@misc{31429,
  author       = {{Elit, Stefan}},
  booktitle    = {{sehepunkte 2, Nr. 12}},
  title        = {{{[Rezension zu:] Ernst Haiger/Amelie Ihering/Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Albrecht Haushofer, Ebenhausen 2002}}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}

@article{13738,
  author       = {{Schmidt, Wolf Gero and Bechstedt, F. and Bernholc, J.}},
  issn         = {{0169-4332}},
  journal      = {{Applied Surface Science}},
  pages        = {{264--268}},
  title        = {{{GaAs(001) surface reconstructions: geometries, chemical bonding and optical properties}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00862-5}},
  volume       = {{190}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}

@article{13737,
  author       = {{Seino, K. and Schmidt, Wolf Gero and Bechstedt, F. and Bernholc, J.}},
  issn         = {{0039-6028}},
  journal      = {{Surface Science}},
  pages        = {{406--410}},
  title        = {{{Structure and energetics of Ga-rich GaAs() surfaces}}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/s0039-6028(02)01278-5}},
  volume       = {{507-510}},
  year         = {{2002}},
}

@misc{19464,
  author       = {{Seng, Eva- Maria}},
  booktitle    = {{Kunstform 2, Nr. 5 und Sehepunkte 1, Nr. 2}},
  number       = {{2, Nr. 5 und 1, Nr.2}},
  title        = {{{Kathrin Reckmann, Anfänge der Barockarchitektur in Sachsen. Johann Georg Starcke und seine Zeit, Köln 2000}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@misc{19544,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  booktitle    = {{Germanistik}},
  number       = {{H. 3/4}},
  pages        = {{762--763}},
  title        = {{{Franz-Josef Deiters: Drama im Augenblick des Sturzes. Zur Allegorisierung des Dramas in der Moderne. Versuche zu einer Konstitutionstheorie. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, 1999}}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@misc{19545,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  booktitle    = {{Germanistik}},
  number       = {{H. 3/4}},
  pages        = {{864--865}},
  title        = {{{Katharina Keim: Theatralität in den späten Dramen Heiner Müllers. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1998}}},
  volume       = {{42}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inproceedings{21010,
  author       = {{Brüdgam, S. and Meschut, Gerson}},
  booktitle    = {{DVS-Berichte, Band 218}},
  isbn         = {{ISBN 3-87155-676-9}},
  location     = {{Bejing, P.R. China}},
  pages        = {{191--200}},
  title        = {{{Material technologies und joining techniques for multi material car body structures}}},
  volume       = {{218}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inproceedings{21011,
  author       = {{Walther, U. and Meschut, Gerson}},
  booktitle    = {{Tagungsband zur 5. Jahres- und 2. Europäischen Fachkonferenz “Kleben im Automobilbau”}},
  location     = {{Bad Nauheim}},
  pages        = {{335--344}},
  title        = {{{Kleben von Magnesium}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@book{19110,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  pages        = {{403}},
  publisher    = {{Igel}},
  title        = {{{Thomas Valentin: Der Hausfreund. Dramen (Edition)}}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{19367,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  booktitle    = {{Grabbes Welttheater. Christian Dietrich Grabbe zum 200. Geburtstag}},
  editor       = {{Kopp, Detlev and Vogt, Michael}},
  pages        = {{71--101}},
  publisher    = {{Aisthesis}},
  title        = {{{„Alle Ehre deiner Narbe.“ Die Spur des Körpers im Werk Grabbes}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{19369,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  booktitle    = {{Literaturkonzepte im Vormärz. Forum Vormärz Forschung. Jahrbuch 2000}},
  editor       = {{Vogt, Michael and Kopp, Detlev}},
  pages        = {{243--260}},
  publisher    = {{Aisthesis}},
  title        = {{{Faustisches im Schatten Goethes. Nikolaus Lenaus vormärzlicher Faust – eine Erinnerung}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{19371,
  author       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  booktitle    = {{Thomas Valentin: Der Hausfreund. Dramen}},
  editor       = {{Eke, Norbert Otto}},
  pages        = {{387--403}},
  publisher    = {{Igel}},
  title        = {{{Der Dramatiker Thomas Valentin}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inproceedings{7889,
  abstract     = {{In Requirements Engineering structural and functional requirements for a new software system are gathered, analyzed, and manifested. Unfortunately the connection between these aspects gets lost in the standard object oriented methodology and has to be re-established later on. Not only is this tedious work but the detection of conflicts and inconsistencies in early phases is hindered by the separation of static and dynamic aspects. We propose the use of graph transformations to specify the connection between these aspects. Based on what we call an integrated business model, consistency analysis at the requirements model level becomes possible. Keywords: UML, Unified Process, functional specifications, integrated business model, graph transformation 1 Introduction At the beginning of each software development there are several ideas or visions of what the system to be build should achieve. The techniques developed in the area of requirements engineering are concerned with gathering, structuring and integrating these different ideas for the new system. It is the goal of this process to achieve a set of reasonable and consistent requirements for the further development process. The main problem is the detection