@article{42982,
  author       = {{Allmer, Thomas}},
  journal      = {{Critical Sociology }},
  number       = {{4-5}},
  pages        = {{599--615}},
  title        = {{{Academic Labour, Digital Media and Capitalism}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517735669.}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{42940,
  author       = {{Allmer, Thomas}},
  publisher    = {{Filosofia}},
  title        = {{{Kritická teorie a sociální média: Mezi emancipací a komodifikací. Translated}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{42937,
  author       = {{Matzner, Tobias and Beck, Susanne and Grundwald, Armin and Jacob, Kai}},
  booktitle    = {{der Plattform Lernende Systeme}},
  title        = {{{Whitepaper Künstliche Intelligenz und Diskriminierung – Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{42930,
  author       = {{Matzner, Tobias}},
  journal      = {{Gehirn & Geist Nr. 1 (2019)}},
  title        = {{{Sinnvoll versus gesund? – Bestimmungen der Mediennutzung}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{42906,
  author       = {{Matzner, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence – Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms}},
  editor       = {{Sudmann, Andreas}},
  publisher    = {{transcript}},
  title        = {{{Plural, situated subjects in the critique of artificial intelligence}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{28148,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p> The potential for biases being built into algorithms has been known for some time (e.g., Friedman and Nissenbaum, 1996), yet literature has only recently demonstrated the ways algorithmic profiling can result in social sorting and harm marginalised groups (e.g., Browne, 2015; Eubanks, 2018; Noble, 2018). We contend that with increased algorithmic complexity, biases will become more sophisticated and difficult to identify, control for, or contest. Our argument has four steps: first, we show how harnessing algorithms means that data gathered at a particular place and time relating to specific persons, can be used to build group models applied in different contexts to different persons. Thus, privacy and data protection rights, with their focus on individuals (Coll, 2014; Parsons, 2015), do not protect from the discriminatory potential of algorithmic profiling. Second, we explore the idea that anti-discrimination regulation may be more promising, but acknowledge limitations. Third, we argue that in order to harness anti-discrimination regulation, it needs to confront emergent forms of discrimination or risk creating new invisibilities, including invisibility from existing safeguards. Finally, we outline suggestions to address emergent forms of discrimination and exclusionary invisibilities via intersectional and post-colonial analysis. </jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Mann, Monique and Matzner, Tobias}},
  issn         = {{2053-9517}},
  journal      = {{Big Data & Society}},
  number       = {{2}},
  title        = {{{Challenging algorithmic profiling: The limits of data protection and anti-discrimination in responding to emergent discrimination}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719895805}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{28169,
  author       = {{Matzner, Tobias}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft}},
  pages        = {{46--55}},
  title        = {{{Autonome Trolleys und andere Probleme. Konfigurationen Künstlicher Intelligenz in ethischen Debatten über selbstfahrende Kraftfahrzeuge}}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{28166,
  author       = {{Behrendt, Hauke and Loh, Wulf and Matzner, Tobias and Misselhorn, Catrin}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-476-04859-2}},
  publisher    = {{J.B. Metzler}},
  title        = {{{Privatsphäre 4.0. Eine Neuverortung des Privaten im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{35166,
  abstract     = {{Was verstehen wir heute, sechs Jahre nach den Snowden-Leaks, unter IT-Sicherheit und Privatheit in digitalen Kulturen? Dieser Frage gehen Benedikt Auerbach aus kryptographischer und Mary Shnayien aus medienwissenschaftlicher Perspektive nach. So beschäftigt sich Benedikt Auerbach mit dem Skalierungsverhalten kryptographischer Verfahren. Es beschreibt, inwiefern sich Angriffe auf einzelne Nutzerinnen und Nutzer des Verfahrens zugroßskaligen Angriffen auf zahlreiche Nutzerinnen und Nutzer übertragen lassen – ein für Massenüberwachung durch Geheimdienste relevantes Angriffsszenario. Mary Shnayien untersucht ausgehend von der weltweiten Cyberattacke WannaCry diskursanalytisch, wie IT-Sicherheit zum Forschungsgegenstand und -feld wurde, und welche Metaphern das Feld strukturieren.}},
