@inbook{13301, author = {{Trier, Matthias and Müller, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management}}, isbn = {{9783540240884}}, issn = {{0302-9743}}, title = {{{Towards a Systematic Approach for Capturing Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-540-30545-3_23}}, year = {{2010}}, } @inbook{13302, author = {{Trier, Matthias and Bobrik, Annette}}, booktitle = {{Communities and Technologies 2007}}, isbn = {{9781846289040}}, title = {{{Analyzing the Dynamics of Community Formation Using Brokering Activities}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_23}}, year = {{2010}}, } @techreport{2830, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis}}, pages = {{V--VIII}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Editorial Preface}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @article{2649, author = {{Dzienziol, J. and Kundisch, Dennis}}, journal = {{Kredit und Kapital}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{539--562}}, title = {{{Optimale Darlehensbündel in der privaten Immobilienfinanzierung}}}, volume = {{42}}, year = {{2009}}, } @article{2650, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Klein, C.}}, journal = {{Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{212--224}}, title = {{{Zur Preissetzung verschiedener Emittenten bei Indexzertifikaten auf den DAX}}}, volume = {{21}}, year = {{2009}}, } @article{2651, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Klein, C.}}, journal = {{Der Betrieb}}, number = {{22}}, pages = {{1141--1145}}, title = {{{Der Tracking Error von indexnachbildenden Instrumenten auf den DAX - eine empirische Analyse des ETFs DAX EX sowie zehn Indexzertifikaten}}}, volume = {{62}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{3473, author = {{Becker, Jörg and Beverungen, Daniel and Blinn, Nadine and Knackstedt, Ralf and Nüttgens, Markus and Thomas, Oliver and Fellmann, Michael}}, booktitle = {{29th International RESER Conference}}, location = {{Budapest, Hungary}}, title = {{{Productivity management for customer solutions --- Towards a performance management system for efficient service value networks}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{3474, author = {{Becker, Jörg and Beverungen, Daniel and Knackstedt, Ralf and Matzner, Martin}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 42th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences}}, isbn = {{978-0-7695-3450-3}}, issn = {{1530-1605}}, location = {{Waikoloa, HI, USA}}, title = {{{Configurative Service Engineering --- A Rule-Based Configuration Approach for Versatile Service Processes in Corrective Maintenance}}}, doi = {{10.1109/HICSS.2009.127}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{3475, author = {{Becker, Jörg and Beverungen, Daniel and Knackstedt, Ralf and Matzner, Martin and Müller, Oliver and Pöppelbuß, Jens}}, booktitle = {{Americas Conference on Information Systems}}, location = {{San Francisco, USA}}, title = {{{A Framework for Design Research in the Service Science Discipline}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{3476, author = {{Becker, Jörg and Beverungen, Daniel and Matzner, Martin and Müller, Oliver}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Services Science (ISSS'09)}}, editor = {{Alt, Rainer and Fähnrich, Klaus-Peter and Franczyk, Bogdan}}, isbn = {{978-3-8325-2169-1}}, pages = {{75----85}}, title = {{{Design Requirements to Support Information Flows for Providing Customer Solutions: A Case Study in the Mechanical Engineering Sector}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @article{3506, author = {{Becker, Jörg and Beverungen, Daniel and Knackstedt, Ralf and Müller, Oliver}}, journal = {{Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{26----38}}, title = {{{Model-Based Decision Support for the Customer-Specific Configuration of Value Bundles}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{2783, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Mittal, N. and Nault, B.}}, booktitle = {{10th Workshop on Information Systems and Economics (WISE)}}, location = {{Phoenix, USA}}, title = {{{IT Productivity and Aggregation using Income Accounting}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{2784, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Zorzi, R.}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 15th Amercas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS)}}, location = {{San Francisco, USA}}, pages = {{259--270}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Enhancing the Quality of Financial Advice with Web 2.0 - An Approach considering Social Capital in the private Asset Allocation}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{2785, author = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Klein, C.}}, booktitle = {{International Federation of Classification Societies 2009 Conference}}, location = {{Dresden, Germany}}, title = {{{An Evaluation Framework for Tracker Certificates during the Financial Crisis and beyond}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inbook{2787, author = {{Dorfleitner, G. and Klein, C. and Kundisch, Dennis}}, booktitle = {{Monetary Growth: Trends, Impacts and Policies}}, publisher = {{Nova Science Publishers}}, title = {{{Technical Analysis as a Method of Risk Management}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @book{2792, editor = {{Kundisch, Dennis and Veit, D. and Weitzel, T. and Weinhardt, C.