@misc{42298,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Productivity optimization through project matching}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{42306,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Matching Mechanisms and Organ Exchange}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{42300,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Cartel Fines in the European Union}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{42302,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Anspruchsregeln in Verhandlungen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{42292,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Die Zusammenstellung eines Sortiments als Beispiel interdependenter Verhandlungen}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@misc{42294,
  author       = {{N., N.}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Matching in Netzwerken}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{35953,
  author       = {{Schwabl, Franziska and Janssen, Elmar A. and Sloane, Peter F. E.}},
  issn         = {{0172-2875}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Mathematics, General Mathematics}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{138--152}},
  publisher    = {{Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH}},
  title        = {{{Sprachsensible Formulierung von Erhebungsinstrumenten}}},
  doi          = {{10.25162/zbw-2020-0005}},
  volume       = {{116}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@techreport{46541,
  abstract     = {{Theoretical papers show that optimal prevention decisions in the sense of selfprotection (i.e., primary prevention) depend not only on the level of (second-order) risk aversion but also on higher-order risk preferences such as prudence (third-order risk aversion). We study empirically whether these theoretical results hold and whether prudent individuals show less preventive (self-protection) effort than non-prudent individuals. We use a unique dataset that combines data on higher-order risk preferences and various measures of observed real-world prevention behavior. We find that prudent individuals indeed invest less in self-protection as measured by influenza vaccination. This result is driven by high risk individuals such as individuals >60 years of age or chronically ill. We do not find a clear empirical relationship between riskpreferences and prevention in the sense of self-insurance (i.e. secondary prevention). Neither risk aversion nor prudence is related to cancer screenings such as mammograms, Pap smears or X-rays of the lung.}},
  author       = {{Mayrhofer, Thomas and Schmitz, Hendrik}},
  keywords     = {{prudence, risk preferences, prevention, vaccination, screening}},
  publisher    = {{RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen}},
  title        = {{{Prudence and prevention: Empirical evidence}}},
  volume       = {{863}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{46689,
  author       = {{Garnefeld, I. and Krah, T. and Böhm, Eva and Gremler, D. D.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference, San Diego, CA}},
  location     = {{San Diego, CA}},
  title        = {{{Do product testing programs lead to more favorable online reviews? (ausgezeichnet mit Best Paper Award)}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{46690,
  author       = {{Eggert, A. and Böhm, Eva and Akalan, R. and Gebauer, H.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference, San Diego, CA}},
  location     = {{San Diego, CA}},
  title        = {{{Manufacturers’ service growth through mergers and acquisitions – An event study}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{46636,
  author       = {{Böhm, Eva and Eggert, Andreas and Terho, Harri and Ulaga, Wolfgang and Haas, Alexander}},
  issn         = {{0885-3134}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management of Technology and Innovation, Human Factors and Ergonomics}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{180--197}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{Drivers and outcomes of salespersons’ value opportunity recognition competence in solution selling}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/08853134.2020.1778484}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{56295,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>Using rich linked employer–employee data for (West) Germany between 1996 and 2014, we conduct a decomposition analysis based on recentered influence function (RIF) regressions to analyze the relative contributions of various plant and worker characteristics to the rise in German wage dispersion. Moreover, we separately investigate the sources of between‐plant and within‐plant wage dispersion. We find that industry effects and the collective bargaining regime contribute the most to rising wage inequality. In the case of collective bargaining, both the decline in collective bargaining coverage and the increase in wage dispersion among the group of covered plants have played important roles.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Baumgarten, Daniel and Felbermayr, Gabriel and Lehwald, Sybille}},
  issn         = {{0019-8676}},
  journal      = {{Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{85--122}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Dissecting between-plant and within-plant wage inequality – Evidence from Germany}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/irel.12249}},
  volume       = {{59}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{56294,
  author       = {{Baumgarten, Daniel and Irlacher, Michael and Koch, Michael}},
  issn         = {{0014-2921}},
  journal      = {{European Economic Review}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Offshoring and non-monotonic employment effects across industries in general equilibrium}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103583}},
