@article{31441, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{32--33}}, title = {{{Der Elisabeth-von-Böhmen-Preis zur Erforschung der Geschichte der Philosophinnen wird zum dritten Mal verliehen}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{31446, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, journal = {{Konsens}}, pages = {{7--8}}, title = {{{Frauen aus aller Frauen Länder gestalten die Zukunft Deutschlands. Jahrestagung des DAB am 30. April 2021}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{21276, abstract = {{This collection of essays presents new work on women’s contribution to philosophy between the Renaissance and the mid-eighteenth century. They bring a new perspective to the history of philosophy, by highlighting women’s contributions to philosophy and testifying to the rich history of women’s thought in this period. By showing that women were active in many branches of philosophy (metaphysics, science, political philosophy cosmology, ontology, epistemology) the book testifies to the rich history of women’s thought across Europe in this period. The scope of the collection is international, both in terms of the philosophers represented and the contributors themselves from Britain and North America, but also from continental Europe and from as far afield as Australia and Brazil. The philosophers discussed here include both figures who have recently come to be better known (Elisabeth of Bohemia, Anne Conway, Mary Astell, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, Emilie du Châtelet), and less familiar figures (Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella Arcangela Tarabotti, Tullia d’Aragona, Madame Deshoulières, Madame de Sablé, Angélique de Saint-Jean Arnauld d’Andilly, Olivia Sabuco, Susanna Newcome). The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy.}}, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hutton, Sarah}}, isbn = {{ISBN 9780367758646}}, keywords = {{History of Women Philosophers, Methodology, History of Philosophy, Women's Studies, Gender History}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Women Philosophers from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{21277, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, editor = {{Jalobeanu, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T.}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Du Châtelet, Émilie (1706–1749)}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_410-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{34112, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, journal = {{Konsens (2021), 9}}, title = {{{Der Deutsche Akademikerinnenbund ist Mitglied der Europäischen Bewegung Deutschland (EBD)}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{31434, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, publisher = {{Zenodo}}, title = {{{Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists Documentation 2016-2019 (Version 1)}}}, doi = {{http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4982197}}, year = {{2021}}, } @book{34105, editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Neumann, Hanns-Peter and Muller, Jil and Wells, Aaron}}, title = {{{The Paris Ms Fr. 12265. A Critical and Historical Online Edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/dcpm/ (2021-2022)}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{28691, abstract = {{As a formal theory, Bundesen’s theory of visual attention (TVA) enables the estimation of several theoretically meaningful parameters involved in attentional selection and visual encoding. As of yet, TVA has almost exclusively been used in restricted empirical scenarios such as whole and partial report and with strictly controlled stimulus material. We present a series of experiments in which we test whether the advantages of TVA can be exploited in more realistic scenarios with varying degree of stimulus control. This includes brief experimental sessions conducted on different mobile devices, computer games, and a driving simulator. Overall, six experiments demonstrate that the TVA parameters for processing capacity and attentional weight can be measured with sufficient precision in less controlled scenarios and that the results do not deviate strongly from typical laboratory results, although some systematic differences were found.}}, author = {{Krüger, Alexander and Tünnermann, Jan and Stratmann, Lukas and Briese, Lucas and Dressler, Falko and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{2543-8883}}, journal = {{Open Psychology}}, pages = {{1 -- 46}}, title = {{{TVA in the wild: Applying the theory of visual attention to game-like and less controlled experiments}}}, doi = {{10.1515/psych-2021-0001}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{28686, abstract = {{Visual salience is a key component of attentional selection, the process that guards the scarce resources needed for conscious recognition and perception. In previous works, we proposed a measure of visual salience based on a formal theory of visual selection. However, the strength of visual salience depends on the time course as well as local physical contrasts. Evidence from multiple experimental designs in the literature suggests that the strength of salience rises initially and declines after approximately 150 ms. The present article amends the theory-based salience measure beyond local physical contrasts to the time course of salience. It does so through a first experiment which reveals that—contrary to expectations—salience is not reduced during the first 150 ms after onset. Instead, the overall visual processing capacity is severely reduced, which corresponds to a reduced processing speed of all stimuli in the visual field. A second experiment confirms this conclusion by replicating the result. We argue that the slower stimulus processing may have been overlooked previously because the attentional selection mechanism had not yet been modeled in studies on the time course of salience.