}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry}}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2009}}, } @techreport{5072, author = {{Institut für Normung e.V., Deutsches}}, title = {{{PAS 1094: Hybride Wertschöpfung --- Integration von Produktion und Dienstleistung.}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{5597, abstract = {{Der Beitrag diskutiert die kontroversen Ans{\"a}tze ? Verifizierung versus Evaluation/Zertifizierung ? zur Sicherung elektronischer Wahlen mit Wahlger{\"a}ten. Dabei spielt das Urteils des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVG099] eine zentrale Rolle. Hierin wird entschieden, dass die Zertifizierung des Wahlger{\"a}tes nicht ausreicht und es werden Verifizierungsfunktionen gefordert, die den W{\"a}hlern die M{\"o}glichkeit geben sich von der Integrit{\"a}t des Wahlergebnisses zu {\"u}berzeugen. Der Beitrag zeigt auf, dass auch mit der Implementierung entsprechender Verifizierungsfunktionen nicht auf Zertifizierung verzichtet werden kann, da an ein Wahlger{\"a}t auch andere Anforderungen wie etwa hinsichtlich des Wahlgeheimnisses gestellt werden. Es wird au{\ss}erdem die Frage diskutiert, warum der Zertifizierung hinsichtlich dieser zus{\"a}tzlichen Anforderungen vertraut werden kann, w{\"a}hrend dies nicht der Fall bei der Integrit{\"a}tsanforderung ist.}}, author = {{Volkamer, Melanie and Schryen, Guido and Langer, Lucie and Schmidt, Axel and Buchmann, Johannes}}, booktitle = {{Workshop Elektronische Wahlen, elektronische Teilhabe, Societyware, 39th GI-Jahrestagung}}, title = {{{Elektronische Wahlen: Verifizierung vs. Zertifizierung}}}, year = {{2009}}, } @article{5621, abstract = {{Remote voting through the Internet provides convenience and access to the electorate. At the same time, the security concerns facing any distributed application are magnified when the task is so crucial to democratic society. In addition, some of the electoral process loses transparency when it is encapsulated in information technology. In this paper, we examine the public record of three recent elections that used Internet voting. Our specific goal is to identify any potential flaws that security experts would recognize, but may have not been identified in the rush to implement technology. To do this, we present a multiple exploratory case study, looking at elections conducted between 2006 and 2007 in Estonia, Netherlands, and Switzerland. These elections were selected as particularly interesting and accessible, and each presents its own technical and security challenges. The electoral environment, technical design and process for each election are described, including reconstruction of details which are implied but not specified within the source material. We found that all three elections warrant significant concern about voter security, verifiability, and transparency. Usability, our fourth area of focus, seems to have been well-addressed in these elections. While our analysis is based on public documents and previously published reports, and therefore lacking access to any confidential materials held by electoral officials, this comparative analysis provides interesting insight and consistent questions across all these cases. Effective review of Internet voting requires an aggressive stance towards identifying potential security and operational flaws, and we encourage the use of third party reviews with critical technology skills during design, programming, and voting to reduce the changes of failure or fraud that would undermine public confidence.}}, author = {{Schryen, Guido and Rich, Eliot}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics \& Security}}, keywords = {{e-voting, Internet voting, Internet election, security, verifiability, RIES, Estonia, Neuch{\^a}tel}}, number = {{4 Part}}, pages = {{729--744}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{Security in Large-Scale Internet Elections: A Retrospective Analysis of Elections in Estonia, The Netherlands, and Switzerland}}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2009}}, } @inproceedings{5625, abstract = {{The increasing availability and deployment of open source software in personal and commercial environments makes open source software highly appealing for hackers, and others who are interested in exploiting software vulnerabilities. This deployment has resulted in a debate ?full of religion? on the security of open source software compared to that of closed source software. However, beyond such arguments, only little quantitative analysis on this research issue has taken place. We discuss the state-of-the-art of the security debate and identify shortcomings. Based on these, we propose new metrics, which allows to answer the question to what extent the review process of open source and closed source development has helped to fix vulnerabilities. We illustrate the application of some of these metrics in a case study on OpenOffice (open source software) vs. Microsoft Office (closed source software).}}, author = {{Schryen, Guido and Kadura, Rouven}}, booktitle = {{24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing}}, keywords = {{Open source software, Closed source software, Security, Metrics}}, title = {{{Open Source vs. Closed Source Software: Towards Measuring Security}}}, year = {{2009}}, }