@book{29082, editor = {{Hessler, Gudrun and Oechsle, Mechtild and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, publisher = {{Transkript}}, title = {{{Studium und Beruf: Studienstrategien - Praxiskonzepte - Professionsverständnis. Perspektiven von Studierenden und Lehrenden nach der Bologna-Reform}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @book{29083, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Heß, Christiane and Vierck, Sigrid and Bluhm, Clara}}, title = {{{Schreiben: Tipps, Anregungen und Strategien für das Schreiben am Leuphana College}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inbook{31471, abstract = {{Unter Bezugnahme auf Erkenntnisse, die im Rahmen des Projekts STEP (Studium und Beruf: Subjektive Theorien von Studierenden und Lehrenden zwischen Praxisbezug, Employability und Professionalisierung) gewonnen wurden, wird nach der Möglichkeit der Bildung, Reflexion und Ausdifferenzierung von Subjektiven Theorien durch Self-Assessments gefragt. Inhalte wie Strukturiertheit und Theorieförmigkeit der Vorstellungen (Vernetzungen, schlussfolgernd-argumentativer Charakter) erwiesen sich in der Untersuchung als deutlich veränderungsbedürftig. Es wird argumentiert, dass eine inhaltliche Anreicherung oder Restrukturierung vorhandener Überzeugungen die Ausbildung großer und komplexer Überzeugungssysteme vorausetzt. Maßnahmen, die an den individuellen Vorstellungen, deren Bewusstmachung und Reflexion ansetzen, werden vorgestellt.}}, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Bunte, Nicola and Wiescholek, Sabrina}}, booktitle = {{Studium und Beruf: Studienstrategien - Praxiskonzepte – Professionsverständnis. Perspektiven von Studierenden und Lehrenden nach der Bologna-Reform}}, editor = {{Hessler, Gudrun and Oechsle, Mechtild and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, isbn = {{978-3-8376-2156-3}}, pages = {{235 -- 253}}, publisher = {{Transcript Verlag}}, title = {{{Self-Assessment-Instrumente: Eine Möglichkeit der Bildung, Reflexion und Ausdifferenzierung von Subjektiven Theorien}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{31472, author = {{Gunkel, Marjaana and Schütz, Julia and Seifert, Andreas and Scharlau, Ingrid and Beck, Karin and Heuer, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{INTED2013 Conference Proceedings}}, editor = {{Chova, Luis Gómez and Martínez, A. López and Torres, I. Candel}}, isbn = {{978-84-616-2661-8}}, location = {{Valencia, Spain}}, pages = {{2510 -- 2517}}, title = {{{A New Model of Higher Education in the European Context - The Leuphana Experience}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inbook{31390, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Wiescholek, Sabrina}}, booktitle = {{Studium und Beruf: Studienstrategien - Praxiskonzepte - Professionsverständnis. Perspektiven von Studierenden und Lehrenden nach der Bologna-Reform}}, editor = {{Hessler, Gudrun and Oechsle, Mechtild and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, isbn = {{978-3-8376-2156-3}}, pages = {{213 -- 230}}, publisher = {{Transcript Verlag}}, title = {{{Ringen um Sinn. Subjektive Theorien von Lehramtsstudierenden zum Praxisbezug des Studiums.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inbook{31468, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Weiß, Katharina}}, booktitle = {{Simultaneität }}, editor = {{Hubmann, Philipp and Huss, Till Julian}}, isbn = {{978-3-8376-2261-4}}, pages = {{293 -- 314}}, publisher = {{Transcript Verlag}}, title = {{{Was also ist gleichzeitig? Allgemeinpsychologische Anmerkungen zur Wahrnehmung von Gleichzeitigkeit}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{28688, abstract = {{Why are nearly simultaneous stimuli frequently perceived in reversed order? The origin of errors in temporal judgments is a question older than experimental psychology itself. One of the earliest suspects is attention. According to the concept of prior entry, attention accelerates attended stimuli; thus they have “prior entry” to perceptive processing stages, including consciousness. Although latency advantages for attended stimuli have been revealed in psychophysical studies many times, these measures (e.g. temporal order judgments, simultaneity judgments) cannot test the prior-entry hypothesis completely. Since they assess latency differences between an attended and an unattended stimulus, they cannot distinguish between faster processing of attended stimuli and slower processing of unattended stimuli. Therefore, we present a novel paradigm providing separate estimates for processing advantages respectively disadvantages of attended and unattended stimuli. We found that deceleration of unattended stimuli contributes more strongly to the prior-entry illusion than acceleration of attended stimuli. Thus, in the temporal domain, attention fulfills its selective function primarily by deceleration of unattended stimuli. That means it is actually posterior entry, not prior entry which accounts for the largest part of the effect.