}}, author = {{Krüger, Alexander and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0340-0727}}, journal = {{Psychological Research}}, title = {{{The time course of salience: not entirely caused by salience}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s00426-020-01470-6}}, year = {{2021}}, } @unpublished{31677, abstract = {{The theory of visual attention, “TVA”, is an influential and formal theory of attentional selection. It is widely applied in clinical assessment of attention and fundamental attention research. However, most TVA-based research is based on accuracy data from letter report experiments performed in controlled laboratory environments. While such basic approaches to questions regarding attentional selection are undoubtedly useful, recent technological advances have enabled the use of increasingly sophisticated experimental paradigms involving more realistic scenarios. Notably, these studies have in many cases resulted in different estimates of capacity limits than those found in studies using traditional TVA-based assessment. Here we review recent developments in TVA-based assessment of attention that goes beyond the use of letter report experiments and experiments performed in controlled laboratory environments. We show that TVA can be used with other tasks and new stimuli, that TVA-based parameter estimation can be embedded into complex scenarios, such as games that can be used to investigate particular problems regarding visual attention, and how TVA-based simulations of “visual foraging” can elucidate attentional control in more naturalistic tasks. We also discuss how these developments may inform future advances of TVA.}}, author = {{Tünnermann, Jan and Kristjansson, Arni and Petersen, Anders and Schubö, Anna and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Open Psychology}}, publisher = {{Center for Open Science}}, title = {{{Advances in the application of a computational Theory of Visual Attention (TVA): Moving towards more naturalistic stimuli and game-like tasks}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{31671, author = {{Reis, Oliver and Jenert, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Hochschule auf Abstand}}, editor = {{Neiske, Iris and Osthushenrich, Judith and Schaper, Niclas and Trier, Ulrike and Vöing, Nerea}}, pages = {{141 -- 154}}, publisher = {{transcript}}, title = {{{Kontaktlos lehren?}}}, doi = {{10.1515/9783839456903-010}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{31669, author = {{Reinmann, Gabi and Kreber, Carolin and Bremer, Helmut and Langemeyer, Ines and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Hochschullehre im Spannungsfeld zwischen individueller und institutioneller Verantwortung: Tagungsband der 15. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Hochschulforschung}}, editor = {{Bohndick, Carla and Bülow-Schramm, Margret and Paul, Daria and Reinmann, Gabi}}, pages = {{33 -- 47}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Wer bestimmt die Hochschullehre?}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{31668, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{Interdisziplinarität als fachdidaktische Herausforderung: Psychologie im Schulfach Erziehungswissenschaft}}, editor = {{Gather, Katharina}}, pages = {{162 -- 181}}, publisher = {{Schneider}}, title = {{{Jean Piaget als - was?}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{32560, abstract = {{Several methods are available to answer questions regarding similarity and accuracy, each of which has specific properties and limitations. This study focuses on the Latent Congruence Model (LCM; Cheung, 2009), because of its capacity to deal with cross-informant measurement invariance issues. Until now, no cross-national applications of LCM are present in the literature, perhaps because of the difficulty to deal with both cross-national and cross-informant measurement issues implied by those models. This study presents a step-by-step procedure to apply LCM to dyadic cross-national research designs controlling for both cross-national and cross-informant measurement invariance. An illustrative example on parent–child support exchanges in Italy and Germany is provided. Findings help to show the different possible scenarios of partial invariance, and a discussion related to how to deal with those scenarios is provided. Future perspectives in the study of parent–child similarity and accuracy in cross-national research will be discussed.