@article{23045,
  author       = {{Michael, Jan and Hillebrand, Michael and Wohlers, Benedict and Henke, Christian and Dumitrescu, Roman and Trächtler, Ansgar}},
  journal      = {{Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal (RE&PQJ) 16}},
  number       = {{14}},
  pages        = {{359--364}},
  title        = {{{Implementing intelligent technical systems into smart homes by using model based systems engineering and multi-agent systems}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{23046,
  author       = {{Pai, Arathi and Riepold, Markus and Trächtler, Ansgar}},
  journal      = {{IFAC-PapersOnLine}},
  number       = {{21}},
  pages        = {{66–73}},
  title        = {{{Precision Control of SMA Actuators with a Real Time Model-Based Controller and Extended VSC}}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{23049,
  author       = {{Pai, Arathi and Riepold, Markus and Trächtler, Ansgar}},
  booktitle    = {{IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics AIM}},
  title        = {{{A model extended temperature and strain controller modulated with PWM for precision position control of shape memory alloy actuators}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{23050,
  author       = {{Kruse, Daniel and Warkentin, Andreas P. and Krüger, Martin and Trächtler, Ansgar and Rackow, Sascha}},
  booktitle    = {{Proc. 4. Internationales Commercial Vehicle Technology Symposium}},
  title        = {{{Multidomänenmodell zur Optimierung der Hydraulik eines Raupenlaufwerks für Landmaschinen}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{23054,
  author       = {{Bockholt, Marcos and Katter, Michael and Pohl, Georg and Michael, Jan and Alpögger, Thomas}},
  booktitle    = {{3rd International Conference on System-integrated Intelligence: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering}},
  title        = {{{A Tool Chain for Model-Based Development of Heat Pump Dryers}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21687,
  abstract     = {{The spare part industry in aerospace is highly demanding. For conventional manufacturing technologies it is difficult to meet these requirements. In contrast to that, the design freedom of Additive Manufacturing enables the production of complex and lightweight parts. The lack of experience with this technology hampers the decision where Additive Manufacturing can be economically applied. The cost drivers have to be newly evaluated and holistically investigated. Supply chain advantages have to be considered during the decision process, too. Therefore, aerospace characteristics are analyzed within the paper and a methodology based on Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) is introduced. To do so, the cost appraisal for Additive Manufacturing has to be detailed. Additionally, changes in the supply chain have to be identified and quantified. Quality criteria have to be taken into account as well. In the end it is shown how these influence factors can be combined to create a decision support. }},
  author       = {{Deppe, G. and Koch, R.}},
  booktitle    = {{27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium }},
  pages        = {{81--92}},
  title        = {{{Supporting the Decision Process for applying Additive Manufacturing in the MRO Aerospace Business by MADM}}},
  doi          = {{http://utw10945.utweb.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/006-Deppe.pdf}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21688,
  abstract     = {{Additive Manufacturing offers a great potential for the optimization of products. Therefore different approaches are feasible to exploit these potentials for elaborating optimal solutions. For example these include optimization of weight or stiffness of structural components as well as the integration of functions and other entities of assemblies. Note, however, that additive manufacturing processes have process specific limitations. Products, components and assemblies, as well as procedures for the design and production preparation must be optimized with regard to a successful additive manufacturing. The use of already known tools for the optimization and design needs to be reconsidered and adapted to theadditive manufacturing. This also includes the production planning with component orientation in build chamber as well as a necessary quality management system. This paper shows several ways for product optimization with additive manufacturing, often based on topology optimization, and procedures for information gathering, decision making and shape determination for part optimization for Additive Manufacturing.}},
  author       = {{Reiher, T. and Koch, R.}},
  booktitle    = {{27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium }},
  pages        = {{2236--2249}},
  title        = {{{Product optimization with and for Additive Manufacturing}}},
  doi          = {{http://utw10945.utweb.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/179-Reiher.pdf}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21689,
