Executive summary Die vorliegende Zukunftsstudie „Automation 2035“ gibt einen Ausblick auf die Entwicklung der Automatisierungstechnik in den nächsten 10 Jahren. Neben der Beschreibung von Trends wie Kreislaufwirtschaft, Automatisierung der Märkte, Biologisierung, autonome Systeme und Robotik sowie IT-Sicherheit wird die zu erwartende Veränderung in der Bildung beschrieben. Dazu verwenden wir Methoden der Zukunftsforschung und arbeiten mit der Szenarientechnik, um Zukunftsperspektiven der Automation aufzuzeigen. Personas werden eingesetzt, um die zukünftigen Entwicklungen plastisch aus den Augen der Personen im Jahr 2025 und in der Zukunft im Jahr 2035 zu beschreiben. Schlüsselthemen und Trends: ... ... Inhalt Executive summary 1 1 Einführung 3 2 Zukunftsfelder für die Automatisierungstechnik 2035 4 2.1 Kreislaufwirtschaft 4 2.2 Automatisierung der Märkte 7 2.3 Biologisierung 8 2.4 Autonome Systeme und Robotik 10 2.5 Security 12 2.6 Veränderung der Ausbildung 13 3 Szenario der Automation 2035 16 4 Personas 18 4.1 Unternehmer 18 4.2 Ingenieurin 19 4.3 Schüler 20 5 Thesen und Ausblick 22 Methodik 24 Autorenteam 25 Schrifttum 26...
}}, author = {{Gräßler, Iris and Özcan, Deniz and Tusek, Alena Marie and Bilgic, Attila and Lange, Christian and Stich, Christian and Maul, Christine and Heizmann, Michael and Weyrich, Michael and Dessel,, Sascha and Miny, Torben and Jumar, Ulrich}}, isbn = {{9783911670180}}, publisher = {{VDI Verlag}}, title = {{{Automation 2035}}}, doi = {{10.51202/9783911670180}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{61944, abstract = {{his article describes a new student-based approach to Decoding and Disrupting. This approach consists of an educational programme that works with a multidisciplinary group of undergraduate students, so-called Culture Fellows. In the programme, the students learn about theories on disciplinary cultures and their practices, Decoding the Disciplines, and communication. The programme focuses on the implicitness of disciplinary practices and how to explore them, i.e., it seeks to address the importance of making disciplinary practices, norms, and values more accessible to students. Within the programme, the Culture Fellows use a student-based variant of the Decoding the Disciplines Paradigm that we call ‘Culture Quest’. The Culture Quest supplies students with the tools to question, explore, and decode their respective disciplines and practices. Disciplinary practices often remain implicit because lecturers, with their wealth of experience and expertise in their discipline, may be operationally blind and thus no longer aware of the fact that certain practices might need to be explained. This lack of explanation or explicitness can lead to students feeling bewildered, confused or puzzled. The Culture Fellows and in particular the Culture Quest can encourage dialogue about and exploration of disciplinary cultures and their practices and can thus allow students to grasp the implicit cultural norms and expectations within their respective disciplines more clearly. The Culture Fellows and the Culture Quest provide students – and maybe even lecturers – with opportunities to engage with and reflect on teaching and learning strategies and practices.}}, author = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, issn = {{1918-0853}}, journal = {{Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{98--115}}, publisher = {{Penn State University Libraries}}, title = {{{No Student Should Be an Island: A Peer-Approach to Decoding and Disrupting}}}, doi = {{10.59236/td2025vol18iss31913}}, volume = {{18}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{62205, author = {{Rumlich, Dominik and Matz, Frauke}}, booktitle = {{Grenzen, Grenzräume, Entgrenzungen}}, editor = {{Kulovics, Nina and Mentz, Olivier and Raith, Thomas}}, pages = {{507--508}}, publisher = {{wbv}}, title = {{{Nachwuchs-Café: Symposium zur interdisziplinären Vernetzung von Doktorand/ innen und Postdocs}}}, doi = {{10.3278/9783763977932}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{62202, author = {{Rumlich, Dominik}}, booktitle = {{Leistungsmessung, Evaluation und Feedback im Fremdsprachenunterricht}}, editor = {{Vogt, Karin and Rossa, Henning}}, pages = {{35--41}}, publisher = {{Klett Kallmeyer}}, title = {{{Reliabilität}}}, doi = {{10.5555/9783772717772}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62204, author = {{Schmöckel, Sabrina}}, journal = {{die hochschullehre}}, title = {{{Hör mal, wer da spricht – Eine dialogische Perspektive auf studentische Äußerungen zu Fachkulturen}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62211, abstract = {{Zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz technischer Komponenten sind neben dem Leichtbau insbesondere neuartige Fertigungstechnologien und Prozessketten mit geschlossenen Stoffkreisläufen von großer Bedeutung. Im Beitrag werden am Beispiel einer Demonstratorstruktur aus hybriden Leichtbauprofilen (Aluminium und faserverstärktes Polyamid) technisch-technologische Lösungsoptionen für die gesamte Prozesskette inklusive des Recyclings vorgestellt und in Pilotversuchen bewertet.