@article{17194, author = {{Rohlfing, Katharina and Nomikou, Iris}}, issn = {{1879-7865}}, journal = {{Language, Interaction and Acquisition}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{117--136}}, publisher = {{John Benjamins Publishing Company}}, title = {{{Intermodal synchrony as a form of maternal responsiveness: Association with language development.}}}, doi = {{10.1075/lia.5.1.06roh}}, volume = {{5}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{17199, abstract = {{Research of tutoring in parent-infant interaction has shown that tutors - when presenting some action - modify both their verbal and manual performance for the learner (‘motherese’, ‘motionese’). Investigating the sources and effects of the tutors’ action modifications, we suggest an interactional account of ‘motionese’. Using video-data from a semi-experimental study in which parents taught their 8 to 11 month old infants how to nest a set of differently sized cups, we found that the tutors’ action modifications (in particular: high arches) functioned as an orienting device to guide the infant’s visual attention (gaze). Action modification and the recipient’s gaze can be seen to have a reciprocal sequential relationship and to constitute a constant loop of mutual adjustments. Implications are discussed for developmental research and for robotic ‘Social Learning’. We argue that a robot system could use on-line feedback strategies (e.g. gaze) to pro-actively shape a tutor’s action presentation as it emerges.}}, author = {{Pitsch, Karola and Vollmer, Anna-Lisa and Rohlfing, Katharina and Fritsch, Jannik and Wrede, Britta}}, issn = {{1572-0381}}, journal = {{Interaction Studies}}, keywords = {{conversation analysis, interactional coordination, adult-child-interaction, feedback, gaze, quantification, social learning, motionese, tutoring}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{55--98}}, publisher = {{John Benjamins Publishing Company}}, title = {{{Tutoring in adult-child-interaction: On the loop of the tutor's action modification and the recipient's gaze}}}, doi = {{10.1075/is.15.1.03pit}}, volume = {{15}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{17200, abstract = {{This research investigated infants’ online perception of give-me gestures during observation of a social interaction. In the first experiment, goal-directed eye movements of 12-month-olds were recorded as they observed a give-and-take interaction in which an object is passed from one individual to another. Infants’ gaze shifts from the passing hand to the receiving hand were significantly faster when the receiving hand formed a give-me gesture relative to when it was presented as an inverted hand shape. Experiment 2 revealed that infants’ goal-directed gaze shifts were not based on different affordances of the two receiving hands. Two additional control experiments further demonstrated that differences in infants’ online gaze behavior were not mediated by an attentional preference for the give-me gesture. Together, our findings provide evidence that properties of social action goals influence infants’ online gaze during action observation. The current studies demonstrate that infants have expectations about well-formed object transfer actions between social agents. We suggest that 12-month-olds are sensitive to social goals within the context of give-and-take interactions while observing from a third-party perspective.}}, author = {{Elsner, Claudia and Bakker, Marta and Rohlfing, Katharina and Gredebäck, Gustaf}}, issn = {{0022-0965}}, journal = {{Journal of Experimental Child Psychology}}, keywords = {{Give-me gesture, Infant, Anticipation, Eye movement, Gesture, Social interaction}}, pages = {{280--294}}, publisher = {{Elsevier BV}}, title = {{{Infants' online perception of give-and-take interactions}}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jecp.2014.05.007}}, volume = {{126}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{17197, abstract = {{According to natural pedagogy theory, infants are sensitive to particular ostensive cues that communicate to them that they are being addressed and that they can expect to learn referential information. We demonstrate that 6-month-old infants follow others' gaze direction in situations that are highly attention-grabbing. This occurs irrespective of whether these situations include communicative intent and ostensive cues (a model looks directly into the child's eyes prior to shifting gaze to an object) or not (a model shivers while looking down prior to shifting gaze to an object). In contrast, in less attention-grabbing contexts in which the model simply looks down prior to shifting gaze to an object, no effect is found. These findings demonstrate that one of the central pillars of natural pedagogy is false. Sensitivity to gaze following in infancy is not restricted to contexts in which ostensive cues are conveyed.