@misc{33148, author = {{Schlieper, Hendrik}}, booktitle = {{Romanische Forschungen 123.4, 2011}}, pages = {{540--542}}, publisher = {{Rodopi}}, title = {{{zu Nigel Harkness et al. (Hg.): Birth and Death in Nineteenth-Century French Culture, Amsterdam }}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32946, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Verschiebebahnhöfe der Erinnerung. Zum Werk W.G. Sebalds}}, editor = {{Martin, Sigurd and Wintermeyer, Ingo}}, pages = {{105--118}}, publisher = {{Königshausen & Neumann}}, title = {{{Kristallisation als kulturelle Transformation. Stendhal, W.G. Sebald und das Problem der Wirklichkeitstreue}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32950, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Struktur, Figur, Kontur. Abstraktion in Kunst und Lebenswissenschaften}}, editor = {{Blümle, Claudia and Schäfer, Armin}}, pages = {{93--114}}, publisher = {{diaphanes}}, title = {{{"Geistige Raumscheu". Bemerkungen zu Wilhelm Worringers Anthropologie der Abstraktion.}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32952, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Gehetzt. Südfrankreich 1940 - Deutsche Literatur im Exil}}, editor = {{Werfel, Ruth}}, pages = {{169--190}}, publisher = {{NZZ}}, title = {{{"Unheimliche Heimat. Literarische Positionen und Reflexionen zur Psychologie des Exils"}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32947, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Scritture dell ́immagine. }}, editor = {{d ́Amelia , Antonella }}, pages = {{347--361}}, publisher = {{Verlag Liguori}}, title = {{{"Effet du réel". Strategie di costruzione dell ́illusione in W.G. Sebald}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32948, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Wilhelm Worringer: Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie}}, editor = {{Grebing, Helga}}, pages = {{13--42}}, publisher = {{Fink}}, title = {{{Einleitung}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32715, author = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}}, booktitle = {{Physis und Norm. Neue Perspektiven der Anthropologie im 18. Jahrhundert}}, editor = {{Beetz, Manfred}}, pages = {{278--299}}, title = {{{OEconomie der Lüste. Konfigurationen des ‚plaisir’ in der galanten Anthropologie der Frühaufklärung (Etienne-Simon de Gamaches, Dupuy La Chapelle)}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32716, author = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}}, booktitle = {{Epochale Psycheme und Menschenwissen: von Montaigne bis Redonnet}}, editor = {{Thoma, Heinz and van der Meer, Kathrin}}, pages = {{107--127}}, title = {{{Räume des empfindsamen Subjekts. Seelenausfaltungstechnologien in Sénancours „Obermann“}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @misc{33641, author = {{Rezat, Sara}}, booktitle = {{Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26/1}}, title = {{{Ulrike Krieg, Wortbildungsstrategien in der Werbung}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @phdthesis{33527, author = {{Rezat, Sara}}, publisher = {{Universitätsverlag Winter}}, title = {{{Die Konzession als strategisches Sprachspiel}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32951, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Jahrbuch Gegenwartsliteratur. Heft 6/2007: W.G. Sebald}}, editor = {{Lützeler, Paul Michel and Schindler, Stephan K.}}, pages = {{21--43}}, publisher = {{Stauffenburg Verlag}}, title = {{{Medialität und Poetik des trompe l ́oeil. W.G. Sebald und Jan Peter Tripp}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{31306, author = {{Schuster, Britt-Marie}}, booktitle = {{Textsorten und Textallianzen vom 16. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert}}, editor = {{Wiesinger , Peter }}, keywords = {{Sprachliche Formelhaftigkeit/-Musterhaftigkeit}}, pages = {{349–383}}, publisher = {{Weidler}}, title = {{{Historische Phraseologismen und ihre Bedeutung zum Aufbau von Textallianzen im frühen 16. Jahrhundert – ein systematischer Entwurf}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @article{46257, author = {{Topalović, Elvira}}, journal = {{Neue Sprachgeschichte(n). Der Deutschunterricht.}}, number = {{3/07}}, pages = {{29--42}}, title = {{{„O du herzlieber schaz wie geschicht meinem herz“ Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in historischen Geheimbriefen und Verhörprotokollen.}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{32781, author = {{Steigerwald, Jörn}}, booktitle = {{Enzyklopädie der Neuzeit. Bd. 5, Gymnasium-Japanhandel}}, editor = {{Jaeger, Friedrich}}, pages = {{574--579}}, title = {{{Lemma Hof, Literatur 1500-1850.}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{19334, abstract = {{Angaben zur Herausgeberschaft: Hg. von Michael Vogt unter Mitwirkung von Bernd Füllner und Fritz Wahrenburg}}, author = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}}, booktitle = {{Georg Weerth und die Satire im Vormärz. Referate des internationalen Kolloquiums im 150. Todesjahr des Autors, 16.