@misc{5967,
  author       = {{Koch, Alexander}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Reduzierung des Energieverlustes im Smart Grid mittels Koalitionsbildung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{5977,
  author       = {{Kückmann, Marie-Ann and Kremer, H.-Hugo}},
  booktitle    = {{Vielfalt des Lernens im Rahmen berufsbezogener Standards}},
  editor       = {{Buschfeld, D. and Cleef, M.}},
  isbn         = {{9783830937739}},
  pages        = {{177--188}},
  publisher    = {{Waxmann}},
  title        = {{{Multiprofessionelle Teams zur inklusiven Bildungsarbeit. Empirische Explorationen, theoretisch-konzeptionelle Annäherungen und praktische Gestaltung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@book{6164,
  author       = {{Schillinger, Rolf and Schryen, Guido}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-88246-374-3}},
  publisher    = {{University of Regensburg}},
  title        = {{{Security in Highly Connected IT Systems – Results of the Bavarian Research Alliance FORSEC}}},
  doi          = {{10.5283/epub.36264}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{6199,
  author       = {{Eggert, Andreas and Steinhoff, Lena and Witte, Carina}},
  title        = {{{Are Gift Purchases an Effective Driver of Customer Loyalty?}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{6238,
  author       = {{Kremer, H.-Hugo and Emmighausen, Laura and Mauer, Eileen}},
  booktitle    = {{Heterogenität als Chance. Bilanz und Perspektiven des Qualitätspakt Lehre-Projekts an der Universität Paderborn}},
  editor       = {{Riegraf, B. and Meister, D. M. and Reinhold, P. and Schaper, N. and Temps, T. T.}},
  isbn         = {{9783945437049}},
  pages        = {{126--129}},
  title        = {{{Studiengangsmanagement an der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Organisation, Arbeitsgebiete und Herausforderungen}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@book{4441,
  abstract     = {{Der Band reflektiert die normativen Voraussetzungen sowie methodologische und methodische Merkmale einer Hochschulbildungsforschung. Eine solche Forschung befasst sich mit den spezifischen didaktischen Anforderungen, die mit akademischem Lehren und Lernen sowie mit dem Anspruch an eine Bildung durch Wissenschaft verbunden sind. Hochschuldidaktik braucht eine Forschung, die ihrem Gegenstand gerecht wird und sich sowohl mit den normativen Zielen von Hochschulbildung als auch mit den individuellen Ansprüchen und Rahmenbedingungen einzelner Fächer auseinandersetzt. Im Rahmen konzeptioneller Beiträge wie auch konkreter Beispiele zeigt der Sammelband, wie Theorie und Praxis der Hochschulbildungsforschung entwickelt werden können.}},
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Reinmann, Gabi and Schmohl, Tobias}},
  title        = {{{Hochschulbildungsforschung: Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanstöße für die Hochschuldidaktik}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4453,
  abstract     = {{Business schools have been repeatedly confronted with demands to change their ways of educating future managers. Much of the current criticism focuses on content-related aspects of management education, targeting economic theory and management studies as an academic discipline. However, addressing what is taught alone has a very limited scope. Business schools also need to equip their students and their instructors with capabilities that allow them to question the viability of the theories, models and concepts for solving specific management tasks. In other words: Managers and therefore management education need to become more reflective in their practices. We present a study addressing the following research questions (1) What is the current level of reflective capabilities in management students across different business schools/programmes and in comparison to students in other disciplines? (2) Which characteristics of educational contexts influence the development of reflective capabilities? (3) What kinds of interventions for developing student reflection are suitable for being implemented in typical large-cohort undergraduate management programmes? Therefore we developed a survey measuring both students’ reflection modes (dependent variables) as well as factors influencing these modes (independent variables). We measured student reflection at two universities with a total sample of 747 students. Results show that undergraduate management students reflect less on their studies than their counterparts in other subjects. Second, we found that undergraduate management education seems to worsen than to improve students’ readiness to reflect. We used our findings to systematize existing teaching and learning methods and suggest a basic structure for effective interventions to foster undergraduate management students’ reflection capabilities.}},
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Wagner, Dietrich and Gommers, Luci and Brahm, Taiga}},
  booktitle    = {{Academy of Management Proceedings}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{10602}},
  title        = {{{Developing Undergraduate Management Students ‘Reflection Capabilities'}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4500,
  abstract     = {{Der Band reflektiert die normativen Voraussetzungen sowie methodologische und methodische Merkmale einer Hochschulbildungsforschung. Eine solche Forschung befasst sich mit den spezifischen didaktischen Anforderungen, die mit akademischem Lehren und Lernen sowie mit dem Anspruch an eine Bildung durch Wissenschaft verbunden sind. Hochschuldidaktik braucht eine Forschung, die ihrem Gegenstand gerecht wird und sich sowohl mit den normativen Zielen von Hochschulbildung als auch mit den individuellen Ansprüchen und Rahmenbedingungen einzelner Fächer auseinandersetzt. Im Rahmen konzeptioneller Beiträge wie auch konkreter Beispiele zeigt der Sammelband, wie Theorie und Praxis der Hochschulbildungsforschung entwickelt werden können.}},