}}, author = {{Tagliabue, Semira and Zambelli, Michela and Sorgente, Angela and Sommer, Sabrina and Hoellger, Christian and Buhl, Heike M. and Lanz, Margherita}}, issn = {{1664-1078}}, journal = {{Frontiers in Psychology}}, keywords = {{latent congruence model, measurement invariance, similarity, accuracy, cross-national, cross-informant, parent-child relationship, support exchanges}}, publisher = {{Frontiers Media SA}}, title = {{{Latent Congruence Model to Investigate Similarity and Accuracy in Family Members' Perception: The Challenge of Cross-National and Cross-Informant Measurement (Non)Invariance}}}, doi = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672383}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{33372, abstract = {{Academics may actively respond to the expectations of the academic status market, which have largely been shaped by the World University Rankings (WURs). This study empirically examines how academics’ citation patterns have changed in response to the rise of an “evaluation environment” in academia. We regard the WURs to be a macro-level trigger for cementing a bibliometric-based evaluation environment in academia. Our analyses of citation patterns in papers published in two higher education journals explicitly considered three distinct periods: the pre-WURs (1990–2003), the period of WURs implementation (2004–2010), and the period of adaption to WURs (2011–2017). We applied the nonparametric Kaplan–Meier method to compare first-citation speeds of papers published across the three periods. We found that not only has first-citation speed become faster, but first-citation probability has also increased following the emergence of the WURs. Applying Cox proportional hazard models to first-citation probabilities, we identified journal impact factors and third-party funding as factors influencing first-citation probability, while other author- and paper-related factors showed limited effects. We also found that the general effects of different factors on first-citation speeds have changed with the emergence of the WURs. The findings expand our understanding of the citation patterns of academics in the rise of WURs and provide practical grounds for research policy as well as higher education policy.}}, author = {{Lee, Soo Jeung and Schneijderberg, Christian and Kim, Yangson and Steinhardt, Isabel}}, issn = {{2071-1050}}, journal = {{Sustainability}}, keywords = {{world university rankings, citation, first-citation speed, Minerva, Studies in Higher Education}}, number = {{17}}, publisher = {{MDPI AG}}, title = {{{Have Academics’ Citation Patterns Changed in Response to the Rise of World University Rankings? A Test Using First-Citation Speeds}}}, doi = {{10.3390/su13179515}}, volume = {{13}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{34707, abstract = {{Of the many outstanding female philosophers of the European Enlightenment, Emilie Du Châtelet excelled as a physicist, a philosopher, and a mathematician, as well as a Bible critic. She was famous in her lifetime and was not completely forgotten thereafter. Among her admirers, correspondents and friends were the most acknowledged scholars of her time, including Voltaire, Clairault, Maupertuis, Diderot, Helvetius, La Mettrie, Buffon, Christian Wolff, Leonard Euler, and Johann II Bernoulli. Her philosophical work enjoyed high reputation and her opus magnum, the Institutions physiques, was translated into Italian and German and proved her to be an intellectual of European stature. Its defense of living forces and its implied forecast into dynamics as well as her methodological grounding of scientific knowledge as hypothetical, impacted philosophy and science. Reality must by nature escape us. What we perceive are phenomena. Du Châtelet explains the function of space and time to trace us back to the origin of phenomena. Her influence on Kant is evident. Next to her writings in physics, mathematics, philosophy, language, and logic, she contributed to morality and ethics. Du Châtelet left an opus of quite systematic breadth. This impressive publishing activity excels in the amount of its scientific and philosophical production to which a vast collection of manuscripts must be added.She argued against prejudice and idolatry in philosophy and science. Science is a cooperative undertaking over history and beyond nations. Her moral writings align with ideas of the French materialists. Du Châtelet translated and commented on Newton’s Principia, preparing thus the fertile soil of the generation of physicists to come in France.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, keywords = {{aura Bassi Luise Gottsched Immanuel Kant Dourtous de Mairan Johann II Bernoulli Algarotti Buffon d’Alembert La Mettrie Principle of contradiction Hypotheses Enlightenment Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence Living forces Dead forces, happiness Space Imaginary beings Monads Epicurus Ethics Women philosophers Newton’s laws Principia Motion inertia Active force Vis viva Vis mortua Hypothetic reasoning Hypotheses, a priori principles, Experience, Dead forces, Living forces, Energy Dynamics}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Du Châtelet, Émilie (1706–1749)}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_410-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{34706, abstract = {{Essential ideas significantly connected to humanism, Renaissance, and early modern philosophy stem from women’s pens. The supportive role of women in the early modern period has hardly been recognized up to today. The relevant issues women have contributed to range from commentaries on and critiques of the Bible, and their demands for equality and the critique of political institutions, topics that became eminent enhancers of political and societal change in the relevant period of early modern philosophy, to enlightenment philosophy.