@inproceedings{46689,
  author       = {{Garnefeld, I. and Krah, T. and Böhm, Eva and Gremler, D. D.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference, San Diego, CA}},
  location     = {{San Diego, CA}},
  title        = {{{Do product testing programs lead to more favorable online reviews? (ausgezeichnet mit Best Paper Award)}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{46690,
  author       = {{Eggert, A. and Böhm, Eva and Akalan, R. and Gebauer, H.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference, San Diego, CA}},
  location     = {{San Diego, CA}},
  title        = {{{Manufacturers’ service growth through mergers and acquisitions – An event study}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{46636,
  author       = {{Böhm, Eva and Eggert, Andreas and Terho, Harri and Ulaga, Wolfgang and Haas, Alexander}},
  issn         = {{0885-3134}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{180--197}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Drivers and outcomes of salespersons’ value opportunity recognition competence in solution selling}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/08853134.2020.1778484}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{56295,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Using rich linked employer–employee data for (West) Germany between 1996 and 2014, we conduct a decomposition analysis based on recentered influence function (RIF) regressions to analyze the relative contributions of various plant and worker characteristics to the rise in German wage dispersion. Moreover, we separately investigate the sources of between‐plant and within‐plant wage dispersion. We find that industry effects and the collective bargaining regime contribute the most to rising wage inequality. In the case of collective bargaining, both the decline in collective bargaining coverage and the increase in wage dispersion among the group of covered plants have played important roles.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Baumgarten, Daniel and Felbermayr, Gabriel and Lehwald, Sybille}},
  issn         = {{0019-8676}},
  journal      = {{Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{85--122}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Dissecting between-plant and within-plant wage inequality – Evidence from Germany}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/irel.12249}},
  volume       = {{59}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{56294,
  author       = {{Baumgarten, Daniel and Irlacher, Michael and Koch, Michael}},
  issn         = {{0014-2921}},
  journal      = {{European Economic Review}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Offshoring and non-monotonic employment effects across industries in general equilibrium}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103583}},
  volume       = {{130}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{49467,
  author       = {{Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Trenz, M. and Weiger, W. and Tarafdar, M. and Cheung, C.}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  pages        = {{415--428}},
  title        = {{{One app to trace them all? Examining app specifications for mass acceptance of contact-tracing apps}}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{49470,
  author       = {{Mandrella, M. and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Kolbe, L. M.}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Association for Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{388–427}},
  title        = {{{Synthesizing and Integrating Research on IT-Based Value Co-Creation: A Meta-Analysis}}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{57459,
  author       = {{Riepe, Jan and Veer, Theresa and Yang, Philip}},
  journal      = {{SSRN Electronic Journal}},
  title        = {{{Strategic information sharing between ventures and CVCs during socialization: The importance of active investors in weak IP regimes}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{57393,
  author       = {{Puhani, Patrick A. and Yang, Philip}},
  issn         = {{0167-2681}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization}},
  pages        = {{333--341}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Does increased teacher accountability decrease leniency in grading?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.017}},
  volume       = {{171}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{60041,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Given the increasing role of socially responsible investing (SRI), but still limited participation of individual (i.e. small, retail) investors, the objective of this study is twofold: (i) We aim to identify investment barriers regarding SRI for individual investors and analyze to what extent these barriers vary across different investor groups. (ii) We analyze to what extent sustainability or transparency labels can help to overcome these barriers. To this end, we empirically analyze data from a survey and a stated choice experiment for a broad sample of financial decision makers in German households. The results suggest that a considerable amount of respondents can imagine to invest in a socially responsible manner, which is promising for policymakers and practitioners who aim to foster sustainable development and SRI. However, too high information costs are a severe barrier for potential future investors and a considerable share of respondents distrusts providers of socially responsible investment products. Banks, who could help to solve this problem, appear not to fulfill their role as intermediaries. But we find that labels might serve as a complement to banks. Especially sustainability certificates that confirm the consideration of sustainability criteria could decrease information costs and overcome at least some barriers for some investor groups, particularly for new investors. However, the results also suggest that a certain degree of basic knowledge and trust in providers of socially responsible investment products is required before labels work efficiently.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gutsche, Gunnar and Zwergel, Bernhard}},
  issn         = {{1439-2917}},
  journal      = {{Schmalenbach Business Review}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{111--157}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Investment Barriers and Labeling Schemes for Socially Responsible Investments}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s41464-020-00085-z}},
  volume       = {{72}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{45742,
  author       = {{Reimer, T. and Steinhoff, Lena and Leyer, M.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference Proceedings, San Diego.}},
