@article{40598,
  author       = {{Rudisch, Julian and Jöllenbeck, Thomas and Vogt, Lutz and Cordes, Thomas and Klotzbier, Thomas Jürgen and Vogel, Oliver and Wollesen, Bettina}},
  issn         = {{0966-6362}},
  journal      = {{Gait & Posture}},
  keywords     = {{Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biophysics}},
  pages        = {{55--64}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{{Agreement and consistency of five different clinical gait analysis systems in the assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.01.013}},
  volume       = {{85}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37830,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:p>Jegliche Art von Emotionen im Sport spielen vor allem in Wettkampfsituationen eine bedeutende Rolle, wenn es darum geht, zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt die optimale Leistung abzurufen. Emotionen können Auswirkungen auf der physiologischen, perzeptuell-kognitiven oder behavioralen Ebenen haben. Daher bildet den Schwerpunkt des vorliegenden Scoping-Reviews, die Untersuchung der Bedeutung wettkampfbezogener (state) Emotionen von Sporttreibenden. Die Literaturrecherche ergab 1126 Arbeiten, aus denen 15 Studien die Einschlusskriterien erfüllten. Diese wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Themenschwerpunkte betrachtet: 1) Emotionen, Kognitionen und Angst; 2) Emotionen, Leistungsbeurteilung und Stress; 3) Emotionen und Leistungsziele; 4) Unterschiede emotionaler Ausprägung im Geschlecht und Leistungsniveau; 5) Einfluss von Kausalzuschreibungen auf die Emotionen. Anschließend wurden die in den vorgestellten Studien verwendeten emotionserfassenden Messinstrumente betrachtet und vorgestellt. Zusammengefasst erscheint die Erfassung wettkampfbezogener (state) Emotionen rund um das sportliche Geschehen (vor, während, danach) ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der angewandten Sportpsychologie, davon abgeleiteter Emotionsregulationsstrategien und somit der optimalen Leistungserbringung zu sein, auch wenn der (deutschsprachigen) sportpsychologischen Praxis bisher nur begrenzte validierte Messinstrumente vorliegen.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wetzel, Änne and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3142}},
  journal      = {{German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{419--432}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Wettkampfbezogene Emotionen im Sport – ein Scoping-Review}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12662-021-00772-0}},
  volume       = {{52}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37786,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Abstract. In several kinds of sports, deceptive actions are used to hinder the anticipation performance of an opponent. During a head fake in basketball, a player turns the head to one side but passes the ball to the other side. A pass with a head fake generates a head-fake effect in the observer, which is characterized by slower and more error-prone responses to the pass direction as compared to passes without a head fake. Whereas the head-fake effect has been replicated several times, the question of its origin with dynamic stimuli has not been answered yet. The present study includes four experiments, which are conducted to examine the perceptual-cognitive mechanism underlying the effect by using the model of dimensional overlap ( Kornblum et al., 1990 ) and the additive factors logic ( Sternberg, 1969 ). Results point to multiple processes contributing to the head-fake effect for dynamic stimuli, which operate not only at a perceptual level but also at a level of response selection. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Polzien, Andrea and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{1618-3169}},
  journal      = {{Experimental Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{General Psychology, Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Medicine}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{349--363}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Examining the Perceptual-Cognitive Mechanism of Deceptive Actions in Sports}}},
  doi          = {{10.1027/1618-3169/a000503}},
  volume       = {{67}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{46720,
  author       = {{Polzien, Andrea and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  journal      = {{Plos one}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{e0251117}},
  publisher    = {{Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA}},
  title        = {{{A question of (perfect) timing: A preceding head turn increases the head-fake effect in basketball}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251117}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{37842,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Margraf, Linda and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  publisher    = {{Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 43 }},
  title        = {{{Neural Correlates of Augmented Feedback Processing are Associated to Short-Term Behavioral Changes and Automaticity in Motor Learning}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{38074,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Margraf, Linda and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  editor       = {{Huckauf, Anke and Baumann, Martin and Ernst, Marc and Herbert, Cornelia and Kiefer, Markus and Sauter, Marian}},
