@inproceedings{57356,
  author       = {{Schaffer, Michael Erol  and Terfloth, Lutz and Schulte, Carsten and Buhl, Heike M.}},
  location     = {{Valletta, Malta}},
  title        = {{{Perception and Consideration of the Explainees’ Needs for Satisfying Explanations}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{57357,
  author       = {{Schaffer, Michael Erol  and Terfloth, Lutz and Schulte, Carsten and Buhl, Heike M.}},
  booktitle    = {{Joint Proceedings of the xAI-2024 Late-breaking Work, Demos and Doctoral Consortium. 3793}},
  title        = {{{Explainers’ Mental Representations of Explainees’ Needs in Everyday Explanations}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{53072,
  abstract     = {{Negated statements require more processing efforts than assertions. However, in certain contexts, repeating negations undergo adaptation, which over time mitigates the effort.
Here, we ask negations hamper visual processing and whether consecutive repetitions mitigate its influence. 
We assessed the overall attentional capacity and its distribution, the relative weight, quantitatively using 
the formal Theory of Visual Attention (TVA).
We employed a very simple form for negations, binary negations. Negated instructions, expressing the only alternative to the core supposition, were cognitively demanding, resulting in a loss of attentional capacity in three experiments. The overall attentional capacity recovered gradually but stagnated at a lower level than with assertions, even after many repetitions. Additionally, negations distributed the attention equally between target and reference stimulus. Repetitions slightly increased the reference' share of attention. Assertions, on the other hand, shifted the attentional weight towards the target. Few repetitions slightly decreased the bias towards the target, many repetitions increased the bias.}},
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Tünnermann, Jan and Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  journal      = {{Frontiers in Psychology}},
  title        = {{{Benefiting from Binary Negations? Verbal Negations Decrease Visual Attention and Balance Its Distribution}}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451309}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{57846,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Abstract: Teachers require various generic competencies that are not addressed explicitly in the teacher education program, such as learning strategies. Although universities offer student teachers extracurricular opportunities to develop these competencies, few students seize them. Our training program fosters students’ self-regulated competency development: Self-reflection as an important first step to self-regulated competency development is addressed through an online self-assessment tool providing individual feedback and suggestions for further development. Forming and implementing intentions to develop competencies is addressed by a workshop based on an evidence-based self-management training program and group coaching sessions to bridge potential intention–behavior gaps. After the training program, the experimental group ( n = 32) showed a more favorable development in self-reflection, procrastination, and participation in competency-enhancing offers than the control group ( n = 34). The results show that supporting students in their self-regulated competency development can be an important key in their professional development. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Kaemper, Mara and Buhl, Heike M. and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{0049-8637}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{197--208}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{How to Improve Student Teachers’ Self-Regulated Competency Development}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0049-8637/a000301}},
  volume       = {{56}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{57903,
  author       = {{Bobe, Julia and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  location     = {{Wien}},
  title        = {{{Der Einfluss des antizipierten subjektiven Unwohlseins auf akademische Prokrastination }}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{58110,
  author       = {{Gruchel, Nicole and Kamin, Anna-Maria}},
  booktitle    = {{Handbuch Digitalisierung in der Kita. Grundlagen, Kompetenzen und Praxis}},
  editor       = {{Schindler, Lara }},
  isbn         = {{9783556098424}},
  pages        = {{305 -- 326}},
  publisher    = {{Carl Link}},
  title        = {{{Mediennutzung von Eltern}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{48486,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>In Europe, most Internet searches for school‐related tasks are situated at home, where parents can support adolescents. Although the frequency (quantity) of parental support has already been analyzed, a research gap exists concerning the quality of parental support in adolescents' information‐related Internet use. The quality of parental support in the field of homework involvement is known to be a predictor of adolescents' learning motivation and academic achievement, often discussed with regard to self‐determination theory (SDT) in terms of autonomy support, structure, emotional support, and control. These categories were adapted in this study to analyze parents' support in adolescents' Internet searching activities.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Using a mixed‐methods approach, we combined quantitative questionnaires and qualitative observations to analyze joint information‐related Internet uses. Therefore, 243 parent–adolescent dyads were surveyed and six parent–adolescent dyads were observed by videography in 2019/2020 in Germany. The adolescents were 11 years old, on average.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The parents rated all qualities higher than the adolescents. Emotional support was rated highest by both groups, whereas structure was rated lowest. Adolescents' and parents' view on parental support differ. The qualitative study revealed parents' often interfering behavior, whereas emotional support was low. Further, the active role of adolescents was highlighted in both quantitative and qualitative data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>By combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, we demonstrated a fruitful application of SDT in analyzing the quality of parental support during adolescents' Internet searches at home and shed light on the co‐construction of joint Internet searches.</jats:p></jats:sec>}},
