@article{60144,
author = {{Depenbusch, Sarah}},
journal = {{Frontiers in Computer Science}},
number = {{1553441}},
title = {{{VR-based avatar videos as an effective tool for process training in the context of digitalization?}}},
doi = {{10.3389/fcomp.2025.1553441}},
volume = {{7}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{59167,
author = {{Thomas, Sven}},
journal = {{HannahArendt.Net}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{240–242}},
title = {{{Rezension: Thomas Meyers neue Arendt Biographie. Sinnbild der Verstrickung von Theorie und Praxis}}},
doi = {{10.57773/HANET.V14I1.607}},
volume = {{14}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@book{61364,
abstract = {{Women’s rights over their own bodies is one of the most pressing issues, esp. as women still seem to have fewer rights over their bodies than men. International authors from philosophy, literature, art, architecture, and gender studies address the topic from a variety of perspectives, reaching beyond classical feminism, and beyond the labels of "motherhood" and "sex." The contributions are grouped into five sections – Body Experiences, History, Technology and Arts, Feminism and Phenomenology, and Beauty. Papers address a multitude of areas, ranging from beauty practices and Ukrainian women refugees in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war, feminist phenomenology and socio-structural critique, female specific neuropathology, the discourse of the Victorian women’s menstruation to "motherhood" in gender studies and feminist new materialisms. The book provides not only a comprehensive overview over the current state of research, but will also inspire further discussions. A separate bibliography listing relevant titles for readers new to the topics and for advanced researchers rounds out the volume.}},
editor = {{Muller, Jil}},
isbn = {{9783111396125}},
pages = {{360}},
publisher = {{De Gruyter Brill}},
title = {{{Women and their Body}}},
doi = {{10.1515/9783111396934}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{63711,
author = {{Muller, Jil}},
booktitle = {{Women and Their Body}},
isbn = {{9783111396125}},
publisher = {{De Gruyter}},
title = {{{1 1Introduction Women and Their Body: Breaking the Silence}}},
doi = {{10.1515/9783111396934-002}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{60204,
author = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Muller, Jil and Grewe, Felix}},
issn = {{1868-7245}},
journal = {{GENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht Kultur und Gesellschaft}},
number = {{2-2025}},
publisher = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH}},
title = {{{Vorwort: Brisante Wahrheiten – Philosophinnen und Denkerinnen und die andere Geschichte der Philosophie und Wissenschaften}}},
doi = {{10.3224/gender.v17i2.01}},
volume = {{17}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{55091,
booktitle = {{GENDER: Zeitschrift, Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft - Frauen in der Geschichte der Philosophie}},
editor = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Muller, Jil and Grewe, Felix}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{160}},
publisher = {{Barbara Budrich Verlag}},
title = {{{Brisante Wahrheiten – eine andere Geschichte der Philosophie }}},
volume = {{25}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{61121,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 08058231}},
title = {{{Franke-Reddig, Julia, „Bernard Bolzano im Kontext der Logikgeschichtsschreibung von Heinrich Scholz“, SieB. Siegener Beiträge zur Geschichte und Philosophie der Mathematik 18 (2024), 155–175}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{63181,
abstract = {{
Purpose
This study aims to explore the current state of generative artificial intelligence (genAI) in the workplace and discuss a potential digital divide in relation to genAI.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a quantitative approach, we study career-relevant predictors – family socio-economic status, education and work characteristics – and their relationship with different indicators of digital divide – access, genAI use, attitude toward AI and perceived AI literacy. To test our hypothesis, we used logistic and linear regression analyses. Additionally, latent profile analysis was conducted to identify patterns regarding work characteristics within the sample.
Findings
Among the 1,341 participants, 326 individuals were genAI users. Our results show that higher family socio-economic status, education and enriched and demanding work can be linked to a more positive attitude toward AI and higher perceived AI literacy. In the case of access and frequency of use, the results were mixed.
Originality/value
Our findings offer a novel contribution by examining a potentially upcoming digital divide in the case of genAI. We focus on how the career adaptation of the workforce might develop in the age of genAI. Importantly, we highlight that not all individuals may have an equal opportunity to adapt to genAI, which could hinder their future career development and reinforce patterns of inequality. Future research should address how to promote inclusivity and consider individual differences in adapting to genAI.