  location     = {{ Ulm}},
  title        = {{{Predictive value of valence-dependent neural correlates of augmented feedback processing for behavioral adaptation and learning in extensive motor learning}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{37840,
  author       = {{Margraf, Linda and Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  publisher    = {{Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 43}},
  title        = {{{Neural Processing of Augmented Feedback is Valence-Dependent and Changes After Extensive Practice of a New Motor Task}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{38078,
  author       = {{Margraf, Linda and Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  editor       = {{Huckauf, Anke and Baumann, Martin and Ernst, Marc and Herbert, Cornelia and Kiefer, Markus and Sauter, Marian}},
  location     = {{Ulm}},
  title        = {{{Changes in valence-dependent neural correlates of augmented feedback processing after extensive motor sequence learning}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{47031,
  author       = {{Polzien, A. and Güldenpenning, Iris and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Huckauf, A. and Baumann, M. and Ernst, M. and Herbert, C. and Kiefer, M. and Sauter, M.}},
  location     = {{Ulm (online)}},
  pages        = {{193}},
  publisher    = {{Pabst Science Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Repeating head fakes in basketball: Temporal aspects affect the congruency-sequence effect}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{47131,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Barkey, Thies and Jackson, Robin C. and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Talententwicklung und Coaching im Sport. Abstractband der 53. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Höner, O. and Wachsmuth, S. and Reinhard, M.L. and Schultz, F.}},
  location     = {{Tübingen (online)}},
  pages        = {{95}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Tübingen}},
  title        = {{{Der Einfluss von Kontextinformationen auf den Blicktäuschungseffekt im Basketball}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{47030,
  author       = {{Güldenpenning, Iris and Kunde, W. and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 63rd Conference of Experimental Psychologists (TeaP)}},
  editor       = {{Huckauf, A. and Baumann, M. and Ernst, M. and Herbert, C. and Kiefer, M. and Sauter, M.}},
  location     = {{Ulm (online)}},
  pages        = {{97--98}},
  publisher    = {{Pabst Science Publishers}},
  title        = {{{Cognitive load reduces interference by head fakes in basketball}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{48723,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Blischke, Klaus}},
  booktitle    = {{Bewegung, Training, Leistung und Gesundheit}},
  editor       = {{Güllich, Arne and Krüger, Michael}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Automatisierung der motorischen Kontrolle}}},
  doi          = {{doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53386-4_62-1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{48036,
  abstract     = {{BACKGROUND: A detail of previous studies on mental rotation, which has not received any attention so far, relates to the testing situation of the participants. In nearly every study, participants were tested in a sitting posture (and not standing). However, when considering embodied cognition approaches on mental processes, participants may not be able to fully exploit these processes when performing mental rotation tasks in a sitting posture.&#x0D;
AIM: Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the potential influence of two different postures (sitting vs. standing), when solving mental body rotation tasks.&#x0D;
METHOD: Sixteen participants (6 females) were tested in two mental body-rotation tasks (MBRT), requiring either an object-based spatial transformation (based on a same-different judgment) or an egocentric transformation (based on a left-right judgment) in a sitting and in a standing posture. Reaction times and response errors were analysed in two three-way ANOVAs, with the factors orientation, task, and posture.&#x0D;
RESULTS: Results revealed an effect of orientation and task, indicating that participants performed better for egocentric than for object-based transformations. However, there was no effect of posture.&#x0D;
CONCLUSION: The different dynamics of postural control during sitting and standing do not induce different embodiment effects on mental rotation.}},
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Barela, José Angelo and Figueiredo, Gabriella Andreeta and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2446-4902}},
  journal      = {{Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{73--84}},
  publisher    = {{Brazilian Journal for Motor Behavior}},
  title        = {{{Mental body rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations in different postures: sitting vs. standing}}},
  doi          = {{10.20338/bjmb.v14i2.165}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{48038,
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Barela, José A and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstractband der 52. Jahrestagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp)}},
