@article{37231,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Zusammenfassung</jats:title><jats:p>In diesem Beitrag der Zeitschrift Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. (GIO) wird das Instrument zur Diagnose pädagogischer Kompetenzen von Pflegelehrpersonen (PädKomPflege) vorgestellt.</jats:p><jats:p>Die Berufsbildung in der Pflege ist durch sich verändernde inhaltliche und gesetzliche Anforderungen geprägt. Verschiedene landesspezifische rechtliche Vorgaben führen zu einem sehr heterogenen Bild von Qualifikationen und Kompetenzen der Pflegelehrpersonen. Die Anrechnung bereits erworbener Kompetenzen auf pflegepädagogische Studiengänge sowie die Kompetenzerfassung und -bilanzierung in Berufsbildungseinrichtungen spielt daher eine wichtige Rolle. Vor diesem Hintergrund wurde das Instrument PädKomPflege entwickelt und erprobt. Grundlage des Kompetenzmodells sind die Empfehlungen der Kultusministerkonferenz (2004) zu den Standards für die (allgemeine) Lehrerbildung sowie Expertenworkshops und -interviews mit PflegedidaktikerInnen. Die empirische Erprobung erfolgte an einer Stichprobe von 1096 Pflegelehrpersonen. Psychometrische Analysen auf Grundlage der klassischen Testtheorie sowie IRT-basierte Analysen führten zu einer Überarbeitung des Instruments, welches nun als zweisprachiges Online-Self-Assessmenttool (eng./deut.) vorliegt. Die Validierung der deutschsprachigen Version fand anhand von 545 TeilnehmerInnen im Jahr 2016 statt, sodass ein geprüftes Instrument mit 54 Items in den fünf Hauptskalen (Unterricht, Beurteilung, Beratung, Lernortkooperation sowie Organisations- und Schulentwicklung) und 18 Subskalen zur Verfügung steht.</jats:p><jats:p>Sowohl klassische als auch probabilistische Testgütekriterien werden erfüllt. Die Skalen weisen hohe interne Konsistenzen auf (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> &gt; 0,80) und sind überwiegend konstruktvalide. So lassen sich für 17 der 18 Subskalen ordinale Raschmodelle anpassen. Auf der Ebene der Hauptskalen können Partial Credit Modelle für alle Items von modellkonformen Subskalen einer Hauptskala angepasst werden. Das Instrument kann zur individuellen Kompetenzdiagnostik, zur Identifikation von Bildungsbedarfen in Schulen des Gesundheitswesens und im Kontext beruflicher Bildungsprozesse genutzt werden. In der Onlineversion erhalten Teilnehmende abschließend ein individuelles Kompetenzprofil mit möglichen Vergleichswerten. Das Tool kann begleitend zu Qualifizierungsprozessen als Monitoring-Instrument oder zur individuellen Kompetenzbilanzierung eingesetzt werden.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Schürmann, Mirko and Bender, Elena and Grebe, Christian}},
  issn         = {{2366-6145}},
  journal      = {{Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO)}},
  keywords     = {{Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Kompetenzdiagnose in der Berufsbildung von Pflegelehrpersonen}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11612-021-00574-w}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{37234,
  author       = {{Grebe, Christian and Schürmann, Mirko and Latteck, Änne-Dörte}},
  publisher    = {{LibreCat University}},
  title        = {{{Die Health Professionals Competence Scales (HePCoS) zur Kompetenzerfassung in den Gesundheitsfachberufen. Technical Report}}},
  doi          = {{10.13140/RG.2.2.13480.08967/1}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{33748,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> Zusammenfassung. In der Arbeit 4.0 ist durch neue Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten für Mitarbeitende eine Langzeitbindung an ein Unternehmen seltener. Unternehmen reagieren mit flexibilisierten Arbeitsplätzen, um diesem Wunsch der Mitarbeitenden nachzukommen. Flexibilisierung reduziert die Absicht das Unternehmen zu verlassen. Dabei ist wichtig, räumliche und zeitliche Flexibilisierung zu differenzieren. Außerdem gewinnen individuelle Werte bezüglich Stabilität und Kontinuität an Bedeutung und können den Bindungswunsch stärken. Hauptziel dieser Untersuchung ist, anhand eines kontroll- und ressourcentheoretisch fundierten Rahmens in zwei aufeinander aufbauenden Studien ( N = 448, N = 202) die (potenziell unterschiedlich starken) Zusammenhänge von zeitlicher und räumlicher Flexibilisierung mit Mitarbeitendenbindung zu analysieren und zu prüfen, ob sich diese Zusammenhänge bestätigen lassen, wenn zusätzlich individuelle Werte in die Analyse einbezogen werden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass zeitliche und räumliche Flexibilisierung unterschiedlich mit der Bleibeabsicht zusammenhängen. Während zeitliche Flexibilisierung positive Zusammenhänge zeigt, finden sich in Bezug auf räumliche Flexibilisierung keine Zusammenhänge. Werte bezüglich Stabilität und Kontinuität scheinen dabei nicht mit einer stärkeren Mitarbeitendenbindung zusammenzuhängen. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Bender, Elena and Schürmann, Mirko and Poethke, Ute and Soyka, Chantal and Schaper, Niclas and Rowold, und Jens}},
  issn         = {{0932-4089}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&amp;O}},