}}, author = {{Weiß, Katharina and Hilkenmeier, Frederic and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{1932-6203}}, journal = {{PLoS ONE}}, title = {{{Attention and the Speed of Information Processing: Posterior Entry for Unattended Stimuli Instead of Prior Entry for Attended Stimuli}}}, doi = {{10.1371/journal.pone.0054257}}, volume = {{8}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{32523, author = {{Buhl, Heike M.}}, journal = {{Psychologie Heute}}, pages = {{26 -- 27}}, title = {{{Bleibt man immer das Kind? Kann es einen gleichberechtigten Umgang zwischen den Generationen geben? }}}, volume = {{10}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{29123, abstract = {{ Procrastination is a well-known phenomenon that often entails negative outcomes with regard to performance and subjective well-being. In an attempt to understand the (alarming) character of procrastination, a large body of research on the causes, correlates, and consequences of procrastination has been accumulating over the last 40 years. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic characterization of the trends in procrastination research and to suggest future directions for research and practice. The systematic characterization comprises a comparison of procrastination to functional forms of delay (referred to as strategic delay) and a presentation of the theoretical approaches to explaining procrastination. The future directions suggested pertain to the development of a differentiated understanding of procrastination and of integral interventions. }}, author = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B.}}, issn = {{1016-9040}}, journal = {{European Psychologist}}, pages = {{24--34}}, title = {{{Procrastination}}}, doi = {{10.1027/1016-9040/a000138}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{29125, author = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B. and Grund, Axel and Schmid, Sebastian and Fries, Stefan}}, issn = {{1543-3382}}, journal = {{Journal of College Student Development}}, pages = {{397--412}}, title = {{{Why Students Procrastinate: A Qualitative Approach}}}, doi = {{10.1353/csd.2013.0060}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{29124, author = {{Klingsieck, Katrin B.}}, issn = {{1046-1310}}, journal = {{Current Psychology}}, pages = {{175--185}}, title = {{{Procrastination in Different Life-Domains: Is Procrastination Domain Specific?}}}, doi = {{10.1007/s12144-013-9171-8}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{29129, author = {{Gerholz, Karl-Heinz and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}}, journal = {{Das Hochschulwesen}}, number = {{4}}, pages = {{122--128}}, title = {{{Employability und Prokrastination aus einer hochschuldidaktischen Perspektive}}}, volume = {{61}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{41411, author = {{Beck, Karin and Gunkel, Marjaana and Seifert, Andreas and Schütz, Julia and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{DGHD-Tagung „Professionalisierung der Hochschuldidaktik”}}, location = {{Magdeburg}}, title = {{{Das Leuphana College: Ein in Europa einzigartiges Hochschulmodell – Studienstruktur.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{41413, author = {{Seifert, Andreas and Schütz, Julia and Gunkel, Marjaana and Beck, Karin and Balsam, Rebecca and Newig, Jens and Hellmann, Karina and Teigeler, Mareike}}, booktitle = {{DGHD-Tagung „Professionalisierung der Hochschuldidaktik”}}, location = {{Magdeburg}}, title = {{{Das Leuphana College: Ein in Europa einzigartiges Hochschulmodell – Innovative hochschuldidaktische Veranstaltungsformate.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{41415, author = {{Seifert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{AEPF-Tagung „Empirische Bildungsforschung und evidenzbasierte Reformen im Bildungswesen”}}, location = {{Dortmund}}, title = {{{Qualitätssicherung im bildungswissenschaftlichen Studium – methodologische Überlegungen.