@inbook{59742,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Jenert, Tobias}},
  booktitle    = {{Psychologiedidaktik an allgemeinbildenden und beruflichen Schulen: Ein Lehrbuch mit Unterrichtsmaterialien}},
  editor       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Bender, Elena and Patrzek, Justine and Schreiber, Christine}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-662-69480-0}},
  pages        = {{1--17}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature}},
  title        = {{{Didaktische Überlegungen in der Psychologie}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@unpublished{61119,
  abstract     = {{<p>The present article offers an assessment of intra-individual variability in visualattention using the Theory of Visual Attention, which provides a formal framework forquantifying attentional components. We specifically investigated overall attentionalcapacity – that is, the available processing speed – and its distribution, the relativeattentional weight.By reanalyzing a large existing dataset from Tünnermann and Scharlau (2021),we found that across multiple testing days, participants either remained stable within a20 Hz margin or showed consistent improvements in capacity – in some cases triplingtheir initial capacity. The weights in response to salient stimuli were remarkablyconsistent.To determine whether increases in capacity reflect pure test-retest effects or arefacilitated by consolidation between days, and to quantify within-day variability, weconducted a second study in which participants completed five self-administeredsessions within a single day. Capacities remained within the same magnitude and didnot show a consistent directional trend. The relative weights exhibited comparativelylittle variation in most participants, akin to the previously analyzed dataset. Further,estimation uncertainty increased with higher capacity values.These results suggest that capacity may be subject to training effects, but thatsuch improvements appear to depend on longer breaks between sessions. This hasimportant implications for individualized assessment: A personal prior could beestimated from a single session to accelerate future estimations, as long as subsequentsessions occur on the same day. Participants with higher capacities may require tailoredexperimentation methods when small to medium effects are of interest, due to increaseduncertainty.</p>}},
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  publisher    = {{Center for Open Science}},
  title        = {{{Intra-individual variability in TVA attentional capacity and weight distribution: A reanalysis across days and an experiment within-day}}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}

@inproceedings{53069,
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  location     = {{Regensburg}},
  title        = {{{Effects of task difficulty on visual processing speed}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{54889,
  abstract     = {{To reach the goal of zero traffic fatalities a year, one building block is the proposition to develop advanced assistance systems for vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as bicyclists. We focus on the dooring problem, i.e., car doors being opened inattentively in the way of an approaching cyclist. We extended our vehicle to everything (V2X) communication-enabled virtual cycling environment for dooring experiments. Our system extends toolkits that are widely used in the V2X research community. We showcase how such a system may be used to realize and evaluate distributed algorithms for VRU safety solutions such as dooring prevention.}},
  author       = {{Stratmann, Lukas and Banh, Ngoc Chi and Scharlau, Ingrid and Dressler, Falko}},
  booktitle    = {{ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2024), Advanced tools, programming languages, and PLatforms for Implementing and Evaluating algorithms for Distributed systems (ApPLIED 2024)}},
  publisher    = {{Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)}},
  title        = {{{Safety Assistance Systems for Bicyclists: Toward Empirical Studies of the Dooring Problem}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/3663338.3665831}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{53816,
  abstract     = {{Augmented (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) technologies have been applied very broadly in the recent past. While prior work emphasizes the potential of these technologies in various application domains, the process of visual attention in and across the contexts of AR/VR environments is not exhaustively explored yet. By now, visual attention in AR/VR environments has majorly been studied by means of overt attention (i.e. saccadic eye movements), self-report, and process-related visual attention proxies (like reaction time). In this work, we analyze covert visual attention based on the (psychological) Theory of Visual Attention (TVA), which allows us to quantify theory-based interpretable properties of the visual attention process. For example, the TVA allows us to measure the overall processing speed. We instantiate this TVA-based framework with a 30-participant explorative within-subjects study. The results show a decisive difference in visual attention between Reality (i.e. the neutral condition) and Virtual Reality and a weak difference between Reality and Augmented Reality. We discuss the consequences of our findings and provide ideas for future studies.}},
  author       = {{Biermeier, Kai and Scharlau, Ingrid and Yigitbas, Enes}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA 2024)}},
  keywords     = {{Visual Attention, TVA, Cognitive Modelling, Bayesian Modelling, AR, VR}},
  publisher    = {{ACM}},
  title        = {{{Measuring Visual Attention Capacity Across xReality}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/3652037.3652050}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{55721,
