[{"type":"conference","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Auswertung einer Befragung unter Studierenden zu der Frage welche Elemente eine Lehrveranstaltung innovativ machen und welche Rolle die neuen Medien dabei spielen.\r\n\r\nDigitale Medien begegnen uns in der Hochschule immer wieder. Häufig handelt es sich um neue Werkzeuge oder Trends (Klicker, MOOCs, Web 2.0), die einerseits potenzialreich und spannend erscheinen, deren didaktische Verwertbarkeit sich aber nicht auf den ersten Blick erschließt. Oft folgt nach einer euphorischen Erprobung schnell die Ernüchterung, wenn festgestellt wird, dass sich durch die digitalen Technologien allein kein erhöhter Lernerfolg ergibt und auch die Studierenden keine nachhaltigen Motivationsschübe erfahren.\r\nAus der Hochschuldidaktik hört man häufig und berechtigterweise kritische Stimmen, welche die Einbettung digitaler Medien in sorgfältig geplante didaktische Arrangements betonen. Es stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit damit die Kreativität und der Entdeckergeist von Lehrenden und Studierenden eingeschränkt werden. Wir wollen im Disq-Space der Frage nachgehen, wie die Hochschuldidaktik auf neue digitale Trends reagieren und dabei einen Mittelweg zwischen \"kreativem Ausprobieren\" und pädagogisch-didaktischer Rationalität einschlagen kann. Zunächst werden die Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Umfrage an der Universität St. Gallen zu den Vorstellungen Studierender zu innovativer Lehre vorgestellt. Nach einer Öffnung des Raums für gute sowie schlechte Erfahrungen und Bespiele von Seiten der Teilnehmenden soll diskutiert werden, welche personellen, didaktischen und organisatorischen Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein müssen, damit Digitalisierung die Kompetenzentwicklung der Studierenden unterstützt.\r\nDie Ergebnisse der Diskussionsrunde werden im Blog des Teams Hochschulentwicklung zur Verfügung gestellt. Es wird angestrebt, diese damit einer breiteren Öffentlichkeit zugänglich zu machen."}],"status":"public","_id":"4469","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","keyword":["Neue Medien","Hochschuldidaktik","Studierende","Innovation in der Lehre"],"extern":"1","year":"2015","citation":{"ieee":"D. Wagner and T. Jenert, “Zwischen\" netten\" Tools und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in der Hochschuldidaktik,” presented at the 44. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd), Paderborn, 2015.","chicago":"Wagner, Dietrich, and Tobias Jenert. “Zwischen\" Netten\" Tools Und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in Der Hochschuldidaktik,” 2015.","ama":"Wagner D, Jenert T. Zwischen\" netten\" Tools und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in der Hochschuldidaktik. In: ; 2015.","apa":"Wagner, D., &#38; Jenert, T. (2015). Zwischen\" netten\" Tools und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in der Hochschuldidaktik. Presented at the 44. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd), Paderborn.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Wagner_Jenert_2015, title={Zwischen\" netten\" Tools und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in der Hochschuldidaktik}, author={Wagner, Dietrich and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2015} }","mla":"Wagner, Dietrich, and Tobias Jenert. <i>Zwischen\" Netten\" Tools Und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in Der Hochschuldidaktik</i>. 2015.","short":"D. Wagner, T. Jenert, in: 2015."},"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:05Z","date_created":"2018-09-18T13:24:56Z","author":[{"first_name":"Dietrich","full_name":"Wagner, Dietrich","last_name":"Wagner"},{"full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","first_name":"Tobias"}],"title":"Zwischen\" netten\" Tools und\" {\\\"U}berdidaktisierung\": Neue Medien in der Hochschuldidaktik","conference":{"end_date":"2015-03-06","location":"Paderborn","name":"44. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd)","start_date":"2015-03-03"}},{"abstract":[{"text":"This research aims to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of attitudes towards two particular objects: the Higher Education Institution (HEI) and the process of studying. Investigating attitudes towards studying at a HEI in a comprehensive way addresses an important research gap. It connects students' perception of the institution with teaching and learning. To validate the Assessment of Students' Attitudes towards Studying (ASAtS) Questionnaire, data was gathered at three different universities in Switzerland (820 students), Sweden (167) and Germany (133). Overall, the results show the internal consistency of the ASAtS. Its nomological validity is also supported by correlations with other constructs, such as intrinsic motivation and study performance. The ASAtS contributes to the theory on students learning by broadening the scope of research beyond learning in a narrow sense. From a practical point of view, it provides a tool for HE management to monitor students' perception of their HEI.","lang":"eng"}],"status":"public","publication":"Learning and individual differences : journal of psychology and education","type":"journal_article","keyword":["Attitude","Student learning","Higher Education Institution","university","student experience"],"extern":"1","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"_id":"4423","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"71994","year":"2015","page":"233 - 242","intvolume":"        43","citation":{"apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2015). On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire. <i>Learning and Individual Differences : Journal of Psychology and Education</i>, <i>43</i>, 233–242.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “On the Assessment of Attitudes towards Studying—Development and Validation of a Questionnaire.” <i>Learning and Individual Differences : Journal of Psychology and Education</i>, vol. 43, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 233–42.","bibtex":"@article{Brahm_Jenert_2015, title={On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire}, volume={43}, journal={Learning and individual differences : journal of psychology and education}, publisher={Elsevier}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2015}, pages={233–242} }","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, Learning and Individual Differences : Journal of Psychology and Education 43 (2015) 233–242.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “On the Assessment of Attitudes towards Studying—Development and Validation of a Questionnaire.” <i>Learning and Individual Differences : Journal of Psychology and Education</i> 43 (2015): 233–42.","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire,” <i>Learning and individual differences : journal of psychology and education</i>, vol. 43, pp. 233–242, 2015.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire. <i>Learning and individual differences : journal of psychology and education</i>. 2015;43:233-242."},"quality_controlled":"1","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1041-6080"]},"title":"On the assessment of attitudes towards studying—development and validation of a questionnaire","publisher":"Elsevier","date_updated":"2024-03-21T14:43:34Z","volume":43,"author":[{"last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","first_name":"Taiga"},{"first_name":"Tobias","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T09:07:26Z"},{"author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T09:09:41Z","volume":9,"publisher":"Forum Neue Medien in der Lehre Austria","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:03Z","title":"Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture","issue":"2","citation":{"chicago":"Jenert, Tobias. “Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i> 9, no. 2 (2014): 1–12.","ieee":"T. Jenert, “Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture,” <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2014.","ama":"Jenert T. Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture. <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>. 2014;9(2):1-12.","apa":"Jenert, T. (2014). Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture. <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, <i>9</i>(2), 1–12.","short":"T. Jenert, Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung 9 (2014) 1–12.","bibtex":"@article{Jenert_2014, title={Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture}, volume={9}, number={2}, journal={Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung}, publisher={Forum Neue Medien in der Lehre Austria}, author={Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014}, pages={1–12} }","mla":"Jenert, Tobias. “Implementing Outcome-Oriented Study Programmes at University: The Challenge of Academic Culture.