  abstract     = {{Additive manufacturing offers advantages for the production of a final product. Nowadays still many companies have not integrated this new technology into their product development processes (PDP). This paper will discuss additive manufacturing with regards to the current available PDP's while setting a focus on the economic aspects of the integration. Based on a sample part several tools will be discusses which may be uses in the different phases of product development. These tools aim on the simplification of integrating additive manufacturing technologies into existing PDP's. Included are methods for early and accurate cost estimation as well as product selection processes, best practice templates for creating knowledge and process awareness.}},
  author       = {{Lindemann, C. and Koch, R.}},
  booktitle    = {{27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium }},
  pages        = {{93--112}},
  title        = {{{Cost Efficient Design and Planning for Additive Manufacturing Technologies}}},
  doi          = {{http://utw10945.utweb.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/007-Lindemann.pdf}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@book{21698,
  abstract     = {{Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been growing rapidly with doubledigit growth rates during the last years and a rising trend towards end products. The further development of the technology highly depends on some critical success factors. For the future, it is vital to know which innovations will be necessary to satisfy the needs of industry. The impulsive forces will be those branches whose special characteristics are met by AM. Within the DMRC study “Thinking ahead the Future of Additive Manufacturing – Analysis of Promising Industries” (Gausemeier 2011), especially aircraft production, automotive production and the electronics industry have been identified as very promising to profit from the use of AM. Experts have selected these branches by assessing the prospective attractiveness of current application fields. Those branches are characterized by low quantities, complex part designs, lightweight design and/or high unit prices. For the aerospace industry, all four elements are of high relevance, which is why it has been a pioneer in applying and developing AM technology since the early beginning (Gausemeier 2011 and 2012). }},
  author       = {{Lindemann, C. and Deppe, G. and Koch, R.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7316-1156-1}},
  pages        = {{283}},
  publisher    = {{Metropolis Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Scenario Based Outlook of Additive Manufacturing Applications for the Aerospace Market}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@book{21699,
  abstract     = {{Additive Manufacturing (AM) is often deemed to be a driver for product piracy in public media. The reasons for this are mainly seen in the fact that it provides a possibility to easily copy three-dimensional objects when used in combination with scanning technologies. This contribution will not focus on the knowledge and skills needed to master AM technology but on its potential contribution to prevent product piracy and reverse engineering. The reverse engineering process will be analyzed to understand the practice of imitators and to transfer the characteristics of AM into specific measures. Finally a five-step methodology is presented which can be used as a guideline to implement protection measures in products to be (re-) developed. This guideline is supposed to be used by industrial companies since an expert survey has identified them as being very likely to profit from the use of AM (Echterhoff et al. 2011). }},
  author       = {{Jahnke, U. and Koch, R.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-7316-1156-1}},
  pages        = {{283}},
  publisher    = {{Metropolis Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Prevention of Product Piracy - Potentials of Additive Manufacturing}}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21702,
  abstract     = {{Nowadays, the material efficiency and part reliability are two majorissues in product development. Thus a product optimization often requires complex structures that are hard to be manufactured conventionally. Additive Manufacturing (AM) however offers great potentials for producing complex shaped parts economically. Different approaches are feasible to exploit these potentials based on the part’s application from shape optimization of structural components to the integration of functions and other entities of assemblies. Several parameters are defined that influence the costs and quality of the future product and carefully have to be balanced. To do so, the use of already known tools for the optimization and design needs to be reconsidered and adapted to the special characteristics of AM. As not all optimization potentials can be realized perfectly, a decision methodology is required to obtain the relevant potentials and to get to a trade-off between all requirements including the ecological impact. The paper shows different approaches for product optimization with AM and procedures for decision making in order to get to the optimal solution.}},
