@article{16882,
author = {{Atkins, Marc and Gilroy, Bernard Michael and Seiler, Volker}},
journal = {{Intereconomics}},
number = {{2}},
pages = {{120--126}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
title = {{{New Dimensions of Service Offshoring in World Trade}}},
volume = {{54}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@inbook{16883,
author = {{Gilroy, Bernard Michael and Golderbein, Alexander and Peitz, Christian and Stöckmann, Nico}},
booktitle = {{Operations Research Proceedings 2018}},
editor = {{Fortz, B. and Labbé, M.}},
pages = {{201--208}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
title = {{{The Impact of Monetary Policy on Investment Bank Profitability in Unequal Economies}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{16884,
author = {{Krimphove, Dieter and Peitz, Christian}},
journal = {{Fintechs: Rechtliche Grundlagen moderner Finanztechnologien}},
pages = {{287}},
publisher = {{Sch{\"a}ffer-Poeschel}},
title = {{{Social-Trading und Copy-Trading}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{10792,
author = {{Khan, Gohar Feroz and Trier, Matthias}},
issn = {{0960-085X}},
journal = {{European Journal of Information Systems}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{370--393}},
title = {{{Assessing the long-term fragmentation of information systems research with a longitudinal multi-network analysis}}},
doi = {{10.1080/0960085x.2018.1547853}},
volume = {{28}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@techreport{12077,
abstract = {{Die Komplexität von Steuersystemen gewinnt in der Debatte um den internationalen Steuerwettbewerb zunehmend an Bedeutung. Im vorliegenden Beitrag erfolgt, basierend auf den Daten, die dem Tax Complexity Index (www.taxcomplexity.org) zugrunde liegen, eine umfassende Gegenüberstellung der Komplexität der Steuersysteme von Deutschland und Öster-reich unter Berücksichtigung der Mittelwerte aller Länder. Die Steuergesetze weisen sowohl in Deutschland als auch in Österreich einen verhältnismäßig hohen Grad an Komplexität auf. Bei den steuerlichen Rahmenbedingungen fällt der Grad an Komplexität in beiden Ländern dagegen niedrig aus, wobei Österreich im Durchschnitt weniger komplex ist als Deutschland.}},
author = {{Hoppe, Thomas and Rechbauer, Martina and Sturm, Susann}},
title = {{{Steuerkomplexität im Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und Österreich – Eine Analyse des Status quo}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{12929,
author = {{Bräuer, Sebastian and Plenter, Florian and Klör, Benjamin and Monhof, Markus and Beverungen, Daniel and Becker, Jörg}},
issn = {{2198-3402}},
journal = {{Business Research}},
title = {{{Transactions for trading used electric vehicle batteries: theoretical underpinning and information systems design principles}}},
doi = {{10.1007/s40685-019-0091-9}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@techreport{15367,
abstract = {{n this paper, I review the empirical literature in the intersection of banks and corporate income taxation that emerged over the last two decades. To structure the included studies, I use a stakeholder approach and outline how corporate income taxation plays into the relation of banks and their four main stakeholders: bank regulators, customers, investors and tax authorities. My contribution to the literature is threefold: First, I contribute by providing, to the best of my knowledge, a first comprehensive review on this topic. Second, I point to areas for future research. Third, I deduce policy implications from the studies under review. In sum, the studies show that taxes distort banks’ pricing decisions, the relative attractiveness of debt and equity financing, the decision to report on or off the balance sheet and banks’ investment allocations. Empirical insights on how tax rules affect banks’ decision-making are helpful for policymakers to tailor suitable and sustainable tax legislation directed at banks. }},
author = {{Gawehn, Vanessa}},
keywords = {{corporate income taxes, banks, stakeholder approach, decision-making process}},
pages = {{34}},
publisher = {{SSRN}},
title = {{{Banks and Corporate Income Taxation: A Review}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@inproceedings{15532,
author = {{Purrmann, Maren and Wünderlich, Nancy}},
booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 2019 Frontiers in Service Conference}},
location = {{Singapore}},
title = {{{Value Co-Creation Patterns in Multi-Actor Service Interactions: A Framework for Collaborative Consumption Platforms}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@inbook{14890,
author = {{Kuhlemann, Stefan and Sellmann, Meinolf and Tierney, Kevin}},
booktitle = {{Lecture Notes in Computer Science}},
isbn = {{9783030300470}},
issn = {{0302-9743}},
title = {{{Exploiting Counterfactuals for Scalable Stochastic Optimization}}},
doi = {{10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_40}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@techreport{14902,
author = {{Mair, Christina and Scheffler, Wolfram and Senger, Isabell and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
title = {{{Analyse der Veränderung der zwischenstaatlichen Gewinnaufteilung bei Einführung einer standardisierten Gewinnverteilungsmethode am Beispiel des Einsatzes von 3D-Druckern}}},
volume = {{42}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{14904,
abstract = {{Die Komplexität von Steuersystemen gewinnt in der Debatte um den internationalen Steuerwettbewerb zunehmend an Bedeutung. Im vorliegenden Beitrag erfolgt, basierend auf den Befragungsdaten, die dem Tax Complexity Index von Hoppe et al. (2019) zugrunde liegen, eine umfassende Gegenüberstellung der Komplexität der Steuersysteme von Deutschland und Österreich unter Berücksichtigung der Mittelwerte aller vom Index abgedeckten Länder. Die Steuergesetze weisen sowohl in Deutschland als auch in Österreich einen verhältnismäßig hohen Grad an Komplexität auf. Bei den steuerlichen Rahmenbedingungen fällt der Grad an Komplexität in beiden Ländern dagegen niedrig
aus, wobei Österreich im Durchschnitt weniger komplex ist als Deutschland.}},
author = {{Hoppe, Thomas and Rechbauer, Martina and Sturm, Susann}},
journal = {{Steuer und Wirtschaft}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{397--412}},
