@article{15522,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  journal      = {{Konsens 1+2 (2012)}},
  pages        = {{57--61}},
  title        = {{{Die Kreativität von Frauen und Müttern: Eine gesellschaftspolitische Herausforderung}}},
  volume       = {{I}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@techreport{12749,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Dasch, Thomas}},
  title        = {{{Was ist und wozu Nanoethik?}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@inbook{48902,
  author       = {{Luft, Sebastian}},
  booktitle    = {{Investigating Subjectivity}},
  pages        = {{25--41}},
  publisher    = {{BRILL}},
  title        = {{{The Subject as Moral Person. On Husserl’s Late Reflections Concerning the Concept of Personhood}}},
  doi          = {{10.1163/9789004222595_003}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@article{49262,
  abstract     = {{This paper takes a renewed look at Husserl’s method of the phenomenological reduction. It interprets “the reduction” as shorthand for the meaning of Husserl’s entire phenomenology in its mature stage. In the same way, the method of reduction might have different manners of execution but they are nevertheless guided by a common intent. The text takes its starting point by considering the different metaphors Husserl uses – the “flatland creatures” and the reduction as akin to a religious conversion – and spells out their implications, which lead me to consider their metaphilosophical significance. In this way, this article attempts a metaphilosophical reading of the meaning of the reduction in Husserl, which is equal to considering the meaning philosophy has for Husserl in the most general terms. In this way, some unorthodox reflections are carried out that shed new light on central phenomenological concepts, such as vidence and eidetic variation, phenomenology as a form of transcendental idealism, and the notorious problem of the lifeworld. In this way, Husserl’s phenomenology is interpreted as a peculiar representative of Enlightenment philosophy that restitutes a special notion of responsibility. }},
  author       = {{Luft, Sebastian}},
  issn         = {{2567-5494}},
  journal      = {{Phänomenologische Forschungen}},
  keywords     = {{General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{5--29}},
  publisher    = {{Felix Meiner Verlag GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Von der mannigfaltigen Bedeutung der Reduktion nach Husserl}}},
  doi          = {{10.28937/1000107805}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@article{50646,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik}},
  pages        = {{336--345}},
  title        = {{{Ist philosophische Bildung messbar? Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Philosophiedidaktik und empirischer Bildungsforschung}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@article{50645,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik}},
  pages        = {{95--103}},
  title        = {{{Methoden und Medien des autobiographischen Philosophierens}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{50711,
  author       = {{Albus, Vanessa}},
  booktitle    = {{Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik}},
  pages        = {{347--348}},
  title        = {{{Wiater, Werner: Ethik unterrichten. Einführung in die Fachdidaktik, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 2011. 255 Seiten}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18887,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR2840103}},
  title        = {{{Mancosu, Paolo, The Adventure of Reason. Interplay between Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, 1900–1940, Oxford University Press: Oxford 2010}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18702,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1244.01006}},
  title        = {{{Chareix, Fabien, “Geometrization or Mathematization. Christiaan Huygens’s Critiques of Infinitesimal Analysis in his Correspondence with Leibniz”, in: The Practice of Reason. Leibniz and his Controversies, hg. v. Marcelo Dascal, John Benjamins Publishing: Philadelphia 2010, 33–49}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18885,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR2766474 (2012g:01020)}},
  title        = {{{Math.ch/100 – Schweizerische Mathematische Gesellschaft/Société Mathématique Suisse/Swiss Mathematical Society 1910–2010, hg. v. Bruno Colbois/Christine Riedtmann/Victor Schroeder, European Mathematical Society: Zürich 2010}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18703,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1244.01034}},
  title        = {{{Pollard, Stephen (Hg.), Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics by Moritz Pasch, Springer: Dordrecht u.a. 2010 (Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science; 83)}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18700,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1238.01119}},
  title        = {{{Hersh, Reuben/Verena John-Steiner, Loving + Hating Mathematics. Challenging three Myths of Mathematical Life, Princeton University Press: Princeton/Oxford 2011}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18884,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR2732670 (2012d:03012)}},
  title        = {{{McCarty, David, “Constructivism in Mathematics”, in: Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Mathematics, hg. v. Andrew D. Irvine, Elesevier: Amsterdam 2009, 311–343}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18886,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Mathematical Reviews, MR2895608 (2012m:03010)}},
  title        = {{{Vilkko, Risto, “The Logic Question During the First Half of the Nineteenth Century”, in: The Development of Modern Logic, Oxford University Press: Oxford 2009, 203–221}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18705,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{zbMATH Open, Zbl. 1245.00016}},
  title        = {{{Schottenkirk, Dena, Nominalism and Its Aftermath. The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman, Springer: Dordrecht u.a. 2009 (Synthese Library; 343)}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@misc{18888,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Mathematical Reviews,  MR2952222 }},
  title        = {{{Glaschick, Rainer, “Alan Turings Wirkung in Münster”, Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 20 (2012), 42–48}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@article{55227,
  author       = {{Milkov, Nikolay}},
  journal      = {{Grazer philosophische Studien }},
  pages        = {{137--156}},
  title        = {{{Karl Popper’s Debt to Leonard Nelson}}},
  volume       = {{86}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@inbook{17617,
  abstract     = {{Rezension: Zbl. Math. 1316.00023 (D. Bondoni)}},
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Probabilities, Laws, and Structures}},
  editor       = {{Dieks, Dennis and Gonzalez, Wenceslao J. and Hartmann, Stephan and Stöltzner, Michael and Weber, Marcel}},
  pages        = {{419--429}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{The Beginnings of Model Theory in the Algebra of Logic}}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@inbook{12742,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  booktitle    = {{Emilie Du Châtelet between Leibniz and Newton}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  isbn         = {{9789400720749}},
  pages        = {{1--59}},
  publisher    = {{Springer VS}},
  title        = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet and the Transformation of Metaphysics}}},
  year         = {{2012}},
}

@inproceedings{17615,
  author       = {{Peckhaus, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Leonard Nelson – ein früher Denker der Analytischen Philosophie. Ein Symposium zum 80. Todestag des Göttinger Philosophen}},
  editor       = {{Berger, Armin and Raupach-Strey, Gisela and Schroth, Jörg}},
  pages        = {{193--211}},
  publisher    = {{LIT}},
  title        = {{{Logik und Mathematik in der Philosophie Leonard Nelsons}}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}