  author       = {{Stock, Ingrid and Karsten, Andrea and Eik-Nes, Nancy Lea}},
  booktitle    = {{40 Begriffe für eine Schreibwissenschaft. Konzeptuelle Perspektiven auf Praxis und Praktiken des Schreibens}},
  editor       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Haacke-Werron, Stefanie}},
  pages        = {{75--82}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Knowledge telling und knowledge transforming. Eine dialogische Perspektive}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{55723,
  author       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Bertau, Marie-Cécile}},
  booktitle    = {{40 Begriffe für eine Schreibwissenschaft. Konzeptuelle Perspektiven auf Praxis und Praktiken des Schreibens}},
  editor       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Haacke-Werron, Stefanie}},
  pages        = {{261--267}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Stimme. Eine dialogische Perspektive}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@book{32394,
  editor       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Haacke-Werron, Stefanie}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{40 Begriffe für eine Schreibwissenschaft. Konzeptuelle Perspektiven auf Praxis und Praktiken des Schreibens}}},
  doi          = {{https://dx.doi.org/10.3278/9783763976584}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{55720,
  author       = {{Haacke-Werron, Stefanie and Karsten, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{40 Begriffe für eine Schreibwissenschaft. Konzeptuelle Perspektiven auf Praxis und Praktiken des Schreibens}},
  editor       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Haacke-Werron, Stefanie}},
  pages        = {{11--14}},
  publisher    = {{wbv}},
  title        = {{{Einleitung}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inbook{55722,
  author       = {{Karsten, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{40 Begriffe für eine Schreibwissenschaft. Konzeptuelle Perspektiven auf Praxis und Praktiken des Schreibens}},
  editor       = {{Karsten, Andrea and Haacke-Werron, Stefanie}},
  pages        = {{213--220}},
  title        = {{{Schreibprozess. Eine dialogische sprachpsychologische Perspektive}}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@article{53072,
  abstract     = {{Negated statements require more processing efforts than assertions. However, in certain contexts, repeating negations undergo adaptation, which over time mitigates the effort.
Here, we ask negations hamper visual processing and whether consecutive repetitions mitigate its influence. 
We assessed the overall attentional capacity and its distribution, the relative weight, quantitatively using 
the formal Theory of Visual Attention (TVA).
We employed a very simple form for negations, binary negations. Negated instructions, expressing the only alternative to the core supposition, were cognitively demanding, resulting in a loss of attentional capacity in three experiments. The overall attentional capacity recovered gradually but stagnated at a lower level than with assertions, even after many repetitions. Additionally, negations distributed the attention equally between target and reference stimulus. Repetitions slightly increased the reference' share of attention. Assertions, on the other hand, shifted the attentional weight towards the target. Few repetitions slightly decreased the bias towards the target, many repetitions increased the bias.}},
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Tünnermann, Jan and Rohlfing, Katharina J. and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  journal      = {{Frontiers in Psychology}},
  title        = {{{Benefiting from Binary Negations? Verbal Negations Decrease Visual Attention and Balance Its Distribution}}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451309}},
  volume       = {{15}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}

@inproceedings{48595,
  author       = {{Peters, Tobias Martin and Visser, Roel W.}},
  booktitle    = {{Communications in Computer and Information Science}},
  isbn         = {{9783031440694}},
  issn         = {{1865-0929}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Nature Switzerland}},
  title        = {{{The Importance of Distrust in AI}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-031-44070-0_15}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{42641,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Wissenschaftsdidaktik II: Einzelne Disziplinen}},
  editor       = {{Reinmann, Gabi and Rhein, Rüdiger}},
  isbn         = {{ 978-3-8376-6295-5}},
  keywords     = {{Unterrichtsfach Psychologie}},
  pages        = {{49--74}},
  publisher    = {{transcript}},
  title        = {{{Wissenschaft und Alltagserfahrung: Überlegungen zur Wissenschaftsdidaktik der Psychologie}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@article{48777,
  abstract     = {{<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Explainable artificial intelligence has mainly focused on static learning scenarios so far. We are interested in dynamic scenarios where data is sampled progressively, and learning is done in an incremental rather than a batch mode. We seek efficient incremental algorithms for computing feature importance (FI). Permutation feature importance (PFI) is a well-established model-agnostic measure to obtain global FI based on feature marginalization of absent features. We propose an efficient, model-agnostic algorithm called iPFI to estimate this measure incrementally and under dynamic modeling conditions including concept drift. We prove theoretical guarantees on the approximation quality in terms of expectation and variance. To validate our theoretical findings and the efficacy of our approaches in incremental scenarios dealing with streaming data rather than traditional batch settings, we conduct multiple experimental studies on benchmark data with and without concept drift.</jats:p>}},
