@misc{27875,
  author       = {{Eickelmann, Birgit and Barbovschi, Monica and Casamassima, Gianna and Drossel, Kerstin and Gudmundsdottir, Greta Björk and Holmarsdottir, Halla Bjork and Kazani, Aggeliki and Mifsud, Louise and Parsanoglou, Dimitris and Port, Sonja and Sisask, Merike and Symeonaki, Maria and Teidla-Kunitsõn, Gertha}},
  publisher    = {{DigiGen - working paper series}},
  title        = {{{The younger generation’s views on how their education is preparing them for the digital age against the background of COVID-19}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{27874,
  author       = {{Ayllón, Sara and Casamassima, Gianna and Drossel, Kerstin and Eickelmann, Birgit and Hyggen, Christer and Lado, Samuel and Port, Sonja and Broekstra, Nienke}},
  publisher    = {{DigiGen - working paper series}},
  title        = {{{Digital diversity across Europe. Policy brief September 2021 of Working Package 2 'Mapping digital transformations across Europe' in Horizon-2020-Project DigiGen}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36180,
  author       = {{Hellmich, Frank and Hoya, Fabian Karl and Schulze, Jan Roland and Kirsch, Alexander and Blumberg, Eva and Schwab, Susanne}},
  publisher    = {{Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main}},
  title        = {{{Kooperatives Lernen von Lehramtsstudierenden im Zusammenhang mit ihrer Qualifizierung für den inklusiven naturwissenschaftlichen Sachunterricht der Grundschule – Schlussfolgerungen und Implikationen. Vortrag. Abschlussveranstaltung der Förderlinie "Qualifizierung der pädagogischen Fachkräfte für inklusive Bildung" des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{36900,
  abstract     = {{Viele Wege führen in die sozialpädagogische Praxis, doch nach wie vor stellt sich die Frage, wie sozialpädagogisches Handeln gelernt und gelehrt werden kann. Unter Bezugnahme auf kritisch bildungstheoretisch-fundierte Ansätze plädiert der Beitrag für eine Weiterentwicklung einer kritischen Didaktik der beruflichen Fachrichtung Sozialpädagogik.}},
  author       = {{Göddertz, Nina}},
  journal      = {{Sozial Extra}},
  keywords     = {{Fachdidaktik Sozialpädagogik     Kritische Bildungstheorie     Emanzipation und Mündigkeit}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Sozialpädagogische Qualifizierungen weiterdenken}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12054-021-00414-7}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37276,
  abstract     = {{Spätestens mit der Einführung des Bundeskinderschutzgesetzes haben standardisierte Risikoeinschätzungsinstrumente auch in Deutschland eine Ausweitung erfahren. Der Beitrag gibt einen kurzen Einblick in die disparate Landschaft der in Deutschland verwendeten Einschätzungsinstrumente. Auch wenn risikostatische Entscheidungsinstrumente (noch) nicht vorliegen, hat der vermehrte Einsatz standardisierter Einschätzungs- und Dokumentationsinstrumente im Kinderschutz das Potenzial, die lokale Fallpraxis nachhaltig zu beeinflussen. Mit der Einführung standardisierter Einschätzungsinstrumente ist die Hoffnung verbunden, sozialarbeiterische Einschätzungen über Risiken durch verbindliche Verfahren zu verbessern. Dabei gerät leicht aus dem Blick, dass die Anwendung von standardisierten Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren im Organisationshandeln sehr unterschiedliche Funktionen haben kann und lokale Fallpraxis in spezifischer Weise anleitet und strukturiert. Standardisierte Risikoeinschätzungsverfahren koppeln lokale Praxis stärker an organisatorische Vorgaben, beeinflussen durch ihre Konstruktionsweise die Sicht auf den Fall und reduzieren meist komplexe Fallverläufe in vermeintlich deskriptiv eindeutige Kategorien. Damit ist nicht zuletzt die Gefahr verbunden, dass sich die institutionelle Aufmerksamkeit von ko-produktiven Elementen der Leistungserbringung hin zu einem präventiven Managen von potenziellen Gefährdungsrisiken verschiebt.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  journal      = {{Sozial Extra}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature}},
  title        = {{{Risikoeinschätzungsinstrumente im Kinderschutz. Zwischen Standardisierung und situierter Anwendung}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s12054-020-00349-5}},
  volume       = {{45}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{37274,
  abstract     = {{How are activation programs for the young unemployed implemented? How do street-level bureaucrats deal with competing rationalities and demands for action? Transition policies increasingly aim at promoting self-regulation and constructing employable subjects. Stephan Dahmen explores the practical regulation of biographical transitions in activation programs for the young unemployed by focusing on the interactive accomplishment of activation work. The study reveals how the critical tensions of activation policies are continually re-interpreted and adapted to local contingencies and describes the various organisational technologies used for creating employable subjects.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  keywords     = {{Youth, Welfare State, Transitions, Human Service Organizations, Institutional Ethnography, Activation, Sociology of Conventions, Work, Education, Educational Research, Sociology of Education, Social Pedagogy, History of Education, Bielefeld University Press}},