-18.Juni 2006 in der Lippischen Landesbibliothek, Detmold}}, editor = {{Vogt, Michael and Füllner, Bernd and Wahrenburg, Fritz}}, pages = {{13--36}}, publisher = {{Aisthesis}}, title = {{{Politische Dramaturgien des Komischen. Satire im Vormärz (mit Blick auf das Drama)}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{38040, author = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}}, booktitle = {{Die Souveränität der Literatur. Zum Totalitären der Klassischen Moderne 1900-1933}}, editor = {{Hebekus, Uwe and Stöckmann, Ingo}}, pages = {{239--257}}, publisher = {{Fink}}, title = {{{"Antlitz der Zeit". Zur soziologisch-politischen Dimension des Physiognomischen in der Ära der Neuen Sachlichkeit}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inbook{17280, abstract = {{Many classical approaches developed so far for learning in a human-robot interaction setting have focussed on rather low level motor learning by imitation. Some doubts, however, have been casted on whether with this approach higher level functioning will be achieved. Higher level processes include, for example, the cognitive capability to assign meaning to actions in order to learn from the tutor. Such capabilities involve that an agent not only needs to be able to mimic the motoric movement of the action performed by the tutor. Rather, it understands the constraints, the means and the goal(s) of an action in the course of its learning process. Further support for this hypothesis comes from parent-infant instructions where it has been observed that parents are very sensitive and adaptive tutors who modify their behavior to the cognitive needs of their infant. Based on these insights, we have started our research agenda on analyzing and modeling learning in a communicative situation by analyzing parent-infant instruction scenarios with automatic methods. Results confirm the well known observation that parents modify their behavior when interacting with their infant. We assume that these modifications do not only serve to keep the infant’s attention but do indeed help the infant to understand the actual goal of an action including relevant information such as constraints and means by enabling it to structure the action into smaller, meaningful chunks. We were able to determine first objective measurements from video as well as audio streams that can serve as cues for this information in order to facilitate learning of actions.}}, author = {{Wrede, Britta and Rohlfing, Katharina and Spexard, Thorsten P. and Fritsch, Jannik}}, booktitle = {{Humanoid Robots, Human-like Machines}}, editor = {{Hackel, Matthias}}, isbn = {{978-3-902613-07-3}}, pages = {{601--612}}, publisher = {{ARS}}, title = {{{Towards tutoring an interactive robot}}}, doi = {{10.5772/4825}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inproceedings{17279, abstract = {{An open question in imitating actions by infants and robots is how they know ‘‘what to imitate.’’ We suggest that parental modifications in their actions, called motionese, can help infants and robots to detect the meaningful structure of the actions. Parents tend to modify their infant-directed actions, e.g., put longer pauses between actions and exaggerate actions, which are assumed to help infants to understand the meaning and the structure of the actions. To investigate how such modifications contribute to the infants’ understanding of the actions, we analyzed parental actions from an infant-like viewpoint by applying a model of saliency-based visual attention. Our model of an infant-like viewpoint does not suppose any a priori knowledge about actions or objects used in the actions, or any specific capability to detect a parent’s face or his/her hands. Instead, it is able to detect and gaze at salient locations, which are standing out from the surroundings because of the primitive visual features, in a scene. The model thus demonstrates what low-level aspects of parental actions are highlighted in their action sequences and could attract the attention of young infants and robots. Our quantitative analysis revealed that motionese can help them (1) to receive immediate social feedback on the actions, (2) to detect the initial and goal states of the actions, and (3) to look at the static features of the objects used in the actions. We discuss these results addressing the issue of ‘‘what to imitate.’’}}, author = {{Nagai, Yukie and Rohlfing, Katharina}}, booktitle = {{The 4th International Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts}}, title = {{{Can Motionese Tell Infants and Robots "What to Imitate"?