@misc{18821, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR 2007a:03002}}, title = {{{De Mol, Liesbeth, “Closing the Circle: An Analysis of Emil Post’s Early Work”, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (2006), 267–289}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @misc{18823, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR2227083 (2007e:03007) }}, title = {{{Crocco, Gabriella, “Gödel on Concepts”, History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2006), 171–191}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @book{17448, abstract = {{Rezension: Neue Zürcher Zeitung v. 6. Juni 2007 (G. Szpiro); Ralf Bülow, “Hundert Jahre moderne Mathematik”, heise online v. 13.02.2008 (http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Hundert-Jahre-moderne-Mathematik–/meldung/103411); Mathematical Reviews 2007m:01024 (J.M. Plotkin); MAA Online 5. Juli 2007 (M. Berg); Philip J. Davis, “The Z of ZF and ZFC and ZF¬C”, SIAM News 41.1, January/February 2008; SIAM Review 50.1 (2008), 167–169; (J.W. Dawson); European Mathematical Society Newsletter June 2008, 54; The Mathematical Intelligencer 31 (2009), 79–81 (Henry E. Heatherly); Notices of the AMS 56 (2009), 823–827 (G.H. Moore); Zbl. Math. 1176.01001 (H.K. Sørensen).}}, author = {{Ebbinghaus, Heinz-Dieter and Peckhaus, Volker}}, pages = {{xiv + 356 [insbesondere Abschnitte 1.2, 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.8.4, 2.10, 2.11.4, 3.1, 3.2]}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Ernst Zermelo. An Approach to His Life and Work}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @phdthesis{41368, author = {{Seifert, Andreas}}, publisher = {{Waxmann}}, title = {{{Gefährlichkeitseinschätzung von Autofahrern, Motorradfahrern und Radfahrern. Psychometrische Modellierung der Prognose durch verschiedene Gefahrenaspekte und ihr Beitrag zur Klärung von Unterschieden zwischen jungen und nicht-jungen Verkehrsteilnehmern.}}}, volume = {{10}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{41632, author = {{Spiegel, Anna}}, booktitle = {{Handbuch Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung}}, editor = {{Schützeichel, Rainer}}, isbn = {{978-3-89669-551-2}}, keywords = {{Wissenssoziologie}}, pages = {{864}}, publisher = {{UVK-Verl.-Ges}}, title = {{{Wissen zwischen Lokalisierung und Globalisierung}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2007}}, } @article{32511, abstract = {{This longitudinal study addresses the impact of the transition from university to work life on emerging adults' well-being and their relationship with their parents. A sample of 102 German students attending their last year at the university (M = 25.44 years, SD = 2.61) completed a questionnaire. Among others, scales from the Network of Relationships Inventory and symptom checklists were administered. Four years later, 51 employed participants of the initial sample were contacted again. During the transition from university to work life, well-being and the relationship with their parents improved. Following a typological approach, two groups of emerging adults were revealed by means of cluster analyses. Well-being in one group increased, whereas well-being in the second group decreased. Group membership was predicted by sex, personality, and the child–parent relationship in university times.}}, author = {{Buhl, Heike M.}}, journal = {{Journal of Adolescent Research}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{550 -- 571}}, title = {{{Well-being and the child-parent relationship at the transition from university to work life}}}, doi = {{10.1177/0743558407305415}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2007}}, } @book{17460, editor = {{Peckhaus, Volker and Löwe, Benedikt and Räsch, Thoralf}}, isbn = {{1-904987-29-X}}, pages = {{xiv + 282}}, publisher = {{College Publications}}, title = {{{Foundations of Formal Sciences IV. The History of the Concept of Formal Sciences}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2006}}, } @inbook{17580, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Revisiting Discovery and Justification. Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction}}, editor = {{Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich}}, pages = {{99--116}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Psychologism and the Distinction between Discovery and Justification}}}, volume = {{14}}, year = {{2006}}, } @inbook{17581, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Die besten Nebenrollen. 50 Porträts biblischer Randfiguren}}, editor = {{Keuchen, Marion and Kuhlmann, Helga and Schroeter-Wittke, Harald}}, pages = {{58--62}}, publisher = {{Evangelische Verlagsanstalt}}, title = {{{Der Baum der Erkenntnis}}}, year = {{2006}}, } @inproceedings{17583, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Demonstrative and Non-demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Workshop University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Rome, Villa Mirafiori, 16-17 June 2005}}, editor = {{Cellucci, Carlo and Pecere, Paolo}}, location = {{Rome, Villa Mirafiori}}, pages = {{9--25}}, publisher = {{Edizioni dell’Università degli Studi di Cassino}}, title = {{{Predeductive Reasoning}}}, year = {{2006}}, } @inproceedings{17582, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Kreativität. XX. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie. 26.–30. September 2005 an der Technischen Universität Berlin. Kolloquiumsbeiträge}}, editor = {{Abel, Günter}}, location = {{Technische Universität Berlin}}, pages = {{58--69}}, publisher = {{Felix Meiner Verlag}}, title = {{{Die Aktualität der Logik als Organon}}}, year = {{2006}}, } @inbook{17584, author = {{Peckhaus, Volker and Löwe, Benedikt and Räsch, Thoralf}}, booktitle = {{Foundations of Formal Sciences IV. The History of the Concept of Formal Sciences}}, editor = {{Peckhaus, Volker and Löwe, Benedikt and Räsch, Thoralf}}, pages = {{vii–xii}}, publisher = {{College Publications}}, title = {{{Preface}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{15551, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{HNI Jahresbericht}}, pages = {{90}}, title = {{{Dynamische Basisontologie und kooperative Semantiken. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Kombination begrifflicher und graphischer Wissensorganisation}}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{15550, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{HNI Annual Report}}, pages = {{90}}, title = {{{Dynamic Ontology and Cooperative Semantics. The Combination of Conceptual and Graphical Knowledge Representation: Its Possibilities and Limits}}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{6092, abstract = {{The topic of the present edition is visual masking paradigms-as powerful tool for demonstrating the processing of nonconscious visual information. In the present issue one article presents an improved methodology for disentangling perceptual and temporal influences in markers. Another paper demonstrates that preemptive control, or DPS, mediates the allocation of attention towards possible targets. One of the contributions specify conditions under which DPS-like effects are found as opposed to conditions under which stimulus-driven effects are found. A study of two illusions which the prime may cause in a trailing stimulus, a temporal pre-dating of the mask and a perception of motion in later stimuli adjacent to the prime is presented in the issue. Another contribution addresses how the percept of a stimulus is altered by a temporal and spatial interplay of two backward masks or of one forward mask and two backwards masks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich and Breitmeyer, Bruno G.}}, issn = {{1895-1171}}, journal = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}}, keywords = {{visual masking, visual information, attention, stimulus-driven effects, motion perception, Attention, Illusions (Perception), Motion Perception, Visual Masking}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1 -- 5}}, title = {{{Trends and styles in visual masking.}}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{6073, abstract = {{The paper is concerned with two models of early visual processing which predict that priming of a visual mask by a preceding masked stimulus speeds up conscious perception of the mask (perceptual latency priming). One model ascribes this speed-up to facilitation by visuo-spatial attention [Scharlau, I., & Neumann, O. (2003a). Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: Evidence for an attentional explanation. Psychological Research 67, 184-197], the other attributes it to nonspecific upgrading mediated by retino-thalamic and thalamo-cortical pathways [Bachmann, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers]. The models make different predictions about the time course of perceptual latency priming. Four experiments test these predictions. The results provide more support for the attentional than for the upgrading model. The experiments further demonstrate that testing latency facilitation w}}, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich and Horstmann, Gernot}}, issn = {{0001-6918}}, journal = {{Acta Psychologica}}, keywords = {{latency facilitation, temporal order judgments, visual processing, priming, conscious perception, visual mask, Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Perceptual Masking, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Time Perception, Visual Perception, Consciousness States, Judgment, Priming, Visual Masking, Temporal Order (Judgment)}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{129 -- 159}}, title = {{{Latency facilitation in temporal-order judgments: Time course of facilitation as a function of judgment type.