  author       = {{Kurock, Ricarda and Teichert, Jeannine and Meister, Dorothee M. and Gerhardts, Lara and Buhl, Heike M. and Bonanati, Sabrina}},
  issn         = {{0140-1971}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Adolescence}},
  keywords     = {{Psychiatry and Mental health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{566--579}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{A mixed‐methods study of the quality of parental support during adolescents' information‐related Internet use as a co‐construction process}}},
  doi          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jad.12264}},
  volume       = {{96}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{56994,
  author       = {{Schaffer, Michael and Buhl, Heike M.}},
  booktitle    = {{53rd DGPs Congress - Abstracts}},
  editor       = {{Ansorge, Ulrich and Szaszkó, Bence and Werner, Lena}},
  location     = {{Vienna}},
  title        = {{{The mental representation of the object of explanation in the process of co-constructive explanations}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{56887,
  author       = {{Kamin, Anna-Maria and Meister, Dorothee M. and Buhl, Heike M.}},
  booktitle    = {{Medien - Bildung - Forschung. Integrative und interdisziplinäre Perspektiven}},
  editor       = {{Aßmann, Sandra  and Grafe , Silke  and Martin, Alexander}},
  publisher    = {{Julius Klinkhardt}},
  title        = {{{Elterliche Unterstützung beim Lernen mit digitalen Medien }}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{46933,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Group work can increase individual effort, performance, and positive affect, if group members perceive their own contribution as indispensable for the group product. A vignette methodology was applied to investigate whether group work may also reduce procrastination. The vignettes described a typical academic assignment, while varying the task structure (individual work vs. conjunctive group work vs. additive group work) and group member ability (high vs. low). For each vignette, student participants (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 443) provided ratings on their perceived indispensability, procrastination of the assignment, and affect. When group member ability was high, procrastination was lower in additive group work as compared to individual work. When group member ability was low, procrastination was lower in conjunctive group work as compared to both individual work and additive group work. As predicted, perceived indispensability mediated the difference in procrastination between conjunctive and additive group work. Moderation analyses further revealed that the effects were more pronounced for high trait procrastinators. Further, both types of group work led to increases in task-related positive affect as compared to individual work. By demonstrating the relevance of group work as a social factor, the results should be useful for the extension of existing programs targeting procrastination, and may inspire measures for preventing procrastination by changes in the study environment.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Koppenborg, Markus and Klingsieck, Katrin B. and Hüffmeier, Joachim}},
  issn         = {{1046-1310}},
  journal      = {{Current Psychology}},
  keywords     = {{General Psychology}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Conjunctive and additive group work reduce academic procrastination: insights from a vignette study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12144-023-04294-w}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@phdthesis{45658,
  abstract     = {{Um Schüler*innenmerkmale korrekt zu beurteilen benötigen Lehrkräfte diagnostische Kompetenz. Insbesondere die genaue Einschätzung nicht-kognitiver Merkmale von Schüler*innen fällt Lehrkräften eher schwer. Dazu zählen auch mögliche Anzeichen für Lern- und Verhaltensauffälligkeiten. Maßnahmen zur Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz fokussieren bisher größtenteils die Diagnostik fachspezifischer, situativer Urteilsgegenstände, wie Fehlkonzepte im Mathematikunterricht. Systematisch evaluierte Fördermaßnahmen, die das Erkennen und Beurteilen von Lern- und Verhaltensauffälligkeiten bei Schüler*innen fokussieren, existieren bisher nicht.Aus diesem Anlass wurde die digitale, problemorientierte Simulation GEProS zur Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden entwickelt und systematisch in drei längsschnittlichen, (quasi-)experimentellen Kontrollgruppenstudien evaluiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die GEProS einen Mehrwert für die Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz insbesondere im Bereich selbstbestimmter Motivation bieten kann. Ein integriertes Quiz mit Feedback kann mittels testing effect darüber hinaus der Erwerb deklarativ-konzeptionellen Wissens als zentrale Disposition diagnostischer Kompetenz in GEProS unterstützen. Die Ergebnisse tragen durch das entwickelte Integrative Modell diagnostischer Kompetenz zur Theoriebildung sowie zur Forschung und Entwicklung im Bereich der Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz bei, indem eine Maßnahme zur Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz für einen fächerübergreifenden, zeitlich stabilen Urteilsgegenstand systematisch evaluiert wurde. Durch die Ableitung und Berücksichtigung wesentlicher Merkmale digitaler Simulationen trägt diese Arbeit außerdem zur theoretischen Fundierung digitaler Simulationen bei.}},
  author       = {{Grotegut, Lea}},
  pages        = {{56}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{GEProS - Entwicklung und Evaluation einer digitalen Simulation zur Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden}}},
  doi          = {{10.17619/UNIPB/1-1753}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48087,
