TY - CHAP AU - Kremer, H.-Hugo AU - Tramm, T. AU - Wilbers, K. ID - 6446 T2 - Kaufmännische Bildung. Sondierungen zu einer vernachlässigten Sinndimension TI - Einleitung VL - 7-9 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Kremer, H.-Hugo AU - Kallenbach, G. AU - Sprey, M. ID - 6447 T2 - Kaufmännische Bildung. Sondierungen zu einer vernachlässigten Sinndimension TI - Das Kaufmännische: Kaufmännische Bildung in der Ausbildungsvorbereitung ER - TY - JOUR AB - In recent years, the design of study programmes in Higher Education (HE) has been given considerable attention by HE practitioners and researchers. Today, a sound body of concepts and experiences on different realisations of Bologna-conforming study programmes is available. The same, however, does not hold true for questions concerning the processes of implementing and further developing programmes. This paper investigates the challenges related with implementation, particularly at universities. A first aim is to understand the specifics of academic culture and their significance for programme implementation and development. Elaborating on this analysis, a second aim is to outline the role of educational developers in this process, as well as the necessary competencies to perform such a role. AU - Jenert, Tobias ID - 4424 IS - 2 JF - Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung KW - Programmentwicklung KW - Studienprogramme KW - program development KW - educational development KW - academic culture KW - disciplinary culture TI - Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture VL - 9 ER - TY - CONF AB - Abstract Summary: Study programs are currently receiving more attention in Europe. In consequence, it can be observed that the roles of program development and management are professionalized. In the proposed round table, we would like to discuss the role of educational developers to support this professionalization via measures of training and process support in the light of recent developments in Switzerland. Abstract Text: Professionalization of program development as an institutional responsibility In Switzerland, different developments in higher education have led to increased attention to the development and management of the study programs such as the Bologna process, an increasingly competitive environment, the tertiarisation of a number of professions formerly acquired through vocational education. Furthermore, the national qualification framework and in particular accreditation processes require HEI to demonstrate the effectiveness of their activities (e.g., Sursock & Smit, 2010). Many different actors have been involved in development processes on the program level but also within educational development units. However, so far a systematic discourse on key issues regarding the management and development of study programs is missing, not only in German-speaking Europe. The following main question will guide the round table session: How can educational development give vital impulses for program development? Our starting points are two approaches or frameworks from Swiss HEI: a) the definition of competencies for new program professionals at the Zurich University for Teacher Education and b) a process for the strategic development of didactically-aligned study programs at the University of St. Gallen. Framework 1: Competencies for program managers The experiences with a training program for study program managers at the Zurich University for Teacher Education are reported. Over a period of four years, a competency profile has been developed and refined. Insights into the challenges and struggles of this role were gained. Despite diverse job characteristics of program managers (often resulting from an institution-specific history), there is a common set of competencies necessary to successfully cope with organizational complexity such as role competency (Schein, 1992) and lateral leadership (Kühl et al., 2005). Framework 2: Towards a systematic development of study programs The second initiative concerns the strategic approach to program development implemented at the University of St. Gallen (Brahm & Jenert, 2013; Jenert, 2011). In this structured process, the program goes through four process steps: process initiation, program analysis, program development, evaluation of the process and results. A major challenge in this process is the role of program professionals. The goal is to establish them as change agents for a didactically-aligned study program. Outcome: Role of educational development After briefly introducing the two examples, the roles of program professionals and educational development in HEI will be discussed. The questions guiding the discussion will be: • How can program development be established as a continuing task, closely tied to quality development? • How can the competencies of program professionals be developed and the local capacity and ownership be strengthened? • How can educational development support program development and provide vital impulses? Audience Engagement. Depending on the number of participants, first the questions will be discussed in groups. To put the results of the discussion on record, it will be summarized and uploaded in our weblog for further discussion after the session. AU - Brahm, Taiga AU - Zellweger, Franziska AU - Jenert, Tobias AU - Thomann, Geri ID - 4470 KW - curriculum development KW - study programs KW - Bologna KW - educational development KW - higher education TI - Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers ER - TY - CONF AB - Das erste Studienjahr wird als wesentlicher Übergang von der Schule in die Hochschule angesehen. Im Vordergrund steht dabei häufig die Fragen der Identitätsfindung der Studierenden und das "Ankommen" im neuen Lebensabschnitt (Briggs, Clark, & Hall, 2012; Scanlon, Rowling, & Weber, 2007). In diesem Zusammenhang werden ganz unterschiedliche Aspekte untersucht, z. B. die vorhandenen Lernkompetenzen oder das Zeitmanagement der Studierenden (Barron & D'Annunzio-Green, 2009), vorhandene Einführungsprogramme an Hochschulen (z.B. Gale & Parker, 2012) oder dem ‚student engagement‘ während des ersten Jahres (Krause & Coates, 2008). Obwohl die Motivation der Studierenden als starker Prädiktor für die Leistung angesehen wird (z. B. Busato, Prins, Elshouta, & Hamaker, 2000), wurde die Motivationsentwicklung im ersten Studienjahr bis dato nur selten betrachtet. Die vorliegende Mixed Methods-Studie setzt an dieser Forschungslücke an und untersucht die Entwicklung der Studienmotivation von Wirtschaftsstudierenden im Verlauf des ersten Studienjahres. Im Rahmen einer quantitativen Längsschnittuntersuchung mit drei Messzeitpunkten wird dabei die Motivationsentwicklung über die gesamte Studierendenpopulation hinweg erfasst. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage, wie sich die intrinsische und extrinsische Studienmotivation sowie die studienbezogene Selbstwirksamkeit über das erste Studienjahr verändern. Zudem wird untersucht, inwiefern verschiedene studienbezogene Variablen (z. B. Angst) sich auf die Motivationsentwicklung auswirken. Um vertiefte Erkenntnisse über die Bedeutsamkeit verschiedener Gestaltungsmerkmale des ersten Studienjahres auf die Motivationsentwicklung der Studierenden zu gewinnen, wurde parallel zur quantitativen Untersuchung eine qualitative Längsschnittstudie durchgeführt mit dem Ziel, (1) verschiedene Verläufe der Motivationsentwicklung und (2) kritische Ereignisse im Eingangsjahr zu identifizieren. Das vorliegende Papier zeigt in den folgenden beiden Kapiteln den theoretischen Bezugsrahmen der Studie und die methodische Vorgehensweise. Daraufhin werden die Ergebnisse sowohl der quantitativen als auch der qualitativen Studie dargestellt und im Rahmen der Diskussion miteinander verbunden. AU - Jenert, Tobias AU - Brahm, Taiga ID - 4472 KW - Motivationsentwicklung KW - Hochschule KW - motivation KW - Längsschnitt KW - Mixed Methods TI - Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie ER - TY - CONF AB - Research on entrepreneurial learning often stresses the role of experience and previous knowledge. We aim to advance this perspective by pointing out the prerequisites and limitations of experience-based forms of learning and by adapting findings from educational psychology to the entrepreneurial context. Developing a model of self-regulated entrepreneurial learning (SREL) we pursue a more process oriented view of entrepreneurial learning in order to explain how learning unfolds in contexts of uncertainty and novelty when relevant experience and knowledge are scarce. The model comprises a planning, a performance and a review phase in order to support entrepreneurs in their learning process. It is suggested how SREL is related to self-efficacy, emotions and cognitive biases. AU - Fust, Alexander AU - Jenert, Tobias ID - 4473 KW - Unternehmertum KW - lernen TI - Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning ER - TY - CONF AB - The transition from school to university can be overwhelming for some students. While students' motivation is considered a strong predictor of performance, the development of motivation during students' transition from high school to university has rarely been investigated. Additionally, little is known about the relation of motivational aspects with other influences on study performance. The present mixed methods study addresses this research gap and examines the development of economics students' study motivation. The longitudinal mixed-method study included three waves of data collected using quantitative surveys and a series of five interviews conducted with 14 first-year students over eight months. Regarding students' development over time, the quantitative analysis showed a gradual decline in students' motivation. However, in the interviews, certain events during the first year were identified as critical incidents demotivating students. These insights into the development of students' motivation at a business school show that concrete incidents influence students' motivational development; thus, they could be transformed by structural changes. AU - Brahm, Taiga AU - Jenert, Tobias ID - 4474 KW - motivation KW - business school KW - higher education KW - latent growth curve model KW - longitudinal study KW - mixed methods KW - interview KW - students TI - The crucial first year: The development of students' motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study ER - TY - CONF AB - Tertiary education comprises at least two phases, undergraduate and graduate studies. Often, the first year is regarded another, crucial phase where students familiarize with the study environment. It can be hypothesized that students' individual perceptions of learning and studying as well as the pedagogies they experience differ depending on their current study phase. Yet, differences between the phases in HE have rarely been investigated. To capture differences in student experiences in HE comprehensively, Jenert and Gebhardt (2010) have developed a framework describing Learning Culture in HEI. LC comprises a number of constructs on the three levels of the individual student, pedagogical interactions and the organization. The study first aims to quantitatively describe differences in LC between the phases of HE within a university. Based on this analysis, a second goal is to develop a deeper understanding of how students manage the transitions between different phases by applying qualitative research methods. AU - Gebhardt, Anja AU - Jenert, Tobias ID - 4475 KW - Higher Education KW - Transitions KW - Bachelor KW - Master TI - Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school ER - TY - CONF AB - Auseinandersetzungen über Forschungsmethodologien haben in den Bildungswissenschaften lange Tradition. Sie werden häufig unversöhnlich und mit Profilierung der Gegensätze geführt. Für uns hängt die Sinnhaftigkeit einer Forschungskonzeption von der Problemstellung und dem Erkenntnisinteresse ab. Dies gilt auch für Design-Based Research (DBR). Dieser Ansatz entstand als Reaktion auf die Kritik an mangelnder praktischer Anwendung von Befunden aus der empirisch-analytischen Lehr-Lernforschung. Als Ergebnis werden Theorien angestrebt, die für die Praxis einen Nutzen bieten und zugleich über die Anwendung in einer singulären Situation hinausgehen. Wir wollen folgenden Fragen nachgehen: Wo liegen die Gemeinsamkeiten, wo die Spezifika von DBR gegenüber bestehenden Methodologien? Wie wird der Generalisierungsanspruch von Theorien innerhalb von DBR verstanden und umgesetzt? Für welche Erkenntnisinteressen eignet sich DBR? Welche Methoden sind für DBR sinnvoll und können wie angewendet werden? AU - Brahm, Taiga AU - Jenert, Tobias ID - 4476 KW - design-based research KW - gestatlungsbasierte Forschung KW - Erziehungswissenschaft KW - Design KW - Mixed Methods TI - Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden? ER - TY - CHAP AU - Jenert, Tobias ED - Škerlak, Tina ED - Kaufmann, Helen ED - Bachmann, Gudrun ID - 4508 SN - 978-3-8309-3056-3 T2 - Lernumgebungen an der Hochschule. Auf dem Weg zum Campus von morgen TI - Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen VL - Band 66 ER -