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 9, no. 2, Forum Neue Medien in der Lehre Austria, 2014, pp. 1–12."},"intvolume":"         9","page":"1-12","year":"2014","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"_id":"4424","extern":"1","keyword":["Programmentwicklung","Studienprogramme","program development","educational development","academic culture","disciplinary culture"],"type":"journal_article","publication":"Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung","status":"public","abstract":[{"text":"In recent years, the design of study programmes in Higher Education (HE) has been given considerable attention by HE practitioners and researchers. Today, a sound body of concepts and experiences on different realisations of Bologna-conforming study programmes is available. The same, however, does not hold true for questions concerning the processes of implementing and further developing programmes. This paper investigates the challenges related with implementation, particularly at universities. A first aim is to understand the specifics of academic culture and their significance for programme implementation and development. Elaborating on this analysis, a second aim is to outline the role of educational developers in this process, as well as the necessary competencies to perform such a role.","lang":"eng"}]},{"year":"2014","citation":{"ama":"Brahm T, Zellweger F, Jenert T, Thomann G. Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers. In: ; 2014.","ieee":"T. Brahm, F. Zellweger, T. Jenert, and G. Thomann, “Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers,” presented at the ICED 2014 : Educational Development in a Changing World, Stockholm, 2014.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, Franziska Zellweger, Tobias Jenert, and Geri Thomann. “Developing Study Programs as a Continuous Task-the Role of Educational Developers,” 2014.","apa":"Brahm, T., Zellweger, F., Jenert, T., &#38; Thomann, G. (2014). Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers. Presented at the ICED 2014 : Educational Development in a Changing World, Stockholm.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, et al. <i>Developing Study Programs as a Continuous Task-the Role of Educational Developers</i>. 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Zellweger_Jenert_Thomann_2014, title={Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Zellweger, Franziska and Jenert, Tobias and Thomann, Geri}, year={2014} }","short":"T. Brahm, F. Zellweger, T. Jenert, G. Thomann, in: 2014."},"title":"Developing study programs as a continuous task-the role of educational developers","conference":{"name":"ICED 2014 : Educational Development in a Changing World","start_date":"2014-06-16","end_date":"2014-0618","location":"Stockholm"},"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","date_created":"2018-09-18T13:30:30Z","author":[{"first_name":"Taiga","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm"},{"first_name":"Franziska","last_name":"Zellweger","full_name":"Zellweger, Franziska"},{"first_name":"Tobias","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert"},{"first_name":"Geri","full_name":"Thomann, Geri","last_name":"Thomann"}],"abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Abstract Summary: Study programs are currently receiving more attention in Europe. In consequence, it can be observed that the roles of program development and management are professionalized. In the proposed round table, we would like to discuss the role of educational developers to support this professionalization via measures of training and process support in the light of recent developments in Switzerland.\r\n\r\nAbstract Text: Professionalization of program development as an institutional responsibility \r\nIn Switzerland, different developments in higher education have led to increased attention to the development and management of the study programs such as the Bologna process, an increasingly competitive environment, the tertiarisation of a number of professions formerly acquired through vocational education. Furthermore, the national qualification framework and in particular accreditation processes require HEI to demonstrate the effectiveness of their activities (e.g., Sursock & Smit, 2010). Many different actors have been involved in development processes on the program level but also within educational development units. However, so far a systematic discourse on key issues regarding the management and development of study programs is missing, not only in German-speaking Europe. The following main question will guide the round table session: How can educational development give vital impulses for program development?\r\nOur starting points are two approaches or frameworks from Swiss HEI: a) the definition of competencies for new program professionals at the Zurich University for Teacher Education and b) a process for the strategic development of didactically-aligned study programs at the University of St. Gallen.\r\n\r\nFramework 1: Competencies for program managers\r\nThe experiences with a training program for study program managers at the Zurich University for Teacher Education are reported. Over\r\na period of four years, a competency profile has been developed and refined. Insights into the challenges and struggles of this role\r\nwere gained. Despite diverse job characteristics of program managers (often resulting from an institution-specific history), there is a\r\ncommon set of competencies necessary to successfully cope with organizational complexity such as role competency (Schein, 1992)\r\nand lateral leadership (Kühl et al., 2005).\r\nFramework 2: Towards a systematic development of study programs\r\nThe second initiative concerns the strategic approach to program development implemented at the University of St. Gallen (Brahm &\r\nJenert, 2013; Jenert, 2011). In this structured process, the program goes through four process steps: process initiation, program\r\nanalysis, program development, evaluation of the process and results. A major challenge in this process is the role of program\r\nprofessionals. The goal is to establish them as change agents for a didactically-aligned study program.\r\nOutcome: Role of educational development\r\nAfter briefly introducing the two examples, the roles of program professionals and educational development in HEI will be discussed.\r\nThe questions guiding the discussion will be:\r\n• How can program development be established as a continuing task, closely tied to quality development?\r\n• How can the competencies of program professionals be developed and the local capacity and ownership be strengthened?\r\n• How can educational development support program development and provide vital impulses?\r\nAudience Engagement. Depending on the number of participants, first the questions will be discussed in groups. To put the results of\r\nthe discussion on record, it will be summarized and uploaded in our weblog for further discussion after the session."