@article{20690,
  abstract     = {{The Enlightenment is well known for its critical analysis of the Bible. Though the Renaissance sources have been acknowledged as an inspiration of this movement, the Querelle des Femmes and its critique of the Bible has never been considered as a possible catalyst for the enlightened philosophical discourse. For centuries women have fought against interpretations of the Bible.This paper argues that the Querelle des Femmes criticized the Bible not only because of its patriarchal content but also criticized philosophical thinking that, for supporting the views from the Bible and its misogynist stance, misusing the instruments of rational philosophy. Arguments from 1400-1750, from Nogarola to Du Châtelet proof women philosophers’ fight in favour of a critique of the bible from a rational point of view, reflecting also on the status of what it meant, to argue rationally.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-88-7000-877-7}},
  journal      = {{Dianoia 31, no. XXV}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords: Bible critics, Isotta Nogarola, Querelle des femmes, Enlightenment, Émilie Du Châtelet.}},
  location     = {{Bologna }},
  pages        = {{331--353}},
  title        = {{{Pressure on Enlightenment. Bible Critics from Nogarola to Du Châtelet}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@inbook{20569,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  booktitle    = {{Männlich, weiblich, divers? Philosophische Anthropologie der Geschlechter}},
  editor       = {{Hoye, William J.}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-00-065669-9}},
  pages        = {{27--59}},
  publisher    = {{Josef Pieper Stiftung}},
  title        = {{{Der männliche Gott. Bibel- und Gesellschaftskritik in der Tradition der Philosophinnen der frühen Neuzeit}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{31436,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Thorgeirsdottir, Sigridur}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Methodological Reflections on Women’s Contribution and Influence in the History of Philosophy. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences, Vol 3}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44421-1}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@book{34106,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Brown, Andrew and Kölving, Ulla and Ertz, Stefanie}},
  title        = {{{The Saint Petersburg Manuscripts. A historical and critical online edition. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/stp/ (2020-2021)}}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

@article{20686,
  abstract     = {{Die Philosophiegeschichte, die heute gelehrt wird präsentiert sich als ein Kanon, der von "großen Männern" dominiert wird. Doch das ist nicht richtig und vor allem, es war nicht immer so. Es gab großartige und einflussreiche Denkerinnen, von Hildegard von Bingen bis Hannah Arendt und Edith Stein, "in allen Ländern und zu allen Zeiten", wie der aufgeklärte Historiograph Jakob Brucker 1745 in seiner Philosophiegeschichte schrieb. }},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  journal      = {{philosophie Magazin}},
  keywords     = {{women philosophers, stolen history, Ruth Hagengruber}},
  number       = {{13}},
  pages        = {{8--14}},
  title        = {{{Die gestohlene Geschichte}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{15493,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  issn         = {{0930-6633}},
  journal      = {{Konsens}},
  keywords     = {{Interview, Europe, Women, Diversity}},
  pages        = {{43--44}},
  publisher    = {{Deutscher Akademikerinnenbund}},
  title        = {{{Frauen aus der Mitte Deutschlands}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{13549,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  issn         = {{0026-9662}},
  journal      = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy. Vol. 27}},
  number       = {{4}},
  publisher    = {{Routledge}},
  title        = {{{Women Philosophers in Early Modern Philosophy}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{12726,
  abstract     = {{In seiner Auseinandersetzung mit Immanuel Kant bestreitet Johann August Eberhard Kants Anspruch, in seiner Transzendentalphilosophie die Reichweite und Grenzen des Verstandes auf neue, zuvor nicht dagewesene Weise definiert zu haben. Eberhard dagegen meint die Prinzipien und Grundbegriffe transzendentalphilosophischer Erkenntniskritik schon aus der Leibniz-Wolffschen Schule ableiten zu k{\"o}nnen. An einschl{\"a}giger Stelle -- im dritten Teil seiner Ausf{\"u}hrungen {\"U}ber den wesentlichen Unterschied der Erkenntnis durch die Sinne und durch den Verstand -- belegt er diese Behauptung mit einem Verweis auf die {\glqq}Definition{\grqq} der Erscheinung in den Institutions physiques der Philosophin und Mathematikerin Du Ch{\^a}telet.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  booktitle    = {{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-658-14021-2}},
  pages        = {{173--195}},