  location     = {{San Diego}},
  title        = {{{“Dear Stranger, This Looks Good on You”: The Effect of Ambiguous Interactive Virtual Presence on Store Loyalty in Offline Retailing}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{63781,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Triggering the energy-efficient behavior of agents in firms simultaneously decreases costs and mitigates CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions. If firms use team tournaments to increase energy-efficient behavior and thus employee performance, they may face unintended consequences, like a bifurcation effect: Individuals drop out if they believe that they cannot win the contest. By contrast, high-performing employees may overexert themselves. Additionally, some individuals might be tempted to free-ride. In a field experiment with truck drivers, we analyze whether proportional sharing of the bonus within teams based on individual effort instead of egalitarian sharing reduces both bifurcation and free-riding during team tournaments. Our results reveal that (1) the team contest improves performance; (2) this increase in performance is overall slightly stronger under the proportional than under the egalitarian sharing rule, using ceteris paribus comparisons; and (3) the performance increase is mainly driven by the team member performing worse. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hoffmann, Christin and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1086-0266}},
  journal      = {{Organization &amp; Environment}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{307--331}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Combining Egalitarian and Proportional Sharing Rules in Team Tournaments to Incentivize Energy-Efficient Behavior in a Principal-Agent Context}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/1086026620945343}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{57401,
  author       = {{Pfeifer, Christian and Janssen, Simon and Yang, Philip and Backes-Gellner, Uschi}},
  issn         = {{1877-6345}},
  journal      = {{Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{131--147}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Training participation of a firm’s aging workforce}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/bf03546513}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{61853,
  author       = {{Bartlitz, David}},
  journal      = {{Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht (NZG) }},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{105}},
  title        = {{{Review of Lutter, Marcus (founder): Umwandlungsgesetz, 6. Aufl. 2019, Otto Schmidt, Köln}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{17073,
  author       = {{Gries, Thomas and Grundmann, Rainer}},
  issn         = {{1363-6669}},
  journal      = {{Review of Development Economics}},
  pages        = {{644--667}},
  title        = {{{Modern sector development: The role of exports and institutions in developing countries}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/rode.12663}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@techreport{21407,
  author       = {{Bornemann, Tobias and Schipp, Adrian and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  title        = {{{ 2018/2019 Umfrage zur Steuerkomplexität in deutschen Finanzverwaltungen}}},
  doi          = {{10.52569/ILCP9945}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{16486,
  abstract     = {{After the introduction of CbCR – pursuant to the BEPS Project (Action 13) in 2015 –, which was established to reduce the information asymmetry between MNEs and tax authorities of the countries they operate in, now public CbCR – as suggested by the EU Commission in 2016 – is discussed as a next step. Here, the objective is to overcome information asymmetries between MNEs and the general public of the countries they operate in. Starting from the assumption that regulators care about the legitimacy of tax laws, this article evaluates pros and cons of public CbCR. The authors find that from the perspective of information asymmetries, public CbCR increases tax transparency only marginally at best. Accordingly, it is concluded that democracies that are based on the rule of law seem to rely on pillories in terms of public CbCR to enforce fair tax payments.}},
  author       = {{Lagarden, Martin and Schreiber, Ulrich and Simons, Dirk and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  journal      = {{International Transfer Pricing Journal}},
  number       = {{2}},
  title        = {{{Country-by-Country Reporting Goes Public - Cui Bono?}}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{21415,
  abstract     = {{This article comprehensively reviews Australia’s corporate income tax complexity as faced by multinational corporations (MNCs) and compares it to the average of the remaining OECD countries. Building on unique survey data, I find that the Australian tax code is considerably more complex than the OECD average, which is mainly due to overly complex anti-avoidance legislation, such as regulations on transfer pricing, general anti-avoidance or controlled foreign corporations (CFC). In contrast, Australia’s tax framework, which covers processes and features such as tax law enactment or tax audits, is close to the OECD average. A more detailed analysis yields further interesting insights. For example, excessive details in the tax code and the time between the announcement of a tax law change and its enactment turn out to be serious issues in Australia relative to the remaining OECD countries. }},
  author       = {{Hoppe, Thomas}},
  journal      = {{Australian Tax Forum}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{451--475}},
  title        = {{{Tax Complexity in Australia – a Survey-Based Comparison to the OECD Average}}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{21420,
  author       = {{Mair, Christina and Scheffler, Wolfram and Senger, Isabell and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  journal      = {{Steuer und Wirtschaft}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{317--329}},
  title        = {{{Auswirkungen der digitalen Flexibilisierung des Fertigungsortes auf die Verteilung der Besteuerungsrechte – Ergebnisse von Modellrechnungen zum 3D-Druck-Verfahren}}},
  volume       = {{97}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{49871,
  author       = {{Giese, Henning and Graßl, Benjamin and Holtmann, Svea and Krug, Philipp}},
  journal      = {{Deutsches Steuerrecht}},
  number       = {{16-16}},
  pages        = {{752--760}},
  title        = {{{Steuerliche Entlastungsmöglichkeiten für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen wegen der COVID-19-Pandemie}}},
  volume       = {{59}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}