}},
author = {{Neufeld, Katharina and Ohly, Sandra and Sedefoglu-Ulucak, Didem and Steinhardt, Isabel and Mauermeister, Sylvi}},
issn = {{1362-0436}},
journal = {{Career Development International}},
pages = {{1--19}},
publisher = {{Emerald}},
title = {{{Analyzing the role of family socio-economic status, education and work characteristics in times of generative artificial intelligence and digital divide}}},
doi = {{10.1108/cdi-10-2024-0442}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@techreport{64781,
author = {{Rossmann, Felix and Greitens, Jan and Knoll, Lisa}},
title = {{{SMEs within a Data-Driven Sustainable Finance Framework: A European Survey}}},
doi = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5677922}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{58806,
abstract = {{The present paper has two objectives. First, it explicates the story, initially portrayed by Eckart Förster, that philosophy allegedly started with publishing of Kant’s CPR and ended a quarter century later when Hegel’s Phenomenology of Mind appeared. We address the questions in what sense this happened and how is this development to be interpreted? Secondly, we demonstrate that similar radical transition from new, “true” beginning of philosophy to its apparent finishing took place in two other, high profile occasions in the history of Western philosophy, in two key points of its development: in the years 390-365 bc, between the early and the late Plato, and between 1898 and 1922, between Russell and Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. These three short-lived, spectacular transitions from philosophy’s alleged start to its alleged ultimate accomplishment give us good reason to speak about a specific 25-years principle in philosophy. In a peculiar way, this principle reveals philosophy’s true nature.}},
author = {{Milkov, Nikolay}},
issn = {{2576-2435}},
journal = {{Journal of Research in Philosophy and History}},
keywords = {{Aristotle, Hegel, Kant, Plato, Russell, Wittgenstein}},
location = {{Rome, Italy}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{36--43}},
publisher = {{SCHOLINK INC.}},
title = {{{Philosophy’s 25-Years Principle: Philosophy between Intuitive Understanding and Discursive Reasoning}}},
doi = {{10.22158/jrph.v8n1p36}},
volume = {{8}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{58818,
author = {{Milkov, Nikolay}},
booktitle = {{Susan Stebbing: Analysis, Common Sense, and Public Philosophy}},
editor = {{Coliva, Annalisa and Doulas, Luis}},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
title = {{{Susan Stebbing and Some Poorly Explored Venues of Analytic Philosophy}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{58822,
abstract = {{In 1921, John Wisdom (1904–1993) became a member of Fitzwilliam House, Cambridge, where he read philosophy and attended lectures by G. E. Moore, C. D. Broad, and J. E. McTaggart. He received his BA in 1924, after which he worked for five years at the National Institute of Industrial Psychology. From 1929 to 1934, Wisdom was a Lecturer in the department of logic and metaphysics at the University of St Andrews and a colleague of G. F. Stout. After the publication of his book Interpretation and Analysis (1931) and five articles on “Logical Constructions” in Mind (1931–3), Wisdom became a Lecturer in Moral Sciences in Cambridge and a Fellow of Trinity College. This gave him the opportunity to gain first-hand knowledge of Wittgenstein’s philosophy. Since nothing by Wittgenstein but Tractatus appeared in print for decades, Wisdom’s publications of these years were—mistakenly—read as portents of the new ideas of Wittgenstein himself. The publication of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations in 1953 brought with it, among other things, the fall of Wisdom’s popularity. }},
author = {{Milkov, Nikolay}},
booktitle = {{Wittgenstein and Other Philosophers: His Influence on Historical and Contemporary Analytic Philosophers, 2 vol., Volume II}},
editor = {{Khani , Ali Hossein and Kemp , Gary }},
keywords = {{elucidation, facts, Frege, language, metaphysics, G. E. Moore, Russell, Stebbing, John Wisdom, Wittgenstein}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
title = {{{Wisdom's Wittgenstein}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@inbook{58821,
abstract = {{Susan Stebbing wrote only once on Wittgenstein, in her paper ‘Logical Positivism and Analysis’ (1933). The paper was unusually critical of Wittgenstein. It put the Cambridge analytic philosophy of Moore and Russell in a sharp opposition to the positivist philosophy of the Vienna Circle, in which Stebbing included Wittgenstein. Whereas the positivists were interested in analysing language, the Cambridge realists were analysing facts. To be more explicit, the analytic philosophers were engaged in directional analysis, which seeks to illuminate (to elucidate) the multiplicity of the analysed facts. In contrast, positivists aimed at a final analysis that proves that there are simples. Stebbing’s sympathies were clearly on the side of the Cambridge realists. The important implication of Stebbing’s paper was that it urged Wittgenstein to change the style of his philosophy, abandoning those points which allegedly connected him with the Vienna Circle.}},
author = {{Milkov, Nikolay}},
booktitle = {{Wittgenstein and Other Philosophers: His Influence on Historical and Contemporary Analytic Philosophers, vol. II}},
editor = {{Khani , Ali Hossein and Kemp , Gary }},
keywords = {{directional analysis, elucidation, facts, metaphysics, G. E. Moore, Russell, Stebbing, John Wisdom, Wittgenstein}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
title = {{{Stebbing's Wittgenstein}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{59143,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR4654178}},
title = {{{Moon, Stella S., “Demarcating Descartes’s Geometry with Clarity and Distinctness”, Synthese 202 (2023), No. 4, Paper No. 124, 29 pp.}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{60306,
author = {{Schoenert, Kathrin and Sommer, Sabrina and Buhl, Heike M.}},
journal = {{Frontiers in Developmental Psychology}},
title = {{{Impact of felt obligation and perceived mutual reciprocity on support between mothers and their adult children}}},
doi = {{10.3389/fdpys.2025.1508469}},
volume = {{3}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@article{59636,
author = {{Bohndick, Carla and Breetzke, Jonas and Klingsieck, Katrin B. and Buhl, Heike M.}},
journal = {{Social Psychology of Education}},
title = {{{Students’ personality impacts sense of belonging of students in different ways}}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11218-025-10058-0}},
volume = {{28}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{60869,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 07965480}},
title = {{{Bolzano, Bernard, Vermischte Schriften 1845–1847, hg. v. Otto Neumaier, Frommann-Holzboog, Eckhart Holzboog: Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 2024 (Bernard Bolzano-Gesamtausgabe. Reihe I: Schriften. Bd. 20,1). }}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{59144,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1556.03003}},
title = {{{Maddy, Penelope, Jouko Väänänen, Philosophical Uses of Categoricity Arguments, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2023 (Cambridge Elements).}}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{60870,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 079505172}},
title = {{{Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Wiener Ausgabe, Bd. 10,3: Zettelsammlung aus den Synopsen der Manuskriptbände I bis X, hg. v. Michael Nedo, Vittorio Klostermann: Frankfurt a.M. 2024, xv, 479–726 S. }}},
year = {{2025}},
}
@misc{59564,
author = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
booktitle = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 07925543}},
title = {{{Hermann, Michael, „Der Wandel von Statistik zu Maschinellem Lernen“, SieB. Siegener Beiträge zur Geschichte und Philosophie der Mathematik 17 (2023), 145–179. }}},
year = {{2025}},
}