  publisher    = {{Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; Imprint: Springer VS}},
  title        = {{{Émilie Du Châtelet zwischen Leibniz und Kant. Du Châtelet in der Eberhard-Kant-Kontroverse}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-14022-9{\textunderscore }6}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{12778,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hutton, Sarah}},
  issn         = {{0960-8788}},
  journal      = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{673--683}},
  title        = {{{Introduction}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{12775,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  isbn         = {{9783658140229}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung. Vol. 3. Philosophie History of Science Frauen in Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Women Philosophers and Scientists}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-658-14022-9}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inbook{12777,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  booktitle    = {{Emilie du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-658-14021-2}},
  pages        = {{5--12}},
  publisher    = {{Springe}},
  title        = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und ihre Wirkung in Deutschland}}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@book{12085,
  abstract     = {{In diesem Band werden neueste Forschungen zur Physikerin, Mathematikerin und Philosophin Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749) vorgestellt. Emilie Du Châtelet genoss in der deutschen Aufklärung eine hohe Reputation. Sie verband Leibniz Metaphysik mit der Physik von Newton und gelangte zu erstaunlichen Ergebnissen, die die Physik auf den Weg zu Einsteins Energieformel führte. Ihre Werke wurden sofort ins Deutsche übersetzt, Kant nimmt in seiner ersten Dissertation von 1747 auf sie Bezug. Die Sammlung stellt Texte vor, die den Einfluss der deutschen Aufklärung auf Du Châtelets und Du Châtelets Einfluss auf die deutsche Philosophie diskutieren. Die großen Namen der Epoche stehen hier zur Debatte, Leibniz, Wolff, Boskovic, Euler, Friedrich II, Voltaire, La Mettrie und viele weitere Größen der Aufklärung werden in ihrem Zusammenhang mit Du Châtelet vorgestellt. }},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hecht, Hartmut}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 978-3-658-14022-9}},
  keywords     = {{Emilie Du Châtelet, Immanuel Kant, Leibniz, Aufklärung, Christian Wolff, Luise Gottsched}},
  pages        = {{420}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  title        = {{{Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung}}},
  volume       = {{3 }},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{12933,
  abstract     = {{Abstract · Émilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) were three philosophers and scientists of outstanding im-portance in their epoch. However, the attribution of importance and reputation to women’s intellectual achievements in this period is a case of its own. This paper investigates the methodical attempt of 18th century historiography, presenting the example of Jakob Brucker and his Pinacoteca to relocate intellectual women in his history of philosophy and science. The relative integration of women into the 18th century intellectual sphere is the starting point of this methodical investigation to retrace its ‘why and how’.
Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philoso-phy, Science.}},
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  journal      = {{Bruniana & Campanelliana}},
  keywords     = {{Keywords : Emilie Du Châtelet, Luise Gottsched, Laura Bassi, History, Philosophy, Science.}},
  number       = {{Studi 18}},
  publisher    = {{Fabrizio Serra Roma Pisa }},
  title        = {{{Relocating Women in the History of Philosophy and Science. Emilie Du Châtelet (1706-1749), Laura Bassi (1711-1778), and Luise Gottsched (1713-1762) in Brucker’s Pinacotheca}}},
  volume       = {{Suppl XLIII}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{15494,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  issn         = {{09306633}},
  journal      = {{Konsens}},
  keywords     = {{Maria von Welser, Women, Media, War, Women in War, Refugees}},
  number       = {{2019}},
  pages        = {{20--22}},
  publisher    = {{Deutscher Akademikerinnen Bund}},
  title        = {{{Zur Ehrenpromotion von Maria von Welser an der Fakultät für Kulturwissenschaften der Universität Paderborn}}},
  volume       = {{2019}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@article{12082,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Hutton, Sarah}},
  issn         = {{0960-8788}},
  journal      = {{British Journal for the History of Philosophy}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{673--683}},
  title        = {{{Introduction}}},
  doi          = {{10.1080/09608788.2019.1610861}},
  volume       = {{27}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}