}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inproceedings{17285, abstract = {{Whether interacting with a colleague from another department, a child with distinct cognitive and linguistic skills or a foreigner with different cultural background, humans try to adapt to their communication partners. The adaptation allows for a flow in communication and thereby for successful turn-taking. In contrast, when users communicate with artificial systems often reduced flow and turn-overtaking 4 are observable. The reasons for these insufficiencies may lie in the fact that little is known about the turn-taking strategies that dialogue systems should pursue 4. In our approach, we postulate that it is the feedback of the system and the interpretation of the feedback by the user that are in the center of an adaptation process As a result, one way to improve HRI, and especially its communicational flow, is to focus on different types of feedback and how they affect the user{\textquoteright} discursive behavior. In contrast to former work concentrating on telephone based speech systems or multimodal systems consisting of a touch screen and speech 1, 2, 5, we study an embodied interaction with the service robot BIRON (BIelefeld RObot CompanioN). The general goal of the studies is to develop a situated system that can learn the spatial environment as well as the names and visual appearance of objects. Therefore, BIRON can not only understand spoken speech but also co-verbal deictic references to objects in the scene and carry out mixed-initiative dialogues. In our study, the subjects were asked to introduce objects to the robot by showing and pointing. This very restricted goal allowed us to compare verbal and gestural behavior across subjects. We analyzed the interactions of 15 native German speaking users communicating with BIRON. The interaction was carried out with the fully autonomous mode of BIRON, except for the speech recognition, which was simulated by keyboard input in order to avoid speech recognition errors. By using the autonomous interaction system, we were able to produce realistic communication sequences including problems caused by the complex interaction of the diverse perceptual system components. In analyzing the users{\textquoteright} discursive behavior, we noticed different task-related interaction strategies. Focusing on subject{\textquoteright}s consistency and changes of strategies in the course of the ongoing turn-taking, we analyzed which feedback of the system caused a change of a strategy within a user. We found that subjects decided for one strategy addressing one perceptual channel (vision or speech) of the system and used it as long as they did not receive any feedback about the failure of this specific channel. We observed a change in strategy when it became obvious to the subject via feedback that a particular perceptual channel was not working appropriately. The change in strategy was likely to maintain the interaction flow and thereby the user satisfaction. While these results support previous findings indicating when and how users change strategies 1, 5, they give new insights into the discursive behavior, i.e. into the repertoire of strategies in embodied and situated interaction. The results imply that within turn-taking, users interpret the system{\textquoteright}s feedback and thus verify their model of the capabilities of the interlocutor. Thus, the change in discursive strategy is an indicator of users{\textquoteright} expectation of how the robot functions 3. In further studies we plan to deliberately vary the robots misunderstandings and integrate the personality traits of the subjects into the research on strategies.}}, author = {{Lohse, Manja and Rohlfing, Katharina and Wrede, Britta}}, booktitle = {{Presentation at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA)}}, title = {{{Changes of users' discursive behavior in HRI}}}, year = {{2007}}, } @inproceedings{17284, abstract = {{The paper introduces an online user study onapplications for social robots with 127 participants. The potential users proposed 570 application scenarios based on the appearance and functionality of four robots presented (AIBO,BARTHOC, BIRON, iCat). The items were grouped into 13 categories which are interpreted and discussed by means of four dimensions: public vs. private use, intensity of interaction,complexity of interaction model, and functional vs. human-like appearance. The interpretation lead to three classes of applications for social robots according to the degree of social interaction: (1) Specialized Applications where the robot has to perform clearly defined tasks which are delegated by a user, (2)Public Applications which are directed to the communication with many users, and (3) Individual Applications with the need of a highly elaborated social model to maintain a variety of situations with few people.}}, author = {{Hegel, Frank and Lohse, Manja and Swadzba, Agnes and Wachsmuth, Sven and Rohlfing, Katharina and Wrede, Britta}}, booktitle = {{16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN’07)}}, pages = {{938--943}}, publisher = {{IEEE}}, title = {{{Classes of Applications for Social Robots: A User Study}}}, doi = {{10.1109/roman.2007.4415218}}, year = {{2007}}, }