@inproceedings{10213, author = {{Melnikov, Vitaly and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings 27. Workshop Computational Intelligence, Dortmund, Germany 2017}}, pages = {{1--12}}, title = {{{Optimizing the Structure of Nested Dichotomies: A Comparison of Two Heuristics}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @inproceedings{10216, author = {{Shaker, Ammar and Heldt, W. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings ECML/PKDD, European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Skopje, Macedonia}}, title = {{{Learning TSK Fuzzy Rules from Data Streams}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{10267, author = {{Bräuning, M. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Keller, T. and Glaum, M.}}, journal = {{European Journal of Operational Research}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{295--306}}, title = {{{Lexicographic preferences for predictive modeling of human decision making. A new machine learning method with an application in accounting}}}, volume = {{258}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{10268, author = {{Platenius, M.-C. and Shaker, Ammar and Becker, M. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Schäfer, W.}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{739--759}}, title = {{{Imprecise Matching of Requirements Specifications for Software Services Using Fuzzy Logic}}}, volume = {{43}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{10269, author = {{Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{The Computing Research Repository (CoRR)}}, title = {{{From Knowledge-based to Data-driven Modeling of Fuzzy Rule-based Systems: A Critical Reflection}}}, year = {{2017}}, } @article{24154, author = {{Ramaswamy, Arunselvan and Bhatnagar, Shalabh}}, journal = {{Stochastics}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{1173--1187}}, publisher = {{Taylor \& Francis}}, title = {{{Stochastic recursive inclusion in two timescales with an application to the lagrangian dual problem}}}, volume = {{88}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{3318, author = {{Melnikov, Vitalik and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Kaimann, Daniel and Frick, Bernd and Gupta, Pritha }}, issn = {{2083-8476}}, journal = {{Schedae Informaticae}}, publisher = {{Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego}}, title = {{{Pairwise versus Pointwise Ranking: A Case Study}}}, doi = {{10.4467/20838476si.16.006.6187}}, volume = {{25}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{190, abstract = {{Today, software components are provided by global markets in the form of services. In order to optimally satisfy service requesters and service providers, adequate techniques for automatic service matching are needed. However, a requester’s requirements may be vague and the information available about a provided service may be incomplete. As a consequence, fuzziness is induced into the matching procedure. The contribution of this paper is the development of a systematic matching procedure that leverages concepts and techniques from fuzzy logic and possibility theory based on our formal distinction between different sources and types of fuzziness in the context of service matching. In contrast to existing methods, our approach is able to deal with imprecision and incompleteness in service specifications and to inform users about the extent of induced fuzziness in order to improve the user’s decision-making. We demonstrate our approach on the example of specifications for service reputation based on ratings given by previous users. Our evaluation based on real service ratings shows the utility and applicability of our approach.}}, author = {{Platenius, Marie Christin and Shaker, Ammar and Becker, Matthias and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Schäfer, Wilhelm}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE), presented at ICSE 2017}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{739--759}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{Imprecise Matching of Requirements Specifications for Software Services using Fuzzy Logic}}}, doi = {{10.1109/TSE.2016.2632115}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{184, abstract = {{In this paper, we propose a framework for a class of learning problems that we refer to as “learning to aggregate”. Roughly, learning-to-aggregate problems are supervised machine learning problems, in which instances are represented in the form of a composition of a (variable) number on constituents; such compositions are associated with an evaluation, score, or label, which is the target of the prediction task, and which can presumably be modeled in the form of a suitable aggregation of the properties of its constituents. Our learning-to-aggregate framework establishes a close connection between machine learning and a branch of mathematics devoted to the systematic study of aggregation functions. We specifically focus on a class of functions called uninorms, which combine conjunctive and disjunctive modes of aggregation. Experimental results for a corresponding model are presented for a review data set, for which the aggregation problem consists of combining different reviewer opinions about a paper into an overall decision of acceptance or rejection.}}, author = {{Melnikov, Vitaly and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML/PKDD 2016)}}, pages = {{756--771}}, title = {{{Learning to Aggregate Using Uninorms}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-46227-1_47}}, year = {{2016}}, } @misc{10785, author = {{Fürnkranz, J. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining}}, editor = {{Sammut, C. and Webb, G.I.}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Preference Learning}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15400, author = {{Labreuche, C. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Vojtas, P. and Fallah Tehrani, A.}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings DA2PL 2016 EURO Mini Conference From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, Paderborn Germany}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, R. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{On the identifiability of models in multi-criteria preference learning}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15401, author = {{Schäfer, D. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings DA2PL`2016 Euro Mini Conference From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, Paderborn, Germany}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, R. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{Preference -based reinforcement learning using dyad ranking}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15402, author = {{Couso, Ines and Ahmadi Fahandar, Mohsen and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings DA2PL 2016 EURO Mini Conference From Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning, Paderborn Germany}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, R. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{Statistical Inference for Incomplete Ranking Data: A Comparison of two likelihood-based estimators}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15403, author = {{Lu, S. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings 26th Workshop Computational Intelligence, Dortmund Germany}}, editor = {{Hüllermeier, Eyke and Hoffmann, F. and Mikut, R.}}, pages = {{1--8}}, publisher = {{KIT Scientific Publishing}}, title = {{{Support vector classification on noisy data using fuzzy superset losses}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15404, author = {{Schäfer, D. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Workshop LWDA "Lernen, Wissen, Daten, Analysen" Potsdam, Germany}}, title = {{{Plackett-Luce networks for dyad ranking}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{15111, author = {{Pfannschmidt, Karlson and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Held, S. and Neiger, R.}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings IPMU 16th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Part 1, Eindhoven, The Netherlands}}, pages = {{450--461}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Evaluating tests in medical diagnosis-Combining machine learning with game-theoretical concepts}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{16041, author = {{Leinweber, M. and Fober, T. and Strickert, M. and Baumgärtner, L. and Klebe, G. and Freisleben, B. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{1423--1434}}, title = {{{CavSimBase: A database for large scale comparison of protein binding sites}}}, volume = {{28}}, year = {{2016}}, } @phdthesis{141, author = {{Mohr, Felix}}, publisher = {{Universität Paderborn}}, title = {{{Towards Automated Service Composition Under Quality Constraints}}}, doi = {{10.17619/UNIPB/1-171}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inbook{10214, author = {{Fürnkranz, J. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining}}, editor = {{Sammut, C. and Webb, G.I.}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Preference Learning}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @proceedings{10221, editor = {{Hoffmann, F. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mikut, R.}}, title = {{{ Proceedings 26. Workshop Computational Intelligence KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, Germany}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10222, author = {{Jasinska, K. and Dembczynski, K. and Busa-Fekete, Robert and Klerx, Timo and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings ICML-2016, 33th International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, USA}}, editor = {{Balcan, M.F. and Weinberger, K.Q.}}, title = {{{Extreme F-measure maximization using sparse probability estimates }}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10223, author = {{Melnikov, Vitaly and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Part II, Riva del Garda, Italy}}, pages = {{756--771}}, title = {{{Learning to aggregate using uninorms, in Proceedings ECML/PKDD-2016}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10224, author = {{Dembczynski, K. and Kotlowski, W. and Waegeman, W. and Busa-Fekete, Robert and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings ECML/PKDD European Conference on Maschine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Part II, Riva del Garda, Italy}}, pages = {{511--526}}, title = {{{Consistency of probalistic classifier trees}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10225, author = {{Shabani, Aulon and Paul, Adil and Platon, R. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings ICCBR, 24th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Atlanta, GA, USA}}, pages = {{356--369}}, title = {{{Predicting the electricity consumption of buildings: An improved CBR approach}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10226, author = {{Pfannschmidt, Karlson and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Held, S. and Neiger, R.}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings IPMU 16th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Part 1, Eindhoven, The Netherlands}}, pages = {{450--461}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Evaluating tests in medical diagnosis-Combining machine learning with game-theoretical concepts}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10227, author = {{Labreuche, C. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Vojtas, P. and Fallah Tehrani, A.}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings DA2PL ´2016, Euro Mini Conference from Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, Robert and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{On the Identifiability of models in multi-criteria preference learning }}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10228, author = {{Schäfer, Dirk and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings DA2PL ´2016, Euro Mini Conference from Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, Robert and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Dyad Ranking}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10229, author = {{Couso, Ines and Ahmadi Fahandar, Mohsen and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings DA2PL ´2016, Euro Mini Conference from Multiple Criteria Decision Aid to Preference Learning}}, editor = {{Busa-Fekete, Robert and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mousseau, V. and Pfannschmidt, Karlson}}, title = {{{Statistical Inference for Incomplete Ranking Data: A Comparison of two likelihood-based estimators}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10230, author = {{Lu, S. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings 26. Workshop Computational Intelligence, KIT Scientific Publishing}}, editor = {{Hoffmann, F. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Mikut, R.}}, pages = {{1--8}}, title = {{{Support vector classification on noisy data using fuzzy supersets losses}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{10231, author = {{Schäfer, Dirk and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Workshop LWDA "Lernen, Wissen, Daten, Analysen"}}, title = {{{Plackett-Luce networks for dyad ranking}}}, year = {{2016}}, } @proceedings{10263, editor = {{Kaminka, G.A. and Fox, M. and Bouquet, P. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Dignum, V. and Dignum, F. and van Harmelen, F.}}, publisher = {{IOS Press}}, title = {{{ECAI 2016, 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, including PAIS 2016, Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence}}}, volume = {{285}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{10264, author = {{Leinweber, M. and Fober, T. and Strickert, M. and Baumgärtner, L. and Klebe, G. and Freisleben, B. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{1423--1434}}, title = {{{CavSimBase: A database for large scale comparison of protein binding sites}}}, volume = {{28}}, year = {{2016}}, } @article{10266, author = {{Riemenschneider, M. and Senge, Robin and Neumann, U. and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Heider, D.}}, journal = {{BioData Mining}}, number = {{10}}, title = {{{Exploiting HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase cross-resistance information for improved drug resistance prediction by means of multi-label classification}}}, volume = {{9}}, year = {{2016}}, } @inproceedings{280, abstract = {{The Collaborative Research Centre "On-The-Fly Computing" works on foundations and principles for the vision of the Future Internet. It proposes the paradigm of On-The-Fly Computing, which tackles emerging worldwide service markets. In these markets, service providers trade software, platform, and infrastructure as a service. Service requesters state requirements on services. To satisfy these requirements, the new role of brokers, who are (human) actors building service compositions on the fly, is introduced. Brokers have to specify service compositions formally and comprehensively using a domain-specific language (DSL), and to use service matching for the discovery of the constituent services available in the market. The broker's choice of the DSL and matching approaches influences her success of building compositions as distinctive properties of different service markets play a significant role. In this paper, we propose a new approach of engineering a situation-specific DSL by customizing a comprehensive, modular DSL and its matching for given service market properties. This enables the broker to create market-specific composition specifications and to perform market-specific service matching. As a result, the broker builds service compositions satisfying the requester's requirements more accurately. We evaluated the presented concepts using case studies in service markets for tourism and university management.}}, author = {{Arifulina, Svetlana and Platenius, Marie Christin and Mohr, Felix and Engels, Gregor and Schäfer, Wilhelm}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the IEEE 11th World Congress on Services (SERVICES), Visionary Track: Service Composition for the Future Internet}}, pages = {{333----340}}, title = {{{Market-Specific Service Compositions: Specification and Matching}}}, doi = {{10.1109/SERVICES.2015.58}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{323, abstract = {{On-the-fly composition of service-based software solutions is still a challenging task. Even more challenges emerge when facing automatic service composition in markets of composed services for end users. In this paper, we focus on the functional discrepancy between “what a user wants” specified in terms of a request and “what a user gets” when executing a composed service. To meet the challenge of functional discrepancy, we propose the combination of existing symbolic composition approaches with machine learning techniques. We developed a learning recommendation system that expands the capabilities of existing composition algorithms to facilitate adaptivity and consequently reduces functional discrepancy. As a representative of symbolic techniques, an Artificial Intelligence planning based approach produces solutions that are correct with respect to formal specifications. Our learning recommendation system supports the symbolic approach in decision-making. Reinforcement Learning techniques enable the recommendation system to adjust its recommendation strategy over time based on user ratings. We implemented the proposed functionality in terms of a prototypical composition framework. Preliminary results from experiments conducted in the image processing domain illustrate the benefit of combining both complementary techniques.}}, author = {{Jungmann, Alexander and Mohr, Felix}}, journal = {{Journal of Internet Services and Applications}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1--18}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{An approach towards adaptive service composition in markets of composed services}}}, doi = {{10.1186/s13174-015-0022-8}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{324, abstract = {{Services are self-contained software components that can beused platform independent and that aim at maximizing software reuse. Abasic concern in service oriented architectures is to measure the reusabilityof services. One of the most important qualities is the functionalreusability, which indicates how relevant the task is that a service solves.Current metrics for functional reusability of software, however, have verylittle explanatory power and do not accomplish this goal.This paper presents a new approach to estimate the functional reusabilityof services based on their relevance. To this end, it denes the degreeto which a service enables the execution of other services as its contri-bution. Based on the contribution, relevance of services is dened as anestimation for their functional reusability. Explanatory power is obtainedby normalizing relevance values with a reference service. The applicationof the metric to a service test set conrms its supposed capabilities.