}],"status":"public","type":"conference","keyword":["curriculum development","study programs","Bologna","educational development","higher education"],"extern":"1","alternative_title":["Educational Development in a Changing World"],"_id":"4470","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057"},{"extern":"1","keyword":["Motivationsentwicklung","Hochschule","motivation","Längsschnitt","Mixed Methods"],"department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","_id":"4472","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Das erste Studienjahr wird als wesentlicher Übergang von der Schule in die Hochschule angesehen. Im Vordergrund steht dabei häufig die Fragen der Identitätsfindung der Studierenden und das \"Ankommen\" im neuen Lebensabschnitt (Briggs, Clark, & Hall, 2012; Scanlon, Rowling, & Weber, 2007). In diesem Zusammenhang werden ganz unterschiedliche Aspekte untersucht, z. B. die vorhandenen Lernkompetenzen oder das Zeitmanagement der Studierenden (Barron & D'Annunzio-Green, 2009), vorhandene Einführungsprogramme an Hochschulen (z.B. Gale & Parker, 2012) oder dem ‚student engagement‘ während des ersten Jahres (Krause & Coates, 2008). Obwohl die Motivation der Studierenden als starker Prädiktor für die Leistung angesehen wird (z. B. Busato, Prins, Elshouta, & Hamaker, 2000), wurde die Motivationsentwicklung im ersten Studienjahr bis dato nur selten betrachtet. Die vorliegende Mixed Methods-Studie setzt an dieser Forschungslücke an und untersucht die Entwicklung der Studienmotivation von Wirtschaftsstudierenden im Verlauf des ersten Studienjahres. Im Rahmen einer quantitativen Längsschnittuntersuchung mit drei Messzeitpunkten wird dabei die Motivationsentwicklung über die gesamte Studierendenpopulation hinweg erfasst. Im Mittelpunkt steht die Frage, wie sich die intrinsische und extrinsische Studienmotivation sowie die studienbezogene Selbstwirksamkeit über das erste Studienjahr verändern. Zudem wird untersucht, inwiefern verschiedene studienbezogene Variablen (z. B. Angst) sich auf die Motivationsentwicklung auswirken. Um vertiefte Erkenntnisse über die Bedeutsamkeit verschiedener Gestaltungsmerkmale des ersten Studienjahres auf die Motivationsentwicklung der Studierenden zu gewinnen, wurde parallel zur quantitativen Untersuchung eine qualitative Längsschnittstudie durchgeführt mit dem Ziel, (1) verschiedene Verläufe der Motivationsentwicklung und (2) kritische Ereignisse im Eingangsjahr zu identifizieren. Das vorliegende Papier zeigt in den folgenden beiden Kapiteln den theoretischen Bezugsrahmen der Studie und die methodische Vorgehensweise. Daraufhin werden die Ergebnisse sowohl der quantitativen als auch der qualitativen Studie dargestellt und im Rahmen der Diskussion miteinander verbunden."}],"type":"conference","conference":{"name":"2. Tagung der Gesellschaft für Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF)","start_date":"2014-03-03","end_date":"2014-03-05","location":"Frankfurt am Main "},"title":"Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie","author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert"},{"last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","first_name":"Taiga"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T13:38:33Z","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","citation":{"ama":"Jenert T, Brahm T. Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie. In: ; 2014.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. “Entwicklung Der Motivation von Studierenden Der Wirtschafts-Wissenschaften Im Ersten Studienjahr-Eine Mixed-Methods-Studie,” 2014.","ieee":"T. Jenert and T. Brahm, “Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie,” presented at the 2. Tagung der Gesellschaft für Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF), Frankfurt am Main , 2014.","mla":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. <i>Entwicklung Der Motivation von Studierenden Der Wirtschafts-Wissenschaften Im Ersten Studienjahr-Eine Mixed-Methods-Studie</i>. 2014.","short":"T. Jenert, T. Brahm, in: 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Jenert_Brahm_2014, title={Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie}, author={Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}, year={2014} }","apa":"Jenert, T., &#38; Brahm, T. (2014). Entwicklung der Motivation von Studierenden der Wirtschafts-wissenschaften im ersten Studienjahr-eine Mixed-Methods-Studie. Presented at the 2. Tagung der Gesellschaft für Empirische Bildungsforschung (GEBF), Frankfurt am Main ."},"year":"2014"},{"type":"conference","abstract":[{"text":"Research on entrepreneurial learning often stresses the role of experience and previous knowledge. We aim to advance this perspective by pointing out the prerequisites and limitations of experience-based forms of learning and by adapting findings from educational psychology to the entrepreneurial context. Developing a model of self-regulated entrepreneurial learning (SREL) we pursue a more process oriented view of entrepreneurial learning in order to explain how learning unfolds in contexts of uncertainty and novelty when relevant experience and knowledge are scarce. The model comprises a planning, a performance and a review phase in order to support entrepreneurs in their learning process. It is suggested how SREL is related to self-efficacy, emotions and cognitive biases.","lang":"eng"}],"status":"public","_id":"4473","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","keyword":["Unternehmertum","lernen"],"extern":"1","year":"2014","citation":{"apa":"Fust, A., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning. Presented at the 59th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Dublin .","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Fust_Jenert_2014, title={Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning}, author={Fust, Alexander and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","short":"A. Fust, T. Jenert, in: 2014.","mla":"Fust, Alexander, and Tobias Jenert. <i>Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning</i>. 2014.","ama":"Fust A, Jenert T. Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning. In: ; 2014.","chicago":"Fust, Alexander, and Tobias Jenert. “Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning,” 2014.","ieee":"A. Fust and T. Jenert, “Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning,” presented at the 59th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Dublin , 2014."},"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","date_created":"2018-09-19T08:03:27Z","author":[{"full_name":"Fust, Alexander","last_name":"Fust","first_name":"Alexander"},{"last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","first_name":"Tobias"}],"title":"Self-Regulation and Entrepreneurial Learning","conference":{"name":"59th World Conference of the International Council for Small Business (ICSB)","start_date":"2014-06-11","end_date":"2014-06-14","location":"Dublin "}},{"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:06:46Z","author":[{"last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","first_name":"Taiga"},{"orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert","id":"71994","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","conference":{"end_date":"2014-08-22","location":"Leuven","name":"SIG4 Higher Education & SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014","start_date":"2014-08-20"},"title":"The crucial first year: The development of students' motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study","citation":{"apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). The crucial first year: The development of students’ motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study. Presented at the SIG4 Higher Education &#38; SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014, Leuven.","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, in: 2014.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. <i>The Crucial First Year: The Development of Students’ Motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study</i>. 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Jenert_2014, title={The crucial first year: The development of students’ motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “The crucial first year: The development of students’ motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study,” presented at the SIG4 Higher Education &#38; SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014, Leuven, 2014.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “The Crucial First Year: The Development of Students’ Motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study,” 2014.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. The crucial first year: The development of students’ motivation at a Business School-a Mixed Methods Study. In: ; 2014."},"year":"2014","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","_id":"4474","extern":"1","keyword":["motivation","business school","higher education","latent growth curve model","longitudinal study","mixed methods","interview","students"],"type":"conference","status":"public","abstract":[{"text":"The transition from school to university can be overwhelming for some students. While students' motivation is considered a strong predictor of performance, the development of motivation during students' transition from high school to university has rarely been investigated. Additionally, little is known about the relation of motivational aspects with other influences on study performance. The present mixed methods study addresses this research gap and examines the development of economics students' study motivation. The longitudinal mixed-method study included three waves of data collected using quantitative surveys and a series of five interviews conducted with 14 first-year students over eight months. Regarding students' development over time, the quantitative analysis showed a gradual decline in students' motivation. However, in the interviews, certain events during the first year were identified as critical incidents demotivating students. These insights into the development of students' motivation at a business school show that concrete incidents influence students' motivational development; thus, they could be transformed by structural changes.","lang":"eng"}]},{"author":[{"full_name":"Gebhardt, Anja","last_name":"Gebhardt","first_name":"Anja"},{"full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:10:09Z","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","conference":{"start_date":"2014-08-20","name":"SIG4 Higher Education & SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014","location":"Leuven","end_date":"2014-08-22"},"title":"Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school","citation":{"ama":"Gebhardt A, Jenert T. Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school. In: ; 2014.","ieee":"A. Gebhardt and T. Jenert, “Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school,” presented at the SIG4 Higher Education &#38; SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014, Leuven, 2014.","chicago":"Gebhardt, Anja, and Tobias Jenert. “Transition within Higher Education Institutions (HEI): Differences in Learning Culture (LC) between First-Year, Bachelor, and Master Students at a Business School,” 2014.","apa":"Gebhardt, A., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school. Presented at the SIG4 Higher Education &#38; SIG17 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Learning and Instruction Earli SIG Conference 2014, Leuven.","mla":"Gebhardt, Anja, and Tobias Jenert. <i>Transition within Higher Education Institutions (HEI): Differences in Learning Culture (LC) between First-Year, Bachelor, and Master Students at a Business School</i>. 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Gebhardt_Jenert_2014, title={Transition within higher education institutions (HEI): Differences in learning culture (LC) between first-year, bachelor, and master students at a business school}, author={Gebhardt, Anja and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","short":"A. Gebhardt, T. Jenert, in: 2014."},"year":"2014","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","_id":"4475","extern":"1","keyword":["Higher Education","Transitions","Bachelor","Master"],"type":"conference","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"Tertiary education comprises at least two phases, undergraduate and graduate studies. Often, the first year is regarded another, crucial phase where students familiarize with the study environment. It can be hypothesized that students' individual perceptions of learning and studying as well as the pedagogies they experience differ depending on their current study phase. Yet, differences between the phases in HE have rarely been investigated. To capture differences in student experiences in HE comprehensively, Jenert and Gebhardt (2010) have developed a framework describing Learning Culture in HEI. LC comprises a number of constructs on the three levels of the individual student, pedagogical interactions and the organization.\r\nThe study first aims to quantitatively describe differences in LC between the phases of HE within a university. Based on this analysis, a second goal is to develop a deeper understanding of how students manage the transitions between different phases by applying qualitative research methods."}]},{"year":"2014","citation":{"chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Wie Kann Über DBR Die Wissenschaftliche Und Praktische Relevanz Der Forschung Gesichert Werden?” Humboldt-Universität, 2014.","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden?,” presented at the 24. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE), Berlin, 2014.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden? In: Humboldt-Universität; 2014.","apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden? Presented at the 24. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE), Berlin: Humboldt-Universität.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. <i>Wie Kann Über DBR Die Wissenschaftliche Und Praktische Relevanz Der Forschung Gesichert Werden?</i> Humboldt-Universität, 2014.","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, in: Humboldt-Universität, 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Jenert_2014, title={Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden?}, publisher={Humboldt-Universität}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }"},"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","publisher":"Humboldt-Universität","author":[{"first_name":"Taiga","last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga"},{"full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:14:35Z","title":"Wie kann über DBR die wissenschaftliche und praktische Relevanz der Forschung gesichert werden?","conference":{"end_date":"2014-03-12","location":"Berlin","name":"24. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DGfE)","start_date":"2014-03-09"},"type":"conference","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Auseinandersetzungen über Forschungsmethodologien haben in den Bildungswissenschaften lange Tradition. Sie werden häufig unversöhnlich und mit Profilierung der Gegensätze geführt. Für uns hängt die Sinnhaftigkeit einer Forschungskonzeption von der Problemstellung und dem Erkenntnisinteresse ab. Dies gilt auch für Design-Based Research (DBR). Dieser Ansatz entstand als Reaktion auf die Kritik an mangelnder praktischer Anwendung von Befunden aus der empirisch-analytischen Lehr-Lernforschung. Als Ergebnis werden Theorien angestrebt, die für die Praxis einen Nutzen bieten und zugleich über die Anwendung in einer singulären Situation hinausgehen. Wir wollen folgenden Fragen nachgehen: Wo liegen die Gemeinsamkeiten, wo die Spezifika von DBR gegenüber bestehenden Methodologien? Wie wird der Generalisierungsanspruch von Theorien innerhalb von DBR verstanden und umgesetzt? Für welche Erkenntnisinteressen eignet sich DBR? Welche Methoden sind für DBR sinnvoll und können wie angewendet werden?"}],"status":"public","_id":"4476","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","keyword":["design-based research","gestatlungsbasierte Forschung","Erziehungswissenschaft","Design","Mixed Methods"],"extern":"1"},{"publisher":"Waxmann Verlag GmbH ","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:07Z","author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","id":"71994","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T11:39:06Z","volume":"Band 66","title":"Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen","publication_identifier":{"isbn":["978-3-8309-3056-3"]},"year":"2014","place":"New York","citation":{"ama":"Jenert T. Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen. In: Škerlak T, Kaufmann H, Bachmann G, eds. <i>Lernumgebungen an Der Hochschule. Auf Dem Weg Zum Campus von Morgen </i>. Vol Band 66. Medien in der Wissenschaft . New York: Waxmann Verlag GmbH ; 2014:159-175.","ieee":"T. Jenert, “Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen,” in <i>Lernumgebungen an der Hochschule. Auf dem Weg zum Campus von morgen </i>, vol. Band 66, T. Škerlak, H. Kaufmann, and G. Bachmann, Eds. New York: Waxmann Verlag GmbH , 2014, pp. 159–175.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias. “Verändern Medien Die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie Zwischen Virtuellen Und Physischen Lernräumen.” In <i>Lernumgebungen an Der Hochschule. Auf Dem Weg Zum Campus von Morgen </i>, edited by Tina  Škerlak, Helen Kaufmann, and Gudrun Bachmann, Band 66:159–75. Medien in Der Wissenschaft . New York: Waxmann Verlag GmbH , 2014.","short":"T. Jenert, in: T. Škerlak, H. Kaufmann, G. Bachmann (Eds.), Lernumgebungen an Der Hochschule. Auf Dem Weg Zum Campus von Morgen , Waxmann Verlag GmbH , New York, 2014, pp. 159–175.","bibtex":"@inbook{Jenert_2014, place={New York}, series={Medien in der Wissenschaft }, title={Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen}, volume={Band 66}, booktitle={Lernumgebungen an der Hochschule. Auf dem Weg zum Campus von morgen }, publisher={Waxmann Verlag GmbH }, author={Jenert, Tobias}, editor={Škerlak, Tina  and Kaufmann, Helen and Bachmann, GudrunEditors}, year={2014}, pages={159–175}, collection={Medien in der Wissenschaft } }","mla":"Jenert, Tobias. “Verändern Medien Die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie Zwischen Virtuellen Und Physischen Lernräumen.” <i>Lernumgebungen an Der Hochschule. Auf Dem Weg Zum Campus von Morgen </i>, edited by Tina  Škerlak et al., vol. Band 66, Waxmann Verlag GmbH , 2014, pp. 159–75.","apa":"Jenert, T. (2014). Verändern Medien die Lernkultur? Mögliche Rollen von Technologie zwischen virtuellen und physischen Lernräumen. In T. Škerlak, H. Kaufmann, &#38; G. Bachmann (Eds.), <i>Lernumgebungen an der Hochschule. Auf dem Weg zum Campus von morgen </i> (Vol. Band 66, pp. 159–175). New York: Waxmann Verlag GmbH ."