}}}, volume = {{122}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{6076, abstract = {{In the present study, we examined whether the detection advantage for negative-face targets in crowds of positive-face distractors over positive-face targets in crowds of negative faces can be explained by differentially efficient distractor rejection. Search Condition A demonstrated more efficient distractor rejection with negative-face targets in positive-face crowds than vice versa. Search Condition B showed that target identity alone is not sufficient to account for this effect, because there was no difference in processing efficiency for positive- and negative-face targets within neutral crowds. Search Condition C showed differentially efficient processing with neutral-face targets among positive- or negative-face distractors. These results were obtained with both a within-participants (Experiment 1) and a between-participants (Experiment 2) design. The pattern of results is consistent with the assumption that efficient rejection of positive (more homogenous) distractors is an im}}, author = {{Horstmann, Gernot and Scharlau, Ingrid and Ansorge, Ulrich}}, issn = {{1069-9384}}, journal = {{Psychonomic Bulletin & Review}}, keywords = {{angry face distractors, visual search, negative face distractors, Adult, Anger, Attention, Face, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Rejection (Psychology), Visual Perception, Distraction, Face Perception, Visual Perception, Visual Search}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{1067 -- 1073}}, title = {{{More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.}}}, volume = {{13}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{6094, abstract = {{In the current study, we tested whether search for a visual motion singleton presented among several coherently moving distractors can be more efficient than search for a motion stimulus presented with a single distractor. Under a variety of conditions, multiple spatially distributed and coherently moving distractors facilitated search for a uniquely moving target relative to a single-motion-distractor condition (Experiments 1,3, and 4). Color coherencies among static distractors were not equally effective (Experiments 1 and 2). These results confirm that humans are highly sensitive to antagonistically directed motion signals in backgrounds compared with spatially more confined regions of visual images. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Scharlau, Ingrid and Labudda, Kirsten}}, issn = {{0340-0727}}, journal = {{Psychological Research}}, keywords = {{visual search, motion singleton, visual images, visual motion, coherently moving distractors, Adult, Attention, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Visual Perception, Motion Perception, Stimulus Salience, Visual Search, Distraction, Retinal Image}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{103 -- 116}}, title = {{{Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors.}}}, volume = {{70}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{6077, abstract = {{The phenomena of illusory line motion and perceptual latency priming are both assumed to reflect a facilitation of perceptual latency. The explanation of illusory line motion presupposes that attention is distributed in a gradient fashion whereas this is not a necessary part of the explanation of perceptual latency priming. Two experiments test whether an attentional gradient is present in perceptual latency priming. Evidence for a gradient was found within 2.5° of visual angle around the attended location, but not at a distance of 5° and more. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Horstmann, Gernot}}, issn = {{1895-1171}}, journal = {{Advances in Cognitive Psychology}}, keywords = {{perceptual latency priming, illusory line motion, attention, visual angle, Illusions (Perception), Priming, Visual Field, Visual Perception, Visual Attention, Spatial Orientation (Perception)}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{87 -- 97}}, title = {{{Perceptual latency priming and illusory line motion: Facilitation by gradients of attention?}}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2006}}, } @article{32510, abstract = {{Der Regulationstheorie der Sprachproduktion folgend gibt eine Ist-Soll-Diskrepanz jenseits tolerierbarer Grenzen ggf. den Anstoß zum Sprachproduktionsprozess, der in eine Äußerung mündet (vgl. Herrmann & Grabowski, 2003). Wir nehmen an, dass die Stärke der Ist-Soll-Diskrepanz die Häufigkeit der Verbalisierung von Soll- und Ist-Informationen in der sprachlichen Äußerung beeinflusst. Bei starkem Ziel werden mehr Soll-Informationen erwartet als bei schwachem Ziel. In zwei Rollenspielexperimenten wurden Äußerungen Jugendlicher in Konfliktgesprächen mit der Mutter erhoben, wobei die Stärke der Ist-Soll-Diskrepanz, operationalisiert über die Bedeutsamkeit des Zieles in einer Konfliktsituation, variiert wurde. Um Einflüssen der Kommunikationssituation nachzugehen, wurde das erste Experiment mündlich (N = 53), das zweite schriftlich (N = 131) durchgeführt. Insgesamt wurden schriftlich mehr Soll-Informationen verbalisiert. Im mündlichen Rollenspielexperiment fanden sich wie erwartet bei starkem Ziel mehr Soll-Informationen als bei schwachem Ziel. Im schriftlichen Rollenvorstellungsexperiment dagegen waren bei starkem Ziel sogar weniger Soll-Informationen zu verzeichnen, was unter Berücksichtigung situationaler Unterschiede zwischen mündlicher und schriftlicher Sprachproduktion diskutiert wird.}}, author = {{Buhl, Heike M. and Hofer, Manfred and Lege, Thomas}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Psychologie}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{48 -- 58}}, title = {{{Kommunikative Regulation und sprachlicher Ausdruck von Soll-Ist-Diskrepanzen in mündlichen und schriftlichen Äußerungen}}}, volume = {{214}}, year = {{2006}}, }