@inproceedings{777,
  author       = {{Dräxler, Martin and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{2013 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2013, Sardinia, Italy, July 1-5, 2013}},
  pages        = {{1181----1186}},
  title        = {{{Cross-layer scheduling for multi-quality video streaming in cellular wireless networks}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/IWCMC.2013.6583724}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@unpublished{781,
  author       = {{Dräxler, Martin and Blobel, Johannes and Dreimann, Philipp and Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{CoRR}},
  title        = {{{Anticipatory Buffer Control and Quality Selection for Wireless Video Streaming}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8057,
  abstract     = {{The paradigm of service-oriented architectures has emerged as an architectural style for designing enterprise applications. Requirements engineering for such applications comprises the specification of business goal models representing stakeholder objectives and the operationalization to business process models that specify the required composition of services. Inconsistencies between business goals and derived business processes can lead to service compositions that are not in line with the actual stakeholder objectives. For preserving consistency it is required to consider logical and temporal dependencies among goals (e.g. the order in which they need to be achieved) in the derivation of business processes. In previous work, we provided a technique for the elicitation and specification of dependencies between business goals. Extending this approach, we aim at validating the consistency between business goal models and business process models regarding these dependencies. In this paper, we present a pattern-based approach for the automated generation of verifiable business process quality constraints from business goal models. We describe how these constraints can be used to check the consistency between business goals and business processes and demonstrate the applicability of our approach in a case study by using the implemented tool support.}},
  author       = {{Nagel, Benjamin and Gerth, Christian and Post, Jennifer and Engels, Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC'13)}},
  pages        = {{17--26}},
  publisher    = {{IEEE Computer Society}},
  title        = {{{Ensuring Consistency Among Business Goals and Business Process Models}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8058,
  author       = {{Schumacher, Claudia and Engels, Gregor and Güldali, Baris and Niehammer, Markus and Hamburg, Matthias}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the conference on Software Enginneering, Fachtagung des GI Fachbereichs Softwaretechnik (SE 2013), Aachen (Germany)}},
  editor       = {{Kowalewski, Stefan and Rumpe, Bernhard}},
  pages        = {{331--344}},
  publisher    = {{Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)}},
  title        = {{{Modellbasierte Bewertung von Testprozessen nach TPI NEXT® mit Geschäftsprozess-Mustern}}},
  volume       = {{P-213}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8059,
  author       = {{Engels, Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Software Engineering 2013}},
  pages        = {{17--18}},
  title        = {{{On-the-Fly Computing - Das Entwicklungs- und Betriebsparadigma für Softwaresysteme der Zukunft}}},
  volume       = {{P-213}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8060,
  author       = {{Huma, Zille and Gerth, Christian and Engels, Gregor and Juwig, Oliver}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC'13)}},
  pages        = {{524--532}},
  publisher    = {{Springer-Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Automated Service Composition for On-the-Fly SOAs}}},
  volume       = {{8274}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8061,
  author       = {{Luckey, Markus and Engels, Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceeding of the 8th international symposium on Software engineering for adaptive and self-managing systems}},
  pages        = {{143--152}},
  publisher    = {{ACM}},
  title        = {{{High-­Quality Specification of Self-­Adaptive Software Systems}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8062,
  author       = {{Brüseke, Frank and Becker, Steffen and Engels, Gregor}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 4th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE 2013), Prague (Czech Republic)}},
  pages        = {{77--88}},
  publisher    = {{ACM New York, NY, USA}},
  title        = {{{Decision Support via Automated Metric Comparison for the Palladio-based Performance Blame Analysis}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{8063,
  author       = {{Becker, Matthias and Luckey, Markus and Becker, Steffen}},
  booktitle    = {{Ninth International ACM Sigsoft Conference on the Quality of Software Architectures}},
  pages        = {{43--52}},
  publisher    = {{ACM New York, NY, USA}},
  title        = {{{Performance Analysis of Self-Adaptive Systems for Requirements Validation at Design-Time}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@techreport{8222,
  author       = {{Küster, Jochen and Kovács, Dániel and Bauer, Eduard and Gerth, Christian}},
  publisher    = {{IBM Research}},
  title        = {{{Integrating Coverage Analysis into Test-driven Development of Model Transformations}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@techreport{8223,
  author       = {{Huma, Zille and Gerth, Christian and Engels, Gregor}},
  publisher    = {{University of Paderborn, Germany}},
  title        = {{{Automated Service Discovery and Composition for On-the-Fly SOAs}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{5752,
  author       = {{Yigitbas, Enes and Gerth, Christian and Sauer, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{Informatik 2013, 43. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), Informatik angepasst an Mensch, Organisation und Umwelt, 16.-20. September 2013, Koblenz, Deutschland}},
  pages        = {{2714--2723}},
  title        = {{{Konzeption modellbasierter Benutzungsschnittstellen für verteilte Selbstbedienungssysteme}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inbook{6276,
  author       = {{Klompmaker, Florian and Paelke, Volker and Fischer, Holger Gerhard}},
  booktitle    = {{Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions}},
  isbn         = {{9783642393501}},
  issn         = {{0302-9743}},
  location     = {{Las Vegas, USA}},
  pages        = {{32--41}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Berlin Heidelberg}},
  title        = {{{A Taxonomy-Based Approach towards NUI Interaction Design}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-39351-8_4}},
  volume       = {{8028}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inbook{6279,
  author       = {{Fischer, Holger Gerhard and Strenge, Benjamin and Nebe, Karsten}},
  booktitle    = {{Design, User Experience, and Usability. Design Philosophy, Methods, and Tools}},
