@article{41337, abstract = {{AbstractOnline reviews have profound impacts on firm success in terms of sales volume and how much customers are willing to pay, yet firms remain highly dependent on customers’ voluntary contributions. A popular way to increase the number of online reviews is to use product testing programs, which offer participants free products in exchange for writing reviews. Firms that employ this practice generally hope to increase review quality and secure higher product rating scores. However, a qualitative study, experimental study, and multilevel analysis of a field study dataset of more than 200,000 online reviews by product testers combine to reveal that product testing programs do not necessarily generate higher quality reviews, nor better product ratings. Only in certain circumstances (e.g., higher priced products) does offering a product testing program generate these benefits for the firm. Therefore, companies should consider carefully if and when they want to offer product testing programs.}}, author = {{Garnefeld, Ina and Krah, Tabea and Böhm, Eva and Gremler, Dwayne D.}}, issn = {{0092-0703}}, journal = {{Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science}}, keywords = {{Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, Business and International Management}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{703--722}}, publisher = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}}, title = {{{Online reviews generated through product testing: can more favorable reviews be enticed with free products?}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s11747-021-00770-6}}, volume = {{49}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{46635, author = {{Schaefers, Tobias and Ruffer, Stefan and Böhm, Eva}}, issn = {{0019-8501}}, journal = {{Industrial Marketing Management}}, keywords = {{Marketing}}, pages = {{466--481}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Outcome-based contracting from the customers' perspective: A means-end chain analytical exploration}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.06.002}}, volume = {{93}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{49097, author = {{Krebs, Benjamin and Kabst, Rüdiger}}, journal = {{PERSONALquartely}}, title = {{{Shared Leadership: Neue Studien für die Unternehmenspraxis}}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{24375, author = {{Wach, Bernhard and Krebs, Benjamin and Kabst, Rüdiger}}, booktitle = {{HR-Trends 2021}}, editor = {{Schwuchow, K. and Gutmann, J.}}, publisher = {{Haufe-Lexware}}, title = {{{HR-Manager als Intrapreneure}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{42778, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia and Schneider, Martin}}, booktitle = {{Komparatistik heute}}, isbn = {{9783846766088}}, pages = {{159--173}}, publisher = {{Brill | Fink}}, title = {{{Passivität als Widerstand gegen die Macht der Verhältnisse? Melvilles Bartleby, the scrivener aus literaturwissenschaftlicher und ökonomischer Perspektive}}}, doi = {{10.30965/9783846766088_009}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{36060, abstract = {{Merging a sample of 492 merger and acquisition (M&A) announcements from 284 acquiring firms across Europe and North America with data from 5-year single-name credit default swaps (CDSs) written on stock-listed acquiring firms between 2005 and 2018, the paper at hand empirically analyzes the CDS investors’ risk perceptions of M&A announcements using event study methodologies. As a baseline result, we provide evidence for significantly positive cumulative average abnormal CDS spread changes for both, European and North American acquirers suggesting that CDS investors perceive an increase in the acquiring firms’ credit risk exposures due to M&A announcements. Our baseline finding holds under several robustness checks, especially when controlling for the robustness of the empirical design. Moreover, results from a large variety of sensitivity analyses reveal a number of deal and firm characteristics that may explain why CDS investors from our sample expect an increase in the acquirers’ credit risk exposures due to forthcoming M&A transactions. }}, author = {{Hippert, Benjamin and Uhde, André}}, keywords = {{credit default swaps, risk perception of CDS investors, mergers and acquisitions, event study}}, title = {{{CDS Investors’ Risk Perceptions of M&A Announcements}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{36063, abstract = {{This paper empirically investigates determinants of the outstanding net notional amount of credit default swaps (CDSs) contracts written on banks. We extend and complement the previous literature dealing with CDS trading by analyzing a comprehensive set of CDS tradingspecific, bank-fundamental, macroeconomic and bank-institutional determinants. We find that risk hedging clearly dominates an investor’s speculation and arbitrage motive, while the latter, however, exhibits the strongest impact on the outstanding net notional amount of bank CDSs. Furthermore, being classified as a G-SIB, being a constituent of the main CDS index and the equity trading volume may significantly explain changes in the outstanding CDS net notional on banks. The analysis at hand provides important implications for both academics and practitioners, since understanding the trading motives of bank CDS investors provides a deeper insight into the opaque CDS market. }}, author = {{Hippert, Benjamin and Uhde, André and Wengerek, Sascha Tobias}}, keywords = {{banking, outstanding CDS net notional, determinants of bank CDS trading}}, title = {{{Determinants of CDS Trading on Major Banks}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{49277, author = {{Fochmann, Martin and Heinemann-Heile, Vanessa and Huber, Hans-Peter and Maiterth, Ralf and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}}, title = {{{Tax Burden on German Companies – Income Tax Burden and Administrative Costs}}}, doi = {{10.52569/XGKV7897}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{47957, author = {{Schneider, Jennifer Nicole}}, booktitle = {{Fostering Digitisation and Industry 4.0: Education – Vocation - Industry – Future. New Opportunities and Challenges for European VET. Insights in the DigI-VET Project}}, editor = {{Beutner, Marc and Pechuel, Rasmus and Schneider, Jennifer }}, pages = {{57 -- 62 }}, title = {{{Digital transformation in industry}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{47966, author = {{Schneider, Jennifer }}, booktitle = {{Fostering Digitisation and Industry 4.0: Education – Vocation - Industry – Future. New Opportunities and Challenges for European VET. Insights in the DigI-VET Project}}, editor = {{Beutner, Marc and Pechuel, Rasmus and Schneider, Jennifer}}, pages = {{150 -- 165}}, title = {{{Teaching and Learning Materials}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{49462, author = {{Brendel, A.B. and Greve, M. and Masuch, K. and Trang, S.