  keywords     = {{Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{14--30}},
  publisher    = {{Hogrefe Publishing Group}},
  title        = {{{Die Rolle von arbeitsplatzbezogener Flexibilisierung und die Betrachtung von individuellen Werten           für Mitarbeitendenbindung in der Arbeitswelt 4.0}}},
  doi          = {{10.1026/0932-4089/a000364}},
  volume       = {{66}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37276,
  abstract     = {{Spätestens mit der Einführung des Bundeskinderschutzgesetzes haben standardisierte Risikoeinschätzungsinstrumente auch in Deutschland eine Ausweitung erfahren. Der Beitrag gibt einen kurzen Einblick in die disparate Landschaft der in Deutschland verwendeten Einschätzungsinstrumente. Auch wenn risikostatische Entscheidungsinstrumente (noch) nicht vorliegen, hat der vermehrte Einsatz standardisierter Einschätzungs- und Dokumentationsinstrumente im Kinderschutz das Potenzial, die lokale Fallpraxis nachhaltig zu beeinflussen. Mit der Einführung standardisierter Einschätzungsinstrumente ist die Hoffnung verbunden, sozialarbeiterische Einschätzungen über Risiken durch verbindliche Verfahren zu verbessern. Dabei gerät leicht aus dem Blick, dass die Anwendung von standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren im Organisationshandeln sehr unterschiedliche Funktionen haben kann und lokale Fallpraxis in spezifischer Weise anleitet und strukturiert. Standardisierte Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren koppeln lokale Praxis stärker an organisatorische Vorgaben, beeinflussen durch ihre Konstruktionsweise die Sicht auf den Fall und reduzieren meist komplexe Fallverläufe in vermeintlich deskriptiv eindeutige Kategorien. Damit ist nicht zuletzt die Gefahr verbunden, dass sich die institutionelle Aufmerksamkeit von ko-produktiven Elementen der Leistungserbringung hin zu einem präventiven Managen von potenziellen Gefährdungsrisiken verschiebt.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  journal      = {{Sozial Extra}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature}},
  title        = {{{Risikoeinschätzungsinstrumente im Kinderschutz. Zwischen Standardisierung und situierter Anwendung}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12054-020-00349-5}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{37274,
  abstract     = {{How are activation programs for the young unemployed implemented? How do street-level bureaucrats deal with competing rationalities and demands for action? Transition policies increasingly aim at promoting self-regulation and constructing employable subjects. Stephan Dahmen explores the practical regulation of biographical transitions in activation programs for the young unemployed by focusing on the interactive accomplishment of activation work. The study reveals how the critical tensions of activation policies are continually re-interpreted and adapted to local contingencies and describes the various organisational technologies used for creating employable subjects.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  keywords     = {{Youth, Welfare State, Transitions, Human Service Organizations, Institutional Ethnography, Activation, Sociology of Conventions, Work, Education, Educational Research, Sociology of Education, Social Pedagogy, History of Education, Bielefeld University Press}},
  pages        = {{312}},
  publisher    = {{Bielefeld University Press}},
  title        = {{{Regulating Transitions from School to Work. An Institutional Ethnography of Activation Work in Action}}},
  doi          = {{10.14361/9783839457061}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{37273,
  abstract     = {{How are activation programs for the young unemployed implemented? How do street-level bureaucrats deal with competing rationalities and demands for action? Transition policies increasingly aim at promoting self-regulation and constructing employable subjects. Stephan Dahmen explores the practical regulation of biographical transitions in activation programs for the young unemployed by focusing on the interactive accomplishment of activation work. The study reveals how the critical tensions of activation policies are continually re-interpreted and adapted to local contingencies and describes the various organisational technologies used for creating employable subjects.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  keywords     = {{Youth, Welfare State, Transitions, Human Service Organizations, Institutional Ethnography, Activation, Sociology of Conventions, Work, Education, Educational Research, Sociology of Education, Social Pedagogy, History of Education, Bielefeld University Press}},
  pages        = {{312}},
  publisher    = {{Bielefeld University Press}},
  title        = {{{Regulating Transitions from School to Work. An Institutional Ethnography of Activation Work in Action}}},
  doi          = {{10.14361/9783839457061}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37277,
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}},
  number       = {{H.3}},