  pages        = {{312}},
  publisher    = {{Bielefeld University Press}},
  title        = {{{Regulating Transitions from School to Work. An Institutional Ethnography of Activation Work in Action}}},
  doi          = {{10.14361/9783839457061}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@book{37273,
  abstract     = {{How are activation programs for the young unemployed implemented? How do street-level bureaucrats deal with competing rationalities and demands for action? Transition policies increasingly aim at promoting self-regulation and constructing employable subjects. Stephan Dahmen explores the practical regulation of biographical transitions in activation programs for the young unemployed by focusing on the interactive accomplishment of activation work. The study reveals how the critical tensions of activation policies are continually re-interpreted and adapted to local contingencies and describes the various organisational technologies used for creating employable subjects.}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  keywords     = {{Youth, Welfare State, Transitions, Human Service Organizations, Institutional Ethnography, Activation, Sociology of Conventions, Work, Education, Educational Research, Sociology of Education, Social Pedagogy, History of Education, Bielefeld University Press}},
  pages        = {{312}},
  publisher    = {{Bielefeld University Press}},
  title        = {{{Regulating Transitions from School to Work. An Institutional Ethnography of Activation Work in Action}}},
  doi          = {{10.14361/9783839457061}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37277,
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  journal      = {{Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}},
  number       = {{H.3}},
  pages        = {{243–247}},
  title        = {{{Technologien in Kindheit und Familie. Einführung in den Schwerpunkt.}}},
  volume       = {{41}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37285,
  abstract     = {{<jats:p>In the last decade, the German transition system has witnessed the large‐scale introduction of so‐called “analysis of potentials” (&lt;em&gt;Potenzialanalysen&lt;/em&gt;) in secondary compulsory schooling. In most German Länder, 8th graders must participate in a two‐day assessment center which combines psychometric testing with observations of their social and professional competencies in pre‐specified tasks. The programmatic aim of these assessments is to “introduce pupils early to choosing a job” (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung [BMBF], 2017, p. 2) as well as to enhance the propensity of pupils to “take responsibility for their own future” (BMBF, 2017, p. 9). In the context of the German school‐to‐work system, the introduction of these new forms of diagnostics bear witness to a new preventive political rationality that aims at reducing the entry age into upper secondary education, reduce the recourse to so‐called “transition measures” and optimizing transitions into an apprenticeship market that is characterized by structural inequalities and “mismatch” between pupils’ job aspirations and the offers in apprenticeship places. However, little is known on the role of competency testing devices for the construction of further trajectories and aspirations and their role in the reproduction of inequalities in transitions from school to work. Based on an in‐depth analysis of policy documents and competency profiles (the documents handed out to the pupils after undergoing testing), the article reconstructs the political rationale for the introduction of the so‐called &lt;em&gt;Potenzialanalysen&lt;/em&gt;. Based on a Foucauldian framework, we show how pupils are constructed as “competent” subjects. We show that competency assessments are part and parcel of a political rationality that aims at the promotion of a specific (future‐oriented, optimized, self‐regulated) relation to one’s own biographical future on the side of the pupils. Our results demonstrate that competency profiles construct the process of choosing a job as an individualized project of the self and that they invisibilize structural barriers and power relations. In doing so, competency assessments potentially contribute to the reproduction of inequalities in post‐secondary education through delegating “cooling out” processes from institutional gatekeepers to the interiority of persons.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Dahmen, Stephan}},
  issn         = {{2183-2803}},
  journal      = {{Social Inclusion}},
  keywords     = {{Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{347--360}},
  publisher    = {{Cogitatio}},
  title        = {{{Constructing the “Competent” Pupil: Optimizing Human Futures Through Testing?}}},
