@inproceedings{8038,
  author       = {{Chambers, Chris and Erwig, Martin and Luckey, Markus}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing 2010 (VL/HCC 2010)}},
  pages        = {{85--92}},
  publisher    = {{IEEE Computer Society}},
  title        = {{{SheetDiff: A Tool for Identifying Changes in Spreadsheets}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8039,
  author       = {{Van den Bergh, Jan and Meixner, Gerrit and Breiner, Kai and Pleuß, Andreas and Sauer, Stefan and Hussmann, Heinrich}},
  booktitle    = {{Proc. 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010)}},
  pages        = {{4429--4432}},
  publisher    = {{ACM}},
  title        = {{{Model-driven Development of Advanced User Interfaces}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8040,
  abstract     = {{Software Quality Lab (s-lab) is an open multi-private-public partnership institute for knowledge and technology transfer. In s-lab, partners from industrial software development closely cooperate with research groups of the University of Paderborn. Together with partners from industry, s-lab develops and evaluates constructive and analytical methods and tools of software engineering for obtaining high-quality software. Testing plays an important role in analytical quality assurance within s-lab’s activities. Thereby our main focus lies on the development of testing methods, test automation tools and test management concepts for the individual needs of the industrial partners. Because of the different requirements of the university and the industry; the cooperation involves some challenges, e.g. defining projects aiming at the commercial interests of the industry and addressing interesting research questions. In this paper, we give an overview of testing activities in s-lab and address targets and challenges of the cooperative work between industry and university. We also summarize the lessons learned during the numerous testing projects especially in the domain of business information systems.}},
  author       = {{Güldali, Baris and Sauer, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{online Proc. of International TestIstanbul Conference 2010 (URL: www.testistanbul.org/presentations.html)}},
  publisher    = {{Turkish Testing Board}},
  title        = {{{Transfer of Testing Research from University to Industry: An Experience Report}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{8041,
  author       = {{von der Maßen, Thomas and Wübbeke, Andreas}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of Software Engineering 2010 (SE2010)}},
  pages        = {{17--18}},
  publisher    = {{Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI)}},
  title        = {{{Verteiltes Testen heterogener Systemlandschaften}}},
  volume       = {{P-159}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{805,
  author       = {{Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{European Transactions on Telecommunications}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{714----724}},
  title        = {{{Cooperative feedback to improve capacity and error rate in multiuser diversity systems - an OFDM case study}}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/ett.1454}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{806,
  author       = {{S. Lichte, Hermann and Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{IEEE Communications Letters}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{130----132}},
  title        = {{{Expected interference in wireless networks with geometric path loss: a closed-form approximation}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/LCOMM.2010.02.091863}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{807,
  author       = {{Simon Lichte, Hermann and Valentin, Stefan and Karl, Holger}},
  journal      = {{Mobile Networks and Applications}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{769----785}},
  title        = {{{Automated Development of Cooperative MAC Protocols - A Compiler-Assisted Approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s11036-009-0210-5}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{808,
  author       = {{Andree, Matthias and Gebel, Alexander and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2010, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK, June 29-July 1, 2010}},
  pages        = {{737----742}},
  title        = {{{Concept and Prototype for a Real-Time Enabled Publish/Subscribe System}}},
  doi          = {{10.1109/CIT.2010.142}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{809,
  author       = {{Birkenheuer, Georg and Brinkmann, Andre and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing - 15th International Workshop, JSSPP 2010, Atlanta, GA, USA, April 23, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{51--76}},
  title        = {{{Risk Aware Overbooking for Commercial Grids}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-16505-4_4}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{810,
  author       = {{S. Lichte, Hermann and Frey, Hannes and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the 11th ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, MobiHoc 2010, Chicago, IL, USA, September 20-24, 2010}},
  pages        = {{101----110}},
  title        = {{{Fading-resistant low-latency broadcasts in wireless multihop networks: the probabilistic cooperation diversity approach}}},