and resolution of inconsistencies and conflicts between competing requirements. The application of formal methods and notations promises to support this task by enabling automated analysis. Although multiple formal methods have been proposed by scientists (see e.g. [7] for a survey), the standard methodologies in object oriented software engineering still use very informal and imprecise techniques in this phase of the development process. In particular, what is missing is a coupling between the structural (data) description (captured in class diagrams) and the behavior of the system (captured in activity and use case diagrams). In this paper we will show how to improve this situation by giving use cases a precise description, thus achieving a coupling of the dynamic and static parts of the model. This allows to apply formal techniques of consistency analysis. The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 gives an introduction to the requirements analysis phase in the Unified Process (UP) and points out some weak points of this approach. We will advance the basic ideas presented in the UP by further elaborating the ideas of a business model and formalizing their notion in Section 3. Section 4 introduces use case diagrams and their new role in the context of the integrated business model. Section 5 extends the notion of views to structure the whole requirements model and the concluding Section 6 gives perspectives toward further work on this topic.}},
  author       = {{Hendrik Hausmann, Jan and Heckel, Reiko}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of the GI/OCG-Jahrestagung on Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft in der Network Economy - Visionen und Wirklichkeit (2001), Wien (Österreich)}},
  pages        = {{595--599}},
  publisher    = {{Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft}},
  title        = {{{Use Cases as views: A formal approach to Requirements engineering in the Unified Process}}},
  volume       = {{1}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{32225,
  author       = {{Ptashnyk, Stefaniya}},
  booktitle    = {{Wirkendes Wort. Deutsche Sprache und Literatur in Forschung und Lehre. Heft 3/2001}},
  pages        = {{435–454}},
  publisher    = {{Wissenschaftlicher Verlag}},
  title        = {{{Phraseologische Substitution und ihre Funktionen im Text}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{32226,
  author       = {{Ptashnyk, Stefaniya}},
  booktitle    = {{Вісник Львівського університету. Випуск 9: Серія іноземні мови}},
  pages        = {{112–120}},
  title        = {{{Фразеологiчні модифiкацiї: термінологічні проблеми [Phraseologische Modifikationen: Terminologische Probleme – ukr.]}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{32359,
  author       = {{Ptashnyk, Stefaniya and Fraczek, Agnieszka}},
  booktitle    = {{Convivium. Germanistisches Jahrbuch Polen 2001}},
  pages        = {{400--403}},
  publisher    = {{ Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst}},
  title        = {{{„Grammatik in Deutsch-Lehrwerken“. Germanisten - Tagung in Karpacz (5.- 7. Sep-tember 2000)}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{31099,
  author       = {{van Laak, Lothar}},
  booktitle    = {{Synästhesie. Interferenz – Transfer – Synthese der Sinne}},
  editor       = {{Adler, Hans and Zeuch, Ulrike}},
  pages        = {{225--238}},
  publisher    = {{Königshausen & Neumann }},
  title        = {{{Synästhesie und Sinnlichkeit. Überlegungen zu einer Hermeneutik der Synästhesie in der Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@article{31569,
  author       = {{Egidi, Margreth and Baldzuhn, Michael and Miedema, Nine}},
  journal      = {{ZfdPh 120 }},
  pages        = {{114--117}},
  title        = {{{Tagungsbericht zu: Sangspruchtradition. Textualität – Aufführung – Traditionsbildung. Tagung Münster 31.08. – 01.09.2000}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@inbook{32972,
  author       = {{Öhlschläger, Claudia}},
  booktitle    = {{Grenzüberschreibungen: "Feminismus" und "Cultural Studies"}},
  editor       = {{Berressem , Hanjo }},
  pages        = {{55--83}},
  publisher    = {{Aisthesis }},
  title        = {{{Negative Anthropologie. Kafkas Verwandlung und die Produktivität des Verworfenen}}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

@article{32503,
  abstract     = {{Two parameters of language production, the partner model and the mentally represented knowledge
about a spatial constellation, are investigated with respect to their influence on spatial reference. At
issue is whether the verbally expressed point of view in route directions is primarily influenced by the
needs of the partner or by the underlying mental representation of the speaker stemming from his or
her own experience with an object. Two experiments in which participants (N 5 90) were asked to
produce a set of route directions are reported. The experimental situation was such that the point of
view of the speaker did not correspond to the point of view of the partner. The results show that more
participants localize from their own point of view than from the point of view of the partner.
Discussion centers on the fact that speakers do not always behave in a truly partner-oriented manner.}},
  author       = {{Buhl, Heike M.}},
  journal      = {{Journal of Psycholinguistic Research}},
  keywords     = {{language production, partner model, mental representation, spatial point of view, route direction}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{549 -- 567}},
  title        = {{{Partner orientation and speaker’s knowledge as conflicting parameters in language production}}},
  volume       = {{30}},
  year         = {{2001}},
}