  author       = {{Fumagalli, Fabian and Muschalik, Maximilian and Hüllermeier, Eyke and Hammer, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{0885-6125}},
  journal      = {{Machine Learning}},
  keywords     = {{Artificial Intelligence, Software}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Science and Business Media LLC}},
  title        = {{{Incremental permutation feature importance (iPFI): towards online explanations on data streams}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10994-023-06385-y}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{45862,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid and Karsten, Andrea}},
  booktitle    = {{Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre}},
  editor       = {{Berendt, Brigitte and Fleischmann, Andreas and Salmhofer, Gudrun and Schaper, Niclas and Szczyrba, Birgit and Wiemer, Matthias and Wildt, Johannes}},
  pages        = {{17--35}},
  publisher    = {{DUZ medienhaus}},
  title        = {{{Schreibfokussierte Graduiertenförderung: Reflexive Spezialisierung für interdisziplinäre Forschungskontexte}}},
  volume       = {{111}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{46283,
  author       = {{Banh, Ngoc Chi and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Abstracts of the 65th TeaP}},
  editor       = {{Merz, Simon and Frings, Christian and Leuchtenberg, Bettina and Moeller, Birte and Mueller, Stefanie and Neumann, Roland and Pastötter, Bernhard and Pingen, Leah and Schui, Gabriel}},
  location     = {{Trier, Germany}},
  publisher    = {{ZPID (Leibniz Institute for Psychology)}},
  title        = {{{First steps towards real-time assessment of attentional weights and capacity according to TVA}}},
  doi          = {{10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.12945}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inproceedings{52866,
  author       = {{Sloane, Hannah Sabrina and Schmöckel, Sabrina}},
  location     = {{Belfast}},
  title        = {{{Turning Disciplinary Differences from a Brake into a Motor in Higher Education (Collaboration)}}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}

@inbook{34015,
  author       = {{Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Reflexive Schreibwissenschaft}},
  editor       = {{Haacke-Werron, Stefanie and Karsten, Andrea and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  pages        = {{147--152}},
  publisher    = {{WBV}},
  title        = {{{Hundertstelmillimeter}}},
  doi          = {{10.3278/9783763972524}},
  volume       = {{14}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{34014,
  author       = {{Haacke-Werron, Stefanie and Karsten, Andrea and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Reflexive Schreibwissenschaft. Disziplinäre und praktische Perspektiven}},
  editor       = {{Haacke-Werron, Stefanie and Karsten, Andrea and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  pages        = {{9 -- 18}},
  publisher    = {{WBV}},
  title        = {{{Einleitung}}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

@inbook{33864,
  abstract     = {{Im Zentrum Beitrags steht die Frage nach dem Spezifischen einer Didaktik im Wissenschafts- bzw. Hochschulkontext. Dabei hat die Organisation des Wissenschaftssystems in Disziplinen bzw. disziplinäre Gemeinschaften eine besondere Bedeutung. Disziplinen entwickeln spezifische Praktiken, die das Handeln ihrer Angehörigen prägen und sich in Fachkulturen zeigen. Diese Praktiken werden insbesondere an kommunikativen Artefakten sichtbar. Für Personen außerhalb einer disziplinären Gemeinschaft und ganz besonders für jene, die keinen direkten Bezug zum Wissenschaftssystem haben, sind disziplinäre Praktiken häufig schwer zu erschließen. Unsere Konzeption von Wissenschaftsdidaktik lenkt den Blick auf die impliziten Praktiken wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Aufgabe von Wissenschaftsdidaktik ist es dem- nach, erstens die impliziten disziplinären Sinnstrukturen, die hinter bestimmten Prak- tiken stehen und in kommunikativen Handlungen und Artefakten verschlüsselt sind, zu entschlüsseln. Zweitens ist es notwendig, die Wahrnehmung disziplinärer Praktiken durch die Studierenden zu analysieren und Differenzen zum Sinnverstehen von Wissenschaftler:innen zu identifizieren. Ausgehend davon kann dann drittens auf eine Verständigung über die Praktiken und deren Sinngehalt hingearbeitet werden. Der Beitrag formuliert die Grundzüge einer Wissenschaftsdidaktik, welche Verständigung über die Praktiken wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen zu einem Kernbestandteil akademischer Lehre macht. Dazu gehört auch ein Moment von Wissenschaftskritik, das auf die Disziplinen und deren Praktiken selbst zurückwirkt. Wissenschaftsdidaktik in diesem Sinne verlangt, den Blick Dritter auf die Praktiken der eigenen Disziplin einzunehmen. Dazu gehör auch, sich einzugestehen, wenn Praktiken keinen Sinn für wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisprozesse (mehr) aufweisen bzw. diesen verloren haben.}},
  author       = {{Jenert, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}},
  booktitle    = {{Wissenschaftsdidaktik I: Einführung}},
  editor       = {{Reinmann, Gabi and Rhein, Rüdiger}},
  keywords     = {{Wissenschaftsdidaktik, Fachsozialisation, Wissenschaftskritik, Verständigung, Fachkultur, akademische Praktiken, Unterrichtsfach Psychologie}},
  pages        = {{155 -- 179}},
  publisher    = {{transcript}},
  title        = {{{Wissenschaftsdidaktik als Verständigung über wissenschaftliches Handeln – eine Auslegeordnung}}},
  doi          = {{10.14361/9783839460979-008}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

