@inbook{65061, abstract = {{Abstract One of the purposes for which XAI is often brought into play is to enable a user to act responsibly. However, responsibility is a complex normative and social phenomenon that we unfold in this chapter. We consider that the classical concepts of agency and responsibility do not fully capture what is needed for meaningful collaboration between human users and XAI. Advocating the perspective of sXAI, we argue that the growing adaptivity of AI systems will result in sXAI being considered as partners. Both partners adopt particular (dialogical) roles within a collaborative process and take responsibility for them. We expect that these roles lead to reactive attitudes toward the sXAI on the side of the human partners that make these roles relational. They resemble those reactive attitudes that we hold toward other human agents. For agents to exercise their responsibility, they need to possess agential capacities to fulfill their role with respect to the structure of a social interaction. Hence, sXAI can be expected to act responsibly. But because of XAI’s limited normative capacities, it might rather act as a marginal agent. We refer to marginal agents and show they can be scaffolded with regard to their agential capacities and their knowledge about the structure of a social interaction. The structure links the actions of the partners to each other in terms of a set of stimuli and responses to it in pursuit of a particular goal. Hence, it is important to differentiate between the different goals that a structure can impose for exercising responsibility. Therefore, we follow (Responsibility from the margins. Oxford University Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715672.24001.0001 ) and offer three structures that can help to organize responsibility for decisions made with the assistance of AI systems. These structures are attributability, answerability, and accountability. Our insights will inform the development and design process of XAI to meet the guiding principles of responsible research and innovation as well as trustworthy AI. }}, author = {{Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Alpsancar, Suzana and Schulte, Carsten}}, booktitle = {{Social Explainable AI}}, isbn = {{9789819652891}}, pages = {{157--177}}, publisher = {{Springer Nature Singapore}}, title = {{{Responsibilities in sXAI}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-981-96-5290-7_9}}, year = {{2026}}, } @inbook{65063, abstract = {{Abstract This chapter critically examines how social explainable AI (sXAI) can better support AI practitioners in ensuring fairness in AI-based decision-making. We argue for a fundamental shift: Fairness should be understood not as a technical property or an information problem, but as a matter of vulnerability—focusing on the real-world impacts of AI on individuals and groups, especially those most at risk. Hereby, we call for a shift in perspective: from fair AI to tasking AI fairly . To motivate our vulnerability approach, we review the “Dutch welfare fraud scandal” (system risk indication—SyRI) and current challenges in the field of fair AI/machine learning (ML). Vulnerability of a person or members of a definable group of persons is a complex relational notion, and not a technical property of a technical system. Accordingly, we suggest several nontechnical strategies that hold the promise to compensate for the insufficiency of purely technical approaches to fairness and other ethical issues in the practical use of AI-based systems. To discuss how sXAI, due to its interactive and adaptive social character, might better fulfill this role than current XAI techniques, we provide a toy scenario for how sXAI might support the virtuous AI practitioner in an ethical inquiry. Finally, we also address challenges and limits of our approach. }}, author = {{Alpsancar, Suzana and Stamboliev, Eugenia}}, booktitle = {{Social Explainable AI}}, isbn = {{9789819652891}}, pages = {{557--581}}, publisher = {{Springer Nature Singapore}}, title = {{{Tasking AI Fairly. How to Empower AI Practitioners With sXAI?