  volume       = {{130}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{49467,
  author       = {{Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Trenz, M. and Weiger, W. and Tarafdar, M. and Cheung, C.}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  pages        = {{415--428}},
  title        = {{{One app to trace them all? Examining app specifications for mass acceptance of contact-tracing apps}}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{49470,
  author       = {{Mandrella, M. and Trang, Simon Thanh-Nam and Kolbe, L. M.}},
  journal      = {{Journal of the Association for Information Systems (VHB Jourqual 3 A)}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{388–427}},
  title        = {{{Synthesizing and Integrating Research on IT-Based Value Co-Creation: A Meta-Analysis}}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{57459,
  author       = {{Riepe, Jan and Veer, Theresa and Yang, Philip}},
  journal      = {{SSRN Electronic Journal}},
  title        = {{{Strategic information sharing between ventures and CVCs during socialization: The importance of active investors in weak IP regimes}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{57393,
  author       = {{Puhani, Patrick A. and Yang, Philip}},
  issn         = {{0167-2681}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Economic Behavior &amp; Organization}},
  pages        = {{333--341}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Does increased teacher accountability decrease leniency in grading?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.017}},
  volume       = {{171}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{60041,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Given the increasing role of socially responsible investing (SRI), but still limited participation of individual (i.e. small, retail) investors, the objective of this study is twofold: (i) We aim to identify investment barriers regarding SRI for individual investors and analyze to what extent these barriers vary across different investor groups. (ii) We analyze to what extent sustainability or transparency labels can help to overcome these barriers. To this end, we empirically analyze data from a survey and a stated choice experiment for a broad sample of financial decision makers in German households. The results suggest that a considerable amount of respondents can imagine to invest in a socially responsible manner, which is promising for policymakers and practitioners who aim to foster sustainable development and SRI. However, too high information costs are a severe barrier for potential future investors and a considerable share of respondents distrusts providers of socially responsible investment products. Banks, who could help to solve this problem, appear not to fulfill their role as intermediaries. But we find that labels might serve as a complement to banks. Especially sustainability certificates that confirm the consideration of sustainability criteria could decrease information costs and overcome at least some barriers for some investor groups, particularly for new investors. However, the results also suggest that a certain degree of basic knowledge and trust in providers of socially responsible investment products is required before labels work efficiently.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Gutsche, Gunnar and Zwergel, Bernhard}},
  issn         = {{1439-2917}},
  journal      = {{Schmalenbach Business Review}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{111--157}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Investment Barriers and Labeling Schemes for Socially Responsible Investments}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s41464-020-00085-z}},
  volume       = {{72}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{45742,
  author       = {{Reimer, T. and Steinhoff, Lena and Leyer, M.}},
  booktitle    = {{2020 AMA Winter Academic Conference Proceedings, San Diego.}},
  location     = {{San Diego}},
  title        = {{{“Dear Stranger, This Looks Good on You”: The Effect of Ambiguous Interactive Virtual Presence on Store Loyalty in Offline Retailing}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{63781,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Triggering the energy-efficient behavior of agents in firms simultaneously decreases costs and mitigates CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> emissions. If firms use team tournaments to increase energy-efficient behavior and thus employee performance, they may face unintended consequences, like a bifurcation effect: Individuals drop out if they believe that they cannot win the contest. By contrast, high-performing employees may overexert themselves. Additionally, some individuals might be tempted to free-ride. In a field experiment with truck drivers, we analyze whether proportional sharing of the bonus within teams based on individual effort instead of egalitarian sharing reduces both bifurcation and free-riding during team tournaments. Our results reveal that (1) the team contest improves performance; (2) this increase in performance is overall slightly stronger under the proportional than under the egalitarian sharing rule, using ceteris paribus comparisons; and (3) the performance increase is mainly driven by the team member performing worse. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Hoffmann, Christin and Thommes, Kirsten}},
  issn         = {{1086-0266}},
  journal      = {{Organization &amp; Environment}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{307--331}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  title        = {{{Combining Egalitarian and Proportional Sharing Rules in Team Tournaments to Incentivize Energy-Efficient Behavior in a Principal-Agent Context}}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/1086026620945343}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}