@misc{35839,
abstract = {{Erklärvideos gewinnen auch im Kontext des Physikunterrichts verstärkt an Relevanz. Um zu evaluieren, welche Gestaltungsaspekte ein wirkungsvolles Erklärvideo ausmachen, ist es das Ziel der vorliegenden Masterarbeit herauszufinden, welchen Einfluss die kohärente Gestaltung eines Erklärvideos hat. Dazu wird die Forschungsfrage gestellt: „Welchen Einfluss hat die kohärente Gestaltung eines Erklärvideos auf den dadurch hervorgerufenen Lernzuwachs im Vergleich zu einem in der Hinsicht nicht optimierten Video?“ Um die Forschungsfrage zu beantworten, ist eine quantitative Studie im Prä- und Posttestdesign mit Schüler:innen der Jahrgangsstufe Q1 durchgeführt worden. Außerdem wurde in verschiedenen Kategorien nach einer Bewertung der Videos gefragt.
Die Auswertung zeigt, dass durch das optimierte Video mit einem kleinen Effekt bessere Ergebnisse erzielt wurden, diese aber nicht signifikant und auch nicht für alle Aufgaben besser sind. Die Schüler:innen bewerteten das nicht optimierte Video in allen Kategorien besser als das optimierte Video. Auch dieses Ergebnis ist nicht signifikant.}},
author = {{Hörnlein, Madeleine}},
pages = {{105}},
title = {{{Untersuchung von Erklärvideos im Physikunterricht - Wirksamkeit von Kohärenz}}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45001,
author = {{Roos, E. and Brehm, Martin}},
journal = {{Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.}},
pages = {{1242--1253}},
title = {{{A Force Field for Bio-Polymers in Ionic Liquids (BILFF) – Part 1: [EMIm][OAc] / Water Mixtures}}},
doi = {{10.1039/D0CP04537C}},
volume = {{23}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45004,
author = {{Brehm, Martin and Thomas, M.}},
journal = {{Molecules}},
pages = {{1875}},
title = {{{Optimized Atomic Partial Charges and Radii Defined by Radical Voronoi Tessellation of Bulk Phase Simulations}}},
doi = {{10.3390/molecules26071875}},
volume = {{26 (7)}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45005,
author = {{Roy, S. and Brehm, Martin and Sharma, S. and Wu, F. and Maltsev, D. and Halstenberg, P. and Gallington, L. and Mahurin, S. and Dai, S. and Ivanov, A. and Margulis, C. and Bryantsev, V.}},
journal = {{J. Phys. Chem. B}},
pages = {{5971--5982}},
title = {{{Unraveling Local Structure of Molten Salts via X-Ray Scattering, Raman Spectroscopy, and ab initio Molecular Dynamics}}},
doi = {{10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c03786}},
volume = {{125 (22)}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45006,
author = {{Triolo, A. and Pietro, M. E. Di and Mele, A. and Celso, F. Lo and Brehm, Martin and Lisio, V. Di and Martinelli, A. and Chater, P. and Russina, O.}},
journal = {{J. Chem. Phys.}},
pages = {{244501}},
title = {{{Liquid Structure and Dynamics in the Choline Acetate:Urea 1:2 Deep Eutectic Solvent}}},
doi = {{10.1063/5.0054048}},
volume = {{154}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45003,
author = {{Codescu, M.-A. and Weiß, M. and Brehm, Martin and Kornilov, O. and Sebastiani, D. and Nibbering, E. T. J.}},
journal = {{J. Phys. Chem. A}},
pages = {{1845--1859}},
title = {{{Switching Between Proton Vacancy and Excess Proton Transfer Pathways in the Reaction Between 7-Hydroxyquinoline and Formate}}},
doi = {{10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10191}},
volume = {{125 (9)}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45000,
author = {{Mukherjee, M. and Tripathi, D. and Brehm, Martin and Riplinger, C. and Dutta, A. K.}},
journal = {{J. Chem. Theory Comput.}},
pages = {{105--116}},
title = {{{Efficient EOM-CC-Based Protocol for the Calculation of Electron Affinity of Solvated Nucleobases: Uracil as a Case Study}}},
doi = {{10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00655}},
volume = {{17 (1)}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45002,
author = {{Triolo, A. and Celso, F. Lo and Brehm, Martin and Lisio, V. Di and Russina, O.}},
journal = {{J. Mol. Liq.}},
pages = {{115750}},
title = {{{Liquid Structure of a Choline Chloride-Water Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent: A Molecular Dynamics Characterization}}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115750}},
volume = {{331}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45115,
abstract = {{
Context
Return to running (RTR) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a crucial milestone. However, how and when to start a running program are uncertain.