  editor       = {{Amesberger, Günter and Würth, Sabine and Finkenzeller, Thomas}},
  location     = {{Salzburg}},
  pages        = {{40}},
  title        = {{{Hat die Körperposition (sitzen vs. stehen) einen Einfluss auf die Leistung in einer Mentalen Rotationsaufgabe?}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37831,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Zusammenfassung. Die vorliegende Studie befasst sich mit der Übersetzung und Validierung des englischsprachigen Sport Emotion Questionnaire (SEQ; Jones et al., 2005 ), der vorwettbewerblichen Emotionen von Sporttreibenden misst. In einer ersten Teilstudie wurde mittels einer Hin-Rück-Übersetzung und des Bilingual-Retest-Verfahrens ( n = 32) eine deutsche Version des SEQ (SEQ-d) erzeugt. In Studie 2 (Tennisspieler/innen, n = 116) zeigte sich jedoch eine vom Original abweichende Faktorstruktur, woraufhin der SEQ-d als dreidimensionale Kurzskala entwickelt wurde. Diese wurde in Studie 3 (Läufern/innen, n = 271) validiert. Die Kurzskala besitzt einen akzeptablen Fit (CFI = .950, RMSEA = .069, SRMR = .063) und eine interne Konsistenz von α = .84 (negative Emotionen), α = .86 (positive Emotionen), α = .87 (Anspannung). Durch Korrelationen mit anderen Emotionsmerkmalen konnte die konvergente Validität bestätigt werden. Die Kriteriumsvalidität wurde anhand wettkampf- und personenbezogener Zusatzparameter untersucht (bspw. Alter, Wettkampferfahrung…). Mit der deutschsprachigen Version des SEQ liegt ein ökonomisches und validiertes Messinstrument zur Erfassung vorwettbewerblicher Emotionen vor. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Wetzel, Änne and Weigelt, Matthias and Klingsieck, Katrin Birte}},
  issn         = {{0012-1924}},
  journal      = {{Diagnostica}},
  keywords     = {{Clinical Psychology}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{246--257}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Übersetzung und Validierung einer deutschsprachigen Version des Sport Emotion Questionnaire (SEQ)}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0012-1924/a000255}},
  volume       = {{66}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{38121,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Richert, Benjamin and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Differences in event-related potentials indicate differential use of mental rotation processes in parity judgements of humanoid and alphanumeric stimuli}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inproceedings{38115,
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Richert, Benjamin and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  title        = {{{Neuronale Korrelate der mentalen Rotation von menschlichen Figuren und alphanumerischen Stimuli}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37828,
  abstract     = {{<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Nursing staff is burdened by high workload and stress. Furthermore, heavy lifting, as well as transferring nursing home residents, cause lumbar tissue damage and back pain. Exercise intervention studies to reduce work-related problems are rare and the evidence for efficacy of studies among nurses is limited. Studies including targeted analysis of requirements are necessary to generate effective recommendations and tailored interventions for health promotion programmes. The purpose of this multicentred intervention study is to identify work-related problems, to implement health promotion programmes and to evaluate their effectiveness.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A randomised controlled trial will be conducted, including a total of 48 nursing home facilities in eight regions of Germany with an estimated sample size of 700 nurses. Standardised ergonomics and posture training (10 weeks, once a week for 20–30 min) and subsequently, back-fitness training (12 weeks, once a week for 45–60 min) will be administered. Following the implementation of standardised health promotion programmes, further demand-oriented interventions can be implemented. The perceived exposure to work-related demands, work-related pain in different parts of the body, health-related quality of life, perceived stress, work-related patterns of behaviour and experience, presentism behaviour, work environment as well as general needs and barriers to health promotion, will be assessed at baseline (pre-test), at 10 weeks (post-test, after ergonomics training), at 22 weeks (post-test, after back-fitness training) and at 34 weeks of the programme (follow-up).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Hamburg (AZ: 2018_168). The results of the study will be published in open-access and international journals. Furthermore, the results will be presented in the participating nursing homes and at national and international conferences.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>DRKS.de (DRKS00015241).</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Otto, Ann-Kathrin and Pietschmann, Juliane and Appelles, Luisa-Marie and Bebenek, Michael and Bischoff, Laura L and Hildebrand, Claudia and Johnen, Bettina and Jöllenbeck, Thomas and Kemmler, Wolfgang and Klotzbier, Thomas and Korbus, Heide and Rudisch, Julian and Schott, Nadja and Schoene, Daniel and Voelcker-Rehage, Claudia and Vogel, Oliver and Vogt, Lutz and Weigelt, Matthias and Wilke, Jan and Zwingmann, Katharina and Wollesen, Bettina}},
  issn         = {{2044-6055}},
