = {{Comments on an article by Jan Theeuwes (see record [rid]2010-20897-002[/rid]). Theeuwes summarizes an impressive number of studies demonstrating interference by irrelevant visual singletons in computer experiments with humans. Theeuwes assumes that this salience-driven capture of attention is fast and occurs within 150 ms since singleton onset, during the feed-forward phase of visual processing. In contrast to Theeuwes, we think that top–down contingent capture is the rule and explains initial and fast attention capture effects in the first feed-forward phase of visual processing. During a later phase and under some conditions exogenous capture of attention possibly follows. At the same time, we propose that the evidence presented by Theeuwes fails to support exogenous orienting because it fails to exclude a top–down contingent capture explanation. We present our arguments in two sections. One major source of evidence for top–down controlled attentional capture during the feed-forward}}, author = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0001-6918}}, journal = {{Acta Psychologica}}, keywords = {{visual selection, attention, information, visual field, brain, Attention, Humans, Models, Psychological, Visual Perception, Volition, Brain, Visual Field, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Information}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{123 -- 126}}, title = {{{Top–down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing.}}}, volume = {{135}}, year = {{2010}}, } @article{6083, abstract = {{How fast can information of a first target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation be used for top-down allocation of attention in time? A valid cue about the temporal position of a second target (T2) was integrated into T1. The data show that 100 ms after T1 onset, T2 was identified better than without cue, raising the conditional T2 performance. T1 apparently triggers a facilitative effect of attention, known from other paradigms such as peripheral cueing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Hilkenmeier, Frederic and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0954-1446}}, journal = {{European Journal of Cognitive Psychology}}, keywords = {{temporal attention, attentional blink paradigm, first target information, top-down allocation, rapid serial visual presentation, Stimulus Presentation Methods, Visual Stimulation, Visual Attention}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{1222 -- 1234}}, title = {{{Rapid allocation of temporal attention in the attentional blink paradigm.}}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{15533, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Utopia. La Busqueda de la Sociedad ideal}}, editor = {{Ramiro-Aviles, Miguel}}, title = {{{On Scarcity and Abundance. Three Types of Social Reasoning in More’s, Campanellas and Bacon’s Utopian Drafts}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @misc{15574, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews}}, title = {{{Ulrich Steinvorth. Rethinking the Western Understanding of the Self (Cambridge u.a.: Cambridge UP, 2009) }}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{12737, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Von Diana zu Minerva. Philosophierende Aristokratinnen des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Rodrigues, Ana}}, isbn = {{3050049235}}, pages = {{11--33}}, publisher = {{Akademie-Verlag}}, title = {{{Von Diana zu Minerva: Philosophierende Aristokratinnen des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{49263, abstract = {{In this essay, I will attempt a systematic reconstruction of the general shape of Husserl’s late philosophy, insofar as it centers on the concept of personhood. The systematic concatenation of this and other themes in Husserl’s late work – the method of epoché and reduction, ethics, personhood, and teleology – has only recently begun to be explored in Husserl scholarship, and this article is a modest contribution to the further elucidation of their mutual relation-ship. One of the most striking results of this reconstructive analysis is Husserl’s final concept of “person“, which goes beyond the traditional distinctions, such as “heart“ and “mind“ or “reason“ and “emotion“. For Husserl to conceive of the subject as moral person implies, then, the demand to not only conduct oneself morally (in a novel sense of “moral”), but also to have an ethical view of the world as a world that bears meaning and harbors values despite its apparent absurdities.}}, author = {{Luft, Sebastian}}, booktitle = {{Geist, Person, Gemeinschaft: Freiburger Beiträge zur Aktualität Husserls}}, editor = {{Merz, Philippe and Staiti, Andrea and Steffen, Frank}}, pages = {{221--240}}, publisher = {{Ergon Verlag }}, title = {{{Das Subjekt als moralische Person. Zu Husserls späten Reflexionen bezüglich des Personenbegriffs}}}, year = {{2010}}, } @misc{18679, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1181.01029}}, title = {{{Bolzano, Bernard, Philosophische Tagebücher 1803–1810. Erster Teil, hg. v. Jan Berg (Bernard Bolzano-Gesamtausgabe. Reihe II. B.14), Friedrich Frommann Verlag-Günther Holzboog: Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 2009}}}, year = {{2010}}, }