@inproceedings{34110,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy Vol. 29}},
  pages        = {{57--62}},
  title        = {{{Good Philosophy for a Good Life! How Marie de Gournay (1565-1645) and Emilie du Châtelet (1706-1749) Criticized the Canon and Argued for Women’s Concern}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@article{31449,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  journal      = {{CARE affair, no. 11}},
  pages        = {{18--22}},
  title        = {{{Ein selbstloser Akt? Philosophische Gedanken über das Helfen}}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@misc{13104,
  author       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth}},
  booktitle    = {{Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{300–302}},
  title        = {{{Brigitte Rauschenbach: Der Geist der Geschlechter}}},
  doi          = {{https://doi.org/10.3196/004433018823769084}},
  volume       = {{72}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@book{12755,
  abstract     = {{Part 1: Social Ontology in Edith Stein and Gerda Walther -- Chapter 1. The Role of Empathy in Experiencing Community (Antonio Calcagno) -- Chapter 2. Meaning of Individuals within Communities: Gerda Walther and Edith Stein on the Constitution of Social Communities (Julia M{\"u}hl) -- Chapter 3. Edith Stein on Social Ontology and the Constitution of Individual Moral Identity (William Tullius) -- Chapter 4. The Ontic-Ontological Aspects of Social Life. Edith Stein's Approach to the Problem (Anna Jani) -- Chapter 5. Starting from Husserl: Communal Life according to Edith Stein (Alice Togni) -- Chapter 6. The role of the intellectual in the social organism. Edith Stein's analyses between social ontology and philosophical anthropology (Martina Galvani) -- Chapter 7. The Phenomenology of Shared Emotions - Reassessing Gerda Walther (Thomas Szanto) -- Chapter 8. We-Experience - with Walther (Hans-Bernhard Schmid) -- Chapter 9. Gerda Walther between the phenomenology of mystics and the ontology of communities (Anna Piazza:) -- Chapter 10. Do We-Experiences Require an Intentional Object? On the Nature of Reflective Communities (Following Gerda Walther) (Sebastian Luft) -- Part2: The Ontology of Hedwig Conrad-Martius -- Chapter 11. Essence, Abyss, and Self - Hedwig Conrad-Martius on the Non-Spatial Dimensions of Being (Ronny Miron) -- Chapter 12. ``The reinstatement of the phenomenon''. Hedwig Conrad Martius and the meaning of ``being'' (Manuela Massa) -- Chapter 13. From Collectives to Groups - Sartre and Stein on Joint Action and Emotional Sharing (Gerhard Thonhauser) -- Chapter 14. Women as zoa politika, or: Why There Could Never Be a Women's Party. An Arendtian-Inspired Phenomenology of a Female Political Subject (Maria Robaszkiewicz) -- Chapter 15. Ontology is social. How Arendt Solves a Wittgensteinian Problem (Anna-Magdalena Schaupp) This edited volume examines women's voices in phenomenology, many of which had a formative impact on the movement but have be kept relatively silent for many years. It features papers that truly extend the canonical scope of phenomenological research. Readers will discover the rich philosophical output of such scholars as Edith Stein, Hedwig Conrad-Martius, and Gerda Walther. They will also come to see how the phenomenological movement allowed its female proponents to achieve a position in the academic world few women could enjoy at the time. The book explores the intersection of social ontology, phenomenology, and women scholars in phenomenology. The papers offer a fresh look at such topics as the nature of communities, shared values, feelings, and other mental content. In addition, coverage examines the contributions of Jewish women to the science, who were present at the beginning of the phenomenological movement. This remarkable anthology also features a paper on Gerda Walther written by Linda Lopez McAlister, former editor of the feminist journal Hypatia, who had met Walther in 1976. This book features work from the conference ``Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology,'' held at the University of Paderborn. Overall, it collects profiles and analysis that unveil a hidden history of phenomenology}},
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth Edith}},
  isbn         = {{9783319978628}},
  keywords     = {{Europe, Central-History, Ontology, Phenomenology, Philosophy, Political science, Political science / Philosophy}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology. Vol. 1. Women in the History of Philosophy and Sciences}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-97861-1}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

@book{7063,
  editor       = {{Hagengruber, Ruth and Luft, Sebastian}},
  isbn         = {{978-3-319-97861-1}},
  issn         = {{2523-8760}},
  pages        = {{244}},
  publisher    = {{Springer International Publishing}},
  title        = {{{Women Phenomenologists on Social Ontology}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-319-97861-1}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}