}}, author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences}}, editor = {{Jalobenau, Dana and Wolfe, Charles T.}}, isbn = {{9783319207919}}, publisher = {{Springer International Publishing}}, title = {{{Women in Early Modern Philosophy and Science: An Introduction}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_529-1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{36545, abstract = {{Due to the Corona crisis, German Higher Education Institutions had to close their campuses in March and lecturers had to teach online. To understand how the Corona crisis affected students, first this article explains the structural and social inequalities in the German higher education system, using Tinto's (1975; 1997) student engagement theory. Second, the concept of Bergman-Rosamond et al. (2020) is used to analyze the challenges that Corona has raised for students, including current surveys. We found that the closure of the social space campus (and the Corona crisis as a whole) particularly hit hard those students who had previously been affected by (intersectional) inequality. Therefore, to lessen the specific challenges associated with the ad hoc transition to digital studying, the creation of a digital community of learning can help. We demonstrate how such a community can be created by the example seminar, "Digital practices: an autoethnographic observation". During the seminar, students recorded their digital technology use in a journal, and we analyzed the diary entries using the collaborate autoethnography method. The seminar example shows that this method is well suited for the development of a community of learning as it not only places students in the spotlight but as students work together on a topic they get to know each other, and a basis of trust is created through peer-feedback. Therefore, it was important to have a digital space (in this case Mahara) where the exchange could take place. The continuous insight into the students’ "learning status" enabled the lecturer to promote the learning and provide individual assistance for the students.}}, author = {{Steinhardt, Isabel}}, journal = {{ISA Pedagogy Series}}, keywords = {{Intersectionality, inequality, gender, diversity, higher-education, crisis}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{42--59}}, publisher = {{International Sociology Association}}, title = {{{Students in the spotlight: Using collaborative autoethnography to build a community of learning in the Corona crisis}}}, volume = {{1}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{36551, abstract = {{The call for free access to research data and materials is becoming louder and louder from the political and scientific communities in Germany. More and more researchers are facing demands to open up qualitative research data for scientific purposes. They often have a general interest in sharing their data, but are unsure how to proceed. This handout was developed to provide an initial introduction to opening and sharing qualitative data. It was developed at a workshop held in Berlin in January 2020, organized by the research group „Digitization of Science“ of the Weizenbaum Institute, together with its associate researcher Dr. Isabel Steinhardt from the University of Kassel. The workshop involved staff from German research data centers as well as mentees and mentors from the Fellow Program Open Science who already have experience with Open Science, qualitative research, and interdisciplinary research. The handout is addressed primarily to qualitatively researching scientists in Germany. For this reason, it was initially written in German. One year later, we have now decided to translate the handout into English as well. The reasons are twofold: first, we want to make it accessible to researchers in Germany with little knowledge of German. Second, we also want to give interested people outside Germany an insight into the German system and the German discussion about opening up and sharing qualitative data. Due to the objectives and the history of its development, the handout focuses on the German context. This includes the literature references and further sources, and the references to research data centers as well as legal issues. We have deliberately not included a contextualization of the German situation in international discussions in order to keep the handout as short as possible.}}, author = {{Steinhardt, Isabel and Fischer, Caroline and Heimstädt, Maximilian and Hirsbrunner, Simon David and Ikiz-Akinci, Dilek and Kressin, Lisa and Kretzer, Susanne and Möllenkamp, Andreas and Portzelt, Maike and Rahal, Rima-Maria and Schimmler, Sonja and Wilke, René and Wünsche, Hannes}}, pages = {{20}}, publisher = {{Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - The German Internet Institu}}, title = {{{Opening up and Sharing Data from Qualitative Research: A Primer}}}, doi = {{10.34669/WI.WS/17}}, volume = {{17}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{37015, author = {{Knoll, Lisa}}, booktitle = {{Der Staat in der Großen Transformation}}, editor = {{Sturn, Richard and Klüh, Ulrich}}, pages = {{193--218}}, publisher = {{Metropolis}}, title = {{{Nachhaltigkeitsmärkte im Vergleich. Zur Transformation von Staatlichkeit}}}, volume = {{Band 19}}, year = {{2021}}, }