}}, author = {{Szufnarowska, Joanna and Rohlfing, Katharina and Christine, Fawcett and Gustaf, Gredebäck}}, issn = {{2045-2322}}, journal = {{Scientific Reports}}, keywords = {{Human behavior, Attention}}, number = {{1}}, publisher = {{Nature Publishing Group}}, title = {{{Is ostension any more than attention?}}}, doi = {{10.1038/srep05304}}, volume = {{4}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{17196, author = {{Krause, Franziska and Richter, Kerstin and Rohlfing, Katharina}}, issn = {{0944-405X}}, journal = {{Logos}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{4--15}}, publisher = {{ProLog, Therapie- und Lernmittel OHG}}, title = {{{Ich oder Du? Die Therapie der pronominalen Umkehr bei Autismus-Spektrum-Störung - Eine vergleichende Einzelfallstudie nach der Angewandten Verhaltensanalyse mit Verbal Behavior und der Model/Rival-Methode}}}, volume = {{22}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{17202, author = {{Vollmer, Anna-Lisa and Grizou, Jonathan and Lopes, Manuel and Rohlfing, Katharina and Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves}}, booktitle = {{2014 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics}}, isbn = {{978-1-4799-7540-2}}, keywords = {{interaction, communication, co-construction, interaction protocols}}, pages = {{208 -- 215}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{Studying the Co-Construction of Interaction Protocols in Collaborative Tasks with Humans}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{17201, author = {{Gaspers, Judith and Panzner, Maximilian and Lemme, Andre and Cimiano, Philipp and Rohlfing, Katharina and Wrede, Sebastian}}, booktitle = {{EACL Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning}}, title = {{{A multimodal corpus for the evaluation of computational models for (grounded) language acquisition}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{17195, author = {{Nomikou, Iris and Rohlfing, Katharina and Szufnarowska, Joanna}}, title = {{{Developing mutual attention in infancy: Switching gaze roles within multimodal interactions}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{17198, author = {{Nomikou, Iris and Rohlfing, Katharina and Leonardi, Giuseppe and Rączaszek-Leonardi, Joanna}}, title = {{{The Development of Purposeful Intersubjectivity}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inproceedings{41476, author = {{Seifert, Andreas}}, booktitle = {{Quality Audit: „Lernen durch Praxisvergleich und Dialog“}}, location = {{Lüneburg}}, title = {{{Hochschule und Qualität.}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{40137, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, publisher = {{Sage}}, title = {{{Social Media. A Critical Introduction}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{40140, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, publisher = {{Zero Books}}, title = {{{OccupyMedia! The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{40141, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Digital Labour and Karl Marx}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{41446, editor = {{Fuchs, Christian and Mosco, Vincent and Başaran, Funda}}, publisher = {{Nota Bene}}, title = {{{Marx Geri Döndü. Medya, Meta ve Sermaye Birikimi (Turkish translation of 11 contributions in book format)}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{41438, author = {{Fuchs, Christian and Sandoval, Marisol and Prodnik, Jernej A. and Sevignani, Sebastian and Allmer, Thomas}}, journal = {{tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique}}, number = {{2}}, pages = {{464--801}}, title = {{{Special Issue: Philosophers of the World Unite! Theorising Digital Labour and Virtual Work - Definitions, Dimensions and Forms}}}, doi = {{https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.631}}, volume = {{12}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{41440, editor = {{Fuchs, Christian and Trottier, Daniel}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @book{41439, editor = {{Fuchs, Christian and Sandoval, Marisol}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, title = {{{Critique, Social Media and the Information Society}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @article{41580, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, journal = {{International Journal of Communication}}, pages = {{2718--2732}}, title = {{{WikiLeaks and the Critique of the Political Economy}}}, volume = {{8}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inbook{41606, author = {{Fuchs, Christian}}, booktitle = {{Critical Studies in Communication and Society}}, editor = {{Cao, Jin and Mosco, Vincent and Regan Shade, Leslie}}, pages = {{26--79}}, publisher = {{Yiwen}}, title = {{{Dallas Smythe Today – The Audience Commodity, the Digital Labour Debate, Marxist Political Economy and Critical Theory. Prolegomena to a Digital Labour Theory of Value}}}, year = {{2014}}, } @inbook{41655, author = {{Fuchs, Christian and Cao, Jin and Mosco, Vincent and Regan Shade, Leslie}}, booktitle = {{Critical Studies in Communication and Society}}, pages = {{496--519}}, publisher = {{Yiwen}}, title = {{{Web 2.0, Prosumption, and Surveillance}}}, year = {{2014}}, }