}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-981-96-5290-7_29}}, year = {{2026}}, } @inbook{65064, abstract = {{Abstract XAI can minimize the risks of being manipulated and deceived by AI but in turn entails other specific risks. This also applies to sXAI, and the specifically social character of sXAI harbors particular risks that designers and developers should be aware of. In this chapter, we shall discuss the potential opportunities and risks of sXAI. We see a particularly positive potential in the social character of sXAI, which lies in the fact that skillful users, including those with “healthy distrust,” can use the adaptivity of sXAI to produce an explanation that is actually relevant and adequate for them. However, this requires a high level of skills on the part of the user and is thus in contrast to the general promise of efficiency in the use of AI. A potential risk of XAI is that it can be (even more) persuasive, as the interactive involvement and the anthropomorphism strengthen a trustworthy appearance/performance (independent of the adequacy of the sXAI performance).}}, author = {{Alpsancar, Suzana and Klenk, Michael}}, booktitle = {{Social Explainable AI}}, isbn = {{9789819652891}}, pages = {{583--616}}, publisher = {{Springer Nature Singapore}}, title = {{{The Risk of Manipulation and Deception in sXAI}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-981-96-5290-7_30}}, year = {{2026}}, } @inbook{62709, author = {{Reijers, Wessel and Alpsancar, Suzana}}, booktitle = {{Social explainable AI. Communications of NII Shonan Meetings}}, editor = {{Rohlfing, Katharina and Främling, Kary and Lim, Brian and Alpsancar, Suzana and Thommes, Kirsten}}, pages = {{179--195}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Values and Norms in sXAI}}}, year = {{2026}}, } @book{65065, abstract = {{Abstract This introduction sets the stage for the present book. Whereas research in eXplainable AI (XAI) is motivated by societal changes and values, technology development largely ignores social aspects. This book aims to address this research gap with a systematic and comprehensive social view on explainable AI. Besides introducing many relevant concepts, the book offers first access to their possible implementation, thus advancing the development of more social XAI. The introduction starts by connecting the topic to the general research field of XAI. The second part defines the novel approach of social eXplainable AI (sXAI) along the three characteristics of social interaction such as patternedness, incrementality, and multimodality. Finally, the third part explains the structure followed by each chapter. The book offers insights not only for readers who work on technology development but also for those working in sociotechnical fields. Addressing an interdisciplinary readership, the book is an invitation for more exchange and further development of the sXAI field.}}, editor = {{Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Främling, Kary and Lim, Brian and Alpsancar, Suzana and Thommes, Kirsten}}, isbn = {{9789819652891}}, publisher = {{Springer Nature Singapore}}, title = {{{Social Explainable AI}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-981-96-5290-7_1}}, year = {{2026}}, } @article{59167, author = {{Thomas, Sven}}, journal = {{HannahArendt.Net}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{240–242}}, title = {{{Rezension: Thomas Meyers neue Arendt Biographie. Sinnbild der Verstrickung von Theorie und Praxis}}}, doi = {{10.57773/HANET.V14I1.607}}, volume = {{14}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inproceedings{62181, abstract = {{This research investigates how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be systematically integrated into existing business processes by combining suitable competencies with graphical AI workflow modelling. While AI offers a high potential for automation and increased efficiency, its implementation often fails due to a lack of interdisciplinary competencies that bridge the gap between domain expertise and IT know-how. Low-code platforms and visual modelling tools are increasingly recognised as enablers, empowering non-programmers to intuitively create graphical AI- based workflows. Nevertheless, specific competencies are required to realise the full potential of AI, the domain specific knowledge and align technical understanding with AI capabilities. The paper reviews the state of the art in AI-driven business process automation and competencies for visual low-code approaches. It then presents a practical solution to identify and systematise essential competence areas. Based on this, a practical competence model is developed to support the design of user-friendly, AI-enabled workflows. This is tested in a practical application context — emergency management — where it supports critical decision-making processes and is validated through expert feedback. The study concludes by offering actionable recommendations to help organisations foster the necessary competencies and methods for competently integrating AI into their digital processes.}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz}}, booktitle = {{AHFE International}}, issn = {{2771-0718}}, location = {{Split}}, publisher = {{AHFE International}}, title = {{{Graphical AI workflow modelling: Identifying relevant competencies in AI-based automation of business processes}}}, doi = {{10.54941/ahfe1006785}}, volume = {{198}}, year = {{2025}}, } @book{62182, abstract = {{

