@inbook{17638,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Rezeption, Forschung, Ausblick}},
  editor       = {{Beiderbeck, Friedrich and Li, Wenchao and Waldhoff, Stephan}},
  pages        = {{537--547}},
  publisher    = {{Steiner Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Logik}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{17895,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Verleihung der Ehrendoktorwürde an Maria von Welser durch die Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Universität Paderborn am 14. November 2019}},
  pages        = {{3--4}},
  title        = {{{Grußwort}}},
  volume       = {{155}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{21294,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  booktitle    = {{H-France Net}},
  issn         = {{ISSN 1553-9172}},
  title        = {{{Review Hagengruber Le Ru Émilie Du Châtelet Philosophe }}},
  volume       = {{158}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{31437,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  booktitle    = {{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and its Methodical Implications}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1_4}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{20690,
  abstract     = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}},
  journal      = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}},
  location     = {{Bologna }},
  pages        = {{331--353}},
  title        = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{20569,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  booktitle    = {{Männlich, weiblich, divers? Philosophische Anthropologie der Geschlechter}},
  editor       = {{Hoye, William J.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-00-065669-9}},
  pages        = {{27--59}},
  publisher    = {{Josef Pieper Stiftung}},
  title        = {{{Der männliche Gott. Bibel- und Gesellschaftskritik in der Tradition der Philosophinnen der frühen Neuzeit}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{31436,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{34106,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Brown, Andrew and Kölving, Ulla and Ertz, Stefanie}},
  title        = {{{The Saint Petersburg Manuscripts. A historical and critical online edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/stp/ (2020-2021)}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{48813,
  author       = {{Luft, Sebastian and Janes, Jered}},
  booktitle    = {{Transcending Reason. Heidegger on Rationality,}},
  editor       = {{Burch, M and McMullin, I}},
  pages        = {{237--258}},
  title        = {{{Die angebliche Frage nach dem ‘Sein des Seienden’:  An Unknown Husserlian Response to Heidegger’s ‘Question of Being’}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{50635,
  editor       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Münnix, Gabriele and Rolf, Bernd}},
  title        = {{{Total Digital? - Mind on the net? Geist im Netz? L’ esprit dans le réseau?. Reihe Forum Philosophie International. (Stefan Düfel: Lehrerbibliothek: Rezension)}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{50634,
  editor       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  title        = {{{Lesestrategien, Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik}}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{50636,
  editor       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Schalk, Helge}},
  title        = {{{Handbuch Medien im Philosophie- und Ethikunterricht}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{50679,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Jost, Leif Marvin}},
  journal      = {{Ethik & Unterricht}},
  pages        = {{10--11}},
  title        = {{{Kants kategorischer Imperativ im sprachsensiblen Philosophieunterricht. Sapere Aude – Habe Mut, dich Primärquellen zu bedienen. (gekürzt)}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50689,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Metaphernforschung in interdisziplinäreren und interdiskursiven Perspektiven}},
  editor       = {{Mikulas, Roman}},
  pages        = {{279--297}},
  title        = {{{Thesen zur Konstituierung einer interdisziplinären Metapherndidaktik}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50690,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Total Digital? - Mind on the net? Geist im Netz? L’ esprit dans le réseau?}},
  editor       = {{Münnix, Gabriele and Rolf, Bernd and Albus, Vanessa}},
  pages        = {{17--23}},
  title        = {{{Digitalisierung und Sprachförderung als Triebfeder der Drittmittel- und Preismaschinerie. Ein kritischer Kommentar}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50697,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung}},
  editor       = {{Cramer, Coli and König, Johannes and Rothland, Martin and Blömeke, Sigrid}},
  pages        = {{495--500}},
  title        = {{{Philosophie und Ethik in der Lehrerinnen und Lehrerbildung}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50692,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Bildung und Erziehung im Ausnahmezustand. Philosophische Reflexionsangebote zur COVID-19-Pandemie}},
  editor       = {{Drerup, Johannes and Schweiger, Gottfried}},
  pages        = {{96--107}},
  title        = {{{Der Stachel der Melancholie. Philosophische Bildung in pandemischen Zeiten}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{50698,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Burkard, Anne}},
  journal      = {{Information Philosophie}},
  pages        = {{110--114}},
  title        = {{{Caroline Heinrich, Christian Thein: „Das philosophiedidaktische Dreieck in der Diskussion}}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50695,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Medien im Philosophie- und Ethikunterricht}},
  editor       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Schalk, Helge}},
  pages        = {{8--10}},
  title        = {{{Medien im Ethik- und Philosophieunterricht}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{50696,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Medien im Philosophie- und Ethikunterricht}},
  editor       = {{Albus, Vanessa and Schalk, Helge}},
  pages        = {{14--27}},
  title        = {{{Texte – Lesen und Verstehen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}