}}, author = {{Mohr, Felix}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR)}}, pages = {{298----313}}, title = {{{A Metric for Functional Reusability of Services}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-319-14130-5_21}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{319, abstract = {{Services are self-contained and platform independent software components that aim at maximizing software reuse. The automated composition of services to a target software artifact has been tackled with many AI techniques, but existing approaches make unreasonably strong assumptions such as a predefined data flow, are limited to tiny problem sizes, ignore non-functional properties, or assume offline service repositories. This paper presents an algorithm that automatically composes services without making such assumptions. We employ a backward search algorithm that starts from an empty composition and prepends service calls to already discovered candidates until a solution is found. Available services are determined during the search process. We implemented our algorithm, performed an experimental evaluation, and compared it to other approaches.}}, author = {{Mohr, Felix and Jungmann, Alexander and Kleine Büning, Hans}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC)}}, pages = {{57----64}}, title = {{{Automated Online Service Composition}}}, doi = {{10.1109/SCC.2015.18}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{4792, author = {{Senge, Robin and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, issn = {{1063-6706}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{2024--2033}}, publisher = {{Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)}}, title = {{{Fast Fuzzy Pattern Tree Learning for Classification}}}, doi = {{10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2396078}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{15406, author = {{Schäfer, D. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings of the 2015 international Workshop on Meta-Learning and Algorithm Selection co-located ECML/PKDD, Porto, Portugal}}, pages = {{110--111}}, title = {{{Preference-based meta-learning using dyad ranking: Recommending algorithms in cold-start situations}}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{15749, author = {{Paul, Adil and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Workshop Proceedings from ICCBR, 23rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Frankfurt, Germany}}, pages = {{68--77}}, title = {{{A cbr approach to the angry birds game}}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{15750, author = {{Ewerth, R. and Balz, A. and Gehlhaar, J. and Dembczynski, K. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings 25. Workshop Computational Intelligence, Dortmund, Germany}}, editor = {{Hoffmann, F. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, pages = {{235--240}}, publisher = {{KIT Scientific Publishing}}, title = {{{Depth estimation in monocular images: Quantitative versus qualitative approaches}}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{15751, author = {{Lu, S. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings 25th Workshop Computational Intelligence, Dortmund Germany}}, editor = {{Hoffmann, F. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, pages = {{97--104}}, publisher = {{KIT Scientific Publishing}}, title = {{{Locally weighted regression through data imprecisiation}}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{16049, author = {{Senge, Robin and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{2024--2033}}, title = {{{Fast fuzzy pattern tree learning for classification }}}, volume = {{23}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{16051, author = {{Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{Informatik Spektrum}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{500--509}}, title = {{{From knowledge-based to data driven fuzzy modeling: Development, criticism and alternative directions}}}, volume = {{38}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{16053, author = {{Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{Fuzzy Sets and Systems}}, pages = {{292--299}}, title = {{{Does machine learning need fuzzy logic?}}}, volume = {{281}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{16058, author = {{Waegeman, W. and Dembczynski, K. and Jachnik, A. and Cheng, W. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{Journal of Machine Learning Research}}, pages = {{3313--3368}}, title = {{{On the Bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizers}}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2015}}, } @article{16067, author = {{Shaker, A. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, journal = {{Neurocomputing}}, pages = {{250--264}}, title = {{{Recovery analysis for adaptive learning from non-stationary data streams: Experimental design and case study}}}, volume = {{150}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{10234, author = {{Hüllermeier, Eyke and Minor, M.}}, booktitle = {{in Proceedings 23rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2015) LNAI 9343}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development }}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{10235, author = {{Hoffmann, F. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, title = {{{Proceedings 25. Workshop Computational Intelligence KIT Scientific Publishing}}}, year = {{2015}}, } @inproceedings{10236, author = {{Abdel-Aziz, A. and Hüllermeier, Eyke}}, booktitle = {{In Proceedings 23rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR 2015)}}, pages = {{1--14}}, title = {{{Case Base Maintenance in Preference-Based CBR}}}, year = {{2015}}, }