@inproceedings{57511,
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  editor       = {{Fröber, Kerstin and Abel, Magdalena and Bäuml, Karl-Heinz and Dreisbach, Gesine and Kliegl, Oliver and Köster, Moritz and Lingnau, Angelika and Volberg, Gregor and Götz, Felix J.}},
  keywords     = {{action preparation, perception, movement planning, deception}},
  location     = {{ Regensburg }},
  pages        = {{77}},
  title        = {{{Try harder! - The influence of effort instructions on fake production costs in basketball novices and experts}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{58841,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Böer, Nils Tobias and Kunde, Wilfried and Giesen, Carina G. and Rothermund, Klaus and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstractband des 56. Herbsttreffens experimentelle Kognitionspsychologie (HexKop)}},
  location     = {{Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: a study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{54303,
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{56. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (ASP)}},
  editor       = {{Koester, Dirk and Krämer, Lina and Fuhlert, Leonhard and Everding, Jannik and Weilharter, Fritz and Marlovits, Andreas}},
  location     = {{Berlin}},
  pages        = {{119}},
  title        = {{{The influence of effort instruction on fake production costs in basketball novices and experienced basketball players.}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{48484,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Previous research indicates that performing passes with a head fake in basketball leads to increased response initiation times and errors as compared to performing a pass without a head fake. These so-called fake production costs only occurred when not given the time to mentally prepare the deceptive movement. In the current study, we investigated if extensive practice could reduce the cognitive costs of producing a pass with head fake. Twenty-four basketball novices participated in an experiment on five consecutive days. A visual cue prompted participants to play a pass with or without a head fake either to the left or right side. The cued action had to be executed after an interstimulus interval (ISI) of either 0 ms, 400 ms, 800 ms or 1200 ms, allowing for different movement preparation times. Results indicated higher response initiation times (ITs) and error rates (ERs) for passes with head fakes for the short preparation intervals (ISI 0 ms and 400 ms) on the first day but no difference for the longer preparation intervals (ISI 800 ms and 1200 ms). After only one day of practice, participants showed reduced fake production costs (for ISI 0 ms) and were even able to eliminate these cognitive costs when given time to mentally prepare the movement (for ISI 400 ms). Accordingly, physical practice can reduce the cognitive costs associated with head-fake generation. This finding is discussed against the background of the strengthening of stimulus response associations.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Weigelt, Matthias and Schütz, Christoph and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  issn         = {{0340-0727}},
  journal      = {{Psychological Research}},
  keywords     = {{Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Medicine}},
  pages        = {{523--534}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Practice reduces the costs of producing head fakes in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00426-023-01885-x}},
  volume       = {{88}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{47630,
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 55th Autumn Meeting of Experimental Cognitive Psychology (HExKoP)}},
  editor       = {{Bogenschütz, Luisa and Fenske, Pia and Ayatollahi, Shabnamalsadat and Hamzeloo, Mohammad and Montoya, Gustavo Adolfo León and Viegas, Lisa and Baess, Pamela and Hackländer, Ryan}},
  keywords     = {{action preparation, perception, movement planning, deception}},
  location     = {{Hildesheim}},
  pages        = {{16--17}},
  title        = {{{The influence of effort instructions on fake production costs in basketball novices and experts}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{45825,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Böer, Nils Tobias and Kunde, Wilfried and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 65th Conference of experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Merz, Simon and Frings, Christian and Leuchtenberg, Bettina and Moeller, Birte and Mueller, Stefanie and Neumann, Roland and Pastötter, Bernhard and Pingen, Leah and Schui, Gabriel}},
  location     = {{Trier}},
  pages        = {{139--140}},
  title        = {{{Adaptation to context information for head fakes in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12945}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48682,