Objective
To explore the feasibility of a structured program to reintroduce running after ACLR and evaluate the predictive value of potential predictors of short-term success.
Design
Longitudinal cohort study.
Setting
Local research center and participants' homes.
Patients or Other Participants
Thirty-five participants were recruited after ACLR.
Intervention(s)
Program with a progression algorithm to reintroduce running (10 running sessions in 14 days).
Main Outcome Measure(s)
The criterion for short-term success was no exacerbation of symptoms. Potential predictors were (1) the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form score, (2) ACL Return to Sport after Injury questionnaire score, (3) quadriceps and hamstrings strength, (4) step-down endurance test, and (5) modified Star Excursion Balance test. Descriptive statistics were performed to study the feasibility of the RTR program, and Poisson regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of success.
Results
Of the 34 participants, 33 completed the RTR program. Sixteen participants experienced some temporary exacerbation of symptoms, but only 1 had to stop the program. The initial IKDC score was the only significant predictor of a successful RTR, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 80.4%. An IKDC cut-off of 63.7/100 differentiated responders and nonresponders with the highest sensitivity and specificity (77.8% and 75.0%, respectively). A participant with an IKDC score above this threshold had a 3-fold greater chance of success.
Conclusions
Our results confirm the feasibility of our RTR program and progression algorithm after ACLR. Clinicians should use an IKDC score of >64 as a criterion to reintroduce running after ACLR to increase the likelihood of short-term success.
}},
author = {{Pairot de Fontenay, Benoit and Van Cant, Joachim and Gokeler, Alli and Roy, Jean-Sébastien}},
issn = {{1938-162X}},
journal = {{Journal of Athletic Training}},
keywords = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
number = {{6}},
pages = {{540--546}},
publisher = {{Journal of Athletic Training/NATA}},
title = {{{Reintroduction of Running After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Hamstrings Graft: Can We Predict Short-Term Success?}}},
doi = {{10.4085/1062-6050-0407.21}},
volume = {{57}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45135,
abstract = {{Context: Only 55% of the athletes return to competitive sports after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Athletes younger than 25 years who return to sports have a second injury rate of 23%. There may be a mismatch between rehabilitation contents and the demands an athlete faces after returning to sports. Current return-to-sports (RTS) tests utilize closed and predictable motor skills; however, demands on the field are different. Neurocognitive functions are essential to manage dynamic sport situations and may fluctuate after peripheral injuries. Most RTS and rehabilitation paradigms appear to lack this aspect, which might be linked to increased risk of second injury. Objective: This systematic and scoping review aims to map existing evidence about neurocognitive and neurophysiological functions in athletes, which could be linked to ACL injury in an integrated fashion and bring an extensive perspective to assessment and rehabilitation approaches. Data Sources: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published between 2005 and 2020 using the keywords ACL, brain, cortical, neuroplasticity, cognitive, cognition, neurocognition, and athletes. Study Selection: Studies investigating either neurocognitive or neurophysiological functions in athletes and linking these to ACL injury regardless of their design and technique were included. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Data Extraction: The demographic, temporal, neurological, and behavioral data revealing possible injury-related aspects were extracted and summarized. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in this review. Deficits in different neurocognitive domains and changes in neurophysiological functions could be a predisposing risk factor for, or a consequence caused by, ACL injuries. Conclusion: Clinicians should view ACL injuries not only as a musculoskeletal but also as a neural lesion with neurocognitive and neurophysiological aspects. Rehabilitation and RTS paradigms should consider these changes for assessment and interventions after injury. }},
