@article{26051,
  author       = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Mauer, Eileen and Sloane, Hannah}},
  journal      = {{bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik}},
  title        = {{{Zweifel am Studium? - Beratungskonzepte in der Studieneingangsphase zur Unterstützung  bei individuellen Problemlagen}}},
  volume       = {{34}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{2652,
  author       = {{Schlangenotto, Darius and Kundisch, Dennis and Wünderlich, Nancy}},
  journal      = {{Electronic Markets}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{407--421}},
  title        = {{{Is Paid Search Overrated? When Bricks-and-Mortar-Only Retailers Should Not Use Paid Search}}},
  volume       = {{28}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2660,
  author       = {{Neumann, Jürgen and Gutt, Dominik and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  booktitle    = {{Conference Abstracts of the Symposium on Statistical Challenges in Electronic Commerce Research (SCECR)}},
  location     = {{Rotterdam, Netherland}},
  title        = {{{The Traveling Reviewer Problem - Exploring the Relationship Between Offline Locations and Online Rating Behavior}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2678,
  author       = {{Piasecki, David and Schlangenotto, Darius}},
  booktitle    = {{Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg}},
  title        = {{{Can Companies Freeride on Public Interest Events? The Effect of Peak Days on Paid Search Advertising during the UEFA Euro 2016}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2679,
  author       = {{Bohn, Nicolai and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg}},
  title        = {{{Much more than "same solution using a different technology"}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2680,
  author       = {{Görzen, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg}},
  title        = {{{Trust the Experienced? Investigating the Effect of Experience on Decision Making in the Crowd}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2681,
  author       = {{Görzen, Thomas and Laux, Florian}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg}},
  title        = {{{Extracting the Wisdom from the Crowd: A Comparison of Approaches to Aggregating Collective Intelligence}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{2682,
  author       = {{Schlangenotto, Darius}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg}},
  title        = {{{With or Without You? The Influence of Search Partners on Consumer Behavior in Paid Search}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{3279,
  author       = {{Bartelheimer, Christian and Hendrik Betzing, Jan and Berendes, Ingo and Beverungen, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems}},
  location     = {{Portsmouth, UK}},
  title        = {{{Designing Multi-sided Community Platforms for Local High Street Retail}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{3280,
  author       = {{Hendrik Betzing, Jan and Beverungen, Daniel and Becker, Jörg}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband Data driven X --- Turning Data into Value --- Band V}},
  editor       = {{Drews, Paul and Funk, Burkhardt and Niemeyer, Peter and Xie, Lin}},
  pages        = {{2083----2094}},
  title        = {{{Design Principles for Co-Creating Digital Customer Experience in High Street Retail}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{3313,
  author       = {{Maurer, Alexandra}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Kundenbewertungen und Produktnachfrage: Eine ökonomische Analyse}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{3314,
  author       = {{Michels, Luisa Juliane}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{The Segmentation of Video-On-Demand Consumers}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{3315,
  author       = {{Walter, Miriam}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Sentiment Analysis of User-generated Ratings in the Sharing Economy }}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{3316,
  author       = {{Korn, Hanna}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Restaurant reputation and meal prices: empricial evidence from the German restaurant industry}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{3516,
  abstract     = {{Triadic service relationships comprise complex relationships in which not only the customer and provider are involved as partners but also other individuals with caregiving relationships with the customer. A triadic constellation may arise in the context of services for animal companions, for example, when veterinarians provide counsel and treatment to the animal companion and its owner. Through interviews with both owners of animal companions and providers of services for animal companions, this study explores typical constellations and characteristics of the three relationships in this service triad. In line with balance theory, the results show that four distinct types of triadic relationships exist in services for animal companions: the harmonious, the dysfunctional, the challenging, and the doubtful triad. The study highlights the potential conflicts and dynamics in the triads to advise providers on how to address customers depending on the types of triads to which they belong.}},
  author       = {{Rötzmeier-Keuper, Julia and Hendricks, Jennifer and Wünderlich, Nancy and Schmitz, Gertrud}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Business Research}},
  keywords     = {{Triadic relationships, Balance theory, Pet-related services, Animal companions, Service relationship typology, Service triads}},
  number       = {{85}},
  pages        = {{295----303}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{Triadic relationships in the context of services for animal companions}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{3520,
