@article{47915,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study posits that, in the absence of extensive mandatory regulation and auditing, differences in internal and external corporate governance (CG) mechanisms will explain variations in choices concerning corporate sustainability reporting and the interrelated and underlying corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Specifically, we explore whether board monitoring effectiveness as a major internal CG mechanism and stakeholder engagement as a key external CG mechanism are positively associated with sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), compliance with generally accepted sustainability reporting standards (SRC) and guidelines, and CSP for a sample of Dutch firms that have voluntarily disclosed sustainability reports during the years 2012–2016. In addition to these direct effects, we also investigate the potential indirect effects of the CG mechanisms on SRQ and SRC via CSP and distinguish between nonlagged and lag effects. Using structural equation modeling, our results show that, in the short term, monitoring effectiveness positively affects SRQ and SRC. Stakeholder engagement positively affects SRQ and SRC in the short term and is positively related to SRQ via CSP in the longer term, indicating that active stakeholders, over time, may drive companies toward more sustainable business conduct. Finally, the findings that CSP is positively related to SRQ but negatively related to SRC provide further support for signaling and legitimacy theory, respectively. Companies with superior CSP disclose high‐quality information on CSP to signal the firm's superior sustainability performance, whereas poor performing companies legitimize their inferior CSP by complying with more reporting standards, rather than by directly improving their underlying CSP.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Manning, Bart and Braam, Geert and Reimsbach, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1535-3958}},
  journal      = {{Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Development}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{351--366}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—<scp>E</scp>ffects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/csr.1687}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47916,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study posits that, in the absence of extensive mandatory regulation and auditing, differences in internal and external corporate governance (CG) mechanisms will explain variations in choices concerning corporate sustainability reporting and the interrelated and underlying corporate sustainability performance (CSP). Specifically, we explore whether board monitoring effectiveness as a major internal CG mechanism and stakeholder engagement as a key external CG mechanism are positively associated with sustainability reporting quality (SRQ), compliance with generally accepted sustainability reporting standards (SRC) and guidelines, and CSP for a sample of Dutch firms that have voluntarily disclosed sustainability reports during the years 2012–2016. In addition to these direct effects, we also investigate the potential indirect effects of the CG mechanisms on SRQ and SRC via CSP and distinguish between nonlagged and lag effects. Using structural equation modeling, our results show that, in the short term, monitoring effectiveness positively affects SRQ and SRC. Stakeholder engagement positively affects SRQ and SRC in the short term and is positively related to SRQ via CSP in the longer term, indicating that active stakeholders, over time, may drive companies toward more sustainable business conduct. Finally, the findings that CSP is positively related to SRQ but negatively related to SRC provide further support for signaling and legitimacy theory, respectively. Companies with superior CSP disclose high‐quality information on CSP to signal the firm's superior sustainability performance, whereas poor performing companies legitimize their inferior CSP by complying with more reporting standards, rather than by directly improving their underlying CSP.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Manning, Bart and Braam, Geert and Reimsbach, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1535-3958}},
  journal      = {{Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management}},
  keywords     = {{Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Development}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{351--366}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—<scp>E</scp>ffects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/csr.1687}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{47914,
  author       = {{Wang, Zhi and Reimsbach, Daniel and Braam, Geert}},
  issn         = {{0959-6526}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Cleaner Production}},
  keywords     = {{Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management, General Environmental Science, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Building and Construction}},
  pages        = {{1185--1197}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Political embeddedness and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China: A trade-off between financial and CSR performance?}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.116}},
  volume       = {{198}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{49099,
  author       = {{Krebs, Benjamin and Kabst, Rüdiger}},
  journal      = {{PERSONALquartely}},
  title        = {{{Erfolgsfaktoren für Inklusion und Diversität in Unternehmen}}},
  volume       = {{4}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4946,
  author       = {{Eisele, Simon and Schneider, Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Gestaltung digitaler und vernetzter Arbeitswelten}},
  editor       = {{Engels, Gregor and Maier, Gunter and Steffen, Eckhard}},
  isbn         = {{3662528983}},
  pages        = {{1--20}},
  title        = {{{ Personalwirtschaft}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4928,
  author       = {{Schneider, Martin}},
  booktitle    = {{The Impact of Digitalization in the Workplace}},
  editor       = {{Harteis, Christian}},
  pages        = {{39----52}},
  title        = {{{Digitalization of Production, Human Capital, and Organizational Capital}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63257-5_4}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50364,
  author       = {{Koch, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{179--207}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Einsatz der Risikoanalyse als Instrument des Investitionscontrollings}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50373,
  author       = {{Puls, Christoph}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{13--42}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Kostenorientiertes Management von Logistikdienstleistern}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@phdthesis{50381,
  author       = {{Hrnjadovic, Damir}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10770-1}},
  pages        = {{367}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Unterstützung von Standardisierungsentscheidungen innerhalb eines produktionsprozessorientierten Komplexitätsmanagements}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50393,