  author       = {{Reiher, T. and Deppe, G. and Koch, R.}},
  booktitle    = {{International Conference Production Engineering and Management 2016}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-946856-00-9}},
  pages        = {{27--38}},
  title        = {{{Combining material efficiency and part reliability by product optimization applying additive manufacturing}}},
  doi          = {{https://www.th-owl.de/elsa/download/333/334/PEM_2016_Proceeding_2016_09_14_Inhaltsnavigation.pdf}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21705,
  abstract     = {{Additive Fertigungsverfahren bieten in der Luftfahrtindustrie großes Potential. Die Geometriefreiheit ermöglicht die Produktion von komplexen und gewichtsoptimierten Bauteilen. Die mangelnde Erfahrung der Unternehmen mit dieser Fertigungstechnologie erschwert jedoch die Entscheidung, an welcher Stelle Additive Manufacturing ökonomisch sinnvoll eingesetzt werden kann. Die Kosteneinflussfaktoren unterscheiden sich an vielen Stellen von denen traditioneller Fertigungsverfahren und müssen gänzlich neu bewertet und eingeordnet werden. Dabei verlagert sich auch der Fokus weg von den reinen Herstellkosten hinzu einer ganzheitlichen Kostenbetrachtung. Wesentliche Vorteile lassen sich auch meist in der Supply Chain erzielen und müssen im Zuge des Entscheidungsprozesses für ein Fertigungsverfahren bei einem bestimmten Bauteil berücksichtigt werden. Daher werden in der Präsentation die Charakteristika der Luftfahrt analysiert und die Methodik einer Entscheidungsunterstützung vorgestellt. Im Zuge dessen gilt es die Kostenbewertung additiver Fertigungsverfahren näher zu beleuchten, um die Fertigungs- bzw. Reperaturkosten mit traditionellen Verfahren vergleichen zu können. Weiterhin müssen Veränderungen in der Supply Chain identifiziert und bewertbar gemacht werden. Qualitätskriterien müssen ebenfalls mit in die Betrachtung einbezogen werden. Anschließend wird aufgeziegt wie diese Einflussfaktoren in die Entscheidungsunterstützung integriert sind.}},
  author       = {{Deppe, G. and Koch, R.}},
  booktitle    = {{Rapid Tech 2016}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-446-45017-2}},
  pages        = {{349--360}},
  publisher    = {{Hanser Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Unterstützung des AM Entscheidungsprozesses in der Luftfahrtersatzteilversorgung}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446450608.031}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{21997,
  abstract     = {{The paper gives an overview of actually used Additive Manufacturing (AM) data formats and AM data infrastructure. Based on empirical analysis of the actual situation, necessary improvement of data management and exchange formats in context with AM technology is derived. The purpose of this paper is to understand the actual use of data formats and management in the field of AM. The paper draws conclusions based on an empirical analysis of the used data formats dependent on stakeholder groups. The results of the expert survey show a necessity to improve or develop new AM specific data formats.}},
  author       = {{Gräßler, I. and Taplick, P. and Pottebaum, J. and Scholle, P. and Reiher, T.}},
  booktitle    = {{14th International DESIGN Conference 2016}},
  title        = {{{Data Management for additive manufacturing: survey on requirements and current state}}},
  doi          = {{https://www.designsociety.org/publication/38831/DATA+MANAGEMENT+FOR+ADDITIVE+MANUFACTURING%3A+SURVEY+ON+REQUIREMENTS+AND+CURRENT+STATE}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{22019,
  abstract     = {{The mechanical characterization of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts is mostly done by static tests. In many applications, parts are also dynamically loaded. Here, fatigue tests can help to identify the expected lifetime of a part. This article discusses the fatigue behavior of FDM specimens manufactured with Ultem 9085. For this, tensile bars are manufactured according to ASTM D638 in different build orientations. Tests are performed in a range of pulsating tensile stresses, and S-N curves are documented for different build orientations. For higher loads, the FDM anisotropy characterizes the lifetime of used specimens, which is similar to static tensile bars. For lower loads, including a higher number of cycles to failure, S-N curves of different build orientations converge. In further tests, tensile bars were chemically smoothed with chloroform vapor. Chemical smoothing reduces surface roughness and increases tensile strength of specimens in the upright build direction. Fatigue tests of chemically treated specimens show no significant lifetime increase.}},
  author       = {{Fischer, M. and Schöppner, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium }},
  pages        = {{563–568}},
  title        = {{{Fatigue Behavior of FDM Parts Manufactured with Ultem 9085}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11837-016-2197-2}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{22025,