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{41353, author = {{Gunkel, Marjaana and Schütz, Julia and Seifert, Andreas and Scharlau, Ingrid and Beck, Karin and Heuer, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{INTED2013 Conference Proceedings: 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference March 4th-6th, 2013 – Valencia, Spain}}, location = {{Valencia}}, pages = {{2510--2517}}, title = {{{A New Model of Higher Education in the European Context - The Leuphana Experience.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @inproceedings{41477, author = {{Seifert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{Kompetenzmessung und -modellierung in den Fachdidaktiken}}, location = {{Siegen}}, title = {{{Potential und Herausforderung von Kompetenzforschung auf der Grundlage von IRT-Modellen.}}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{41354, author = {{Kehne, Miriam and Seifert, Andreas and Schaper, Niclas}}, journal = {{Sportunterricht}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{53--57}}, title = {{{Struktur eines Instruments zur Kompetenzerfassung in der Sportlehrerausbildung.}}}, volume = {{62}}, year = {{2013}}, } @article{6081, abstract = {{The law of prior entry states that attended objects come to consciousness more quickly than unattended ones. This has been well established in spatial cueing paradigms, where two task-relevant stimuli are presented near-simultaneously at two different locations. Here, we suggest that prior entry also plays a pivotal role in temporal attention paradigms, where stimuli appear at the same location but at distinct moments in time, in rapid serial presentation (RSVP). Specifically, we hypothesize that prior entry can explain temporal order reversals in reporting two targets from RSVP. In support of this, three experiments show that cueing attention toward either of the targets has a strong influence on order errors. We conclude that prior entry provides a viable explanation of the way in which relevant information is prioritized in RSVP. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)}}, author = {{Hilkenmeier, Frederic and Olivers, Christian N. L. and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0096-1523}}, journal = {{Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance}}, keywords = {{attentional blink, attentional enhancement, lag-1 sparing, prior entry, temporal cueing, visual attention, rapid serial presentation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attentional Blink, Color Perception, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Cues, Serial Recall, Visual Attention, Eyeblink Reflex}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{180 -- 190}}, title = {{{Prior entry and temporal attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP.}}}, volume = {{38}}, year = {{2012}}, } @article{6064, abstract = {{If one of two events is attended to, it will be perceived earlier than a simultaneously occurring unattended event. Since 150 years, this effect has been ascribed to the facilitating influence of attention, also known as prior entry. Yet, the attentional origin of prior-entry effects¹ has been repeatedly doubted. One criticism is that prior-entry effects might be due to biased decision processes that would mimic a temporal advantage for attended stimuli. Although most obvious biases have already been excluded experimentally (e.g. judgment criteria, response compatibility) and prior-entry effects have shown to persist (Shore, Spence, & Klein, 2001), many other biases are conceivable, which makes it difficult to put the debate to an end. Thus, we approach this problem the other way around by asking whether prior-entry effects can be biased voluntarily. Observers were informed about prior entry and instructed to reduce it as far as possible. For this aim they received continuous feedback}}, author = {{Weiß, Katharina and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{0001-6918}}, journal = {{Acta Psychologica}}, keywords = {{intentions, events, attention, decision processes, Adult, Attention, Choice Behavior, Cues, Female, Humans, Intention, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Time Perception, Visual Perception, Attention, Decision Making, Experiences (Events), Intention}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{54 -- 64}}, title = {{{At the mercy of prior entry: Prior entry induced by invisible primes is not susceptible to current intentions.}}}, volume = {{139}}, year = {{2012}}, }