  isbn         = {{9783642392283}},
  issn         = {{0302-9743}},
  location     = {{Las Vegas, USA}},
  pages        = {{252--261}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Berlin Heidelberg}},
  title        = {{{Towards a Holistic Tool for the Selection and Validation of Usability Method Sets Supporting Human-Centered Design}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_28}},
  volume       = {{8012}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{6284,
  author       = {{Fischer, Holger Gerhard and Geis, Thomas and Molich, Rolf and Kluge, Oliver and Heimgärtner, Rüdiger and Hunkirchen, Peter}},
  booktitle    = {{Jahresband Usability Professionals}},
  pages        = {{28--34}},
  publisher    = {{German UPA}},
  title        = {{{Do You Speak Usability? - Aktueller Stand des Glossars und des Curriculums für den Certified Professional for Usability and User Experience (CPUX) der German UPA}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{469,
  abstract     = {{Runtime monitoring aims at ensuring program safety by monitoring the program's behaviour during execution and taking appropriate action before a program violates some property.Runtime monitoring is in particular important when an exhaustive formal verification fails. While the approach allows for a safe execution of programs, it may impose a significant runtime overhead.In this paper, we propose a novel technique combining verification and monitoring which incurs no overhead during runtime at all. The technique proceeds by using the inconclusive result of a verification run as the basis for transforming the program into one where all potential points of failure are replaced by HALT statements. The new program is safe by construction, behaviourally equivalent to the original program (except for unsafe behaviour),and has the same performance characteristics.}},
  author       = {{Wonisch, Daniel and Schremmer, Alexander and Wehrheim, Heike}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM)}},
  pages        = {{244--258}},
  title        = {{{Zero Overhead Runtime Monitoring}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-40561-7_17}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{470,
  abstract     = {{In OpenFlow [1], multiple switches share the same control plane which is centralized atwhat is called the OpenFlow controller. A switch only consists of a forwarding plane. Rules for forwarding individual packets (called ow entries in OpenFlow) are pushed from the controller to the switches. In a network with a high arrival rate of new ows, such as in a data center, the control trac between the switch and controller can become very high. As a consequence, routing of new ows will be slow. One way to reduce control trac is to use wildcarded ow entries. Wildcard ow entries can be used to create default routes in the network. However, since switches do not keep track of ows covered by a wildcard ow entry, the controller no longer has knowledge about individual ows. To nd out about these individual ows we propose an extension to the current OpenFlow standard to enable packet sampling of wildcard ow entries.}},
  author       = {{Wette, Philip and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '13}},
  pages        = {{541--542}},
  title        = {{{Which Flows Are Hiding Behind My Wildcard Rule? Adding Packet Sampling to OpenFlow}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/2486001.2491710}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@misc{471,
  author       = {{Tezer, Alina}},
  publisher    = {{Universität Paderborn}},
  title        = {{{Verteilte Erstellung und Aktualisierung von Schlüsselservern in identitätsbasierten Verschlüsselungssystemen}}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@article{476,
  abstract     = {{An elementary h-route ow, for an integer h 1, is a set of h edge- disjoint paths between a source and a sink, each path carrying a unit of ow, and an h-route ow is a non-negative linear combination of elementary h-routeows. An h-route cut is a set of edges whose removal decreases the maximum h-route ow between a given source-sink pair (or between every source-sink pair in the multicommodity setting) to zero. The main result of this paper is an approximate duality theorem for multicommodity h-route cuts and ows, for h 3: The size of a minimum h-route cut is at least f=h and at most O(log4 k f) where f is the size of the maximum h-routeow and k is the number of commodities. The main step towards the proof of this duality is the design and analysis of a polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the minimum h-route cut problem for h = 3 that has an approximation ratio of O(log4 k). Previously, polylogarithmic approximation was known only for h-route cuts for h 2. A key ingredient of our algorithm is a novel rounding technique that we call multilevel ball-growing. Though the proof of the duality relies on this algorithm, it is not a straightforward corollary of it as in the case of classical multicommodity ows and cuts. Similar results are shown also for the sparsest multiroute cut problem.}},
  author       = {{Kolman, Petr and Scheideler, Christian}},
  journal      = {{Theory of Computing Systems}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{341--363}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Towards Duality of Multicommodity Multiroute Cuts and Flows: Multilevel Ball-Growing}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00224-013-9454-3}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

@inproceedings{477,
  abstract     = {{We consider the k-token dissemination problem, where k initially arbitrarily distributed tokens have to be disseminated to all nodes in a dynamic network (as introduced by Kuhn et al., STOC 2010). In contrast to general dynamic networks, our dynamic networks are unit disk graphs, i.e., nodes are embedded into the Euclidean plane and two nodes are connected if and only if their distance is at most R. Our worst-case adversary is allowed to move the nodes on the plane, but the maximum velocity v_max of each node is limited and the graph must be connected in each round. For this model, we provide almost tight lower and upper bounds for k-token dissemination if nodes are restricted to send only one token per round. It turns out that the maximum velocity v_max is a meaningful parameter to characterize dynamics in our model.}},
  author       = {{Abshoff, Sebastian and Benter, Markus and Cord-Landwehr, Andreas and Malatyali, Manuel and Meyer auf der Heide, Friedhelm}},
  booktitle    = {{Algorithms for Sensor Systems - 9th International Symposium on Algorithms and Experiments for Sensor Systems, Wireless Networks and Distributed Robotics, {ALGOSENSORS} 2013, Sophia Antipolis, France, September 5-6, 2013, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{22--34}},
  title        = {{{Token Dissemination in Geometric Dynamic Networks}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-45346-5_3}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}