  doi          = {{10.17645/si.v9i3.4354}},
  volume       = {{9}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@misc{37545,
  author       = {{Vochatzer, Stefanie and Schröder,  Sarah and Fischer, Christian}},
  keywords     = {{Lehren Digitale Medien Bildungsforschung Weiterbildung Lehrkraft Social Media Förderung}},
  title        = {{{Fortbildung to go: Twitter als Ratgeber für Lehrkräfte}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@article{37549,
  author       = {{Vochatzer, Stefanie}},
  journal      = {{POSITIONEN}},
  pages        = {{65--71}},
  title        = {{{Caroline Rudolphis „Gemälde weiblicher Erziehung“. Einblicke in die Mädchenerziehung der Spätaufklärung}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inbook{35713,
  author       = {{Kirsch, Alexander and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank and Hoya, Fabian Karl}},
  booktitle    = {{Theorie und Praxis in der Lehrerbildung. Verhältnisbestimmungen aus der Perspektive von Fachdidaktiken }},
  editor       = {{Caruso, Carina and Harteis, Christian  and Gröschner, Alexander}},
  pages        = {{349–372}},
  publisher    = {{Springer }},
  title        = {{{Kooperativ Forschen(d) lernen im inklusiven Sachunterricht der Primarstufe – Ein Theorie-Praxis verzahnter Ansatz zur Vorbereitung von Sachunterrichtsstudierenden auf das Praxissemester}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-32568-8_20}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36159,
  author       = {{Hoya, Fabian Karl and Schulze, Jan Roland and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{Gothenburg, Sweden}},
  title        = {{{Effects of teacher feedback on children’s self-concepts and motivation in science lessons. 19th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference 2021. “Education and Citizenship: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36131,
  author       = {{Hoya, Fabian Karl and Schulze, Jan Roland and Blumberg, Eva and Hellmich, Frank}},
  title        = {{{The role of teacher feedback for children’s self-concepts and motivation in primary school science lessons. Single Paper. ECER 2021 (European Conference on Educational Research). “Education and Society: expectations, prescriptions, reconciliations”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36181,
  author       = {{Albers, Timm and Filipiak, Agnes and Franzen, Katja and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main}},
  title        = {{{Inklusionskompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden im Vergleich dreier europäischer Bildungssysteme – Ergebnisse aus dem Forschungsprojekt. Vortrag. Abschlussveranstaltung der Förderlinie "Qualifizierung der pädagogischen Fachkräfte für inklusive Bildung" des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36182,
  author       = {{Albers, Timm and Filipiak, Agnes and Franzen, Katja and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main}},
  title        = {{{Inklusionskompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden im Vergleich dreier europäischer Bildungssysteme –Schlussfolgerungen und Implikationen. Vortrag. Abschlussveranstaltung der Förderlinie "Qualifizierung der pädagogischen Fachkräfte für inklusive Bildung" des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36155,
  author       = {{Görel, Gamze and Löper, Marwin Felix and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{University of Gothenburg}},
  title        = {{{Determinants for teachers’ intentions to manage heterogeneity in (non-)inclusive primary education. 19th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference 2021. “Education and Citizenship: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36173,
  author       = {{Löper, Marwin Felix and Schwab, Susanne and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{University of Gothenburg}},
  title        = {{{Primary school students’ contact experiences and their attitudes towards peers with disabilities. 19th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference 2021. “Education and Citizenship: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36169,
  author       = {{Löper, Marwin Felix and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{University of Gothenburg}},
  title        = {{{Individual prerequisites for children’s attitudes towards peers with social-emotional disabilities. 19th Biennial EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction) Conference 2021. “Education and Citizenship: Learning and Instruction and the Shaping of Futures”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

@inproceedings{36129,
  author       = {{Franzen, Katja and Moschner, Barbara and Hellmich, Frank}},
  publisher    = {{University of Geneva}},
  title        = {{{The prediction of primary school teachers’ self-efficacy expectations in inclusive education. Single Paper. ECER 2021 (European Conference on Educational Research). “Education and Society: expectations, prescriptions, reconciliations”}}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