Executive summary Die vorliegende Zukunftsstudie „Automation 2035“ gibt einen Ausblick auf die Entwicklung der Automatisierungstechnik in den nächsten 10 Jahren. Neben der Beschreibung von Trends wie Kreislaufwirtschaft, Automatisierung der Märkte, Biologisierung, autonome Systeme und Robotik sowie IT-Sicherheit wird die zu erwartende Veränderung in der Bildung beschrieben. Dazu verwenden wir Methoden der Zukunftsforschung und arbeiten mit der Szenarientechnik, um Zukunftsperspektiven der Automation aufzuzeigen. Personas werden eingesetzt, um die zukünftigen Entwicklungen plastisch aus den Augen der Personen im Jahr 2025 und in der Zukunft im Jahr 2035 zu beschreiben. Schlüsselthemen und Trends: ... ... Inhalt Executive summary 1 1 Einführung 3 2 Zukunftsfelder für die Automatisierungstechnik 2035 4 2.1 Kreislaufwirtschaft 4 2.2 Automatisierung der Märkte 7 2.3 Biologisierung 8 2.4 Autonome Systeme und Robotik 10 2.5 Security 12 2.6 Veränderung der Ausbildung 13 3 Szenario der Automation 2035 16 4 Personas 18 4.1 Unternehmer 18 4.2 Ingenieurin 19 4.3 Schüler 20 5 Thesen und Ausblick 22 Methodik 24 Autorenteam 25 Schrifttum 26...

}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz and Tusek, Alena Marie and Bilgic, Attila and Lange, Christian and Stich, Christian and Maul, Christine and Heizmann, Michael and Weyrich, Michael and Dessel,, Sascha and Miny, Torben and Jumar, Ulrich}}, isbn = {{9783911670180}}, publisher = {{VDI Verlag}}, title = {{{Automation 2035}}}, doi = {{10.51202/9783911670180}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59166, author = {{Thomas, Sven}}, journal = {{HannahArendt.Net}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{237–239}}, title = {{{Rezension: Hanna Meretoja: Die Nacht der alten Feuer}}}, doi = {{10.57773/HANET.V14I1.606}}, volume = {{14}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{61517, author = {{Alpsancar, Suzana}}, booktitle = {{Algorithmische Wissenskulturen. Der Einfluss des Computers auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung}}, editor = {{Hashagen, Ulf and Seising, Rudolf}}, isbn = {{9783658355593}}, issn = {{2730-7425}}, pages = {{327–365}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Algorithmische Kulturen des Pflanzensammelns? Das Beispiel der Computerisierung des Botanischen Gartens und Botanischen Museums Berlin}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-658-35560-9_14}}, year = {{2025}}, } @unpublished{59917, abstract = {{nder the slogan of trustworthy AI, much of contemporary AI research is focused on designing AI systems and usage practices that inspire human trust and, thus, enhance adoption of AI systems. However, a person affected by an AI system may not be convinced by AI system design alone---neither should they, if the AI system is embedded in a social context that gives good reason to believe that it is used in tension with a person’s interest. In such cases, distrust in the system may be justified and necessary to build meaningful trust in the first place. We propose the term \emph{healthy distrust} to describe such a justified, careful stance towards certain AI usage practices. We investigate prior notions of trust and distrust in computer science, sociology, history, psychology, and philosophy, outline a remaining gap that healthy distrust might fill and conceptualize healthy distrust as a crucial part for AI usage that respects human autonomy.}}, author = {{Paaßen, Benjamin and Alpsancar, Suzana and Matzner, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{arXiv}}, title = {{{Healthy Distrust in AI systems}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62028, abstract = {{Explainable AI (XAI) methods can support the identification of biases in automated decision-making (ADM) systems. However, existing research does not sufficiently address whether these biases originate from the ADM system or mirror underlying societal inequalities. This distinction is important because it has major implications for how to act upon an explanation: while the societal bias produced by the ADM system can be algorithmically fixed, societal inequalities demand societal actions. To address this gap, we propose the RR-XAI-framework (recognition-redistribution through XAI) that