  author       = {{Opitz, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{277--317}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Integrierte, ökologieorientierte Produktlebenszyklusrechnung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{50404,
  author       = {{Faupel, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Industrielles Controlling - Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle von Beschaffung, Produktion und Logistik}},
  editor       = {{Betz, Stefan}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-339-10226-3}},
  pages        = {{277--317}},
  publisher    = {{Dr. Kovac}},
  title        = {{{Integrierte, ökologieorientierte Produktlebenszyklusrechnung}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4419,
  abstract     = {{Research on entrepreneurial learning highlights the importance of experience and prior knowledge to entrepreneurial success. However, a conundrum remains and we are still seeking answers as to why some novice entrepreneurs learn successfully from their experiences and succeed, while some experienced entrepreneurs fail with their ventures. In order to advance the discussion about the role of experience during entrepreneurial learning, our critical reflection aims to (1) highlight some of the shortcomings of experiential learning theory (ELT) and (2) illustrate how alternative theoretical perspectives have the potential to advance our conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning processes. We argue for an explanation of entrepreneurial learning as a dynamic and self-regulated process that relies on planning, monitoring, and self-reflection.}},
  author       = {{Fust, Alexander Paul and Jenert, Tobias and Winkler, Christoph}},
  journal      = {{Entrepreneurship Research Journal}},
  keywords     = {{entrepreneurial learning, experiential learning, self-regulated learning}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{1--11}},
  publisher    = {{de @Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Experiential or Self-Regulated Learning: A Critical Reflection of Entrepreneurial Learning Processes}}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4537,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}},
  location     = {{Chicago}},
  title        = {{{Developing Undergraduate Management Students‘ Reflection Capabilities, Academy of Management Proceedings}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{8517,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm , Taiga }},
  location     = {{Aachen }},
  title        = {{{Fostering pre-service economics teachers´ reflection on their attitudes towards the discipline}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inbook{4541,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Gommers, Luci}},
  booktitle    = {{Blickpunkt Hochschuldidaktik}},
  title        = {{{Ziele und Möglichkeiten der Weiterbildung pädagogischer Hochschulentwickler*innen am Beispiel ‚Lehren‘}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@inproceedings{4538,
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}},
  location     = {{Gießen}},
  title        = {{{The Role of Diversity for the Transition to Higher Education}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4874,
  abstract     = {{Restrukturierungen werden sowohl durch die Digitalisierung, aber auch durch klassische Themen – beispielsweise
die Notwendigkeit von Umsatz- und Kostensynergien in kompetitiven Märkten – verstärkt vorangetrieben.
Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet vor allem die Motive und Folgen aus wissenschaftlicher Perspektive, indem großzahlige
empirische Befunde zu den Themen Beschäftigung, Finanzkennzahlen und Kapitalerhöhungen sowie steuerliche
Motive prägnant zusammengefasst und im Kontext des geplanten Joint Ventures von thyssenkrupp und Tata
Steel diskutiert werden.}},
  author       = {{Sievers, Sönke and Sureth-Sloane, Caren and Uhde, André}},
  journal      = {{Die Wirtschaftsprüfung}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{569--575}},
  title        = {{{Restrukturierungen: operative und finanzielle Wertbeiträge. Eine Betrachtung vor dem Hintergrund der Entwicklungen bei thyssenkrupp}}},
  volume       = {{71}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{4516,
  abstract     = {{Although many methods have been proposed for engineering service systems and customer solutions, most of these approaches give little consideration to recombinant service innovation. Recombinant innovation refers to reusing and integrating resources that were previously unconnected. In an age of networked products and data, we can expect that many service innovations will be based on adding, dissociating, and associating existing value propositions by accessing internal and external resources instead of designing them from scratch. The purpose of this paper is to identify if current service engineering approaches account for the mechanisms of recombinant innovation and to design a method for recombinant service systems engineering. In a conceptual analysis of 24 service engineering methods, the study identified that most methods (1) focus on designing value propositions instead of service systems, (2) view service independent of physical goods, (3) are either linear or iterative instead of agile, and (4) do not sufficiently address the mechanisms of recombinant innovation. The paper discusses how these deficiencies can be remedied and designs a revised service systems engineering approach that reorganizes service engineering processes according to four design principles. The method is demonstrated with the recombinant design of a service system for predictive maintenance of agricultural machines.}},
  author       = {{Beverungen, Daniel and Lüttenberg, Hedda and Wolf, Verena}},
  issn         = {{2363-7005}},
  journal      = {{Business & Information Systems Engineering}},
  keywords     = {{Service engineering, Recombinant innovation, (Product-)service system, Design science research, New service development}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{377--391}},
  publisher    = {{SpringerNature}},
  title        = {{{Recombinant Service Systems Engineering}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12599-018-0526-4}},
  volume       = {{60}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{54008,
  author       = {{Ebrahimi, Bohlool and Tavana, Madjid and Rahmani, Morteza and Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J.}},
  issn         = {{0941-0643}},
  journal      = {{Neural Computing and Applications}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{1971--1982}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis in the presence of ordinal and interval data}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00521-016-2826-2}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{54007,
  author       = {{Banakar, Zahra and Tavana, Madjid and Huff, Brian and Di Caprio, Debora}},
  issn         = {{0265-2323}},
  journal      = {{International Journal of Bank Marketing}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{634--662}},
  publisher    = {{Emerald}},
  title        = {{{A bank merger predictive model using the Smoluchowski stochastic coagulation equation and reverse engineering}}},
  doi          = {{10.1108/ijbm-05-2017-0106}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}