  abstract     = {{Die Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz in der Lehrer*innenbildung birgt zwei Herausforderungen: Erstens bleibt in großen Lehrveranstaltungen wenig Raum für die notwendige Anwendung theoretischen Wissens, zweitens können Fehlentscheidungen in realen diagnostischen Situationen gravierende negative Folgen für Schüler*innen haben. Eine digitale Simulation kann beiden Herausforderungen begegnen. In diesem Beitrag wurde eine digitale, problemorientierte Simulation zur Förderung diagnostischer Kompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden evaluiert und mit einer textbasierten, problemorientierten und einer lehrendenzentrierten Kontrollgruppe verglichen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen positive Effekte für die digitale Simulation hinsichtlich der selbstbestimmten Motivation, aber einen geringeren Wissenszuwachs im Vergleich zum lehrendenzentrierten Setting. Die Selbstwirksamkeit nahm in allen drei Gruppen zu. Eine digitale Simulation bietet in der untersuchten Form somit einen, wenn auch geringen, Mehrwert für die Lehrkräftebildung im Bereich der Kompetenzentwicklung.}},
  author       = {{Grotegut, Lea and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  issn         = {{2367-3044}},
  journal      = {{ZeHf – Zeitschrift für empirische Hochschulforschung}},
  keywords     = {{General Earth and Planetary Sciences, General Engineering, General Environmental Science}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{56--73}},
  publisher    = {{Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH}},
  title        = {{{Kompetenzentwicklung in der Lehrkräftebildung: der Mehrwert einer digitalen Simulation}}},
  doi          = {{10.3224/zehf.v7i1.05}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{48730,
  author       = {{Bobe, Julia and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  location     = {{Leipzig}},
  title        = {{{Aufschieben, weil man sich schlecht fühlt, oder sich schlecht fühlen, weil man aufschiebt? – Gruppenspezifische Unterschiede im Verhalten und Erleben von Prokrastination}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{48731,
  author       = {{Bobe, Julia and Klingsieck, Katrin B.}},
  location     = {{Essen}},
  title        = {{{Prokrastination und das schlechte Gewissen - Gruppenunterschiede im Erleben und Auftreten von Prokrastination.}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{48595,
  author       = {{Peters, Tobias Martin and Visser, Roel W.}},
  booktitle    = {{Communications in Computer and Information Science}},
  isbn         = {{9783031440694}},
  issn         = {{1865-0929}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature Switzerland}},
  title        = {{{The Importance of Distrust in AI}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-031-44070-0_15}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{42641,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Wissenschaftsdidaktik II: Einzelne Disziplinen}},
  editor       = {{Reinmann, Gabi and Rhein, Rüdiger}},
  isbn         = {{ 978-3-8376-6295-5}},
  keywords     = {{Unterrichtsfach Psychologie}},
  pages        = {{49--74}},
  publisher    = {{transcript}},
  title        = {{{Wissenschaft und Alltagserfahrung: Überlegungen zur Wissenschaftsdidaktik der Psychologie}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48777,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Explainable artificial intelligence has mainly focused on static learning scenarios so far. We are interested in dynamic scenarios where data is sampled progressively, and learning is done in an incremental rather than a batch mode. We seek efficient incremental algorithms for computing feature importance (FI). Permutation feature importance (PFI) is a well-established model-agnostic measure to obtain global FI based on feature marginalization of absent features. We propose an efficient, model-agnostic algorithm called iPFI to estimate this measure incrementally and under dynamic modeling conditions including concept drift. We prove theoretical guarantees on the approximation quality in terms of expectation and variance. To validate our theoretical findings and the efficacy of our approaches in incremental scenarios dealing with streaming data rather than traditional batch settings, we conduct multiple experimental studies on benchmark data with and without concept drift.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Fumagalli, Fabian and Muschalik, Maximilian and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Hammer, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0885-6125}},
  journal      = {{Machine Learning}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Software}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Incremental permutation feature importance (iPFI): towards online explanations on data streams}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10994-023-06385-y}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{45862,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Karsten, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre}},
  editor       = {{Berendt, Brigitte and Fleischmann, Andreas and Salmhofer, Gudrun and Schaper, Niclas and Szczyrba, Birgit and Wiemer, Matthias and Wildt, Johannes}},
  pages        = {{17--35}},
  publisher    = {{DUZ medienhaus}},
  title        = {{{Schreibfokussierte Graduiertenförderung: Reflexive Spezialisierung für interdisziplinäre Forschungskontexte}}},
  volume       = {{111}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@misc{46533,
  author       = {{Buhl, Heike M. and Eickelmann, Birgit and Niemann, Jan and Raneck-Kuhlmann, Anna and Drossel, Kerstin}},
  title        = {{{Qualitätsmanagement im Verbundvorhaben Communities of Practice für eine innovative Lehrerbildung NRW (COMeIN). Abschlussbericht}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{46283,
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 65th TeaP}},
  editor       = {{Merz, Simon and Frings, Christian and Leuchtenberg, Bettina and Moeller, Birte and Mueller, Stefanie and Neumann, Roland and Pastötter, Bernhard and Pingen, Leah and Schui, Gabriel}},
  location     = {{Trier, Germany}},
  publisher    = {{ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology)}},
  title        = {{{First steps towards real-time assessment of attentional weights and capacity according to TVA}}},
  doi          = {{10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.12945}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