  journal      = {{BMJ Open}},
  keywords     = {{General Medicine}},
  number       = {{10}},
  publisher    = {{BMJ}},
  title        = {{{Physical activity and health promotion for nursing staff in elderly care: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial}}},
  doi          = {{10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038202}},
  volume       = {{10}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37787,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>In sports games, tactical instructions are mostly presented on tactic boards under temporal constraints determined by the length of time outs (e.g., 20–60 s time outs in basketball) and coaches’ instructional behavior. Thus, instructions should be presented in a way that enables fast and errorless information processing. High affordances in visual–spatial transformation (e.g., mental rotation processes) might both impede information processing and decrease execution performance. The aim of this study was to scrutinize the effect of different orientations of visual tactical displays on observation time under self-paced conditions as well as to compare the effects on execution performance to those of externally paced conditions. According to the self-determination theory, self-control over observation time is assumed to increase performance.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>In a mixed-factors design with two factors, 48 participants were instructed to execute a basketball playing pattern, which was presented on a virtual tactic board in one of five different spatial disparities to the players’ on-court perspective. The Self-Paced Group determined the observation time in a self-controlled manner, whereas in the Yoked Group observation times were externally controlled, i.e., the observation time was constrained to match that of the Self-Paced Group..</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The self-controlled time for watching the pattern before execution was significantly shorter and spatial accuracy in pattern execution was significantly higher for low disparity between instruction perspective and on-court perspective. Self-control over observation time did not affect execution accuracy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The orientation effects might be explained by interfering mental rotation processes that are necessary to transform the instructional perspective into the players’ egocentric perspective. According to these results, coaches should align their tactic boards to their players’ on-court viewing perspective.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Krause, Daniel and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2509-3142}},
  journal      = {{German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research}},
  keywords     = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{354--365}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Mental rotation and performance in basketball: effects of self-controlled and externally controlled time constraints on the processing and execution of tactic board instructions with varied orientations}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12662-020-00659-6}},
  volume       = {{50}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{37796,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>BACKGROUND: A detail of previous studies on mental rotation, which has not received any attention so far, relates to the testing situation of the participants. In nearly every study, participants were tested in a sitting posture (and not standing). However, when considering embodied cognition approaches on mental processes, participants may not be able to fully exploit these processes when performing mental rotation tasks in a sitting posture.&#x0D;
AIM: Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the potential influence of two different postures (sitting vs. standing), when solving mental body rotation tasks.&#x0D;
METHOD: Sixteen participants (6 females) were tested in two mental body-rotation tasks (MBRT), requiring either an object-based spatial transformation (based on a same-different judgment) or an egocentric transformation (based on a left-right judgment) in a sitting and in a standing posture. Reaction times and response errors were analysed in two three-way ANOVAs, with the factors orientation, task, and posture.&#x0D;
RESULTS: Results revealed an effect of orientation and task, indicating that participants performed better for egocentric than for object-based transformations. However, there was no effect of posture.&#x0D;
CONCLUSION: The different dynamics of postural control during sitting and standing do not induce different embodiment effects on mental rotation.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Budde, Kirsten and Barela, José Angelo and Figueiredo, Gabriella Andreeta and Weigelt, Matthias}},
  issn         = {{2446-4902}},
  journal      = {{Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior}},
  keywords     = {{General Engineering}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{73--84}},
  publisher    = {{Brazilian Journal for Motor Behavior}},
  title        = {{{Mental body rotation with egocentric and object-based transformations in different postures: sitting vs. standing}}},
  doi          = {{10.20338/bjmb.v14i2.165}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}