  abstract     = {{Das Fraunhofer-Institut für Werkstoff- und Strahltechnik IWS etablierte in enger Kooperation mit Partnern in den letzten Jahren erfolgreich eine geschlossene Technologiekette zur Umsetzung maßgeschneiderter mikrophysiologischer Systeme. Darauf aufbauend wurde eine universelle Mikrobearbeitungsplattform zum automatisierten Fertigen konzipiert und entwickelt. Dies umfasst neue Technologien für Schlüsselprozesse wie das Herstellen mikrofluidischer Komponenten mittels ARBURG Kunststoff-Freiformen sowie das Erzeugen funktionaler Strukturen und das Einbringen von Produktschutzmerkmalen auf innenliegenden Polymergrenzflächen mittels Direktem Laserinterferenz-Verfahren.}},
  author       = {{Moritzer, Elmar and Hirsch, André and Günther, K. and Teutoburg-Weiss, S. and Lasagni, A.F. and Klotzbach, U. and Sonntag, F.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-95908-078-1}},
  journal      = {{6. Dresdner Medizintechnik-Symposium, Biomedizinische Technik - interdisziplinär, integrativ und innovativ}},
  pages        = {{65--70}},
  title        = {{{Universelle Mikrobearbeitungsplaffform und Basistechnologien für das Fertigen und Markieren mikrophysiologischer Systeme}}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@inproceedings{22039,
  abstract     = {{The material Ultem 9085 is a flame-retardant thermoplastic polymer, which can be processed with Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Due to ist high strength-to-weight ratio and FST rating, Ultem 9085 parts are used in aviation. Process related staircase effects on rounded and slanting part areas require a surface treatment for end use parts. These processes include smoothing by mass finishing or coating in order to reduce surface roughness. An alternative smoothing technique is chemical surface treatment, such as the use of Acetone for ABS materials. In this paper, the surface of Ultem 9085 parts is treated with Chloroform vapor in order to solve material at the surface and smooth it. Therefore, specimens built in different build orientations are treated and tested with regard to surface roughness values and mechancial strength properties. The analysis of surface roughness and treatment time shows a significantly higher efficiency for chemical treatment in comparison to mass finishing. By employing chemical treatment, it is possible to reduce surface roughness by more than 80 % to Rz values of approximately 15 µm. Mechanical tests and measurements of the Melt Volume Rate (MVR) show no material destruction for chemical surface treatment at room temperature for less than 150 min.}},
  author       = {{Fischer, M. and Seewald, O. and Schöppner, Volker}},
  booktitle    = {{Rapid Tech - International Trade Show & Conference for Additive Manufacturing}},
  pages        = {{121--133}},
  publisher    = {{Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG}},
  title        = {{{Chemical Surface Treatment of Ultem 9085 Parts}}},
  doi          = {{10.3139/9783446450608.010}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{7699,
  author       = {{Sitarek, P. and Ryczko, K. and Misiewicz, J. and Reuter, Dirk and Wieck, A.}},
  issn         = {{0587-4246}},
  journal      = {{Acta Physica Polonica A}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{849--851}},
  publisher    = {{Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences}},
  title        = {{{Optical Transitions between Confined and Unconfined States in p-Type Asymmetric GaAs/InGaAs/AlGaAs QW Structures}}},
  doi          = {{10.12693/aphyspola.120.849}},
  volume       = {{120}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{7706,
  author       = {{Jadczak, J. and Bryja, L. and Wójs, A. and Bartsch, G. and Yakovlev, D.R. and Bayer, M. and Plochocka, P. and Potemski, M. and Reuter, Dirk and Wieck, A.}},
  issn         = {{0587-4246}},
  journal      = {{Acta Physica Polonica A}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{600--601}},
  publisher    = {{Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences}},
  title        = {{{Exciton Exchange between Nearly-Free and Acceptor-Bound States of a Positive Trion Assisted by Cyclotron Excitation}}},
  doi          = {{10.12693/aphyspola.119.600}},
  volume       = {{119}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{5759,
  author       = {{Jovanovikj, Ivan and Grieger, Marvin and Yigitbas, Enes}},
  journal      = {{Softwaretechnik-Trends, Proceedings of the 18th Workshop Software-Reengineering & Evolution (WSRE) & 7th Workshop Design for Future (DFF)}},
  location     = {{Bad Honnef}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{65--66}},
  title        = {{{Towards a Model-Driven Method for Reusing Test Cases in Software Migration Projects}}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

@article{6249,
  author       = {{Fischer, Holger Gerhard and Kauer-Franz, Michaela and Winter, Dominique and Latt, Stefan}},
  issn         = {{2196-6826}},
  journal      = {{i-com}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Walter de Gruyter GmbH}},
  title        = {{{UUX Method Selection}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/icom-2016-0011}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}