},"page":"159-175","_id":"4508","series_title":"Medien in der Wissenschaft ","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"extern":"1","type":"book_chapter","publication":"Lernumgebungen an der Hochschule. Auf dem Weg zum Campus von morgen ","editor":[{"first_name":"Tina ","last_name":"Škerlak","full_name":"Škerlak, Tina "},{"first_name":"Helen","full_name":"Kaufmann, Helen","last_name":"Kaufmann"},{"first_name":"Gudrun","last_name":"Bachmann","full_name":"Bachmann, Gudrun"}],"status":"public"},{"citation":{"apa":"Jenert, T. (2014). Viel Neues und doch keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, warum es die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen schwer ha. Presented at the  Impulsvortrag an der zweiten Lehr-/Lernkonferenz des Fellowship-Programms für innovative Lehre, Berlin.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Jenert_2014, title={Viel Neues und doch keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, warum es die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen schwer ha}, author={Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","short":"T. Jenert, in: 2014.","mla":"Jenert, Tobias. <i>Viel Neues Und Doch Keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, Warum Es Die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen Schwer Ha</i>. 2014.","ieee":"T. Jenert, “Viel Neues und doch keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, warum es die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen schwer ha,” presented at the  Impulsvortrag an der zweiten Lehr-/Lernkonferenz des Fellowship-Programms für innovative Lehre, Berlin, 2014.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias. “Viel Neues Und Doch Keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, Warum Es Die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen Schwer Ha,” 2014.","ama":"Jenert T. Viel Neues und doch keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, warum es die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen schwer ha. In: ; 2014."},"year":"2014","date_created":"2018-09-20T09:21:16Z","author":[{"last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:09Z","conference":{"name":" Impulsvortrag an der zweiten Lehr-/Lernkonferenz des Fellowship-Programms für innovative Lehre","location":"Berlin"},"title":"Viel Neues und doch keine Innovation!?: Fünf Thesen, warum es die Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen schwer ha","type":"conference","status":"public","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"_id":"4534","extern":"1"},{"extern":"1","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"_id":"4535","status":"public","type":"conference","conference":{"location":"Stockholm ","name":"Workshop held at ICED 2014"},"title":"Change Management in Higher Education Institutions","author":[{"last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","first_name":"Taiga"},{"first_name":"Tobias","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994"}],"date_created":"2018-09-20T09:23:55Z","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:09Z","citation":{"apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). Change Management in Higher Education Institutions. Presented at the Workshop held at ICED 2014, Stockholm .","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. <i>Change Management in Higher Education Institutions</i>. 2014.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Jenert_2014, title={Change Management in Higher Education Institutions}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, in: 2014.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. Change Management in Higher Education Institutions. In: ; 2014.","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “Change Management in Higher Education Institutions,” presented at the Workshop held at ICED 2014, Stockholm , 2014.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Change Management in Higher Education Institutions,” 2014."},"year":"2014"},{"type":"conference","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Das Förderprogramm Lehren, organisiert von der Alfred Toepfer Stiftung F.V.S., kombiniert und erprobt verschiedene Ansätze zur Entwicklung der Lehrqualität an Hochschulen. Der vorgeschlagene Beitrag charakterisiert die unterschiedlichen Zugänge, beschreibt der Potenziale und Grenzen und reflektiert Möglichkeiten, komplementäre Lehrentwicklungs-Ansätze zu kombinieren.\r\nDas \"Lehren Jahresprogramm\" bringt Lehrende, Hochschuldidaktiker/-innen und Leitungspersonen im Rahmen von fünf themenbezogenen Workshops zusammen. Der Austausch im Rahmen der Workshops soll die Teilnehmenden neben der individuellen Kompetenzentwicklung und gegenseitiger Perspektivübernahme dabei unterstützen, Innovationsprojekte an ihren Hochschulen zu entwickeln bzw. zu implementieren. Das Jahresprogramm vertritt damit einen Ansatz, der Lehrqualität durch die Gestaltung organisationaler Rahmenbedingungen an den Hochschulen zu entwickeln versucht. Mit der Kombination verschiedener Akteursgruppen sowie durch die zentrale Organisation des Programms soll eine Community von Lehrentwickler/-innen geschaffen werden, die Strategien zur lehrbezogenen Organisationsentwicklung an Hochschulen entwickelt und teilt.\r\n\r\nDemgegenüber setzt das \"Lehren-Kolleg\" auf einen fachdidaktischen Zugang zur Lehrentwicklung an Hochschulen. So befassen sich im aktuellen Durchgang Teams aus sieben Hochschulen mit der Gestaltung der Mathematikausbildung in den Ingenieurswissenschaften. Auch hier werden von den teilnehmenden Hochschulvertreter/-innen jeweils Innovationsprojekte bearbeitet, wobei diese stets auf die fachdidaktische Fragestellung des Kollegs ausgerichtet sind. In diesem Ansatz spiegelt sich die starke Bedeutung wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen an Hochschulen wider. Die disziplinäre Zugehörigkeit gilt als stärkstes Element der beruflichen Identität von Hochschullehrenden und schlägt sich dementsprechend in den Kulturen einzelner Studienfächer nieder.\r\n\r\nDer Beitrag stellt die beiden Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung - organisations- und fachbezogen - vor dem Hintergrund erster Ergebnisse einer umfangreichen Begleitforschung dar. Dabei geht es nicht darum, die Ansätze konkurrierend darzustellen und sie hinsichtlich ihrer Effektivität zu vergleichen (i.S. der Debatte Fach- versus allgemeine Didaktik). Vielmehr werden die komplementären Potenziale und Schwächen herausgearbeitet, um schliesslich das Konzept eines kombinierten Ansatzes der Lehrentwicklung zu entwerfen, der eine möglichst umfangreiche Dissemination im Rahmen der komplexen Organisationsstrukturen von Hochschulen ermöglichen kann."}],"department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"14931","_id":"4471","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"extern":"1","keyword":["Lehrentwicklung","educational development"],"citation":{"apa":"Jenert, T. (2014). <i>Eine Systematisierung komplementärer Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung am Beispiel des Förderprogramms Lehren</i>. 43. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd), Braunschweig.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Jenert_2014, title={Eine Systematisierung komplementärer Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung am Beispiel des Förderprogramms Lehren}, author={Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014} }","mla":"Jenert, Tobias. <i>Eine Systematisierung Komplementärer Zugänge Zur Lehrentwicklung Am Beispiel Des Förderprogramms Lehren</i>. 2014.","short":"T. Jenert, in: 2014.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias. “Eine Systematisierung Komplementärer Zugänge Zur Lehrentwicklung Am Beispiel Des Förderprogramms Lehren,” 2014.","ieee":"T. Jenert, “Eine Systematisierung komplementärer Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung am Beispiel des Förderprogramms Lehren,” presented at the 43. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd), Braunschweig, 2014.","ama":"Jenert T. Eine Systematisierung komplementärer Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung am Beispiel des Förderprogramms Lehren. In: ; 2014."