author = {{Piskin, Daghan and Benjaminse, Anne and Dimitrakis, Panagiotis and Gokeler, Alli}},
issn = {{1941-7381}},
journal = {{Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach}},
keywords = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{549--555}},
publisher = {{SAGE Publications}},
title = {{{Neurocognitive and Neurophysiological Functions Related to ACL Injury: A Framework for Neurocognitive Approaches in Rehabilitation and Return-to-Sports Tests}}},
doi = {{10.1177/19417381211029265}},
volume = {{14}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45140,
abstract = {{Background: Differential learning (DL) is a motor learning method characterized by high amounts of variability during practice and is claimed to provide the learner with a higher learning rate than other methods. However, some controversy surrounds DL theory, and to date, no overview exists that compares the effects of DL to other motor learning methods.Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of DL in comparison to other motor learning methods in the acquisition and retention phase.Design: Systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis.Methods: PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched until February 3, 2020. To be included, (1) studies had to be experiments where the DL group was compared to a control group engaged in a different motor learning method (lack of practice was not eligible), (2) studies had to describe the effects on one or more measures of performance in a skill or movement task, and (3) the study report had to be published as a full paper in a journal or as a book chapter.Results: Twenty-seven studies encompassing 31 experiments were included. Overall heterogeneity for the acquisition phase (post-pre; I2 = 77%) as well as for the retention phase (retention-pre; I2 = 79%) was large, and risk of bias was high. The meta-analysis showed an overall small effect size of 0.26 [0.10, 0.42] in the acquisition phase for participants in the DL group compared to other motor learning methods. In the retention phase, an overall medium effect size of 0.61 [0.30, 0.91] was observed for participants in the DL group compared to other motor learning methods.Discussion/Conclusion: Given the large amount of heterogeneity, limited number of studies, low sample sizes, low statistical power, possible publication bias, and high risk of bias in general, inferences about the effectiveness of DL would be premature. Even though DL shows potential to result in greater average improvements between pre- and post/retention test compared to non-variability-based motor learning methods, more high-quality research is needed before issuing such a statement. For robust comparisons on the relative effectiveness of DL to different variability-based motor learning methods, scarce and inconclusive evidence was found.}},
author = {{Tassignon, Bruno and Verschueren, Jo and Baeyens, Jean-Pierre and Benjaminse, Anne and Gokeler, Alli and Serrien, Ben and Clijsen, Ron}},
issn = {{1664-1078}},
journal = {{Frontiers in Psychology}},
keywords = {{General Psychology}},
publisher = {{Frontiers Media SA}},
title = {{{An Exploratory Meta-Analytic Review on the Empirical Evidence of Differential Learning as an Enhanced Motor Learning Method}}},
doi = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2021.533033}},
volume = {{12}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45138,
abstract = {{Individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have a high rate of reinjury upon return to competitive sports. Deficits in motor control may influence reinjury risk and can be addressed during rehabilitation with motor learning strategies. When instructing patients in performing motor tasks after ACLR, an external focus of attention directed to the intended movement effect has been shown to be more effective in reducing reinjury risk than an internal focus of attention on body movements. While this concept is mostly agreed upon, recent literature has made it clear that the interpretation and implementation of an external focus of attention within ACLR rehabilitation needs to be better described. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a clinical framework for the application of attentional focus strategies and guide clinicians towards effectively utilizing an external focus of attention in rehabilitation after ACLR. Level of Evidence 5 }},