  abstract     = {{The present study investigates participants' performance in two different mental body-rotation tasks (MBRTs) under conditions in which dynamic stability is challenged in two different balancing conditions: active balance control (Experiment 1), where participants actively maneuver, and re-active balance control (Experiment 2), where participants react to an external perturbation. The two MBRTs induced either an object-based spatial transformation (based on a same-different judgment) or an egocentric transformation (based on a left-right judgment). In Experiment 1, 48 participants were tested while standing on an even ground (low balancing requirements) or on a balance board (high balancing requirements). In Experiment 2, 32 participants performed while either standing still on a vibration plate or with the vibration plate moving in a low (20 Hz) or high (180 Hz) frequency. In both experiments, the results for response time and response error revealed effects of rotation angle and type of task. An effect of balancing condition was only observed for response error in Experiment 1. More precisely, response times and response errors increased for higher rotation angles. Also, performance was better for egocentric than for object-based spatial transformations. However, the different challenges to dynamic stability in Experiments 1 and 2 did not influence performance in the two MBRTs (except for response errors in Experiment 1) nor in a control condition (Experiment 1) without mental rotation.}},
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Mental rotation, Balance control, Perturbation, Embodiment}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{No effects of different perturbations on the performance in a mental body-rotation task (MBRT) with egocentric perspective transformations and object-based transformations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2023.103156}},
  volume       = {{92}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{49515,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Jackson, Robin C. and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1469-0292}},
  journal      = {{Psychology of Sport and Exercise}},
  keywords     = {{Applied Psychology}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Action outcome probability influences the size of the head-fake effect in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102467}},
  volume       = {{68}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{37466,
  abstract     = {{Typically, head fakes in basketball are generated to, and actually do, deteriorate performance on the side of the observer. However, potential costs at the side of the producer of a fake action have only rarely been investigated before. It is thus not clear yet if the benefit (i.e., slowed reactions in the observer) of performing a head fake is overestimated due to concurrently arising fake production costs (i.e., slowed performance in the producer of a head fake). Therefore, we studied potential head-fake production costs with two experiments. Novice participants were asked to generate passes to the left or right side, either with or without head fakes. In Experiment 1, these actions were determined by an auditory stimulus (i.e., a 440 Hz or 1200 Hz sinus or jigsaw wave). After an interstimulus interval (ISI) of either 0 ms, 800 ms, or 1500 ms, which served the preparation of the action, the cued action had to be executed. In Experiment 2, passing to the left or right, either with or without a head fake, was determined by a visual stimulus (i.e., a player with a red or blue jersey defending either the right or left side). After an ISI of either 0 ms, 400 ms, 800 ms, or 1200 ms, the cued action had to be executed. In both experiments, we observed higher reaction times (RTs) for passes with head fakes as compared to passes without head fakes for no and an intermediate preparation interval (from ISI 0 ms to 800 ms), but no difference for a long preparation interval (for an ISI of 1200 ms and 1500 ms). Both experiments show that generating fake actions produces performance costs, however, these costs can be overcome by a longer preparation phase before movement execution.}},
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias and Böer, Nils Tobias and Kunde, Wilfried}},
  issn         = {{0167-9457}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  keywords     = {{Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine, Biophysics}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Producing deceptive actions in sports: The costs of generating head fakes in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.humov.2022.103045}},
  volume       = {{87}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{46868,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Supplementing an earlier analysis of event‐related potentials in extensive motor learning (Margraf et al., 2022a, 2022b), frontal theta‐band activity (4–8 Hz) was scrutinized. Thirty‐seven participants learned a sequential arm movement with 192 trials in each of five practice sessions. Feedback, based on a performance adaptive bandwidth, was given after every trial. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded in the first and last practice sessions. The degree of motor automatization was tested under dual‐task conditions in a pre‐test–post‐test design. Quantitative error information was transported in both feedback conditions (positive and negative). Frontal theta activity was discussed as a general signal that cognitive control is needed and, therefore, was expected to be higher after negative feedback. Extensive motor practice promotes automatization, and therefore, decreased frontal theta activity was expected in the later practice. Further, it was expected that frontal theta was predictive for subsequent behavioural adaptations and the amount of motor automatization. As the results show, induced frontal theta power was higher after negative feedback and decreased after five sessions of practice. Moreover, induced theta activity was predictive for error correction and, therefore, an indicator of whether the recruited cognitive resources successfully induced behavioural adaptations. It remains to be solved why these effects, which fit well with the theoretical assumptions, were only revealed by the induced part of frontal theta activity. Further, the amount of theta activity during practice was not predictive for the degree of motor automatization. It seems that there might be a dissociation between attentional resources associated with feedback processing and attentional resources associated with motor control.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Margraf, Linda and Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{0953-816X}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Neuroscience}},
