@inproceedings{5815,
  author       = {{Bohn, Nicolai and Kundisch, Dennis}},
  location     = {{Phoenix, Arizona, USA}},
  title        = {{{An Extended Perspective of Technology Pivots in Software Startups: Towards a Theoretical Model}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{17094,
  abstract     = {{In reaction to the productivity challenges that hospitals around the world have faced, some hospitals have begun to move towards a process-oriented organization of care in order to enhance productivity. Existing research on process-oriented organization emphasizes severe challenges along the implementation process. However, the literature contains only a small number of documented cases of hospital-wide process-oriented reorganization. Against this background, in this case study, we explain how hospitals can successfully implement organization-wide process orientation. To do so, we conducted an exploratory single case study with semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and document analyses as our primary data-collection methods. We developed a theoretical framework of antecedents, interventions, enablers, barriers, and consequences that explain the trajectory of this successful hospital-reorganization project. We contribute a substantive theory on which other researchers can build and can extend in future studies. Further, in analyzing our unique case, we identify factors that the extant literature has not yet discussed, such as the blackboxing of diagnosis and treatment activities as an enabler. In line with existing literature, we also found that, even in this case, inflexible healthcare IT represented a barrier that hindered the case study in implementing process orientation.}},
  author       = {{Suomi, Reima and Müller, Oliver and vom Brocke, Jan}},
  issn         = {{1532-3416}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{3}},
  title        = {{{Hospital-wide Process-oriented Organization of Care: The Case of Turku University Central Hospital}}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{17099,
  abstract     = {{Data-driven decision making (DDD) refers to organizational decision-making practices that emphasize the use of data and statistical analysis instead of relying on human judgment only. Various empirical studies provide evidence for the value of DDD, both on individual decision maker level and the organizational level. Yet, the path from data to value is not always an easy one and various organizational and psychological factors mediate and moderate the translation of data-driven insights into better decisions and, subsequently, effective business actions. The current body of academic literature on DDD lacks prescriptive knowledge on how to successfully employ DDD in complex organizational settings. Against this background, this paper reports on an action design research study aimed at designing and implementing IT artifacts for DDD at one of the largest ship engine manufacturers in the world. Our main contribution is a set of design principles highlighting, besides decision quality, the importance of model comprehensibility, domain knowledge, and actionability of results.}},
  author       = {{Thiess, Tiemo and Müller, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{European Conference on Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{Towards Design Principles for Data-Driven Decision Making–An Action Design Research Project in the Maritime Industry}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{17098,
  abstract     = {{Augmented Reality (AR) based teaching and learning has evolved rapidly over the past years. Re-searchers have shown that AR has the potential to deliver persuasive learning experiences in for-mal teaching (e.g., in classrooms) and in informal learning environments (e.g., museums). Howev-er, comparatively little extant research is firmly grounded in learning theories and applies rigor-ous empirical methods to evaluate the effect of AR on learning performance. In order to build a cumulative body of knowledge on AR-based instructional design and its effectiveness, it is neces-sary to consolidate both the theoretical foundations of and empirical evidence for using AR for teaching and learning. Against this background we conducted a focused systematic literature re-view on theoretical and empirical foundations of AR in education. We identify theory-based de-sign elements and empirical measures for developing and applying AR teaching and learning ap-plications and consolidate them in a design framework.}},
  author       = {{Sommerauer, Peter and Müller, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{European Conference on Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{Augmented reality for teaching and learning - A literature review on theoretical and empirical foundations}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{17097,
  abstract     = {{Emotions spread through online and offline social networks and subsequently influence individuals’ decisions and behaviours. Empirical studies on emotional contagion are almost non-existent in infor-mation systems research, leaving a gap in understanding how individuals are affected by emotions ex-pressed in online sources. Online newspaper articles and the associated readers’ comments provide a rich and mostly unfiltered data source that is utilized in this work to identify emotional contagion effects between newspaper publishers and its readers. By applying lexicon-based sentiment analysis and multi-level linear regression models to 1,151 online newspaper articles and 28,948 associated readers' com-ments, we model the relationships between sentiments in newspaper articles and comments. The results provide empirical support for emotional contagion effects between emotions expressed in online news-paper articles and emotions expressed in readers' comments. Linguistic, psychological and methodo-logical limitations are considered and discussed.}},
  author       = {{Bösch, Kevin and Müller, Oliver and Schneider, Johannes}},
  booktitle    = {{European Conference on Information Systems}},
  title        = {{{Emotional contagion through online newspapers}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{2728,
  author       = {{Gries, Thomas and Redlin, Margarete and Ugarte, Juliette Espinosa}},
  issn         = {{0177-798X}},
  journal      = {{Theoretical and Applied Climatology}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature}},
  title        = {{{Human-induced climate change: the impact of land-use change}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00704-018-2422-8}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47915,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study posits that, in the absence of extensive mandatory regulation and auditing, differences in internal and external corporate governance (CG) mechanisms will explain variations in choices concerning corporate sustainability reporting and the interrelated and underlying corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Specifically, we explore whether board monitoring effectiveness as a major internal CG mechanism and stakeholder engagement as a key external CG mechanism are positively associated with sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), compliance with generally accepted sustainability reporting standards (SRC) and guidelines, and CSP for a sample of Dutch firms that have voluntarily disclosed sustainability reports during the years 2012–2016. In addition to these direct effects, we also investigate the potential indirect effects of the CG mechanisms on SRQ and SRC via CSP and distinguish between nonlagged and lag effects. Using structural equation modeling, our results show that, in the short term, monitoring effectiveness positively affects SRQ and SRC. Stakeholder engagement positively affects SRQ and SRC in the short term and is positively related to SRQ via CSP in the longer term, indicating that active stakeholders, over time, may drive companies toward more sustainable business conduct. Finally, the findings that CSP is positively related to SRQ but negatively related to SRC provide further support for signaling and legitimacy theory, respectively. Companies with superior CSP disclose high‐quality information on CSP to signal the firm's superior sustainability performance, whereas poor performing companies legitimize their inferior CSP by complying with more reporting standards, rather than by directly improving their underlying CSP.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Manning, Bart and Braam, Geert and Reimsbach, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1535-3958}},
