@unpublished{59839, abstract = {{In many scientific approaches, especially in those that try to foster explainability of Artificial Intelligences, a narrow conception of explaining prevails. This narrow conception implies that explaining is a one-directional action in which knowledge is transferred from the explainer to an addressee. By studying the amount of agency in metaphors for explaining in scientific texts, we want to find out – or at least to contribute a partial answer to the question – why this narrow conception is so dominant. For our analysis, we use a linguistic conception of agency, transitivity. This concept allows to specify the degree of agency or effectiveness of the action in a verbalised event. It is defined by several component parts. We detail and discuss both the parameters of and global transitivity. Overall, transitivity of explaining metaphors has a rather common pattern across metaphors. Agency is not high and reduced in characteristic aspects: The metaphors imply that the object of explaining is static, i.e., is not changed within the explanation, and that explaining is the activity of one person only. This pattern may account for the narrow conception of explaining. It contrasts strongly with current co-constructive or sociotechnical approaches to explainability.}}, author = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Rohlfing, Katharina J.}}, publisher = {{Center for Open Science}}, title = {{{Agency in metaphors of explaining: An analysis of scientific texts}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59846, author = {{Mildorf, Jarmila}}, issn = {{0039-4130}}, journal = {{Studium Ricerca, Letteratura}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{134--160}}, title = {{{The Voice of the Bard: Milton’s Paradise Lost on Radio}}}, volume = {{121}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{53445, author = {{Hälterlein, Jens}}, booktitle = {{The Realities of Autonomous Weapons}}, editor = {{Bächle, Thomas Christian and Bareis, Jascha}}, pages = {{187--204}}, publisher = {{Bristol University Press}}, title = {{{Governing Autonomies: Imagining Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the “Future Combat Air System” European Armament Project}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59867, author = {{Dübbert, Alexander}}, booktitle = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}}, pages = {{403--429}}, publisher = {{Herder}}, title = {{{Muster in der Benamung 'nachhaltiger' Lebensmittelmarkennamen - Kulturbezogene Deutungen von Namen am stationären Verkaufsort als Raum}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @book{59862, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena Maria}}, publisher = {{Herder Verlag}}, title = {{{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59756, abstract = {{A current concern in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is to ensure the trustworthiness of AI systems. The development of explainability methods is one prominent way to address this, which has often resulted in the assumption that the use of explainability will lead to an increase in the trust of users and wider society. However, the dynamics between explainability and trust are not well established and empirical investigations of their relation remain mixed or inconclusive. In this paper we provide a detailed description of the concepts of user trust and distrust in AI and their relation to appropriate reliance. For that we draw from the fields of machine learning, human–computer interaction, and the social sciences. Based on these insights, we have created a focused study of empirical literature of existing empirical studies that investigate the effects of AI systems and XAI methods on user (dis)trust, in order to substantiate our conceptualization of trust, distrust, and reliance. With respect to our conceptual understanding we identify gaps in existing empirical work. With clarifying the concepts and summarizing the empirical studies, we aim to provide researchers, who examine user trust in AI, with an improved starting point for developing user studies to measure and evaluate the user’s attitude towards and reliance on AI systems.}}, author = {{Visser, Roel and Peters, Tobias Martin and Scharlau, Ingrid and Hammer, Barbara}}, issn = {{1389-0417}}, journal = {{Cognitive Systems Research}}, keywords = {{XAI, Appropriate trust, Distrust, Reliance, Human-centric evaluation, Trustworthy AI}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Trust, distrust, and appropriate reliance in (X)AI: A conceptual clarification of user trust and survey of its empirical evaluation}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101357}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59864, author = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena Maria}}, booktitle = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}}, pages = {{7--31}}, publisher = {{Herder Verlag}}, title = {{{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @misc{59922, author = {{Porwol, Philip and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, publisher = {{OSF}}, title = {{{An annotated corpus of elicited metaphors of explaining and understanding using MIPVU}}}, doi = {{10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6SMX}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{51748, author = {{Schulz, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Populäre Artikulationen – Artikulationen des Populären}}, editor = {{Koch, Günter and Rottgeri , André }}, issn = {{2364-9224}}, pages = {{215--244}}, publisher = {{Schüren}}, title = {{{In Likes We Trust oder die unmögliche Möglichkeit vom Like als Gabe zu sprechen}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.15475/skms.2025.1.11}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59982, author = {{Schroeder, René and Reh, Anne and Miller, Susanne and Blumberg, Eva and Kottmann, Brigitte and Franzen, Katja and Thevißen, Max}}, booktitle = {{Förderbezogene Diagnostik in der inklusiven Bildung. Band I: Kompetenzbereiche - Fachdidaktik}}, editor = {{Beck, Katja and Ferdigg, Rosa Anna and Katzenbach, Dieter and Kett-Hauser, Julia and Laux, Sophia and Urban, Michael}}, pages = {{209--229}}, publisher = {{Waxmann}}, title = {{{Didaktisch-diagnostische Potentiale des inklusionsorientierten Sachunterrichts (DiPoSa) – Einblicke in ein designbasiertes Entwicklungsprojekt}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{51747, author = {{de Gruisbourne, Birte and Schulz, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Audiovisual Healing and Reparation: Recuperative Affect of Mediation}}, editor = {{Çiçek, Özgür and Savaş, Özlem}}, pages = {{111--124}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{A