  doi          = {{10.1145/1860093.1860108}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{811,
  author       = {{Biermann, Thorsten and Dannewitz, Christian and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities - 6th International ICST Conference, TridentCom 2010, Berlin, Germany, May 18-20, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{442----453}},
  title        = {{{FIT: Future Internet Toolbox}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_34}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{812,
  author       = {{Dannewitz, Christian and Biermann, Thorsten and Dräxler, Martin and Beister, Frederic and Karl, Holger}},
  booktitle    = {{Testbeds and Research Infrastructures. Development of Networks and Communities - 6th International ICST Conference, TridentCom 2010, Berlin, Germany, May 18-20, 2010, Revised Selected Papers}},
  pages        = {{609----611}},
  title        = {{{Prototyping with the Future Internet Toolbox}}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/978-3-642-17851-1_56}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@techreport{8219,
  abstract     = {{Modern business process modeling environments support distributed development by means of model version control, i.e., comparison and merging of two different model versions. This is a challenging task since most modeling languages support an almost arbitrary creation of process models. Thus, in multi-developer environments, process models or parts of them are often syntactically very different but semantically equivalent. Hence, the comparison of business process models must be performed on a semantic level rather then on a syntactic level. For the domain of business process modeling, this problem is yet unsolved. This paper describes an approach that allows the semantic comparison of different business process models using a normal form. For that purpose, the process models are fully automatically translated into process model terms and normalized using a term rewriting system. The resulting normal forms can be efficiently compared. Our approach enables the semantic comparison of business process models ignoring syntactic redundancies.}},
  author       = {{Gerth, Christian and Luckey, Markus and Küster, Jochen and Engels, Gregor}},
  publisher    = {{IBM Research}},
  title        = {{{Detection of Semantically Equivalent Fragments for Business Process Model Change Management}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@techreport{8220,
  author       = {{Hülsbusch, Mathias and König, Barbara and Rensink, Arend and Semenyak, Maria and Soltenborn, Christian and Wehrheim, Heike}},
  publisher    = {{Centre for Telematics and Information Technology of the University of Twente}},
  title        = {{{Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation - A Comparison of Proof Techniques}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@inproceedings{5756,
  author       = {{Brüseke, Frank and Sancar, Yavuz and Yigitbas, Enes}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the Conference on Software & Systems Engineering Essentials 2010 (SEE 2010), Köln (Germany)}},
  pages        = {{277--298}},
  publisher    = {{Technische Universität München}},
  title        = {{{Erfolgsfaktoren von Testprozessbewertungsmodellen}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{7356,
  author       = {{Löffler, Renate and Güldali, Baris and Geisen, Silke}},
  journal      = {{Softwaretechnik-Trends}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{9--12}},
  title        = {{{Towards Model-based Acceptance Testing for Scrum}}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{7357,
  author       = {{Güldali, Baris and Jungmayr, Stefan and Mlynarski, Michael and Neumann, Stefan and Winter, Mario}},
  journal      = {{OBJEKTspektrum}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{63--69}},
  title        = {{{Starthilfe für modellbasiertes Testen}}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{7358,
  author       = {{Beulen, Dominik and Güldali, Baris and Mlynarski, Michael}},
  journal      = {{Softwaretechnik-Trends}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{6--9}},
  title        = {{{Tabellarischer Vergleich der Prozessmodelle für modellbasiertes Testen aus Managementsicht}}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{7359,
  author       = {{Späth, Melanie and Mlynarski, Michael}},
  journal      = {{Softwaretechnik-Trends}},
  title        = {{{Agiles Testen in Großprojekten mit TDD und Testaspekten: Beobachtungen und erste Erfahrungen}}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}

@article{7364,
  abstract     = {{In the last years the software engineering community pays a strong interest in agile development methods. Those methods place software testing for example the Test-Driven Development method as an important task of the development process. Agile projects rely on good test automation tools. In this paper we evaluate five test automation tools for their usage in acceptance testing for web applications using Test-Driven Development.}},
  author       = {{Jureczko, Marian and Mlynarski, Michael}},
  journal      = {{Electrical Review}},
  pages        = {{198--202}},
  title        = {{{Automated acceptance testing tools for web applications using Test-Driven Development}}},
  volume       = {{86}},
  year         = {{2010}},
}