}}, journal = {{HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik}}, pages = {{698–711}}, title = {{{Corona Tracing Apps – Eine Analyse und Strukturierung des europäischen Marktes}}}, volume = {{58}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{49463, author = {{Trang, S. and Nastjuk, I.}}, journal = {{Computers & Security}}, title = {{{Examining the role of stress and information security policy design in information security compliance behaviour: An experimental study of in-task behaviour}}}, volume = {{104}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{49464, author = {{Trang, S. and Weiger, W.}}, journal = {{Computers in Human Behavior}}, title = {{{The perils of gamification: Does engaging with gamified services increase users’ willingness to disclose personal information?}}}, volume = {{116}}, year = {{2021}}, } @article{24456, abstract = {{One objective of current research in explainable intelligent systems is to implement social aspects in order to increase the relevance of explanations. In this paper, we argue that a novel conceptual framework is needed to overcome shortcomings of existing AI systems with little attention to processes of interaction and learning. Drawing from research in interaction and development, we first outline the novel conceptual framework that pushes the design of AI systems toward true interactivity with an emphasis on the role of the partner and social relevance. We propose that AI systems will be able to provide a meaningful and relevant explanation only if the process of explaining is extended to active contribution of both partners that brings about dynamics that is modulated by different levels of analysis. Accordingly, our conceptual framework comprises monitoring and scaffolding as key concepts and claims that the process of explaining is not only modulated by the interaction between explainee and explainer but is embedded into a larger social context in which conventionalized and routinized behaviors are established. We discuss our conceptual framework in relation to the established objectives of transparency and autonomy that are raised for the design of explainable AI systems currently.}}, author = {{Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Cimiano, Philipp and Scharlau, Ingrid and Matzner, Tobias and Buhl, Heike M. and Buschmeier, Hendrik and Esposito, Elena and Grimminger, Angela and Hammer, Barbara and Haeb-Umbach, Reinhold and Horwath, Ilona and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Kern, Friederike and Kopp, Stefan and Thommes, Kirsten and Ngonga Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille and Schulte, Carsten and Wachsmuth, Henning and Wagner, Petra and Wrede, Britta}}, issn = {{2379-8920}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems}}, keywords = {{Explainability, process ofexplaining andunderstanding, explainable artificial systems}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{717--728}}, title = {{{Explanation as a Social Practice: Toward a Conceptual Framework for the Social Design of AI Systems}}}, doi = {{10.1109/tcds.2020.3044366}}, volume = {{13}}, year = {{2021}}, } @techreport{49876, author = {{Giese, Henning}}, title = {{{Tax Evasion Penalties and Aggressive Tax Avoidance}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{30192, author = {{Arslan, Kader and Trier, Matthias}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 32nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2021)}}, keywords = {{Social media platform affordances, Use culture, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter}}, location = {{Sydney, Australia}}, title = {{{Towards a Differentiation Perspective on Social Media Platforms’ Affordances and Use Cultures – An organizing Literature Review}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{30190, author = {{Arslan, Kader}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021)}}, keywords = {{Social media management, Social media, Literature review, Affordances, User behavior, Use culture}}, location = {{Marrakesh, Marocco}}, title = {{{A Review on Social Media Channel Choice Determinants in Organizations}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{50277, author = {{Daniel-Söltenfuß, Desiree and Fuge, Juliane}}, booktitle = {{Die große Lehre im virtuellen Raum: The Empty Space}}, editor = {{Daniel, Desiree and Emmler, Tina and Fuge, Juliane}}, pages = {{69--100}}, publisher = {{Eusl}}, title = {{{Man sieht nur mit dem Herzen gut. Beziehungsgestaltung in der virtuellen Lehre}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inbook{50278, author = {{Daniel-Söltenfuß, Desiree and Emmler, Tina and Fuge, Juliane}}, booktitle = {{Die große Lehre im virtuellen Raum: The Empty Space}}, editor = {{Daniel, Desiree and Emmler, Tina and Fuge, Juliane}}, pages = {{7--18}}, publisher = {{Eusl}}, title = {{{Editorial}}}, year = {{2021}}, } @inproceedings{26812, author = {{Leffrang, Dirk and Müller, Oliver}}, booktitle = {{IEEE Workshop on TRust and EXpertise in Visual Analytics}}, title = {{{Should I Follow this Model? The Effect of Uncertainty Visualization on the Acceptance of Time Series Forecasts}}}, doi = {{10.1109/TREX53765.2021.00009}}, year = {{2021}}, }