@inbook{53445, author = {{Hälterlein, Jens}}, booktitle = {{The Realities of Autonomous Weapons}}, editor = {{Bächle, Thomas Christian and Bareis, Jascha}}, pages = {{187--204}}, publisher = {{Bristol University Press}}, title = {{{Governing Autonomies: Imagining Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the “Future Combat Air System” European Armament Project}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @book{59862, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena Maria}}, publisher = {{Herder Verlag}}, title = {{{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59756, abstract = {{A current concern in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is to ensure the trustworthiness of AI systems. The development of explainability methods is one prominent way to address this, which has often resulted in the assumption that the use of explainability will lead to an increase in the trust of users and wider society. However, the dynamics between explainability and trust are not well established and empirical investigations of their relation remain mixed or inconclusive. In this paper we provide a detailed description of the concepts of user trust and distrust in AI and their relation to appropriate reliance. For that we draw from the fields of machine learning, human–computer interaction, and the social sciences. Based on these insights, we have created a focused study of empirical literature of existing empirical studies that investigate the effects of AI systems and XAI methods on user (dis)trust, in order to substantiate our conceptualization of trust, distrust, and reliance. With respect to our conceptual understanding we identify gaps in existing empirical work. With clarifying the concepts and summarizing the empirical studies, we aim to provide researchers, who examine user trust in AI, with an improved starting point for developing user studies to measure and evaluate the user’s attitude towards and reliance on AI systems.}}, author = {{Visser, Roel and Peters, Tobias Martin and Scharlau, Ingrid and Hammer, Barbara}}, issn = {{1389-0417}}, journal = {{Cognitive Systems Research}}, keywords = {{XAI, Appropriate trust, Distrust, Reliance, Human-centric evaluation, Trustworthy AI}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Trust, distrust, and appropriate reliance in (X)AI: A conceptual clarification of user trust and survey of its empirical evaluation}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101357}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59864, author = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena Maria}}, booktitle = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}}, pages = {{7--31}}, publisher = {{Herder Verlag}}, title = {{{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @misc{59922, author = {{Porwol, Philip and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, publisher = {{OSF}}, title = {{{An annotated corpus of elicited metaphors of explaining and understanding using MIPVU}}}, doi = {{10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6SMX}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{51748, author = {{Schulz, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Populäre Artikulationen – Artikulationen des Populären}}, editor = {{Koch, Günter and Rottgeri , André }}, issn = {{2364-9224}}, pages = {{215--244}}, publisher = {{Schüren}}, title = {{{In Likes We Trust oder die unmögliche Möglichkeit vom Like als Gabe zu sprechen}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.15475/skms.2025.1.11}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59982, author = {{Schroeder, René and Reh, Anne and Miller, Susanne and Blumberg, Eva and Kottmann, Brigitte and Franzen, Katja and Thevißen, Max}}, booktitle = {{Förderbezogene Diagnostik in der inklusiven Bildung. Band I: Kompetenzbereiche - Fachdidaktik}}, editor = {{Beck, Katja and Ferdigg, Rosa Anna and Katzenbach, Dieter and Kett-Hauser, Julia and Laux, Sophia and Urban, Michael}}, pages = {{209--229}}, publisher = {{Waxmann}}, title = {{{Didaktisch-diagnostische Potentiale des inklusionsorientierten Sachunterrichts (DiPoSa) – Einblicke in ein designbasiertes Entwicklungsprojekt}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{51747, author = {{de Gruisbourne, Birte and Schulz, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Audiovisual Healing and Reparation: Recuperative Affect of Mediation}}, editor = {{Çiçek, Özgür and Savaş, Özlem}}, pages = {{111--124}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{A Healing Media System of Care - Cancer Diaries and Social