  pages        = {{243–247}},
  title        = {{{Technologien in Kindheit und Familie. Einführung in den Schwerpunkt.}}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37285,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In the last decade, the German transition system has witnessed the large‐scale introduction of so‐called “analysis of potentials” (&lt;em&gt;Potenzialanalysen&lt;/em&gt;) in secondary compulsory schooling. In most German Länder, 8th graders must participate in a two‐day assessment center which combines psychometric testing with observations of their social and professional competencies in pre‐specified tasks. The programmatic aim of these assessments is to “introduce pupils early to choosing a job” (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung [BMBF], 2017, p. 2) as well as to enhance the propensity of pupils to “take responsibility for their own future” (BMBF, 2017, p. 9). In the context of the German school‐to‐work system, the introduction of these new forms of diagnostics bear witness to a new preventive political rationality that aims at reducing the entry age into upper secondary education, reduce the recourse to so‐called “transition measures” and optimizing transitions into an apprenticeship market that is characterized by structural inequalities and “mismatch” between pupils’ job aspirations and the offers in apprenticeship places. However, little is known on the role of competency testing devices for the construction of further trajectories and aspirations and their role in the reproduction of inequalities in transitions from school to work. Based on an in‐depth analysis of policy documents and competency profiles (the documents handed out to the pupils after undergoing testing), the article reconstructs the political rationale for the introduction of the so‐called &lt;em&gt;Potenzialanalysen&lt;/em&gt;. Based on a Foucauldian framework, we show how pupils are constructed as “competent” subjects. We show that competency assessments are part and parcel of a political rationality that aims at the promotion of a specific (future‐oriented, optimized, self‐regulated) relation to one’s own biographical future on the side of the pupils. Our results demonstrate that competency profiles construct the process of choosing a job as an individualized project of the self and that they invisibilize structural barriers and power relations. In doing so, competency assessments potentially contribute to the reproduction of inequalities in post‐secondary education through delegating “cooling out” processes from institutional gatekeepers to the interiority of persons.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  issn         = {{2183-2803}},
  journal      = {{Social Inclusion}},
  keywords     = {{Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{347--360}},
  publisher    = {{Cogitatio}},
  title        = {{{Constructing the “Competent” Pupil: Optimizing Human Futures Through Testing?}}},
  doi          = {{10.17645/si.v9i3.4354}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{37435,
  author       = {{Georgi, Christopher}},
  booktitle    = {{Angstkonstruktionen}},
  pages        = {{219–264}},
  publisher    = {{De Gruyter}},
  title        = {{{Angstkonstruktionen zwischen „sinnvoller Vorsicht und sinnloser Panik“}}},
  doi          = {{10.1515/9783110729603-009}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37445,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>A prerequisite for child reading support at school is adequate assessment. Embedding (repeated) assessment into daily teaching routine is often challenging for teachers in terms of time and organization. The use of digital tools can help teachers in the assessment process (in preparation, evaluation, documentation, etc.). A digital assessment tool (Graz Reading Comprehension test: GraLeV), focusing on assessing reading comprehension skills in Grades 3 and 4 is currently being developed in Austria. This reading assessment covers reading comprehension at the word, sentence, and text level. Text level is assessed via two subtests (Subtest I: presentation of nonsense-stories and corresponding questions, and Subtest II: maze selection). The other levels consist of one subtest each. This paper focusses on the subtests at text level. More specifically, the paper reports the results of two studies. Study 1 describes the development phases and the first piloting of these two subtests (data collection: 10/2019-12/2019). Testing 273 students with preliminary versions of the subtests (Subtest I: 30 items, Subtest II: 60 items) produced information on (a) item difficulty, (b) item discriminatory power, and (c) time limits for future speed testing. Items not meeting the required quality criteria were excluded. The final version of Subtest I consists of 16 questions referring to eight different, short, nonsense-texts. Its testing time (without instructions) is three minutes. The final version of the Subtest II consists of 2 texts each with 15 maze selections (30 items) and testing time is 100 seconds. The internal consistency is found to be good