Healing Media System of Care - Cancer Diaries and Social Media}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032647425}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59997, author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}}, booktitle = {{G. E. Lessings Hamburgische Dramaturgie. Zwischen ästhetischer Theorie und dramatischer Praxis}}, editor = {{Robert, Jörg and Steigerwald, Jörn}}, isbn = {{9783770569441}}, pages = {{185--205}}, publisher = {{Brill | Fink}}, title = {{{Der spanische Essex}}}, doi = {{10.30965/9783846769447_010}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59998, author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}}, issn = {{2772-7610}}, journal = {{Artes}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1--23}}, publisher = {{Brill/Fink}}, title = {{{Gunst der Stunde}}}, doi = {{10.30965/27727629-20250001}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60003, author = {{Langer, Svenja}}, booktitle = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}}, pages = {{367 -- 401}}, publisher = {{Verlag Herder GmbH (wbg Academic)}}, title = {{{Die Spur in transdisziplinären Kontexten an den Schnittstellen zwischen Alltags-, Wissens- und Bildräumen}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59749, author = {{Balke, Stefan and Berndt, Axel and Müller, Meinard}}, issn = {{2514-3298}}, journal = {{Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{39--54}}, publisher = {{Ubiquity Press, Ltd.}}, title = {{{ChoraleBricks: A Modular Multitrack Dataset for Wind Music Research}}}, doi = {{10.5334/tismir.252}}, volume = {{8}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60010, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Manfred Knoche: Critique of the Political Economy of the Media: Foundations and Applications}}, isbn = {{9781915445506}}, publisher = {{University of Westminster Press}}, title = {{{Postface; On the Critique of the Political Economy of Digital Capitalism: The Importance of Manfred Knoche’s Contributions to the Critique of the Political Economy of the Media Today}}}, doi = {{10.16997/book79}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inproceedings{58555, author = {{Berndt, Axel}}, booktitle = {{{Forum of the Cultural Research Data Academy: “Music – Media – Cultural Heritage: Intersections between data, research and infrastructure”}}}, title = {{{Deconstruction – Recombination – Order: Ein kurzer Werkstattbericht}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60034, abstract = {{A preference for music theatre works is characteristic of Hans Werner Henze's oeuvre, as is his close collaboration with famous 20th-century authors, who wrote the libretti for his music theatre works. This paper explores the artistic collaborations of Hans Werner Henze and Ingeborg Bachmann on the one hand and Henze, Chester Kallman and W.H. Auden on the other in the context of their joint operatic work, surviving correspondence and poetological essays. This is set against the backdrop of how personal relationships can influence collaboration in the performing arts. In both cases, the letters and biographical writings of the aforementioned working groups, read from a gender perspective and with regard to creativity, forms of relationship and artistic collaboration, point to a tension between potential and desired personal relationships, the confrontation with marriage as a conventional social framework and artistic collaboration as a long-term connection.}}, author = {{Tumat, Antje}}, booktitle = {{(Wahl-)Verwandtschaften.Gemeinschaftliches kulturelles Handeln}}, editor = {{Bagge, Maren and Fornoff-Petrowski, CHristine and Ricke, Anna and Rode-Breymann, Susanne}}, pages = {{209--224}}, publisher = {{Böhlau}}, title = {{{Künstlerische Zusammenarbeit zwischen Ehekonvention und Sublimation. Hans Werner Henzes Bühnenschaffen mit Ingeborg Bachmann, W.H. Auden und Chester Kallman}}}, volume = {{21}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59755, abstract = {{Due to the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in high-risk domains like law or medicine, trustworthy AI and trust in AI are of increasing scientific and public relevance. A typical conception, for example in the context of medical diagnosis, is that a knowledgeable user receives AIgenerated classification as advice. Research to improve such interactions often aims to foster the user’s trust, which in turn should improve the combined human-AI performance. Given that AI models can err, we argue that the possibility to critically review, thus to distrust, an AI decision is an equally interesting target of research. We created two image classification scenarios in which the participants received mock-up AI advice. The quality of the advice decreases for a phase of the experiment. We studied the task performance, trust and distrust of the participants, and tested whether an instruction to remain skeptical and review each piece of advice led to a better performance compared to a neutral condition. Our results indicate that this instruction does not improve but rather worsens the participants’ performance. Repeated single-item self-report of trust and distrust shows an increase in trust and a decrease in distrust after the drop in the AI’s classification quality, with no difference between the two instructions. Furthermore, via a Bayesian Signal Detection Theory analysis, we provide a procedure to assess appropriate reliance in detail, by quantifying whether the problems of under- and over-reliance have been mitigated. We discuss implications of our results for the usage of disclaimers before interacting with AI, as prominently used in current LLM-based chatbots, and for trust and distrust research.}}, author = {{Peters, Tobias Martin and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, journal = {{Frontiers in Psychology}}, keywords = {{trust in AI, trust, distrust, human-AI interaction, Signal Detection Theory, Bayesian parameter estimation, image classification}}, title = {{{Interacting with fallible AI: Is distrust helpful when receiving AI misclassifications?}}}, doi = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574809}}, volume = {{16}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60084, author = {{Garske, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Wissenschaft aus Leidenschaft. Persönliche, biografische, wissenschaftliche Aspekte. FS Cyprian Rogowski zum 70. Geburtstag}}, editor = {{Spiegel , Egon and Stroß, Annette M. and Lehner-Hartmann, Andrea and Marianski, Janusz}}, pages = {{399--410}}, publisher = {{LIT}}, title = {{{Schattenprinzip und Klimawandel - Entwicklungschancen für Lehrende und Lernende im Kontext des ökologischen Lernens }}}, year = {{2025}}, }