author = {{Singh, Harjiv and Gokeler, Alli and Benjaminse, Anne}},
issn = {{2159-2896}},
journal = {{International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy}},
keywords = {{Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation}},
number = {{6}},
publisher = {{International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy}},
title = {{{Effective Attentional Focus Strategies after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Commentary}}},
doi = {{10.26603/001c.29848}},
volume = {{16}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{45151,
author = {{Dingenen, Bart and Billiet, Bart and De Baets, Liesbet and Bellemans, Johan and Truijen, Jan and Gokeler, Alli}},
issn = {{1466-853X}},
journal = {{Physical Therapy in Sport}},
keywords = {{Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, General Medicine}},
pages = {{68--76}},
publisher = {{Elsevier BV}},
title = {{{Rehabilitation strategies of Flemish physical therapists before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An online survey}}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.02.003}},
volume = {{49}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45407,
author = {{Große-Heilmann, Rike Isabel and Burde, Jan-Philipp and Riese, Josef and Schubatzky, Thomas and Weiler, David}},
booktitle = {{PhyDid B-Didaktik der Physik-Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2021}},
pages = {{171--178}},
title = {{{Erwerb und Messung physikdidaktischer Kompetenzen zum Einsatz digitaler Medien}}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45408,
author = {{Weiler, David and Burde, Jan-Philipp and Große-Heilmann, Rike Isabel and Lachner, Andreas and Riese, Josef and Schubatzky, Thomas}},
booktitle = {{PhyDid B-Didaktik der Physik-Beiträge zur DPG-Frühjahrstagung 2021}},
pages = {{209--216}},
title = {{{Entwicklung eines Seminars zur Förderung des Konzeptverständnisses mittels digitaler Medien}}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@article{24566,
author = {{Engelkemeier, Katja and Sun, Aijia and Voswinkel, Dietrich and Grydin, Olexandr and Schaper, Mirko and Bremser, Wolfgang}},
issn = {{2196-0216}},
journal = {{ChemElectroChem}},
pages = {{2155--2168}},
publisher = {{Wiley}},
title = {{{Zinc Anodizing: Structural Diversity of Anodic Zinc Oxide Controlled by the Type of Electrolyte}}},
doi = {{10.1002/celc.202100216}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45449,
author = {{Mutschler, Tanja and Buschhüter, David and Schröder, Jan and Riese, Josef and Borowski, Andreas}},
booktitle = {{Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht und Lehrerbildung im Umbruch? Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Online Jahrestagung 2020}},
editor = {{Habig, Sebastian}},
pages = {{258--261}},
title = {{{Theoriekonformität von Unterrichtsplanungen im Fach Physik vor und nach dem Praxissemester}}},
volume = {{41}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45461,
author = {{Große-Heilmann, Rike Isabel and Riese, Josef}},
booktitle = {{Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht und Lehrerbildung im Umbruch? Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Online Jahrestagung 2020. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen}},
editor = {{Habig, Sebastian}},
pages = {{441--444}},
title = {{{Erwerb physikdidaktischen Wissens zum Einsatz digitaler Medien im Physikunterricht}}},
volume = {{41}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45460,
author = {{Joswig-Käfer, Ann-Kathrin and Riese, Josef}},
booktitle = {{Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht und Lehrerbildung im Umbruch? Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Online Jahrestagung 2020. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen}},
editor = {{Habig, Sebastian}},
pages = {{286--289}},
title = {{{Längsschnitt Physikdidaktischen Wissens: Ursachen für Veränderungen}}},
volume = {{41}},
year = {{2021}},
}
@inproceedings{45463,
author = {{Ermel, Dorothee and Riese, Josef}},
booktitle = {{Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht und Lehrerbildung im Umbruch? Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik. Online Jahrestagung 2020. Essen: Universität Duisburg-Essen}},
editor = {{Habig, Sebastian}},
pages = {{585--588}},
title = {{{Praktische technische Kompetenzen im Techniklehramt}}},
volume = {{41}},
year = {{2021}},
}