for Subtest I (α=.87) and Subtest II (α=.78 to .80). Study 2 reports on testing for validity and retest-reliability (data collection: 09/2020-11/2020). Student scores in another reading comprehension test, together with teacher assessments of reading comprehension, were used to assess congruent validity. Divergent validity was assessed using teacher assessments of mathematical and socio-emotional skills. As expected, the correlations with the congruent measures were higher than those with the divergent measures. A subsample was tested twice with the GraLeV. Retest-reliability was acceptable for Subtest II. However, the scores obtained at time 2 were higher compared to those at time 1 in both subtests. This is probably the result of increased student familiarity with the digital device and the digital test environment at time 2. The results are discussed in the light of teachers’ needs for standardized digital assessments in order to facilitate the tailoring of student reading support.  </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne and Paleczek, Lisa}},
  issn         = {{1479-4403}},
  journal      = {{Electronic Journal of e-Learning}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Education}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{pp336--348}},
  publisher    = {{Academic Conferences International Ltd}},
  title        = {{{Digitally Assessing Text Comprehension in Grades 3-4: Test Development and Validation}}},
  doi          = {{10.34190/ejel.19.5.2467}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37443,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The range of teaching materials now available is becoming increasingly diverse. Despite this, however, the use and influence of textbooks in teaching still remains very high. When instructing reading comprehension, teachers often use textbooks as the basis for teaching in language lessons. Establishing a good match between textbooks and the skills to be acquired is therefore essential. In this paper, I investigate whether textbooks used in Austrian schools can adequately support the teaching of reading comprehension skills. Since reading comprehension is the basis for acquiring knowledge in all subjects, science textbooks are examined in addition to (German) language lesson textbooks. Thus, the content pages of four language textbooks and four science textbooks for fourth and sixth grade were analysed in terms of five different categories, i.e. general structural setup, learning goals, text types, text structures, and activities. The results reveal clear variations with respect to learning goals in language textbooks. For example, the extent to which reading comprehension is addressed ranges from 13.64 to 69.70%, depending on the book used. Although not addressed as a learning goal in the science textbooks, reading comprehension is often presupposed, especially in sixth grade. While the instruction of reading comprehension ought to entail coverage of reading strategies, this is often neglected, or only dealt with indirectly. Given the diversity of textbooks analysed, it seems all the more important to stress that teachers should: 1) clarify the goals and teaching strategies of a book before using it, 2) become aware of strategies that support the development of students' reading comprehension, and 3) use textbooks as a complementary (and not sole) tool to support reading comprehension in all subjects.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Seifert, Susanne}},
  issn         = {{2211-1662}},
  journal      = {{Technology, Knowledge and Learning}},
  keywords     = {{Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Education, Mathematics (miscellaneous)}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{383--405}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Is Reading Comprehension Taken for Granted? An Analysis of Austrian Textbooks in Fourth and Sixth Grade}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10758-021-09490-w}},
  volume       = {{26}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37439,
  author       = {{Krammer, Mathias and Seifert, Susanne and Gasteiger-Klicpera, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0305-5698}},
  journal      = {{Educational Studies}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  pages        = {{1--19}},
  publisher    = {{Informa UK Limited}},
  title        = {{{The presence of students identified as having special needs as a moderating effect on their classmates’ reading comprehension scores in relation to other major class composition effects}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/03055698.2021.1875320}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37442,
  author       = {{Paleczek, Lisa and Seifert, Susanne and Schöfl, Martin}},
  issn         = {{0007-1013}},
  journal      = {{British Journal of Educational Technology}},
  keywords     = {{Education}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{2145--2161}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley}},