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{Theorie und Praxis der Hochschulbildungsforschung: Theoretische, methodologische und methodische Denkanstöße für die Hochschuldidaktik}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-658-20308-5}},
  pages        = {{149--166}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Verlag}},
  title        = {{{,Messy Research‘: Methodologische Herausforderungen der Hochschulbildungsforschung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4505,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Barnat, M. and Salden, P. and Dilger, B.}},
  booktitle    = {{Blickpunkt Hochschuldidaktik}},
  pages        = {{149--164}},
  publisher    = {{Bertelsmann }},
  title        = {{{Struktur, Prozess oder Didaktik als Ausgangspunkt? Ein integratives Modell der Curriculumentwicklung an Hochschulen}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4506,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{Das Writing Fellow-Programm: Ein Praxishandbuch zum Schreiben in der Lehre}},
  editor       = {{Dreifürst, Stephanie and Liebetanz, Franziska and Voigt, Anja}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7639-5806-1}},
  pages        = {{26--29}},
  publisher    = {{WBV}},
  title        = {{{Transfer von, in oder zwischen Lehrentwicklungsprojekten an Hochschulen. Oder: Warum es so schwer ist, Gutes nachzumachen. }}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4519,
  author       = {{Lüttenberg, Hedda and Wolf, Verena and Beverungen, Daniel}},
  booktitle    = {{Service Engineering}},
  isbn         = {{9783658209049}},
  pages        = {{31--49}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden}},
  title        = {{{Service (Systems) Engineering für die Produktion}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-20905-6_3}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4520,
  author       = {{Neumann, Jürgen and Gutt, Dominik and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  booktitle    = {{Workshop on IS Design and Economic Behavior (ISDEB)}},
  location     = {{Lüneburg, Germany}},
  title        = {{{The Traveling Reviewer Problem - Exploring the Relationship Between Offline Locations and Online Rating Behavior}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{4531,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{Deutsche Universitätszeitschrift 06/2018}},
  pages        = {{16 -- 17}},
  title        = {{{Gemeinsam für mehr Wirkung: Warum lehrbezogene lokale Netzwerke ein Ansatz sein können, die Hochschullehre nachhaltig voranzubringen}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4532,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  location     = {{Göttingen}},
  title        = {{{,, Die Hochschule ist wie ein Tanker'': Überlegungen zu Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Lehrinnovationen an Universitäten}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4539,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  location     = {{Wien}},
  title        = {{{‘Messy data, messy research?! ’Using Mixed Methods to support educational design decisions in Higher Education}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4540,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias}},
  title        = {{{Fostering Educational Innovators ‘Networks in Higher Education}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4564,
  abstract     = {{  In our model two divisions negotiate over type-dependent contracts to
  determine an intrafirm transfer price for an intermediate product. Since the
  upstream division's (seller's) costs and downstream division's (buyer's)
  revenues are supposed to be private information, we formally consider
  cooperative bargaining problems under incomplete information.  This means
  that the two divisions consider allocations of expected utility generated by
  mechanisms that satisfy (interim) individual rationality, incentive
  compatibility and/or ex post efficiency.  Assuming two possible types for
  buyer and seller each, we first establish that the bargaining problem is
  regular, regardless whether or not incentive and/or efficiency constraints
  are imposed. This allows us to apply the generalized Nash bargaining
  solution to determine fair transfer payments and transfer
  quantities. In particular, the generalized Nash bargaining solution tries to
  balance divisional profits, while incentive constraints are still in
  place. In that sense a fair profit division is generated. Furthermore, by
  means of illustrative examples we derive general properties of this solution
  for the transfer pricing problem and compare the model developed here with
  the models existing in the literature. We demonstrate that there is a
  tradeoff between ex post efficiency and fairness.
}},
  author       = {{Haake, Claus-Jochen and Recker, Sonja}},
  journal      = {{Group Decision and Negotiation}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{905--932}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{The Generalized Nash Bargaining Solution for Transfer Price Negotiations under Incomplete Information}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10726-018-9592-8}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4577,
  author       = {{Bohn, Nicolai and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS)}},
  location     = {{San Francisco, USA}},
  title        = {{{An Extended Perspective of Technology Pivots in Software Startups: Towards a Theoretical Model}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4665,
  author       = {{Schäfer, Bastian and Feng, Yuanhua}},
  booktitle    = {{Book of Abstracts}},
  location     = {{Paderborn, Germany}},
  pages        = {{7}},
  title        = {{{Further Development of the Double Conditional Smoothing for Nonparametric Surfaces Under a Lattice Spatial Model}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4667,
  author       = {{Feng, Yuanhua and Letmathe, Sebastian}},
  location     = {{Paderborn, Germany}},
  pages        = {{7}},
  title        = {{{The Non-Gaussian ESEMIFAR Model}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}