builds on a distinction between socio-technical and societal bias and Nancy Fraser's justice theory of recognition and redistribution. In our framework, explanations can play two distinct roles: as a socio-technical diagnosis when they reveal biases produced by the ADM system itself, or as a societal diagnosis when they expose biases that reflect broader societal inequalities. We then outline the operationalization of the framework and discuss its applicability for cases in algorithmic hiring and credit scoring. Based on our findings, we argue that the diagnostic functions of XAI are contingent on the provision of such explanations, the resources of the audiences, as well as the current limits of XAI techniques.}}, author = {{Fahimi, Miriam and State, Laura and Kasirzadeh, Atoosa}}, issn = {{3065-8365}}, journal = {{Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{879--892}}, publisher = {{Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)}}, title = {{{From Explaining to Diagnosing: A Justice-Oriented Framework of Explainable AI for Bias Detection}}}, doi = {{10.1609/aies.v8i1.36597}}, volume = {{8}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inproceedings{62229, abstract = {{In 2024, the EU adopted the AI Act, a new set of rules for trustworthy artificial intelligence. This legal instrument carves a large place for standardisation, a regulatory technique that consists in crafting so-called harmonised technical standards, to facilitate legal compliance by industry stakeholders. While EU technical standards have been used in the past for ensuring product safety, for the first time the AI Act relies on standardisation to facilitate compliance with fundamental rights, including the right to non-discrimination and equality. The attempt to translate inherently open-textured rights and ethical principles into operationalizable standards raises critical questions. In particular, how will standardisation practices under the new EU AI Act affect, transform, contest and stabilise notions of equality and non-discrimination in an increasingly algorithmic society? This paper proposes a research agenda to address this question and unpack the black box of AI standardisation.}}, author = {{Xenidis, Raphaële and Fahimi, Miriam}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of Fourth European Workshop on Algorithmic Fairness}}, pages = {{310–314}}, publisher = {{PMLR}}, title = {{{Standardising Equality in the Algorithmic Society? A Research Agenda}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{57531, author = {{Alpsancar, Suzana and Buhl, Heike M. and Matzner, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, journal = {{AI and Ethics}}, pages = {{3015–3033}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Explanation needs and ethical demands: unpacking the instrumental value of XAI}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00622-3}}, volume = {{5}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{62305, author = {{Reijers, Wessel and Matzner, Tobias and Alpsancar, Suzana}}, booktitle = {{Digital Development. Technology, Ethics and Governance}}, editor = {{Farina, Mirko and Yu, Xiao and Chen, Jin}}, isbn = {{9781003567622}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Explainability and AI Governance}}}, doi = {{10.4324/9781003567622-22}}, year = {{2025}}, } @phdthesis{52675, author = {{Reinhold, Jannik}}, isbn = {{978-3-947647-34-7}}, title = {{{Systematik zur musterbasierten Transformation von Wertschöpfungssystemen für Smart Services }}}, volume = {{Band 415}}, year = {{2024}}, } @phdthesis{52678, author = {{Yang, X.}}, isbn = {{978-3-947647-35-4}}, title = {{{Eine Methode zur Unterstützung von Entscheidungen bei der Entwicklung modularer Leichtbauprodukte }}}, volume = {{Band 416}}, year = {{2024}}, } @book{55868, editor = {{Adolphi, Rainer and Hahn, Susanne and Kettner, Matthias}}, isbn = {{978-3-8376-7497-2}}, pages = {{464}}, publisher = {{transcript}}, title = {{{Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht}}}, year = {{2024}}, } @book{58692, editor = {{Alpsancar, Suzana}}, isbn = {{ISBN 978-3-7560-1830-7}}, publisher = {{Nomos}}, title = {{{ Der Sog des Neuen und der Schock des Alten Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2024 }}}, volume = {{10. Jahrgang}}, year = {{2024}}, } @inproceedings{56346, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz}}, booktitle = {{AHFE International}}, location = {{Split}}, publisher = {{AHFE International}}, title = {{{Quality Key Figures for Developing Future Scenarios}}}, doi = {{10.54941/ahfe1005553}}, volume = {{158}}, year = {{2024}}, }