}}, author = {{Weck, Daniel and Müller-Pabel, Michael and Krampitz, Thomas and Hecker, Christine and Selvaggio, Alessandro and Gilich, Julian and Gude, Maik and Lieberwirth, Holger and Tekkaya, A. Erman and Meschut, Gerson}}, journal = {{Werkstattstechnik online}}, number = {{10}}, pages = {{708--717}}, publisher = {{VDI Fachmedien GmbH and Co. KG}}, title = {{{Ressourceneffiziente Fertigung von Leichtbaustrukturen}}}, doi = {{10.37544/1436-4980-2025-10-12}}, volume = {{115}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62213, author = {{Kornowicz, Jaroslaw}}, issn = {{1044-7318}}, journal = {{International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction}}, pages = {{1--19}}, publisher = {{Informa UK Limited}}, title = {{{An Empirical Examination of the Evaluative AI Framework}}}, doi = {{10.1080/10447318.2025.2581260}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{59166, author = {{Thomas, Sven}}, journal = {{HannahArendt.Net}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{237–239}}, title = {{{Rezension: Hanna Meretoja: Die Nacht der alten Feuer}}}, doi = {{10.57773/HANET.V14I1.606}}, volume = {{14}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{61517, author = {{Alpsancar, Suzana}}, booktitle = {{Algorithmische Wissenskulturen. Der Einfluss des Computers auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung}}, editor = {{Hashagen, Ulf and Seising, Rudolf}}, isbn = {{9783658355593}}, issn = {{2730-7425}}, pages = {{327–365}}, publisher = {{Springer}}, title = {{{Algorithmische Kulturen des Pflanzensammelns? Das Beispiel der Computerisierung des Botanischen Gartens und Botanischen Museums Berlin}}}, doi = {{10.1007/978-3-658-35560-9_14}}, year = {{2025}}, } @unpublished{59917, abstract = {{nder the slogan of trustworthy AI, much of contemporary AI research is focused on designing AI systems and usage practices that inspire human trust and, thus, enhance adoption of AI systems. However, a person affected by an AI system may not be convinced by AI system design alone---neither should they, if the AI system is embedded in a social context that gives good reason to believe that it is used in tension with a person’s interest. In such cases, distrust in the system may be justified and necessary to build meaningful trust in the first place. We propose the term \emph{healthy distrust} to describe such a justified, careful stance towards certain AI usage practices. We investigate prior notions of trust and distrust in computer science, sociology, history, psychology, and philosophy, outline a remaining gap that healthy distrust might fill and conceptualize healthy distrust as a crucial part for AI usage that respects human autonomy.}}, author = {{Paaßen, Benjamin and Alpsancar, Suzana and Matzner, Tobias and Scharlau, Ingrid}}, booktitle = {{arXiv}}, title = {{{Healthy Distrust in AI systems}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62028, abstract = {{Explainable AI (XAI) methods can support the identification of biases in automated decision-making (ADM) systems. However, existing research does not sufficiently address whether these biases originate from the ADM system or mirror underlying societal inequalities. This distinction is important because it has major implications for how to act upon an explanation: while the societal bias produced by the ADM system can be algorithmically fixed, societal inequalities demand societal actions. To address this gap, we propose the RR-XAI-framework (recognition-redistribution through XAI) that builds on a distinction between socio-technical and societal bias and Nancy Fraser's justice theory of recognition and redistribution. In our framework, explanations can play two distinct roles: as a socio-technical diagnosis when they reveal biases produced by the ADM system itself, or as a societal diagnosis when they expose biases that reflect broader societal inequalities. We then outline the operationalization of the framework and discuss its applicability for cases in algorithmic hiring and credit scoring. Based on our findings, we argue that the diagnostic functions of XAI are contingent on the provision of such explanations, the resources of the audiences, as well as the current limits of XAI techniques.}}, author = {{Fahimi, Miriam and State, Laura and Kasirzadeh, Atoosa}}, issn = {{3065-8365}}, journal = {{Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{879--892}}, publisher = {{Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)}}, title = {{{From Explaining to Diagnosing: A Justice-Oriented Framework of Explainable AI for Bias Detection}}}, doi = {{10.1609/aies.v8i1.36597}}, volume = {{8}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inproceedings{62229, abstract = {{In 2024, the EU adopted the AI Act, a new set of rules for trustworthy artificial intelligence. This legal instrument carves a large place for standardisation, a regulatory technique that consists in crafting so-called harmonised technical standards, to facilitate legal compliance by industry stakeholders. While EU technical standards have been used in the past for ensuring product safety, for the first time the AI Act relies on standardisation to facilitate compliance with fundamental rights, including the right to non-discrimination and equality. The attempt to translate inherently open-textured rights and ethical principles into operationalizable standards raises critical questions. In particular, how will standardisation practices under the new EU AI Act affect, transform, contest and stabilise notions of equality and non-discrimination in an increasingly algorithmic society? This paper proposes a research agenda to address this question and unpack the black box of AI standardisation.}}, author = {{Xenidis, Raphaële and Fahimi, Miriam}}, booktitle = {{Proceedings of Fourth European Workshop on Algorithmic Fairness}}, pages = {{310–314}}, publisher = {{PMLR}}, title = {{{Standardising Equality in the Algorithmic Society? A Research Agenda}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @misc{62233, author = {{Huybrechts, Yves}}, booktitle = {{Sehepunkte}}, title = {{{Hugo De Schepper: 'A latere principis u de su theniente general'. De regeringsraden naast landsheren en landvoogden in de Habsburgse Nederlanden: Leden, instellingen en algemene politiek, 1577/1580-1609, Leuven: Peeters 2023}}}, volume = {{25}}, year = {{2025}}, } @inbook{57405, author = {{Huybrechts, Yves}}, booktitle = {{Brusselse toponymie van het verleden en de toekomst}}, editor = {{Kesteloot, Chantal and Degryse, Iadine and Wayens, Benjamin}}, title = {{{De Dinantstraat oftewel Beierenstraat, relict van een “vreemde” heerser in de Spaanse Nederlanden}}}, year = {{2025}}, } @article{62190, abstract = {{