  author       = {{Auerbach, Benedikt and Shnayien, Mary and Kiltz, Eike and Tuschling, Anna}},
  issn         = {{1862-2607}},
  journal      = {{Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD}},
  number       = {{11}},
  pages        = {{706–712}},
  title        = {{{Zwei Betrachtungen von Sicherheit und Privatheit nach Snowden}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11623-019-1193-4}},
  volume       = {{43}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{35164,
  author       = {{Raczkowski, Felix and Shnayien, Mary}},
  journal      = {{Tekniikan Waiheita}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{57–67}},
  title        = {{{History and Aesthetics of Progress Indicators [Edistymispalkkien historia ja estetiikka]}}},
  doi          = {{10.33355/tw.86775}},
  volume       = {{37}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{43185,
  abstract     = {{Der Beitrag skizziert in einem historischen Exkurs zentrale Entwicklungslinien der beruflichen Benachteiligtenförderung. Es wird deutlich, dass gesellschaftliche Veränderungen zu einer deutlich kritischeren und pädagogisch reflektierten Sicht auf berufliche Fördermaßnahmen geführt haben.}},
  author       = {{Heisler, Dietmar}},
  journal      = {{Berufsbildung. Zeitschrift für Theorie-Praxis-Dialog}},
  keywords     = {{Benachteiligtenförderung, Transformation}},
  title        = {{{Transformation und Wandel der Beruflichen Integrationsförderung. Vom „Erfolgsmodell“ zum „Problemfall“.}}},
  volume       = {{175}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{42367,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data}},
  editor       = {{Chandler, David and Fuchs, Christian}},
  publisher    = {{University of Westminster Press}},
  title        = {{{Beyond Big Data Capitalism, Towards Dialectical Digital Modernity: Reflections on David Chandler’s Chapter}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.c}},
  volume       = {{43-51}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{41799,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian and Chandler, David}},
  booktitle    = {{Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data}},
  editor       = {{Chandler, David and Fuchs, Christian}},
  isbn         = {{978-1-912656-20-2}},
  pages        = {{1--20}},
  publisher    = {{University of Westminster Press}},
  title        = {{{Introduction: Big Data Capitalism – Politics, Activism, and Theory}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.a}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{42368,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data}},
  editor       = {{Chandler, David and Fuchs, Christian}},
  publisher    = {{University of Westminster Press}},
  title        = {{{Karl Marx in the Age of Big Data Capitalism}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.d}},
  volume       = {{53-71}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@techreport{42495,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian and Michalis, Maria}},
  title        = {{{Evidence submitted to the House of Commons-Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee’s Inquiry on Rural Broadband and Digital Only Services, published on 26 June 2019}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@techreport{42494,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian and Michalis, Maria}},
  title        = {{{Evidence submitted to the House of Commons-Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee’s Inquiry on Rural Broadband and Digital Only Services, published on 26 June 2019}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{42492,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{The Conversation}},
  title        = {{{Slow Media: How to Renew Debate in the Age of Digital Authoritarianism}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@misc{42491,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  booktitle    = {{Los Angeles Review of Books}},
  title        = {{{Henry A. Giroux and the Culture of Neoliberal Fascism}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{42493,
  author       = {{Fuchs, Christian}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{70--74}},
  title        = {{{Herbert Marcuse: Einige gesellschaftliche Folgen moderner Technologie}}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{42988,
  author       = {{Allmer, Thomas}},
  journal      = {{Studies in Communication Sciences }},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{189--203}},
  title        = {{{Sono una madre single. Non sento di poter essere competitiva quanto altri: esperienze di personale precario nelle università del Regno Unito. Translated by Gloria Dagnin}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2019.02.004}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