},"year":"2014","author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","id":"71994","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T13:34:34Z","date_updated":"2023-11-16T10:02:54Z","conference":{"name":"43. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik (dghd)","start_date":"2014-03-17","end_date":"2014-03-19","location":"Braunschweig"},"title":"Eine Systematisierung komplementärer Zugänge zur Lehrentwicklung am Beispiel des Förderprogramms Lehren"},{"extern":"1","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"keyword":["Design-based research","design research","validity","significance","Bildungsforschung","designbasierte Forschung","Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kommunikation"],"department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"71994","_id":"4425","status":"public","abstract":[{"text":"Designbasierte Forschung zielt darauf, praktische Problemstellungen zu lösen und gleichzeitig wissenschaftliche Theorien (weiter) zu entwickeln. Dabei durchläuft designbasierte Forschung in der Regel die Phasen der Problemdefinition, der Entwicklung eines didaktischen Designs, der zyklischen Design-Implementation sowie der Evaluation und Reflexion in enger Kooperation von Wissenschaft und Praxis. Inwieweit es mittels designbasierter Forschung gelingen kann, wissenschaftliche Gültigkeit und praktische Relevanz von Forschung gleichermassen zu steigern, wird im Beitrag anhand des Konzepts multipler Signifikanzen erörtert. Dabei wird diskutiert, wie die Gestaltung der Kooperation von Forschenden und Praktikern/-innen dazu beitragen kann, die praktische, statistische, klinische und wirtschaftliche Signifikanz des designbasierten Forschungsprozesses sicherzustellen.","lang":"ger"}],"publication":"Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)","type":"journal_article","title":"Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz","date_created":"2018-09-18T09:13:31Z","author":[{"full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm","first_name":"Taiga"},{"orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","last_name":"Jenert","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_updated":"2024-03-21T14:43:48Z","publisher":"Steiner","page":"45-62","citation":{"ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz,” <i>Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)</i>, no. Band 27, pp. 45–62, 2014.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in Designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit Und Praktischer Relevanz.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Berufs-Und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)</i>, no. Band 27 (2014): 45–62.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz. <i>Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)</i>. 2014;(Band 27):45-62.","apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2014). Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz. <i>Zeitschrift Für Berufs-Und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)</i>, <i>Band 27</i>, 45–62.","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, Zeitschrift Für Berufs-Und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B) (2014) 45–62.","bibtex":"@article{Brahm_Jenert_2014, title={Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit und praktischer Relevanz}, number={Band 27}, journal={Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)}, publisher={Steiner}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2014}, pages={45–62} }","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Wissenschafts-Praxis-Kooperation in Designbasierter Forschung: Im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Wissenschaftlicher Gültigkeit Und Praktischer Relevanz.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Berufs-Und Wirtschaftspädagogik-Beihefte (ZBW-B)</i>, no. Band 27, Steiner, 2014, pp. 45–62."},"year":"2014","issue":"Band 27","quality_controlled":"1","publication_identifier":{"issn":["0172-2875"]}},{"user_id":"71994","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"_id":"4426","language":[{"iso":"eng"}],"extern":"1","keyword":["Studienanfänger/innen","Herausforderungen","Übergang","Selbstwirksamkeit","Angst"],"type":"journal_article","publication":"Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Beim Übergang von der Schule in die Hochschule stehen Studienanfänger/innen einer Vielzahl von Herausforderungen gegenüber (z. B. Ankommen am Studienort, Bewältigung der Studienanforderungen). Dabei gibt es - abgesehen von deskriptiven Untersuchungen - kaum gesicherte Forschungsergebnisse darüber, in welchem Umfang individuell unterschiedliche Eingangsvoraussetzungen die wahrgenommene Intensität der Übergangsherausforderungen beeinflussen. Mittels einer Längsschnittstudie wird eine Kohorte von Studienanfängerinnen und -anfängern anhand ihrer Selbstwirksamkeit in Gruppen eingeteilt. Es wird gezeigt, dass diese Gruppen sich auch im Ausmass der erwarteten und erlebten Herausforderungen des ersten Studienjahres signifikant unterscheiden."}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T09:15:46Z","author":[{"first_name":"Taiga","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm"},{"first_name":"Tobias","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646"},{"first_name":"Dietrich","last_name":"Wagner","full_name":"Wagner, Dietrich"}],"volume":9,"date_updated":"2024-03-21T14:44:08Z","publisher":"Books on Demand ","title":"Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule","issue":"5","quality_controlled":"1","publication_identifier":{"eissn":["2219-6994"]},"citation":{"ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T, Wagner D. Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule. <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>. 2014;9(5):63-82.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, Tobias Jenert, and Dietrich Wagner. “Nicht Für Alle Gleich: Subjektive Wahrnehmungen Des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i> 9, no. 5 (2014): 63–82.","ieee":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, and D. Wagner, “Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule,” <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 63–82, 2014.","apa":"Brahm, T., Jenert, T., &#38; Wagner, D. (2014). Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule. <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, <i>9</i>(5), 63–82.","bibtex":"@article{Brahm_Jenert_Wagner_2014, title={Nicht für alle gleich: subjektive Wahrnehmungen des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule}, volume={9}, number={5}, journal={Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung}, publisher={Books on Demand }, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias and Wagner, Dietrich}, year={2014}, pages={63–82} }","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, D. Wagner, Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung 9 (2014) 63–82.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, et al. “Nicht Für Alle Gleich: Subjektive Wahrnehmungen Des Übergangs Schule-Hochschule.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 9, no. 5, Books on Demand , 2014, pp. 63–82."},"intvolume":"         9","page":"63-82","year":"2014"},{"keyword":["Kompetenzorientierung","Studienprogrammentwicklung","Hochschulentwicklung","Hochschule","Learning Outcomes"],"extern":"1","_id":"4427","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Kompetenzorientierung ist ein wichtiges aktuelles Ziel bei der Studienprogrammentwicklung. Allerdings ist die Umsetzung in der Praxis mit zwei wesentlichen Herausforderungen verbunden: So ist zum einen der Wechsel von disziplinären Inhalten hin zu Kompetenzen wenig intuitiv; zum anderen wird die Formulierung so genannter Learning Outcomes als administrative Übung betrachtet. An der Universität St. Gallen wurde ein systematischer Prozess für die Qualitätsentwicklung der Studienprogramme eingeführt. Im Beitrag wird dieser Prozess im Hinblick auf die Kompetenzorientierung reflektiert. Es erscheint wesentlich, den Programmen möglichst viel Freiraum auf ihrem Weg zur Kompetenzorientierung zu überlassen und sie auf diese Weise zu unterstützen."