title = {{{Steuerkomplexität im Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und Österreich - Eine Analyse des Status quo}}},
volume = {{96}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{15173,
author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga and Naeve-Stoß, Nicole}},
journal = {{bwpat}},
title = {{{Fachbezogene Reflexion in der beruflichen Lehrer*innenbildung}}},
volume = {{37}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{15174,
author = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm , Taiga}},
journal = {{Journal of Management Education }},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{446--453}},
title = {{{Untangling Faculty Misinformation From an Educational Perspective: Rejoinder to ''The Menace of Misinformation: Faculty Misstatements in Management Education and Their Consequences''}}},
volume = {{43}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@book{15175,
editor = {{Jenert, Tobias and Reinmann, Gabi and Schmohl, Tobias}},
publisher = {{Springer VS}},
title = {{{Theorie und Praxis der Hochschulbildungsforschung}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@techreport{15202,
abstract = {{In this paper, we analyze the two-dimensional Nash bargaining solution (NBS) deploying a standard labor market negotiations model (see McDonald and Solow, 1981; Creedy and McDonald, 1991). We show that the two-dimensional bargaining problem can be decomposed into two one-dimensional problems such that the (Cartesian) product of the solutions of these problems replicates the solution of the two-dimensional problem, if the NBS is applied. However, this decomposition fails for any solution concept that does not satisfy the axiom of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA axiom). Our decomposition result has significant implications for actual negotiations, as it allows for the decomposition of a multi-issue bargaining problem into a set of simpler problems, in particular a set of single-issue bargaining problems. In this way, the decomposition may help facilitate negotiations in labor markets and also in other environments.}},
author = {{Haake, Claus-Jochen and Upmann, Thorsten and Duman, Papatya}},
keywords = {{Labor market negotiations, Efficient bargains, Nash bargaining solution, Sequential bargaining, Restricted bargaining games}},
publisher = {{CIE Working Paper Series, Paderborn University}},
title = {{{The Decomposability of the Nash Bargaining Solution in Labor Markets}}},
volume = {{128}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@techreport{15204,
abstract = {{We criticize some conceptual weaknesses in the recent literature on coalitional TUgames and propose, based on our critics, a new definition of dual TU-games that coincides with the one in the literature on the class of super-additive games. We justify our new definition in four alternative ways: 1. Via an adequate definition of ecient payo vectors. 2. Via a modification of the Bondareva-Shapley duality. 3. Via an explicit consideration of \coalition building". 4. Via associating general TU-games to coalition-production economies. Rather than imputations, we base our analysis on a modification of aspirations.}},
author = {{Aslan, Fatma and Duman, Papatya and Trockel, Walter}},
keywords = {{TU-games, duality, core, c-Core, cohesive games, complete game efficiency}},
publisher = {{CIE Working Paper Series, Paderborn University}},
title = {{{Duality for General TU-games Redefined}}},
volume = {{121}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{15268,
author = {{Szierbowski-Seibel, Klaas and Wach, Bernhard A. and Kabst, Rüdiger}},
issn = {{1541-6518}},
journal = {{Organization Management Journal}},
pages = {{262--277}},
title = {{{The Collaboration of Human Resource Management and Line Management–An International Comparison}}},
doi = {{10.1080/15416518.2019.1679076}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@article{15269,
abstract = {{
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of national culture on organizations’ use of selection practices, specifically to investigate the impact of in-group collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and power distance on interview panels, one-on-one interviews, applications forms, references, ability, technical and psychometric tests.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses survey data from the 2008–2010 CRANET database. It uses OLS regression analysis to test the impact of national culture on organizations’ use of selection practices.
Findings
In-group collectivism increases the use of panel interviews and technical tests, and decreases the use of one-on-one interviews and application forms. Uncertainty avoidance increases the use of panel interviews and technical tests, and a decrease in one-on-one interviews, applications ability, and psychometric tests. Power distance leads to an increase in one-on-one interviews, applications and ability tests, and a decrease in panel interviews, psychometric tests and references.
Originality/value
This paper investigates the use of the impact of national culture on selection practices. Specifically, it looks at the use of a large number of selection practices panel interviews, one-on-one interviews, applications and references, and several different tests, ability, technical and psychometric.
}},
author = {{Prince, Nicholas Ryan and Kabst, Rüdiger}},
issn = {{0142-5455}},
journal = {{Employee Relations: The International Journal}},
pages = {{1145--1161}},
title = {{{Impact of national culture on organizations’ use of selection practices}}},
doi = {{10.1108/er-10-2018-0284}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@book{13968,
author = {{Krimphove, Dieter and Kruse, Oliver}},
pages = {{693}},
publisher = {{C. H. Beck}},
title = {{{Kommentar: MaComp Mindestanforderungen an die Compliance-Funktion und die weiteren Verhaltens-, Organisations- und Transparenzpflichten nach §§ 63 ff. WpHG für Wert-papierdienstleistungsunternehmen}}},
year = {{2019}},
}
@book{13969,
editor = {{Krimphove, Dieter and Kruse, Oliver}},
pages = {{693}},
publisher = {{C. H. Beck}},
title = {{{Kommentar: MaComp Mindestanforderungen an die Compliance-Funktion und die weiteren Verhaltens-, Organisations- und Transparenzpflichten nach §§ 63 ff. WpHG für Wert-papierdienstleistungsunternehmen}}},
year = {{2019}},
}