Media}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032647425}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{59997, author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}}, booktitle = {{G. E. Lessings Hamburgische Dramaturgie. Zwischen ästhetischer Theorie und dramatischer Praxis}}, editor = {{Robert, Jörg and Steigerwald, Jörn}}, isbn = {{9783770569441}}, pages = {{185--205}}, publisher = {{Brill | Fink}}, title = {{{Der spanische Essex}}}, doi = {{10.30965/9783846769447_010}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59998, author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}}, issn = {{2772-7610}}, journal = {{Artes}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{1--23}}, publisher = {{Brill/Fink}}, title = {{{Gunst der Stunde}}}, doi = {{10.30965/27727629-20250001}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60003, author = {{Langer, Svenja}}, booktitle = {{Transdisziplinäre Räume in den Kulturwissenschaften}}, editor = {{Kornbach, Alina and Lammer, Christina and Magdeburg, Lena}}, pages = {{367 -- 401}}, publisher = {{Verlag Herder GmbH (wbg Academic)}}, title = {{{Die Spur in transdisziplinären Kontexten an den Schnittstellen zwischen Alltags-, Wissens- und Bildräumen}}}, volume = {{3}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60010, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Manfred Knoche: Critique of the Political Economy of the Media: Foundations and Applications}}, isbn = {{9781915445506}}, publisher = {{University of Westminster Press}}, title = {{{Postface; On the Critique of the Political Economy of Digital Capitalism: The Importance of Manfred Knoche’s Contributions to the Critique of the Political Economy of the Media Today}}}, doi = {{10.16997/book79}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60034, abstract = {{A preference for music theatre works is characteristic of Hans Werner Henze's oeuvre, as is his close collaboration with famous 20th-century authors, who wrote the libretti for his music theatre works. This paper explores the artistic collaborations of Hans Werner Henze and Ingeborg Bachmann on the one hand and Henze, Chester Kallman and W.H. Auden on the other in the context of their joint operatic work, surviving correspondence and poetological essays. This is set against the backdrop of how personal relationships can influence collaboration in the performing arts. In both cases, the letters and biographical writings of the aforementioned working groups, read from a gender perspective and with regard to creativity, forms of relationship and artistic collaboration, point to a tension between potential and desired personal relationships, the confrontation with marriage as a conventional social framework and artistic collaboration as a long-term connection.}}, author = {{Tumat, Antje}}, booktitle = {{(Wahl-)Verwandtschaften.Gemeinschaftliches kulturelles Handeln}}, editor = {{Bagge, Maren and Fornoff-Petrowski, CHristine and Ricke, Anna and Rode-Breymann, Susanne}}, pages = {{209--224}}, publisher = {{Böhlau}}, title = {{{Künstlerische Zusammenarbeit zwischen Ehekonvention und Sublimation. Hans Werner Henzes Bühnenschaffen mit Ingeborg Bachmann, W.H. Auden und Chester Kallman}}}, volume = {{21}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59755, abstract = {{Due to the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in high-risk domains like law or medicine, trustworthy AI and trust in AI are of increasing scientific and public relevance. A typical conception, for example in the context of medical diagnosis, is that a knowledgeable user receives AIgenerated classification as advice. Research to improve such interactions often aims to foster the user’s trust, which in turn should improve the combined human-AI performance. Given that AI models can err, we argue that the possibility to critically review, thus to distrust, an AI decision is an equally interesting target of research. We created two image classification scenarios in which the participants received mock-up AI advice. The quality of the advice decreases for a phase of the experiment. We studied the task performance, trust and distrust of the participants, and tested whether an instruction to remain skeptical and review each piece of advice led to a better performance compared to a neutral condition. Our results indicate that this instruction does not improve but rather worsens the participants’ performance. Repeated single-item self-report of trust and distrust shows an increase in trust and a decrease in distrust after the drop in the AI’s classification quality, with no difference between the two instructions. Furthermore, via a Bayesian Signal Detection Theory analysis, we provide a procedure to assess appropriate reliance in detail, by quantifying whether the problems of under- and over-reliance have been mitigated. We discuss implications of our results for the usage of disclaimers before interacting with AI, as prominently used in current LLM-based chatbots, and for trust and distrust research.