}],"status":"public","type":"journal_article","publication":"Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung","title":"Herausforderungen der Kompetenzorientierung in der Studienprogrammentwicklung","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:03Z","publisher":"Österreichische Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik","author":[{"full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm","first_name":"Taiga"},{"last_name":"Jenert","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","first_name":"Tobias"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T09:17:20Z","volume":8,"year":"2013","citation":{"ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. Herausforderungen der Kompetenzorientierung in der Studienprogrammentwicklung. <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>. 2013;8(1):7-14.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Herausforderungen Der Kompetenzorientierung in Der Studienprogrammentwicklung.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i> 8, no. 1 (2013): 7–14.","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “Herausforderungen der Kompetenzorientierung in der Studienprogrammentwicklung,” <i>Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2013.","apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2013). Herausforderungen der Kompetenzorientierung in der Studienprogrammentwicklung. <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, <i>8</i>(1), 7–14.","bibtex":"@article{Brahm_Jenert_2013, title={Herausforderungen der Kompetenzorientierung in der Studienprogrammentwicklung}, volume={8}, number={1}, journal={Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung}, publisher={Österreichische Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2013}, pages={7–14} }","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung 8 (2013) 7–14.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “Herausforderungen Der Kompetenzorientierung in Der Studienprogrammentwicklung.” <i>Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung</i>, vol. 8, no. 1, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Hochschuldidaktik, 2013, pp. 7–14."},"page":"7-14","intvolume":"         8","publication_identifier":{"eissn":["2219-6994"]},"issue":"1"},{"_id":"4428","user_id":"51057","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"keyword":["Portfolio","Lehrerbildung","Wirtschaftspädagogik"],"extern":"1","type":"journal_article","publication":"Journal für LehrerInnenbildung","abstract":[{"lang":"ger","text":"Die Auseinandersetzung mit Bildungstechnologien erfolgt häufig ausgehend von einem technologischen Trend bzw. einer Klasse innovativer Werkzeuge (bspw. mobile Technologien). Es geht dann darum, die Potenziale dieser Tools für das Lernen zu ergründen, also letztlich eine Passung zwischen den technologischen Möglichkeiten und pädagogisch-didaktischen Erfordernissen zu konstruieren. In diesem Beitrag kehren wir diese Perspektive um: Ausgehend von einer bestimmten pädagogischen Problemstellung - der Bearbeitung heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung - entwickeln wir unterschiedliche didaktische Handlungsoptionen. Am Ende entsteht ein Werkzeug, das sich in Design und Funktionsumfang auf den Kern der pädagogischen Zielsetzung beschränkt."}],"status":"public","publisher":"Studien-Verlag","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:03Z","author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias"},{"first_name":"Taiga","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm"}],"date_created":"2018-09-18T09:19:16Z","volume":13,"title":"Ein e-Portfolio-Konzept zur Integration heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung","publication_identifier":{"issn":["1681-7028"]},"issue":"4","year":"2013","citation":{"ieee":"T. Jenert and T. Brahm, “Ein e-Portfolio-Konzept zur Integration heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung,” <i>Journal für LehrerInnenbildung</i>, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 29–33, 2013.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. “Ein E-Portfolio-Konzept Zur Integration Heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen Und Studienerfahrungen in Der Lehrerbildung.” <i>Journal Für LehrerInnenbildung</i> 13, no. 4 (2013): 29–33.","ama":"Jenert T, Brahm T. Ein e-Portfolio-Konzept zur Integration heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung. <i>Journal für LehrerInnenbildung</i>. 2013;13(4):29-33.","bibtex":"@article{Jenert_Brahm_2013, title={Ein e-Portfolio-Konzept zur Integration heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung}, volume={13}, number={4}, journal={Journal für LehrerInnenbildung}, publisher={Studien-Verlag}, author={Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}, year={2013}, pages={29–33} }","mla":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. “Ein E-Portfolio-Konzept Zur Integration Heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen Und Studienerfahrungen in Der Lehrerbildung.” <i>Journal Für LehrerInnenbildung</i>, vol. 13, no. 4, Studien-Verlag, 2013, pp. 29–33.","short":"T. Jenert, T. Brahm, Journal Für LehrerInnenbildung 13 (2013) 29–33.","apa":"Jenert, T., &#38; Brahm, T. (2013). Ein e-Portfolio-Konzept zur Integration heterogener Lernvoraussetzungen und Studienerfahrungen in der Lehrerbildung. <i>Journal Für LehrerInnenbildung</i>, <i>13</i>(4), 29–33."},"page":"29-33","intvolume":"        13"},{"type":"conference","status":"public","abstract":[{"lang":"eng","text":"The aim of this qualitative study is first to investigate the attitude development of students in their initial year at university. College effectiveness research has shown that attitudes towards studying as well as to one's university are key factors influencing student engagement. Up to now, little is known about the processes through which such attitudes develop. Based on the theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980), the study addresses this research gap in three parts: a) development paths of students' attitudes towards studying and the university; b) the normative behaviour of the fellow students as well as significant persons, c) university-related experiences during the first year influencing students' attitude development. \r\nTo answer these research questions, a series of five interviews was conducted throughout the first year with a total of 13 first-year students at the University of St. Gallen/Switzerland. Data analysis was performed referring to the procedures suggested by Neale (2012) for qualitative longitudinal data. To master the challenge of displaying developments over time, graphical analysis was used to construct a case history (cf. Henderson, Holland et al., 2012) for each individual. Regarding the students' developments over time, the analysis shows the participants' attitudes towards the university became more differentiated over time. A second major result concerns frictions between students' own attitudes and what they perceive to be the dominant normative behaviour. It became obvious that this developmental process is influenced by concrete incidents students experience during the first year and thus, can be shaped by structural changes."}],"department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","_id":"4477","extern":"1","keyword":["student attitudes","qualitative research","longitudinal study","student motivation"],"citation":{"apa":"Jenert, T., &#38; Brahm, T. (2013). How Business Students Attitudes towards their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study. Presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Jenert_Brahm_2013, title={How Business Students Attitudes towards their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study}, publisher={EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}, author={Jenert, Tobias and Brahm, Taiga}, year={2013} }","mla":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. <i>How Business Students Attitudes towards Their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study</i>. EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","short":"T. Jenert, T. Brahm, in: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","ieee":"T. Jenert and T. Brahm, “How Business Students Attitudes towards their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study,” presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München, 2013.","chicago":"Jenert, Tobias, and Taiga Brahm. “How Business Students Attitudes towards Their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study.” EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","ama":"Jenert T, Brahm T. How Business Students Attitudes towards their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study. In: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction; 2013."