  author       = {{Pelster, Matthias and Hofmann, Annette}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Banking & Finance}},
  title        = {{{About the Fear of Reputational Loss: Social Trading and the Disposition Effect}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.003}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{3550,
  abstract     = {{Nowadays companies like Apple create ecosystems of third- party providers and users around their software platforms. Often online stores like Apple App Store are created to directly market third-party solutions. We call such ecosystems store-oriented software ecosystems. While the architecture of these ecosystems is mainly derived from busi- ness decisions of their owners, ecosystems with greatly different archi- tectural designs have been created. This diversity makes it challenging for future ecosystem providers to understand which architectural design is suitable to fulfill certain business decisions. In turn, opening a plat- form becomes risky while endangering intellectual property or scarifying quality of services. In this paper, we identify three main design options of store-oriented software ecosystems by classifying existing ecosystems based on similarities in their business decisions. We elaborate on the design options, discuss their main contributions, and provide exemplary ecosystems. Our work provides aspiring ecosystem providers with the reusable knowledge of existing ecosystems and helps them to take more informed architectural decisions and reduce risks in future.}},
  author       = {{Jazayeri, Bahar and Zimmermann, Olaf and Engels, Gregor and Küster, Jochen and Kundisch, Dennis and Szopinski, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceeding of International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design}},
  isbn         = {{9783319942131}},
  issn         = {{1865-1348}},
  pages        = {{390--400}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Design Options of Store-Oriented Software Ecosystems: An Investigation of Business Decisions}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_30}},
  volume       = {{319}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{3742,
  author       = {{Hoof, Simon}},
  booktitle    = {{Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications}},
  isbn         = {{9783319929873}},
  issn         = {{2363-8516}},
  pages        = {{13--23}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Dynamic Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: The Recursive Nash Bargaining Solution}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-92988-0_2}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{3902,
  abstract     = {{All over the world, firms and governments are increasingly concerned about the rise in tax complexity. To manage it and develop effective simplification measures, detailed information on the current drivers of complexity is required. However, research on this topic is scarce. This is surprising as the latest developments-for example, those triggered by the BEPS project-have given rise to the conjecture that complexity drivers may have changed, thus questioning the findings of prior studies. In this article, we shed light on this issue and provide a global picture of the current drivers of tax complexity that multinational corporations face based on a survey of 221 highly experienced tax consultants from 108 countries. Our results show that prior complexity drivers of the tax code are still important, with details and changes of tax regulations being the two most important complexity drivers. We also find evidence for new important complexity drivers emerging from different areas of the tax framework, such as inconsistent decisions among tax officers (tax audits) or retroactively applied tax law amendments (tax enactment). Based on the tax consultants' responses, we develop a concept of tax complexity that is characterized by two pillars, tax code and tax framework complexity and illustrates the various aspects that should be considered when assessing the complexity of a country's tax system.}},
  author       = {{Hoppe, Thomas and Schanz, Deborah and Sturm, Susann and Sureth-Sloane, Caren}},
  issn         = {{	0165-2826}},
  journal      = {{Intertax}},
  number       = {{8/9}},
  pages        = {{654--675}},
  publisher    = {{Kluwer Law International}},
  title        = {{{What are the Drivers of Tax Complexity for MNCs? Global Evidence}}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@techreport{2933,
  abstract     = {{We establish axioms under which a bargaining solution can be found by the maximization of the CES function and is unique up to specification of the distribution and elasticity parameters. This solution is referred to as the CES solution which includes the NASH and egalitarian solutions as special cases. Next, we consider a normalization of the CES function and establish axioms, under which a bargaining solution can be found by the maximization of the normalized CES and is unique up to the specifications of the distribution and its substitution parameters. We refer to this solution as the normalized CES solution, which includes the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions as special cases. Our paper contributes to bargaining theory by establishing unified characterizations of existing as well as a great variety of new bargaining solutions.}},
  author       = {{Haake, Claus-Jochen and Qin, Cheng-Zhong}},
  keywords     = {{Bargaining problem, CES Function, Normalized CES Function, Nash solution, Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution, Egalitarian Solution.}},
  publisher    = {{CIE Working Paper Series, Paderborn University}},
  title        = {{{On unification of solutions to the bargaining problem}}},
  volume       = {{113}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