  title        = {{{Comparing digital to print assessment of receptive vocabulary with GraWo‐KiGa in Austrian kindergarten}}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/bjet.13163}},
  volume       = {{52}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37455,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>School classrooms within the EU are multilingual learning environments. The diversity of pupils in classrooms raises significant challenges for teachers, but to date, there are no data from large-scale surveys that compare views within and across European countries. A bespoke questionnaire was designed to examine views of current classroom learning environments with respect to the multilingualism. The questionnaire was piloted and subsequently completed by 2792 teachers across different European countries. Eleven countries provided sufficient data for analyses. Results from structural equation modelling showed that teachers’ attitudes could be reliably measured across Europe with the use of carefully devised questionnaire, whose loading and factor structure remained invariant across countries. Teachers’ views about multilingualism were most challenged by the numbers of children in their classes, not the percentage of multilingual pupils in the class. Countries differed in how they perceived multilingualism, with their differences leading to distinctive country clusters. Gender and education level (elementary vs. secondary) differences were also observed irrespective of country. These findings enhance our understanding of the role that the characteristics of teachers and their classrooms play in a multilingual setting across diverse European settings. The practical relevance of the results and new opportunities for teacher training are discussed.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Dockrell, J. E. and Papadopoulos, T. C. and Mifsud, C. L. and Bourke, L. and Vilageliu, O. and Bešić, E. and Seifert, Susanne and Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. and Ralli, A. and Dimakos, I. and Karpava, S. and Martins, M. and Sousa, O. and Castro, S. and Søndergaard Knudsen, H. B. and Donau, P. and Haznedar, B. and Mikulajová, M. and Gerdzhikova, N.}},
  issn         = {{0256-2928}},
  journal      = {{European Journal of Psychology of Education}},
  keywords     = {{Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{293--320}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Teaching and learning in a multilingual Europe: findings from a cross-European study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10212-020-00523-z}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{37504,
  author       = {{Weber, Jutta}},
  booktitle    = {{Routledge Social Science Handbook of Artificial Intelligence}},
  editor       = {{Elliott, Anthony}},
  pages        = {{58--73 preprint}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Technoscience}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{37545,
  author       = {{Vochatzer, Stefanie and Schröder,  Sarah and Fischer, Christian}},
  keywords     = {{Lehren Digitale Medien Bildungsforschung Weiterbildung Lehrkraft Social Media Förderung}},
  title        = {{{Fortbildung to go: Twitter als Ratgeber für Lehrkräfte}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37549,
  author       = {{Vochatzer, Stefanie}},
  journal      = {{POSITIONEN}},
  pages        = {{65--71}},
  title        = {{{Caroline Rudolphis „Gemälde weiblicher Erziehung“. Einblicke in die Mädchenerziehung der Spätaufklärung}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{35713,
  author       = {{Kirsch, Alexander and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank and Hoya, Fabian Karl}},
  booktitle    = {{Theorie und Praxis in der Lehrerbildung. Verhältnisbestimmungen aus der Perspektive von Fachdidaktiken }},
  editor       = {{Caruso, Carina and Harteis, Christian  and Gröschner, Alexander}},
  pages        = {{349–372}},
  publisher    = {{Springer }},
  title        = {{{Kooperativ Forschen(d) lernen im inklusiven Sachunterricht der Primarstufe – Ein Theorie-Praxis verzahnter Ansatz zur Vorbereitung von Sachunterrichtsstudierenden auf das Praxissemester}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-32568-8_20}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36159,
  author       = {{Hoya, Fabian Karl and Schulze, Jan Roland and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{Gothenburg, Sweden}},
  title        = {{{Effects of teacher feedback on children’s self-concepts and motivation in science lessons. 19th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference 2021. “Education and Citizenship: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36131,
  author       = {{Hoya, Fabian Karl and Schulze, Jan Roland and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank}},
  title        = {{{The role of teacher feedback for children’s self-concepts and motivation in primary school science lessons. Single Paper. ECER 2021 (European Conference on Educational Research). “Education and Society: expectations, prescriptions, reconciliations”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}