  keywords     = {{General Neuroscience}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{1297--1316}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Frontal theta reveals further information about neural valence‐dependent processing of augmented feedback in extensive motor practice - A secondary analysis}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/ejn.15951}},
  volume       = {{57}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{47130,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Jackson, Robin C. and Cañal-Bruland, Rouwen}},
  journal      = {{Human Movement Science}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  title        = {{{The science of deceptive human movement}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2023.103147}},
  volume       = {{92}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{47059,
  author       = {{Weigelt, Matthias and Krause, Daniel and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  booktitle    = {{Sport and Exercise Psychology}},
  editor       = {{Schüler, J. and Wegner, M. and Plessner, H. and Eklund, R. C. }},
  isbn         = {{9783031039201}},
  pages        = {{41--70}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Learning and Memory in Sports}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-031-03921-8_3}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{44694,
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Weigelt, Matthias and Kunde, Wilfried and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  booktitle    = {{Human Performance – Assessment, Intervention & Analysen. Abstractband der 55. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Schott, Nadja and Klotzbier, Thomas  and Korbus, Heide and El-Rajab, I. and Holfelder, B. and Park, S-Y.}},
  keywords     = {{Perception, Action Preparation, Cognition}},
  location     = {{Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart}},
  pages        = {{116--117}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Stuttgart}},
  title        = {{{The influence of effort instructions on the production of head fakes in basketball}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{45779,
  author       = {{Böer, Nils Tobias and Weigelt, Matthias and Güldenpenning, Iris}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 65th Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Merz, Simon and Frings, Christian and Leuchtenberg, Bettina and Moeller, Birte and Mueller, Stefanie and Neumann, Roland and Pastötter, Bernhard and Pingen, Leah and Schui, Gabriel}},
  keywords     = {{perception, action preparation, movement planning, effort instructions}},
  location     = {{Trier}},
  pages        = {{66--67}},
  title        = {{{The influence of effort instructions on producing head fakes in basketball }}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12945}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{47033,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Kunde, W. and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Human Performance – Assessment, Intervention & Analysen. Abstractband der 55. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Schott, N. and Klotzbier, T. and Korbus, H. and El-Rajab, I. and Holfelder, B. and Gomolinsky, U. and Park, S.-Y.}},
  pages        = {{116--117}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Stuttgart}},
  title        = {{{Der Einfluss von kognitiver Belastung auf den Blicktäuschungseffekt im Basketball}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{47034,
  author       = {{Wickemeyer, Carolin and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 55th Autumn Meeting of Experimental Cognitive Psychology (HExKoP) }},
  editor       = {{Bogenschütz, L. and Fenske, P. and Ayatollahi, S. and Hamzeloo, M. and Montoya, G. A. L. and Viegas, L. and Baess, P. and Hackländer, R.}},
  location     = {{Hildesheim}},
  pages        = {{23}},
  title        = {{{Influence of response complexity on response inhibition for the basketball pump fake}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{37834,
  author       = {{Faßbender, Laura and Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Eine meta-analytische Untersuchung der Feedback-Related Negativity in motorischen Aufgaben}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{37839,
  author       = {{Thorenz, Kristin and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Sport Emotion Questionnaire (SEQ) – Nur ein Messinstrument zur Er-fassung wettkampfbezogener Emotionen oder kann der SEQ auch im Freizeit- und Gesundheitssport zum Einsatz kommen?}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{37836,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Mental rotation of tactic board instructions in basketball: Domain-specific expertise improves on-court performance}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inproceedings{37838,
  author       = {{Thorenz, Kristin and Sudeck, Gorden and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{The affective response to moderate physical activity and relaxation exercises}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}