}}, author = {{Peters, Tobias Martin and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, journal = {{Frontiers in Psychology}}, keywords = {{trust in AI, trust, distrust, human-AI interaction, Signal Detection Theory, Bayesian parameter estimation, image classification}}, title = {{{Interacting with fallible AI: Is distrust helpful when receiving AI misclassifications?}}}, doi = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574809}}, volume = {{16}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60084, author = {{Garske, Volker}}, booktitle = {{Wissenschaft aus Leidenschaft. Persönliche, biografische, wissenschaftliche Aspekte. FS Cyprian Rogowski zum 70. Geburtstag}}, editor = {{Spiegel , Egon and Stroß, Annette M. and Lehner-Hartmann, Andrea and Marianski, Janusz}}, pages = {{399--410}}, publisher = {{LIT}}, title = {{{Schattenprinzip und Klimawandel - Entwicklungschancen für Lehrende und Lernende im Kontext des ökologischen Lernens }}}, year = {{2025}}, } @misc{59050, author = {{Garske, Volker}}, publisher = {{Klett}}, title = {{{„… und voll wurde die Erde von ḥāmās“ (Gen 6,11) – Biblische Schöpfungserzählungen im Kontext von Krieg und Gewalt}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inproceedings{60098, author = {{Niesing, Eric and Knickenberg, Margarita and Gorges, Julia and Zurbriggen, Carmen}}, location = {{Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena}}, title = {{{Wie schützt man das akademische Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept im inklusiven Unterricht? Die Rolle des BFLPE, der Individualisierung im Unterricht und des individuellen Vergleichstargets}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{60099, abstract = {{Nachhaltigkeit ist ein Konzept mit einem weiten Bedeutungsspektrum. Dessen Begriffsinhalt wird u. a. von den Autor:innen in den Diskussionen der weltweit vielgenutzten Wikipedia intensiv und mitunter kontrovers ausgehandelt. Für begriffliche Abgrenzungen fechten die Autor:innen die ihres Erachtens inadäquaten Sachverhaltsdarstellungen etc. an, indem sie entsprechende konzeptuelle Aspekte unterschiedlich explizit und sprachbewusst durch die Handlung des Negierens als nicht gültig zurückweisen. Um den Begriff der Nachhaltigkeit zu konturieren, vollziehen die Autor:innen in Wikipedia-Diskussionen folglich die sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik des WIDERSPRECHENS. Auf der Basis eines Korpus aus den Diskussionen zu den Artikeln ‚Nachhaltigkeit‘, ‚Nachhaltige Entwicklung‘, ‚Umweltschutz‘ etc. der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia ermittelt dieser Beitrag Tendenzen, welchen Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten zumeist widersprochen wird, die insofern als besonders umkämpft erachtet werden können.}}, author = {{Dübbert, Alexander}}, journal = {{Research on Language}}, keywords = {{Widersprechen, Praktik, Negation, Nachhaltigkeit}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{56--72}}, title = {{{WIDERSPRECHEN in der Wikipedia zur Aushandlung des Begriffs der Nachhaltigkeit: Eine sprachreflexive, kommunikative Praktik}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.26204/KLUEDO/9044}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{60113, author = {{Endberg, Manuela and Bellenberg, Gabriele and Schulze-Uludasdemir, Johanna and Eickelmann, Birgit}}, booktitle = {{Bildungsforschung und Bildungspraxis in der Metropole Ruhr. Schule und Lehrkräftebildung gemeinsam im regionalen Kontext entwickeln }}, editor = {{van Ackeren-Mindl, Isabell and Göbel, Kerstin and Rohpohl, Mathias}}, isbn = {{978-3-8309-4998-5}}, pages = {{291--299}}, publisher = {{Waxmann}}, title = {{{Lehrkräftebildung in NRW: bildungsgerecht, digital, ko-konstruktiv. Ein standortübergreifendes bildungswissenschaftliches Seminarkonzept auf der Basis eines MOOCs }}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{56142, author = {{Schulze-Uludasdemir, Johanna and Niemann, Jan}}, booktitle = {{Data - Culture - Society. Komplexe Transformationen verstehen und gestalten}}, editor = {{Uppenkamp, V. and Vösgen-Nordloh, M.}}, isbn = {{978-3-534-64166-6}}, pages = {{127--154}}, publisher = {{Verlag wbg}}, title = {{{„Wir [haben] uns da auf eine Form eingegroovt…“ – Gestaltung einer Community of Practice zur Begegnung digitaler Transformationsprozesse in der Lehrkräftebildung. In Interdisziplinäre Studien des Paderborner Graduiertenzentrums für Kulturwissenschaften (Band 2)}}}, year = {{2025}}, }