  journal      = {{Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Development}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{351--366}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—<scp>E</scp>ffects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/csr.1687}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47916,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study posits that, in the absence of extensive mandatory regulation and auditing, differences in internal and external corporate governance (CG) mechanisms will explain variations in choices concerning corporate sustainability reporting and the interrelated and underlying corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Specifically, we explore whether board monitoring effectiveness as a major internal CG mechanism and stakeholder engagement as a key external CG mechanism are positively associated with sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), compliance with generally accepted sustainability reporting standards (SRC) and guidelines, and CSP for a sample of Dutch firms that have voluntarily disclosed sustainability reports during the years 2012–2016. In addition to these direct effects, we also investigate the potential indirect effects of the CG mechanisms on SRQ and SRC via CSP and distinguish between nonlagged and lag effects. Using structural equation modeling, our results show that, in the short term, monitoring effectiveness positively affects SRQ and SRC. Stakeholder engagement positively affects SRQ and SRC in the short term and is positively related to SRQ via CSP in the longer term, indicating that active stakeholders, over time, may drive companies toward more sustainable business conduct. Finally, the findings that CSP is positively related to SRQ but negatively related to SRC provide further support for signaling and legitimacy theory, respectively. Companies with superior CSP disclose high‐quality information on CSP to signal the firm's superior sustainability performance, whereas poor performing companies legitimize their inferior CSP by complying with more reporting standards, rather than by directly improving their underlying CSP.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Manning, Bart and Braam, Geert and Reimsbach, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1535-3958}},
  journal      = {{Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Development}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{351--366}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—<scp>E</scp>ffects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/csr.1687}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47914,
  author       = {{Wang, Zhi and Reimsbach, Daniel and Braam, Geert}},
  issn         = {{0959-6526}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Cleaner Production}},
  keywords     = {{Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management, General Environmental Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Building and Construction}},
  pages        = {{1185--1197}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Political embeddedness and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China: A trade-off between financial and CSR performance?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.116}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{49099,
  author       = {{Krebs, Benjamin and Kabst, Rüdiger}},
  journal      = {{PERSONALquartely}},
  title        = {{{Erfolgsfaktoren für Inklusion und Diversität in Unternehmen}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4946,
  author       = {{Eisele, Simon and Schneider, Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Gestaltung digitaler und vernetzter Arbeitswelten}},
  editor       = {{Engels, Gregor and Maier, Gunter and Steffen, Eckhard}},
  isbn         = {{3662528983}},
  pages        = {{1--20}},
  title        = {{{ Personalwirtschaft}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4928,
  author       = {{Schneider, Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace}},
  editor       = {{Harteis, Christian}},
  pages        = {{39----52}},
  title        = {{{Digitalization of Production, Human Capital, and Organizational Capital}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_4}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50364,
  author       = {{Koch, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{179--207}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Einsatz der Risikoanalyse als Instrument des Investitionscontrollings}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50373,
  author       = {{Puls, Christoph}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{13--42}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Kostenorientiertes Management von Logistikdienstleistern}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@phdthesis{50381,
  author       = {{Hrnjadovic, Damir}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10770-1}},
  pages        = {{367}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Unterstützung von Standardisierungsentscheidungen innerhalb eines produktionsprozessorientierten Komplexitätsmanagements}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50393,
  author       = {{Opitz, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{277--317}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Integrierte, ökologieorientierte Produktlebenszyklusrechnung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50404,
  author       = {{Faupel, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{277--317}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Integrierte, ökologieorientierte Produktlebenszyklusrechnung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4419,
  abstract     = {{Research on entrepreneurial learning highlights the importance of experience and prior knowledge to entrepreneurial success. However, a conundrum remains and we are still seeking answers as to why some novice entrepreneurs learn successfully from their experiences and succeed, while some experienced entrepreneurs fail with their ventures. In order to advance the discussion about the role of experience during entrepreneurial learning, our critical reflection aims to (1) highlight some of the shortcomings of experiential learning theory (ELT) and (2) illustrate how alternative theoretical perspectives have the potential to advance our conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning processes. We argue for an explanation of entrepreneurial learning as a dynamic and self-regulated process that relies on planning, monitoring, and self-reflection.}},
  author       = {{Fust, Alexander Paul and Jenert, Tobias and Winkler, Christoph}},
  journal      = {{Entrepreneurship Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{entrepreneurial learning, experiential learning, self-regulated learning}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{1--11}},
  publisher    = {{de @Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Experiential or Self-Regulated Learning: A Critical Reflection of Entrepreneurial Learning Processes}}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4537,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}},
  location     = {{Chicago}},
  title        = {{{Developing Undergraduate Management Students‘ Reflection Capabilities, Academy of Management Proceedings}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{8517,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm , Taiga }},
  location     = {{Aachen }},
  title        = {{{Fostering pre-service economics teachers´ reflection on their attitudes towards the discipline}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}