},"year":"2013","author":[{"first_name":"Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","id":"71994","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias"},{"full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm","first_name":"Taiga"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:19:05Z","publisher":"EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","conference":{"start_date":"2013-08-27","name":"15th Biennial EARLI Conference","location":"München","end_date":"2013-08-31"},"title":"How Business Students Attitudes towards their University and Studying Develop during the First Year: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study"},{"publisher":"EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","author":[{"first_name":"Taiga","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","last_name":"Brahm"},{"id":"71994","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646","first_name":"Tobias"},{"last_name":"Euler","full_name":"Euler, Dieter","first_name":"Dieter"}],"date_created":"2018-09-19T08:22:51Z","title":"On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ)","conference":{"location":"München ","end_date":"2013-08-31","start_date":"2013-08-27","name":"15th Biennial EARLI Conference"},"year":"2013","citation":{"ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T, Euler D. On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ). In: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction; 2013.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, Tobias Jenert, and Dieter Euler. “On the Assessment of Attitudes towards the Study Process and the University: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ).” EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","ieee":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, and D. Euler, “On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ),” presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München , 2013.","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, D. Euler, in: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Jenert_Euler_2013, title={On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ)}, publisher={EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias and Euler, Dieter}, year={2013} }","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, et al. <i>On the Assessment of Attitudes towards the Study Process and the University: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ)</i>. EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","apa":"Brahm, T., Jenert, T., &#38; Euler, D. (2013). On the assessment of attitudes towards the study process and the university: Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ). Presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München : EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction."},"_id":"4478","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","keyword":["attitudes","teaching and learning","studying","higher education institution","theory of planned behavior","instrument development"],"extern":"1","type":"conference","abstract":[{"text":"The purpose of the research was to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of attitudes towards the study environment in higher education contexts. The questionnaire is designed to measure students' attitudes towards two particular objects: the university (or Higher Education Institution) and the process of studying. Five studies at two different universities were conducted to develop and validate the Attitudes towards the Study Environment Questionnaire (ASEQ). In total, 1640 students filled in the questionnaire. Reliability tests and exploratory factor analysis as well as confirmatory factor analysis showed satisfactory psychometric characteristics of the ASEQ. Each part of the questionnaire is internally consistent and construct validity of the scales is supported by correlations with other constructs as assumed by current theories: Positive attitudinal constructs (normative behavior, autonomy, joy, self-efficacy, and task value) are positively related to intrinsic motivation and the expected study performance while anxiety is negatively related to these constructs. \r\nSince attitudes towards the study situation are connected to student engagement and motivation, the study contributes to the theory of student learning by providing a validated instrument to assess attitudes. Thus, the ASEQ can support further research on student performance and development by providing an instrument for the hitherto neglected but nonetheless extremely relevant domain of attitudes. Also, the questionnaire can be used as a diagnostic instrument for higher education faculty and administration to trace students' attitudinal development over time - a factor of prime importance for student socialization during the introductory phase of studying.","lang":"eng"}],"status":"public"},{"year":"2013","citation":{"apa":"Brahm, T., &#38; Jenert, T. (2013). A latent growth curve analysis of Business students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Brahm_Jenert_2013, title={A latent growth curve analysis of Business students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation}, publisher={EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction}, author={Brahm, Taiga and Jenert, Tobias}, year={2013} }","short":"T. Brahm, T. Jenert, in: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","mla":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. <i>A Latent Growth Curve Analysis of Business Students’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation</i>. EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","chicago":"Brahm, Taiga, and Tobias Jenert. “A Latent Growth Curve Analysis of Business Students’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.” EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2013.","ieee":"T. Brahm and T. Jenert, “A latent growth curve analysis of Business students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation,” presented at the 15th Biennial EARLI Conference, München, 2013.","ama":"Brahm T, Jenert T. A latent growth curve analysis of Business students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction; 2013."},"publisher":"EARLI European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction","date_updated":"2022-01-06T07:01:06Z","date_created":"2018-09-19T08:27:05Z","author":[{"last_name":"Brahm","full_name":"Brahm, Taiga","first_name":"Taiga"},{"first_name":"Tobias","full_name":"Jenert, Tobias","id":"71994","last_name":"Jenert","orcid":" https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-5646"}],"title":"A latent growth curve analysis of Business students' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation","conference":{"start_date":"2013-08-27","name":"15th Biennial EARLI Conference","location":"München","end_date":"2013-08-31"},"type":"conference","abstract":[{"text":"The proposed paper aims to investigate the longitudinal development of students' motivation over the first year of their studies at a business school by using latent growth curve modeling. The study tackles the following core research questions: How do first-year university students' intrinsic and extrinsic vary over time? Which (motivational) factors are related to students' motivational development? Although motivational dispositions have been analyzed extensively in previous studies, their longitudinal development has hitherto not been examined in the higher education context.\r\n\r\nThis longitudinal study is conducted at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. The current sample includes 280 first-year students who have been surveyed three times and who are representative of the first-year student population.\r\n\r\nDescriptive results show that prior to their studies, students were motivated most by intrinsic factors, however, extrinsic motivation was also quite high. Employing latent growth curve modeling, it could be shown that both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation decline significantly over the course of the first year (8 months).\r\n\r\nThe study contributes to motivation theory by providing further insights into the development of academic motivation over time. Latent growth curve modeling as a method can be well used for longitudinal data analysis, thus, excluding measurement error from longitudinal data. Furthermore, the study supports educational developers by determining factors influencing students' motivational development.","lang":"eng"}],"status":"public","_id":"4480","department":[{"_id":"208"},{"_id":"282"}],"user_id":"51057","keyword":["motivation","intrinsic motivation","extrinsic motivation","latent growth curve modeling","longitudinal data analysis","ASEQ","higher education","studying"],"extern":"1"}]